Author Topic: Star Trek Into Darkness - Images, Videos, Discussion, etc (Read 36896 times)

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #60 on:** February 24, 2012, 04:29:34 PM »

Cumberbatch is also sporting Starfleet-issue sideburns. And it can't be Mitchell. The comic series is supposed to lead into the movie, and they've already addressed Mitchell's story.

mckinneyc · « **Reply #61 on:** February 26, 2012, 05:48:05 AM »

Don't believe everything you read.

I hope this isn't going to be another Star Trek film where it'll only make sense if you have read a comic first

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #62 on:** February 26, 2012, 12:08:41 PM »

Quote from: mckinneyc on February 26, 2012, 05:48:05 AM

Don't believe everything you read.

I hope this isn't going to be another Star Trek film where it'll only make sense if you have read a comic first

Well, if you want to believe that Mitchell can survive getting shot with a phaser rifle at point blank range, that's your prerogative.

086gf · « **Reply #63 on:** March 02, 2012, 02:08:43 PM »

More pics from the same scene.

http://trekmovie.com/2012/02/24/more-photos-from-star-trek-set-imax-camera-spotted/

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #64 on:** March 23, 2012, 05:19:06 PM »

Apparently JJ just might be, maybe, I dunno...upset that there've been leaks.

http://trekmovie.com/2012/03/23/wall-built-around-star-trek-location-shooting-to-prevent-more-leaks/

086gf · « **Reply #65 on:** March 23, 2012, 06:53:28 PM »

Starfleet wetsuits?

http://trekmovie.com/2012/03/19/more-star-trek-sequel-set-images-simon-pegg-and-zoe-saldana-spotted-in-new-uniform/

086gf · « **Reply #66 on:** April 20, 2012, 01:39:50 PM »

It seems that a volcano is involved. Spock is wearing a different suit too.

http://trekmovie.com/2012/04/16/spock-sighted-in-new-leaked-star-trek-sequel-set-photo/
http://trekmovie.com/2012/04/19/more-images-of-quinto-as-spock-from-star-trek-sequel-set/

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #67 on:** April 20, 2012, 01:51:46 PM »

Certainly better looking that the TOS EVA suits.

Tally · « **Reply #68 on:** May 01, 2012, 05:29:02 AM »

Say it isn't so http://collider.com/star-trek-2-sequel-villain/162992/

captain_obvious · « **Reply #69 on:** May 01, 2012, 06:56:02 AM »

Darkthunder · « **Reply #70 on:** May 01, 2012, 09:58:38 AM »

Quote from: Tally on May 01, 2012, 05:29:02 AM

Say it isn't so http://collider.com/star-trek-2-sequel-villain/162992/

In fairness, alot of people were upset around 2007-2008 when first news broke that they were re-casting the TOS characters with new actors. Say what you will about the "movie", I thought the actors did an exceptional job (for the most part), in taking on the "iconic" roles.

While yes, it's not exactly the most "creative" villain to use, if done correctly it could turn out quite well. Only time will tell.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #71 on:** May 01, 2012, 10:18:26 PM »

I loved everything about the 2009 film, including the actors. This though...I'll be honest. This is all coming from TrekMovie's unnamed sources. And they are also saying that Nimoy is back as Spock Prime and the Klingons will be major players in the film.

Look over the paparazzi crap that's leaked out. No Nimoy and, more importantly, no ridge-heads. Unless they strip off the makeup before even going to take a piss, we would've caught a glimpse by now since primary filming is almost done. We haven't. Now, I'll probably be eating crow in a few months when we get a teaser trailer, but for now, I'm thinking that JJ's trolling us. If he is, then well done. If he isn't, then I hope Cumberbatch can pull off Khan.

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #72 on:** May 02, 2012, 12:07:37 AM »

I agree with you Shadowknight

086gf · « **Reply #73 on:** May 03, 2012, 02:50:40 PM »

They already said that the villain would absolutly be original and unique...only time will tell. Until then im calling this false.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #74 on:** May 03, 2012, 03:17:18 PM »

Quote from: 086gf on May 03, 2012, 02:50:40 PM

They already said that the villain would absolutly be original and unique...only time will tell. Until then im calling this false.

I don't recall them saying that. In fact, I seem to remember them saying that the villain would be familiar to Trek fans.

I will say this though. If the Klingons are involved, then this will obviously be different than a "Space Seed" rehash.

majormagna · « **Reply #75 on:** May 03, 2012, 05:38:35 PM »

Quote from: Shadowknight1 on May 03, 2012, 03:17:18 PM

I will say this though. If the Klingons are involved, then this will obviously be different than a "Space Seed" rehash.

Not necessarily... The Klingons could merely be featured as part of an introduction, or cliffhanger for the third of the Neo-Trek saga.

JimmyB76 · « **Reply #76 on:** May 04, 2012, 12:33:21 PM »

interesting article... well worth the read...

The Real Problem with Benedict Cumberbatch?s Villain Role in Star Trek 12

mckinneyc · « **Reply #77 on:** May 04, 2012, 01:59:41 PM »

was an interesting article, well written

086gf · « **Reply #78 on:** May 05, 2012, 08:04:56 PM »

Khan can only be legit as a non-white or black character. Ricardo was Hispanic though Khans name suggests South Asia or there-abouts.

K.H.A.N. Perhaps?

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #79 on:** May 09, 2012, 10:52:28 PM »

Well, we'll have to see how they handle it, Khan or no Khan.

As of yesterday, May 08, production on Star Trek: Something, Something has wrapped. Now comes the long, long, LOOOOONG wait.

News:

Author Topic: Star Trek Into Darkness - Images, Videos, Discussion, etc (Read 36896 times)