Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 411314 times)

Offline RCgothic

  • Retired Staff
  • Posts: 428
  • Cookies: 51
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #340 on: May 09, 2009, 01:09:59 PM »
If you get the ships as they come, (for example the standard miranda, and the sov doesn't look too changed up) and these additional modules actually represent the level of customisation users can do to their own ship, then I'm all WOW.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #341 on: May 09, 2009, 01:12:34 PM »
Here here! They'd better do a Constitution.

To 4C's first post: That Intrepid looks like a Cyberman version of DJ's Vivace.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline FourChan

  • Admiral Noel Vermillion
  • Posts: 608
  • Cookies: 4
  • Starfleet Technologies Development Center
    • Twitter Four Channel
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #342 on: May 09, 2009, 02:36:32 PM »
Star Wreck: Online.

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #343 on: May 09, 2009, 04:40:02 PM »
Top Left = Not bad. Not the kinda texture I would've gone with but its very tru to the original Miranda's.
Bottom Middle = Kinda going overboard with it.
Top Right = What the &*%$ is that piece of ?"!^ ?

I Have corrected your post Billz :mrgreen:

You, good sir, have just failed miserably.

Corrected, again:

Quote
Top Left = Not bad. Not the kinda texture I would've gone with but its very true to the original Miranda's.
Top Right = Kinda going overboard with it.
Bottom Middle = What the &*%$ is that piece of ?"!^ ?
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline FourChan

  • Admiral Noel Vermillion
  • Posts: 608
  • Cookies: 4
  • Starfleet Technologies Development Center
    • Twitter Four Channel
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #344 on: May 09, 2009, 05:05:19 PM »
Now if we could get Wiley to make some of these and FIX them, they'd be alright Lol.

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #345 on: May 09, 2009, 05:22:53 PM »
here is one of the few Kling ships to show up

Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #346 on: May 09, 2009, 05:29:01 PM »
Not much change.

There is also this Klingon (apparently) ship.

Edit: I'll get the right link eventually.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #347 on: May 09, 2009, 05:32:28 PM »
Top Left = Not bad. Not the kinda texture I would've gone with but its very tru to the original Miranda's.
Bottom Middle = Kinda going overboard with it.
Top Right = What the &*%$ is that piece of ?"!^ ?

I Have corrected your post Billz :mrgreen:

You, good sir, have just failed miserably.

Corrected, again:

Quote
Top Left = Not bad. Not the kinda texture I would've gone with but its very true to the original Miranda's.
Top Right = Kinda going overboard with it.
Bottom Middle = What the &*%$ is that piece of ?"!^ ?

Sorry buddy, but you're all broken up.. say again over??
*zzzzzzzztstatic*
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #348 on: May 09, 2009, 05:40:53 PM »
Guys, cut the spam please. It's just confusing now.

Other Klingon ship.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #349 on: May 09, 2009, 08:22:41 PM »
Guys, cut the spam please. It's just confusing now.

Other Klingon ship.

For a game set in a supposed alternative future, they sure like recycling old ships.

Example:
Sovereign with weird rollbar type thing added. Might aswell paint a giant bullseye on that added part to the basic Sovereign
Intrepid that looks like J.J. Abrams has taken a shot at b*****dizing like he did with Kirks Enterprise
Miranda that has a variant of what looks like a Miranda and Centaur have been awkwardly mashed together.
And that Klingon ship picture that Dalekanium2 linked to earlier resembles what appears to be a Raptor type bird of prey, which is Enterprise era based.

Actually, since the front of the Raptor was hardly seen in Enterprise, the picture of the model that Dale linked to looks suspiciously like LC's Raptor model from bcfiles.com http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/Klingon_Raptor;40509
Plagiarism much, lol?

I like the Vor'cha variant in that picture that Neb linked to. Thats all I like in STO though.
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline FourChan

  • Admiral Noel Vermillion
  • Posts: 608
  • Cookies: 4
  • Starfleet Technologies Development Center
    • Twitter Four Channel
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #350 on: May 10, 2009, 01:18:25 AM »
Sovereign looks like something from Enterprise NX-01 missed with modern, like it needs the warp field stabilizer there. Who knows though, maybe it's for like a new version of warp?

Offline newman

  • Posts: 215
  • Cookies: 33
  • Hello, Jerry.
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #351 on: May 10, 2009, 06:45:34 PM »
Looks like they made a bit of progress, the only one I really hate in this thread is the sovereign with the module between the nacelles - that just makes no sense whatsoever.

Offline Phaser

  • Star Trek Canon Authority
  • Posts: 387
  • Cookies: 231
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #352 on: May 12, 2009, 09:44:44 PM »
What the f?  What's with these fan-made duds?  Where are the Galaxy, Sovereign, Steamrunner, and Akira classes?  Where's the Romulan Warbird?  Where's the Miranda class?  Where's the Star Trek?!

Seriously, this is the first I've seen of the ST:O ships.  Are these seriously going to appear in-game like this?

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #353 on: May 12, 2009, 10:25:34 PM »
here is another ship for ya to digest....
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #354 on: May 12, 2009, 10:28:53 PM »
that one was posted somewhere before, i remember that ship...  it is a cool one, would be good to have in BC :)

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #355 on: May 12, 2009, 10:39:13 PM »
What the f?  What's with these fan-made duds?  Where are the Galaxy, Sovereign, Steamrunner, and Akira classes?  Where's the Romulan Warbird?  Where's the Miranda class?  Where's the Star Trek?!

Seriously, this is the first I've seen of the ST:O ships.  Are these seriously going to appear in-game like this?

If you go to the site, startrekonline.com, you'll see the Galaxy in a battle video and the Akira in a couple screenshots.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #356 on: May 13, 2009, 01:06:36 AM »
Actually, since the front of the Raptor was hardly seen in Enterprise, the picture of the model that Dale linked to looks suspiciously like LC's Raptor model from bcfiles.com http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/Klingon_Raptor;40509
Plagiarism much, lol?

You don't think it's at all possible, that the guys working on Star Trek: Online, might have had some assistance or been given a "blessing" by the original designer? Cryptic Studios has been given the license to make a Star Trek MMO, they can basically take anything they want from canon Trek, and incorporate it into their game. It's not plagiarism when you have full rights to use the designs.
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline FourChan

  • Admiral Noel Vermillion
  • Posts: 608
  • Cookies: 4
  • Starfleet Technologies Development Center
    • Twitter Four Channel
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #357 on: May 13, 2009, 04:55:30 PM »
Check this ship out


Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #358 on: May 13, 2009, 04:58:54 PM »
umm FourChan I already posted that ship... look 5 posts up
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #359 on: May 13, 2009, 05:02:44 PM »
Check this ship out



Fail.

FourChan, look a few posts up the same page of this thread.
Can't wait for 2014 to start.