Star Trek Online thread

[intrepid90]

star trek games became crap when activision gave back the license to produce them.
Armada and BC were great games, with a nice fan community (still)

but when you make crap games (like bethesda) this is negative advertise for TREK.

I seriously doubt there will be a great trek game ever again
what a pity

[MLeo]

star trek games became crap when activision gave back the license to produce them.
Armada and BC were great games, with a nice fan community (still)

but when you make crap games (like bethesda) this is negative advertise for TREK.

I seriously doubt there will be a great trek game ever again
what a pity

Their Elder Scrolls games are quite good IMHO.
Or were you just talking to their Trek games they were forced to publish just because they got their licence and those games were already in development when Activision turned in the licence?

[Aeries]

Their Elder Scrolls games are quite good IMHO.

Agreed; my personal faves.

[intrepid90]

I was talking about their trek releases only

[blaXXer]

I was talking about their trek releases only

Well you got to remember that Bethesda, in case of recent Trek games, has only been acting as publisher and not developer. The games themselves were developed by Mad Doc software, who previously developed Armada I & II (as evident from the leftovers in Legacies file folders).

BethSoft as developers aren't nearly as bad as you make them out to be, but Mad Doc is.

[Mark]

bethsoft are amazing developers... you would be hard pushed to find fault with their current record of games

[MLeo]

And I'd like to re-iterate that they had to publish the 2 Star Trek Games (Legacy and Tactical Assault) because they got the licence, they were basicly like the extra stuff you sometimes get with mailorders for which you didn't ask.

[intrepid90]

what a pitiy you had to pay for them ;)^^
possibly they are good, but their trek is terrible...why did they buy the license??

[MLeo]

what a pitiy you had to pay for them ;)^^
possibly they are good, but their trek is terrible...why did they buy the license??

Because they saw money.

And I think this will be a very good match. The epicness that Bethsoft can do combined with Star Trek? Oh yeah.

[Aeries]

what a pitiy you had to pay for them ;)^^
possibly they are good, but their trek is terrible...why did they buy the license??

Because they saw money.

And I think this will be a very good match. The epicness that Bethsoft can do combined with Star Trek? Oh yeah.

~dreamy sigh~

[blaXXer]

*dreams of a TES-stlyed Trek RPG*

[Aeries]

*dreams of a TES-stlyed Trek RPG*

Qft
*another dreamy sigh*

[blaXXer]

don'tcha get too dreamy on me, lad ;)

[Aeries]

>_>;;

[blaXXer]

-.-

[Aeries]

*slowly walks away* O.o;

[Voyager16]

I was one of the first who said Legacy would suck lol, but I got it now, and with the right mods, it's less pain in the ass lol.
Ow and tactical Assault, was very nice for a DS game.

anyways, I gave STO up some months back, Like Excalibur much more though.

[henrie85]

can anyone remember star trek online or have any clue if it still exists. came across it earlier and wanted to know more about it and if possible screen shots.

[Kirk]

Search button. Top right. Use it. It's your friend.

[086gf]

^Yeah that.

Using eyes and brain cells ftmfw.

http://forums.filefront.com/st-online-general-discussions/365868-cryptic-making-sto.html