Author Topic: Baz1701 WIP's - Semi retired. (Read 489099 times)

baz1701 · « **Reply #4380 on:** September 27, 2012, 11:13:29 AM »

the height of the ship is about 10% thinner but equally wide.

Not sure about the bussards I kind of like the ones I made here.

vonfrank · « **Reply #4381 on:** September 27, 2012, 11:58:08 AM »

Looks like an awesome design, but you haven't given up on the Space Facility have you?

baz1701 · « **Reply #4382 on:** September 27, 2012, 12:16:47 PM »

No the space office is unwrapped and ready to texture. Since the "dart" is nominated for MOTM then I'm pushing that at the momment.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #4383 on:** September 27, 2012, 04:37:24 PM »

I like, I like!

baz1701 · « **Reply #4384 on:** September 28, 2012, 08:20:03 AM »

You should get a rough idea now of the overall look.

Vortex · « **Reply #4385 on:** September 28, 2012, 08:23:42 AM »

Very, very nice.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #4386 on:** September 28, 2012, 11:52:00 AM »

Sleek and slick. Have a cookie.

JimmyB76 · « **Reply #4387 on:** September 28, 2012, 01:48:20 PM »

is there a name or anything other than "dart"?
just so when it goes to the polls (it has been nominated for MotM lol) something to call it?

you could always put in a generic name, we can say it is "Sam Class" for the time being lol

when it comes to polls, ill need to name it something... even if "Sam Class" for now lol

moed · « **Reply #4388 on:** September 28, 2012, 02:13:24 PM »

Like those nacelles much better now.

But... the front end is way too sharp on the edges of the "fork". I think it would look better if they were smoothed out a bit.

baz1701 · « **Reply #4389 on:** September 28, 2012, 02:27:52 PM »

Tiq has already got a name for this ship but I can't remember what it was

tiqhud · « **Reply #4390 on:** September 28, 2012, 04:07:58 PM »

Uss Navaras Ncc-94010

flarespire · « **Reply #4391 on:** September 30, 2012, 06:11:17 PM »

hmm, looks good, loving that nacell design and the ship looks awsome!
As for a class name, what about the Blazefire class, U.S.S. Blazefire, NCC (or NX)-84748 ?
I also see that the trioval saucer shape with the fore most tip cut to have two prongs design has become popular....
Very well done

i look forward to seeing how this ship turns out!

baz1701 · « **Reply #4392 on:** October 01, 2012, 08:32:48 AM »

Thanks but the ship already has a name (see Tiq's post above)

Done little more on the "saucer"

mckinneyc · « **Reply #4393 on:** October 01, 2012, 08:46:50 AM »

Seems like an awful lot of volume of the saucer section gone

flarespire · « **Reply #4394 on:** October 01, 2012, 09:12:55 AM »

he could gain that volume back by merging the secondary hull and backend of the saucer together to create a smooth curve and make it a little more sleek.

moed · « **Reply #4395 on:** October 01, 2012, 02:58:05 PM »

Quote from: mckinneyc on October 01, 2012, 08:46:50 AM

Seems like an awful lot of volume of the saucer section gone

Agreed.

FarShot · « **Reply #4396 on:** October 01, 2012, 03:06:10 PM »

Quote from: flarespire on October 01, 2012, 09:12:55 AM

he could gain that volume back by merging the secondary hull and backend of the saucer together to create a smooth curve and make it a little more sleek.

Yeah, but then it'd look like the Inferno.

flarespire · « **Reply #4397 on:** October 01, 2012, 03:08:37 PM »

it doesnt have to look like that, im just suggesting that it may be better cuz the saucers aft with those indents looks a bit... out of place.

baz1701 · « **Reply #4398 on:** October 03, 2012, 08:38:10 AM »

Got rid of the rear inserts but kept a small indent.

Bottom of the saucer done as well.

Darkthunder · « **Reply #4399 on:** October 03, 2012, 11:20:50 AM »

Stardrive needs to be pushed further forward under the saucer (imho). Looks a bit too "weak" in the area connecting the saucer to the stardrive. I think the entire stardrive + pylons/nacelles could easily be pushed forward a bit, and give it a more solid design.

Just giving a constructive opinion

News:

Author Topic: Baz1701 WIP's - Semi retired. (Read 489099 times)