Author Topic: Ambassador Class  (Read 27869 times)

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #160 on: May 07, 2010, 02:27:30 PM »
Ok, here's the refit.

The USS Republic.  Put in dry dock after taking extensive damage at the 2nd Battle of Chintoka.  As a large but old battlecruiser, the Republic spent two years in dock without repair.  After that time, Starfleet selected it as the first ship to be part of an Ambassador class modernization program.  With Galaxy class starships getting priority upgrades, the Republic was refitted with refurbished Type X phaser array emitters and torpedo launchers from the USS Galaxy, including two small new arrays near the aft shuttlebay.  An entirely new deflector dish was installed.  Adapted from the Sun Tzu Class, it was selected for its ability to create extremely powerful deflector fields and highly penetrative sensor beams.  

Single reactor impulse engines were added to each nacelle pylon, and the pylons themselves were shortened along the Z axis to accommodate the ship's new, sleeker warp field.  This, along with a new top speed of warp 9.7, came as a result of new, reshaped warp coils.  Overall engine height was adjusted to match the new coils, though a new field emitter ring had to be installed around the circumference of each nacelle.  In addition, each nacelle was capped by a new, high compression bussard collector.

An enlarged bridge deck made space for additional subprocessing cores and storage compartments.

Non visible enhancements include included a high capacity shield grid, faster turbolifts, new bioneural circuitry and holodecks.

Offline moed

  • Posts: 1472
  • Cookies: 57
  • Star Trekus Fanaticus
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #161 on: May 07, 2010, 02:45:06 PM »
Nice!

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #162 on: May 07, 2010, 02:47:10 PM »
I like it  :dance I hope she is bit more agile than the original.
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #163 on: May 07, 2010, 02:48:52 PM »
 :thumbsup:

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #164 on: May 07, 2010, 03:00:00 PM »
I like it  :dance I hope she is bit more agile than the original.

It will be, thanks to additional impulse engines.

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #165 on: May 07, 2010, 03:47:29 PM »
Good to hear.
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline Morgan

  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1340
  • Cookies: 65535
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #166 on: May 07, 2010, 04:00:48 PM »
I like it! Although to be honest, I'm not too sure on the phasers on the side of the shuttlebay; thinking from a tactical standpoint, the positioning makes it look like the beams could be blocked significantly by the nacelles and pylons.

Maybe instead of having them on the "wall" they could be placed on the "floor" (for lack of better words, hope it makes sense lol  :idk: ), facing up. For additional coverage, having a pair facing downward on the underside would help.

Anyways I hope I'm not coming off as overly critical. You have a pretty awesome Ambassador and I guarantee I'll love it weather you move those phasers or leave 'em.  :D

Offline Psyco Diver

  • Posts: 355
  • Cookies: 3
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #167 on: May 07, 2010, 04:09:19 PM »
I like it, I like it alot, but its missing something I think, maybe take the blue hull areas from the original Amby but make it a dark gray? I think it needs some color depth thats all, but I love everything else about it, I can not wait for this one. Oh it maybe late, but what about phaser arrays on top of the naccelles like the galaxy refits, I dunno if it would look good (looks good in my mind, but sometimes it never coverts to reality right lol)

Offline Dawg81

  • Posts: 733
  • Cookies: 29
  • I am Dawg; Resistence is futile
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #168 on: May 07, 2010, 05:06:14 PM »
i hate to admit it but those twin phaser arrays on the aft suhttlebay are in the worst position. Perhaps an array that follows the curve of the hull and perhaps an aft torp launcher

Offline Nihilus

  • Posts: 407
  • Cookies: 14
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #169 on: May 07, 2010, 05:21:44 PM »
I love it!  I can't wait to get my hands on the both of them.  I would still add Torpedo Launchers IMO, but I'm not a modeler so I don't know how easy/hard that is lol.  Nonetheless, she is a beauty.

Offline nicholson

  • Starforce Productions
  • Posts: 25
  • Cookies: 4
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #170 on: May 07, 2010, 05:25:35 PM »
Yeah not sure about the position of those arrays. Maybe Venture/Galaxy X style on top of the nacelles would look better?

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #171 on: May 07, 2010, 05:52:52 PM »
wonderful ship though here are a few things I noticed on the HP and other....

1. on my screen the ship textures seemed a little washed out but that's my fault I think just need to fool with my monitor a little lol...

2. the ship could use a little up in maneuverability and the phaser arcs could be lots better....

I based these findings off a long 20 AWESOME min battle with the KM 1.0 Ambassador. 

Everything else worked like a charm.
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #172 on: May 07, 2010, 07:04:45 PM »
Thanks for the report, neb.

Ship is about 80% the maneuverability of a Galaxy Class.  Phaser arcs are also intentionally somewhat limited to reflect the layout arrays on the ship.  Makes for fun battles though, eh?

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #173 on: May 07, 2010, 07:14:36 PM »
not completely lol... I seriously think they need to be expanded just a little....
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #174 on: May 07, 2010, 07:22:11 PM »
Bah.. Learn to use full thrusters.  :P ;) Helps a lot.
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #175 on: May 07, 2010, 08:04:14 PM »
not every BC has thrusters lol :P
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline dEjavU

  • Posts: 123
  • Cookies: 3
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #176 on: May 08, 2010, 03:22:37 AM »
Great work DJ  :thumbsup: the aztec designs are a definite difference in over-all appearance and sets her apart from the other nice looking ambie's out there, the refit too looks just as stunning! Brilliant work man, the only thing I notice out of place are those two phaser strips on either side of the shuttle bay, I realize their for aft phasers and that in this era demands it but having glance at the possible firing arc seems like it's going to blow both naccelles out of the sky. Also, it looks as though the new deflector dish(for the refit)looks pretty elaborate and needs a little bit more touch-up(maybe add more blue glowing parts or increase the hue level on some areas?)anyways remarkable work DJ.  :)

Offline mayhemuk

  • Posts: 80
  • Cookies: 7
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #177 on: May 08, 2010, 03:25:39 PM »
Ok i think i might have to dust off my copy of bc. DJ love it.

Offline Commander_One

  • Chief of Operations, USS Bo Jangles
  • Posts: 111
  • Cookies: 8
  • Peace and Long Life...Live Long and Prosper
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #178 on: May 08, 2010, 05:28:03 PM »
I loved that  you lowered the warp nacelles!  Makes a huge difference in streamlining the over all design. 

Offline Captain_D

  • Captain of the Seafood Universe
  • Posts: 403
  • Cookies: 5
Re: Ambassador Class
« Reply #179 on: May 08, 2010, 06:16:05 PM »
Great job on the refit. Technically the phasers at the shuttle bay do look like you would have a bad accident on the engines if you had to fire them, but looks wise they look great where they are.

 I also agree with the deflector dish. I think it would look better if you beveled it in like the other ambassadors except the tan part, leave it as it is or make that part a bit smaller. Not like the TV refit. That one sort of reminds me of a weird nipple, :eek never did like it. Could do it like the galaxy and have that a dish that is inside the beveled part.

 She looks great whatever you decide :thumbsup: