Author Topic: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)  (Read 3217 times)

Offline GMunoz

  • Posts: 466
  • Cookies: 139
TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« on: December 17, 2009, 02:56:11 PM »
I will probably gt rapped in the mouth for this one.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2009, 02:57:37 PM »
Make the engineering hull smaller. It looks too bulky compared to the nacelle.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Vladko1

  • Posts: 1148
  • Cookies: 72
  • The trekkie of steel
    • Modders of Steel Shipyards Homepage!
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2009, 03:56:57 PM »
Dalek is right. Just scale down the radius of the engineering hull.

Offline GMunoz

  • Posts: 466
  • Cookies: 139
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2009, 04:19:31 PM »
Scaled the engineering hull down.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2009, 04:23:33 PM »
Use the nacelle pylon as the one connecting the engineering hull but angle it back further. Have it set slightly further forward than the nacelle pylon. Then prop the engineering hull a bit further head. Then stretch the engineering hull forward so it looks longer and thinner.

Sorry, I know I'm being picky. But a TOS Kelvin should look perfect. :)

Edit: A bit like so (attached image)
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2009, 05:00:59 PM »
Neat project, I don't know why anyone'd rap you in the mouth for this idea. :D

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Phoenix Bondi

  • REMEMBER YOUR ORIGIN
  • Posts: 1294
  • Cookies: 575
  • Never Forget Your Origins
    • CHRIS JONES GAMING
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2009, 05:18:56 PM »
not bad, mines working in legacy at the moment just gotta port it over, i use a NECK for my one to the nacel's so like ur idea too

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2009, 05:28:12 PM »
Use the nacelle pylon as the one connecting the engineering hull but angle it back further. Have it set slightly further forward than the nacelle pylon. Then prop the engineering hull a bit further head. Then stretch the engineering hull forward so it looks longer and thinner.

Sorry, I know I'm being picky. But a TOS Kelvin should look perfect. :)

Edit: A bit like so (attached image)

Just, don't put the engineering hull upside down as it is in Dalek's example pic though, lol.
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2009, 05:30:17 PM »
Yes. I haven't quite figured that bit out yet :P.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Centurus

  • If you're reading this, you're missing out on something better.
  • Posts: 444
  • Cookies: 70
  • BOW BEFORE THE POWER OF MY RUBBER CHICKENS!!!
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #9 on: December 17, 2009, 09:42:02 PM »
I love the mesh.  Looks great. 

Offline GMunoz

  • Posts: 466
  • Cookies: 139
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #10 on: December 17, 2009, 11:47:40 PM »
Ok, made the suggested changes. 

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2009, 12:36:38 AM »
Perfect, now HP that sucker and get her ingamme.  :funny

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2009, 05:43:34 AM »
Perfect. The engineering hull looks a little bland though. Any chance of adding some windows to the textures?
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Maxloef

  • STBC Aftermath Co Founder
  • Posts: 493
  • Cookies: 61
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2009, 07:45:44 AM »
its missing the uhm thing begind the bridge...the extrusion..  if u add that in a TOS style u need smaller pylons and itl look better =D

Offline GMunoz

  • Posts: 466
  • Cookies: 139
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2009, 09:47:38 AM »
Maxloef, actually it is there, connected to the impulse engine as it should be.

Offline Maxloef

  • STBC Aftermath Co Founder
  • Posts: 493
  • Cookies: 61
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2009, 01:04:20 PM »
no i ment more bigger like in trek Xi there the pylons actualy is ALLOT smaller then the extrusion and tit runs all the way to the bridge and is as high as the bridge...

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2009, 01:51:30 PM »
He means the two or three decks that lead off of decks three/four, and support the upper pylon.


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline moed

  • Posts: 1470
  • Cookies: 57
  • Star Trekus Fanaticus
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2009, 06:11:30 PM »
Once again, great job!

Offline majormagna

  • English Idiot
  • Posts: 513
  • Cookies: 5
  • Bail Out!
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #18 on: December 18, 2009, 07:41:13 PM »
Don't forget this is TOS style, and pretty much how I'd have expected a TOS Kelvin to look!

Although personally, considering it's an older ship; I'd like to see the nacelle 'spires' on the bussards. (Perhaps a variant?)
Did you know I'm on Twitter?

Offline GMunoz

  • Posts: 466
  • Cookies: 139
Re: TOS Kelvin (had to do it)
« Reply #19 on: December 19, 2009, 12:18:26 AM »
The saucer angle is to steep for this to work.  The JJ Kelvin's saucer is much more flat.