Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 409734 times)

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #400 on: May 18, 2009, 03:55:07 PM »
So get 'em in STO then! :P
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #401 on: May 18, 2009, 05:27:16 PM »
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Phaser

  • Star Trek Canon Authority
  • Posts: 387
  • Cookies: 231
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #402 on: May 18, 2009, 10:20:13 PM »
Wow.  Haven't seen that emoticon in a while.

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #403 on: May 21, 2009, 12:12:00 PM »
*spam removed*

guys please stay ontopic and dont spam this thread...

thx :)

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #404 on: May 21, 2009, 12:14:28 PM »
I wonder if there'll be gravity on planets...with different levels so you can become super bouncy.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline blaXXer

  • Your Leader
  • Posts: 479
  • Cookies: 96
  • The proud result of slave labor
    • blaXXer.design
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #405 on: May 22, 2009, 04:05:02 AM »
I wonder if there'll be gravity on planets...with different levels so you can become super bouncy.
It's a TREK game, yes. But since TREK is cool now, there won't be any nerdish influences on it.
Apart from it, you know, being a TREK game...

YOU suck, get a life, moran.

COME TO MY PLACE clicketh me!

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #406 on: May 22, 2009, 06:40:14 PM »
Given how Cryptic used to handle CoH, after the first few months they'll stop paying constant attention to their new release and focus on STO. Gotta agree that 2011 is a safe range to expect it in, as Age of Conan (for example) was pushed back constantly, and other games like Huxley have been knocked back years upon years. As for content, Cryptic were pretty good with content packages for free, releasing at least 3 or 4 a year, usually with plenty of new customization as well as actual playable content (New powersets, new missions, new taskforces, new areas and the like) So I'd imagine you'd be able to look forward to a long list of minor things you could tweak on your ship (Or tiny modifications to the nacelles to get that tiny detail you've been itching for). There's also the trend that started just before they sold the IP to Paragon Studios, small "Cosmetics booster packs", $10  for some costume parts, emotes and a power. Heck, I bought them, I'm sad like that.

However, I have this terrible feeling that modifications aren't going to be purely cosmetic, meaning that weird bubble on the modded Sovvie may actually do something for your stats. Maybe +Perception or maybe some new form of a Charisma stat like +Command for fleet ops...

I wonder if it will ever be possible to salvage parts, or be a freelancer, hell, we saw plenty of them, and I'd love to mess around with a B'rel or K'vort, give it TMP nacelles and replace one pair of the disruptors with torpedo tubes...  :v: Any bets on how long it takes for a guild/Fleet to be formed under the name "Marquis"? :lol:


Let's just pray that "Statesman" has matured a little and starts listening to the consumers, I'd hate for an "ED" style event to happen to STO, as I really do want it to be amazing.


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline NeoSilverThorn

  • Explorer at heart
  • Posts: 53
  • Cookies: 1
    • NeoSilverThorn's DevArt gallery
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #407 on: May 25, 2009, 12:23:48 PM »
Or, for that matter, to have a developer corruption scandal ala EVE Online...

As far as the ships go, well, I take one look and all I can come up with is a quote from Phineas and Ferb:

"Well, it occurs to me that perhaps not all of the modifications I made are technically 'street legal.'"
"You're diggin' my ride from outer space."

"Okay, okay, so I technically use an ether/anti-ether warp reactor.  Not that different from a matter/anti-matter reactor, is it?"

Offline Dawg81

  • Posts: 733
  • Cookies: 29
  • I am Dawg; Resistence is futile
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #408 on: June 01, 2009, 06:51:35 PM »
heres the latest addition to STO called the excalibur class

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #409 on: June 01, 2009, 07:26:00 PM »
a retroish look with Sov styling/systems
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #410 on: June 01, 2009, 07:40:11 PM »
I have to admit, that 'Excalibur class' doesn't look half bad. Peronally, I wouldn't have used nacelles from a Nova class but then again, I have no say what goes into this game.
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Barihawk

  • Ninth Fleet STO Commanding Officer
  • Posts: 766
  • Cookies: 225
  • BC: The Aftermath Member
    • My Released Work
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #411 on: June 01, 2009, 07:45:13 PM »
I have to admit, that 'Excalibur class' doesn't look half bad. Peronally, I wouldn't have used nacelles from a Nova class but then again, I have no say what goes into this game.

The beauty of it is that you can probably put the nacelles from a Nova class on there yourself.

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #412 on: June 01, 2009, 08:01:18 PM »
I have to admit, that 'Excalibur class' doesn't look half bad. Peronally, I wouldn't have used nacelles from a Nova class but then again, I have no say what goes into this game.

The beauty of it is that you can probably put the nacelles from a Nova class on there yourself.

I said 'wouldn't', not 'would'.
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline FourChan

  • Admiral Noel Vermillion
  • Posts: 608
  • Cookies: 4
  • Starfleet Technologies Development Center
    • Twitter Four Channel
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #413 on: June 02, 2009, 12:58:27 AM »
I was reading some of the Star Trek Online Story and came to a conclusion, that this is the 'alternate' reality based upon JJ Abrams Star Trek Movie.

"On Stardate 64333.4, a Romulan Mining Guild ship observes the start of a chain of events that will forever change the Alpha and Beta Quadrants. The star in the Hobus system, in the far reaches of Romulan space, begins to exhibit massive fluxuations of radiation. Days later, Ambassador Spock of the Federation appears before the Romulan Senate to warn them about the dangers of this star.

Spock believes that if the Hobus star goes supernova, it could create a reaction that would threaten much of the Romulan Empire, and he asks the Senate to coordinate with Vulcan to find a solution. After a lengthy debate, the Senate rejects Spock's plan."

"The Daystrom Institute has announced the successful launch of the "Jellyfish," an experimental spacecraft equipped with trans-metaphasic shielding designed to withstand conditions that would destroy most other ships.

Designed by famed engineer Geordi La Forge, the ship is slated for extensive testing before it can be used for scientific and exploration missions. Starfleet is working with La Forge and the institute to determine which of the ship's systems can be adapted for Federation use. "


I find this pretty neat.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #414 on: June 02, 2009, 01:31:47 AM »
No, the alternate reality begins with the Narada's arrival in 2233, signaling a split in the timeline.

As far as STO is concerned, that is part of the Prime timeline.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #415 on: June 02, 2009, 02:37:56 AM »
FarShot is completely right. The development of the Jellyfish, as well as the mention of the Romulan Mining Guild all happens in the "Prime" timeline. Some of the STO events are mentioned in the Star Trek Countdown comic. The developers of STO have been incorporating story details from a wide range of written sources.
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline BES

  • Posts: 182
  • Cookies: 5
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #416 on: June 02, 2009, 11:44:18 AM »
This game is looking quite good... and after watching the 2hour podcast about all the features and stuff I will pay to play it online, you can even board enemy ships ...its gonna rock..

http://www.startrekonline.com/

It will start out as Starfleet vs Klingons, then expand to many other races(supposedly some SFC races too) , from what I saw you have actual boarder lines and such, you can be klingon or starfleet.

actual game play footage http://www.startrekonline.com/trailer

Offline Johnnymuffintop

  • Concept Artist
  • Posts: 204
  • Cookies: 7
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #417 on: June 02, 2009, 11:47:53 AM »
I actually prefer the STO Excalibur class. I never liked the "Sovereign on steroids" look of the Bridge Commander one. And it's nacelles look ridiculous.
The STO Excalibur looks pretty nifty, the Nova nacelles kinda work, but I wish they had kept those "handlebars" on it.

Offline 1DeadlySAMURAI

  • Posts: 578
  • Cookies: 139
  • Do'h
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #418 on: June 02, 2009, 11:56:40 AM »
*Whispers*
Psst, wrong place. It goes in here: http://bc-central.net/forums/index.php/board,43.0.html :P

Offline BES

  • Posts: 182
  • Cookies: 5
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #419 on: June 02, 2009, 12:02:27 PM »
lol... why is it over there :-P ... I only use off topic currently because its not related to Bridge Commander...but whatever... the mods can del this then :-).