Author Topic: Aeries' "JJVerse" Constellation Class (Read 3239 times)

WileyCoyote · « **Reply #20 on:** February 28, 2009, 06:23:38 PM »

Quote

What engineering hull?

I guess that you are going for a more of a Kelvin designed Constellation with JJ-prise components.

FourChan · « **Reply #21 on:** February 28, 2009, 07:28:51 PM »

Quote from: Dalekanium2 on February 28, 2009, 02:35:01 PM

Quote from: Shadowknight1 on February 28, 2009, 02:28:44 PM
Quote from: FourChan on February 28, 2009, 12:31:15 PM
It looks like something JJ Abrams would make.
Anyway, while it seems to have some echoes of the original Constellation, it's...very different.

So's the JJ-Connie. I think in the JJVerse everything looks different.

The JJVerse is a sick and twisted view of Star Trek. Lol. I will watch the movie but I wont like it

Oh and refit JJ Abrams Enterprise:

Aeries · « **Reply #22 on:** February 28, 2009, 08:16:57 PM »

Quote from: FourChan on February 28, 2009, 07:28:51 PM

refit JJ Abrams Enterprise

I'm going to cry.

Quote from: WileyCoyote on February 28, 2009, 06:23:38 PM

I guess that you are going for a more of a Kelvin designed Constellation with JJ-prise components.

Pretty much...

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #23 on:** February 28, 2009, 08:20:14 PM »

Ummm, FourChan, couldn't TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT be considered sick and twisted views of Star Trek? Especially the latter three? Don't say you won't like something that you haven't seen yet.

Nooo, I prefer some of the more reasonable fan projections on that refit, thank you very much. That's horrendous. johnnymuffintop's conjecture comes to mind.

Anyways Aeries, you might try letting the nacelles lose some weight. That may help the balance of a design that always had fairly small engines.

FarShot · « **Reply #24 on:** March 01, 2009, 01:23:12 AM »

Okay, just because you slap on the refit nacelles and saucer doesn't make it JJVerse. I know that wasn't you, I've seen that before on other sites.

Dalek · « **Reply #25 on:** March 01, 2009, 07:06:07 AM »

Quote from: JimmyB76 on February 28, 2009, 12:23:23 PM

Quote from: ChronowerX_GT on February 28, 2009, 12:18:33 PM
Quote from: Dalekanium2 on February 28, 2009, 12:10:07 PM
The Constellation is younger than the Constitution, JJVerse or not.
I thought it was a lot older.
the Constitution Class was launched 40 years before the Constellation Class...
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Constitution_class
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Constellation_class

Yeah, what I said.

I think maybe if you lose the orange in the bussards and make the blue bits instead of them on the side and instead on the top? And slide the nacelles back?

Kirk · « **Reply #26 on:** March 01, 2009, 09:27:42 AM »

Quote from: FarShot on March 01, 2009, 01:23:12 AM

Okay, just because you slap on the refit nacelles and saucer doesn't make it JJVerse. I know that wasn't you, I've seen that before on other sites.

Ouch dude

FarShot · « **Reply #27 on:** March 01, 2009, 12:18:59 PM »

I just photoshopped my own concept of a refit JJPrise. I got the original from Ex-Astris-Scientia, then did some modifications.

Here is the one I made and comparisons.

Dalek · « **Reply #28 on:** March 01, 2009, 12:27:52 PM »

As much as I like all this, we really should get back ontopic and Aeries should get the next post. Before Jimmy comes along and says it anyway.

JimmyB76 · « **Reply #29 on:** March 01, 2009, 02:47:38 PM »

do me a favor - let the moderating be done by the staff please ;)

thx
(even tho thats exactly what i would have said anyway lol)

aeries will have the next post, and then this thread will get cleaned out, and everything can go back ontopic from there...

Aeries · « **Reply #30 on:** March 01, 2009, 05:04:26 PM »

Better?

Edit: Pic updated; moved the nacelles back a bit.

FourChan · « **Reply #31 on:** March 01, 2009, 06:22:56 PM »

Quote from: Shadowknight1 on February 28, 2009, 08:20:14 PM

Ummm, FourChan, couldn't TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT be considered sick and twisted views of Star Trek? Especially the latter three? Don't say you won't like something that you haven't seen yet.

Nooo, I prefer some of the more reasonable fan projections on that refit, thank you very much. That's horrendous. johnnymuffintop's conjecture comes to mind.

Anyways Aeries, you might try letting the nacelles lose some weight. That may help the balance of a design that always had fairly small engines.

Okay take something that you grew up with, liked, enjoyed and everything then all of a sudden some new person came in, twisted it around and turned it into crap.

Good Example: The Show Knight Rider.

Billz · « **Reply #32 on:** March 01, 2009, 06:51:54 PM »

Lose the enginneering hull.

In no way, shape or form should a Constellation class have a extremely noticable enginnering hull. Not even in the self contained ego-centric universe style of J.J Abrams.

Nacelles are good though.

Aeries · « **Reply #33 on:** March 01, 2009, 07:17:15 PM »

Without it, and merely a second torpedo pod:

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #34 on:** March 01, 2009, 07:28:03 PM »

That looks good.

FarShot · « **Reply #35 on:** March 01, 2009, 07:59:04 PM »

The torpedo pod doesn't look very JJVerse-ish. Streamline it and lose the hull extending around the torpedo ports.

DJ Curtis · « **Reply #36 on:** March 01, 2009, 09:13:05 PM »

i actually liked it a lot better with the sec hull on top.

lint · « **Reply #37 on:** March 01, 2009, 09:42:29 PM »

I have to agree with DJ on that one.

Kirk · « **Reply #38 on:** March 01, 2009, 10:24:39 PM »

I'll have to third that.

FourChan · « **Reply #39 on:** March 02, 2009, 01:17:20 AM »

FourChannel that.

News:

Author Topic: Aeries' "JJVerse" Constellation Class (Read 3239 times)