Author Topic: {Star Fleet: R & D} One wiled ride........ (Read 89295 times)

Bones · « **Reply #340 on:** December 14, 2009, 01:04:48 PM »

And I'm glad you decided to make this rare ship ;) http://tng.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/s6/6x04/relics036.jpg here's the link

Nebula · « **Reply #341 on:** December 14, 2009, 01:14:17 PM »

trek core doesn't like people hotlinking either... you have to dl the img and reupload it

DJ Curtis · « **Reply #342 on:** December 14, 2009, 01:27:20 PM »

that ship looks great.

Bones · « **Reply #343 on:** December 14, 2009, 01:39:11 PM »

uhhh it's starting to be fun

... noooot :wtf ooook so here's uploaded pic

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #344 on:** December 14, 2009, 03:45:52 PM »

Quote from: Billz on December 08, 2009, 05:27:03 PM

Quote from: bankruptstudios on December 08, 2009, 03:00:59 PM
I think the moddeling part is done. Let me know what you think. The rest of the detailing will be done in texture.

Those warp pylons are not correct.

He's right, your warp pylons are completely wrong when compared to the ref pics of the USS Nash you posted earlier.

bankruptstudios · « **Reply #345 on:** December 14, 2009, 04:12:36 PM »

To answer that question about the warp pylons. In my opinion, there to skinny for my liking and honestly don't look like they could handle there function. SO i tolk some artictis liesnce on that part. And its to late to go back, uv's are done and textures are in process. All i can say is that i'm sorry if you don't see this from where i stand.

hobbs · « **Reply #346 on:** December 14, 2009, 04:46:54 PM »

loverly ship my friend

great textures (maybe have mor damage on the front and bottom sections to show the crash landing marks)

also what is its name?
JenolIN
JenolAN
JenolEN

great ship- cookie away

Dalek · « **Reply #347 on:** December 14, 2009, 04:49:12 PM »

It's Jenolan.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #348 on:** December 14, 2009, 06:32:33 PM »

Quote from: bankruptstudios on December 14, 2009, 04:12:36 PM

To answer that question about the warp pylons. In my opinion, there to skinny for my liking and honestly don't look like they could handle there function. SO i tolk some artictis liesnce on that part. And its to late to go back, uv's are done and textures are in process. All i can say is that i'm sorry if you don't see this from where i stand.

Ah, well, that seems logical enough. I honestly didn't notice it until you posted the pics of the studio model anyways.

So will there be a clean version of the Jenolen?

moed · « **Reply #349 on:** December 14, 2009, 06:50:45 PM »

Great work!

But IMO, I'd like a non-damaged ship hull.... It'll get enough damage of its own in quickbattle.

bankruptstudios · « **Reply #350 on:** December 14, 2009, 08:29:25 PM »

Hi guys. To answer some questions, Her official name is USS JENOLIN as seen on her hull during TNG Relics and on the studio models pics. As for the weather the textures will be damage or not for relace, i think a clean one USS SYDNEY will be for the main download and a JENOLIN crashed textures will be a surprise. What you think?

Bones · « **Reply #351 on:** December 15, 2009, 01:27:42 AM »

hehe I did the same with my Constellation pack, first released only clean Stargazer and then whole pack of clean Constellations including bonus wheathered Stargazer as seen in 'the Battle'

Lol I always thought that's USS Jenolan... cookie anyway

bankruptstudios · « **Reply #352 on:** December 15, 2009, 01:52:42 AM »

Thanks Bones, nope its Jenolin. I'll post the studio model pic.Yea every one likes the nice and clean ship, but i'm drawen to the ones that has been around.

Villain · « **Reply #353 on:** December 15, 2009, 05:35:17 AM »

That's because it's constantly referenced to Jenolan. Every image I've got of it is named as such, Memory-Alpha names it as such, but the studio model does read Jenolin. Suppose it's a potayto-potahto thing.

bankruptstudios · « **Reply #354 on:** December 15, 2009, 06:51:03 AM »

K guys, i think im done the Sydney. Let me know what you think. Now from here i'll change the reg's and add the crash effects For the jenolin. After that then i'll flip the ship and change the model a bit and we will have the nash.

Villain · « **Reply #355 on:** December 15, 2009, 07:33:56 AM »

You may need to dull the speculars a bit. The studio model uses the same colours as the other TMP ships (That off-white/eggshell-white) as currently it's very ENT-era (Which is still cool, but if you're going for canon..) As for flipping the ship, the only difference between the Nash and the Jenolan is the registry format, if that's what you meant. Having the bridge upside-down would just look a little... Odd, I guess. Unless you take a little creative liberty and place the bridge-dome on the new "top".

bankruptstudios · « **Reply #356 on:** December 15, 2009, 08:25:52 AM »

The textres are from the TMP Enteprise for all the hull, but i have a coustom overlay on the outer hull and under pods to give a little diffrene from the rest of the ship. As for the nash, takea look, ;)

Toa_Kaita · « **Reply #357 on:** December 15, 2009, 08:27:45 AM »

Makes me want to watch "Relics" all over again...nice work!

bankruptstudios · « **Reply #358 on:** December 15, 2009, 08:36:24 AM »

Thanks Tk, i also cant wate to tag team with you on ST: Frontlines oping song.

Edit:

Here is a peek at the final Sydney and Nash. Hope you'll enjoy. ;)

Bones · « **Reply #359 on:** December 15, 2009, 10:21:20 AM »

Now that's more like it

if you could just make widows rims thiner it should be all fine ;) cookie away

News:

Author Topic: {Star Fleet: R & D} One wiled ride........ (Read 89295 times)