Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread (Read 411379 times)

Billz · « **Reply #320 on:** May 02, 2009, 08:11:14 PM »

Its too bad that STO isn't set in the TOS era. Would've loved to have built a TOS version of the Sovereign class ships, lol

Villain · « **Reply #321 on:** May 02, 2009, 10:32:07 PM »

Quote from: Billz on May 02, 2009, 08:11:14 PM

Its too bad that STO isn't set in the TOS era. Would've loved to have built a TOS version of the Sovereign class ships, lol

Gimmie a day and a few beers, I'll churn out whatever TOS version you want Sprung fully-formed from my brow, or mouth, whichever comes first.. :lol:

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #322 on:** May 04, 2009, 02:23:23 PM »

Quote from: Dalekanium2 on May 02, 2009, 12:13:47 PM

Just something to emphasise the whole customise your ship. With the Mirry as our example!

http://www.zam.com/story.html?story=17843

Most of this we already know, but its the picture that counts for me.

Wow....okay, now that's something that I might be interested in...about the only drawing point for the game so far.

Dalek · « **Reply #323 on:** May 04, 2009, 02:30:41 PM »

It's like Lego really but with slightly bigger parts and power consumption.

FourChan · « **Reply #324 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:36:35 PM »

Do some of these look familiar?

Take a look at this wicked view of the Intrepid Class

And the Sovereigns basic design is running strong in the future.

Centaur Class anyone?

FarShot · « **Reply #325 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:27:05 PM »

The top one is too oval and tall to be an Intrepid.

I hate the bastardized Sovereign class.

The green on the Centaur looks stupid.

Billz · « **Reply #326 on:** May 07, 2009, 06:12:05 PM »

My brain just imploded due to the level of garbage that these ships represent.

I'm happy waiting for Star Trek: Excalibur.

Infact, I think I'll just boycott Star Trek: Online altogther.

Nebula · « **Reply #327 on:** May 07, 2009, 09:53:56 PM »

the middle pic is messed up, there is a corrected version over at the Hailing Frequency forums.

JimmyB76 · « **Reply #328 on:** May 07, 2009, 11:17:27 PM »

Quote from: Billz on May 07, 2009, 06:12:05 PM

My brain just imploded due to the level of garbage that these ships represent.

I'm happy waiting for Star Trek: Excalibur.

Infact, I think I'll just boycott Star Trek: Online altogther.

lol i was just about to post that... *cookied*

Nebula · « **Reply #329 on:** May 07, 2009, 11:30:09 PM »

btw these are very very old pics... there have been more released since then and they look tones better than these.

Villain · « **Reply #330 on:** May 08, 2009, 08:50:19 PM »

Don't let Bari see this thread, lest we all want to die a painful death. 4C, can you rename the thread "WE HATE STO"?

There's a thread for positive thought, so why not for us angry trekkers? :lol:

EDIT: Just realised... What the hell purpose does that middle section between the Sovvies nacelles serve? You'd have to crawl through tubes to get there, and what the heck is it? An observation lounge? The red light district? :v:

Chronocidal Guy · « **Reply #331 on:** May 08, 2009, 09:13:28 PM »

I think that's what you call "We should make all the ships modular... and with lots of aftermarket kits, so people can add cool spoilers and spinning rims on their ships!"

Yeah, the phrase "utter failure" comes to mind. Last I checked, captains couldn't custom order their starships.

FarShot · « **Reply #332 on:** May 08, 2009, 09:51:55 PM »

Quote from: USS Prime on May 08, 2009, 08:50:19 PM

The red light district? :v:

Whoa. Slow down there, man. Obviously it's the Post-Nem version of Kirk's sauna. :lol:

Nebula · « **Reply #333 on:** May 08, 2009, 10:03:52 PM »

here is the correct version of that pic in the middle

that roll bar looks like another bridge....(could be a space saver though)

Billz · « **Reply #334 on:** May 09, 2009, 03:30:13 AM »

Oh yeah because that [sarcasm]is a really good place to put a secondary bridge[/sarcasm]

:roll:

This game should've stayed dead when Perpetual Entertainment died.

1DeadlySAMURAI · « **Reply #335 on:** May 09, 2009, 05:11:42 AM »

still butt ugly.

Nebula · « **Reply #336 on:** May 09, 2009, 09:59:07 AM »

Miranda Class Variations:

FarShot · « **Reply #337 on:** May 09, 2009, 10:03:29 AM »

Ah, the only good looking ships.

Except for the top right, that one sucks.

Billz · « **Reply #338 on:** May 09, 2009, 10:06:58 AM »

Top Left = Not bad. Not the kinda texture I would've gone with but its very tru to the original Miranda's.
Top Right = Kinda going overboard with it.
Bottom Middle = What the &*%$ is that piece of ?"!^ ?

captain_obvious · « **Reply #339 on:** May 09, 2009, 12:23:53 PM »

Quote from: Billz on May 09, 2009, 10:06:58 AM

Top Left = Not bad. Not the kinda texture I would've gone with but its very tru to the original Miranda's.
Bottom Middle = Kinda going overboard with it.
Top Right = What the &*%$ is that piece of ?"!^ ?

I Have corrected your post Billz :mrgreen:

News:

Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread (Read 411379 times)