Author Topic: Star Trek Into Darkness - Images, Videos, Discussion, etc  (Read 101908 times)

Offline Erk

  • never forget the name... Enterprise
  • Posts: 141
  • Cookies: 5
  • Enterprise: boldness or readiness in undertaking
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #320 on: February 04, 2013, 01:00:48 PM »
yeah, i realize that... now. I hope the Enterprise survives... Now I'm slightly worried. Does anyone know why Chekov is wearing red? Could he be working as an engineer in this film, since he's a genius and all? If so, he can come up with some crazy way to save the ship.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #321 on: February 04, 2013, 01:04:48 PM »
I don't think Orci and Kurtzman are cruel enough to completely destroy the Federation flagship before she's even a year old.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #322 on: February 04, 2013, 01:58:48 PM »
The falling from space scene would have to be in the middle of the movie when they first get back to Earth with the other ship(among others no doubt) crashing into the bay and various buildings blowing up. Hence why they would have to go to Q'onos to capture Harrison right after in this little ship instead of the Enterprise. Clearly it now seems that the term "detonating the fleet" is actually literal as first thought. I would bet that Harrison got the prefix codes for the ships around Earth(or any that would be in range) and synced it with the explosions on Earth. Some have mentioned that the damage does look like the kind caused by internal explosions and they could be right except for the scortch marks which im guessing are from the volcano resuce of Spock. Kirk(?) in the space suit avoiding the debris with our(?) moon in the background could very well be the same scene. What would Kirk be doing outside the ship leaving Spock in command I don't know.

And once they get back from this mission they find the Big E waiting for them(with minor changes at most!). The new girl is not going anywhere anytime soon. Logically its waaay too early to bring out a massive refit let alone the "A". Its only been a year if that after the events of the first. Come on peeps use your noggins lol.

And I would agree that the ship crashing into the bay and the one taking out buildings is the same one.

Then there is this place here. Looks like a massive starship armory or something. There are atleast three bays with what could be photon warheads and others with probably matter/anti-matter storage pods and such. A few seem to have some small ships(cargo ferrys?) which would explain the tunnel.

erk one issue with that thought process... the ent rising from the water isn't damaged...

...and takes place early in the movie.
All hail the messiah!

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #323 on: February 04, 2013, 02:15:38 PM »
The Enterprise has only been in service for about 6 months at this point.  Too early for a major overhaul, I'd think.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #324 on: February 04, 2013, 02:50:01 PM »
Who says it's getting an overhaul? Even if it gets massive battledamage, it's possible that it will simply be fixed up to look like it did before the battle. Just look at Voyager and the whopping Year of Hell reset button.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline mckinneyc

  • Screenshot Master
  • Posts: 1600
  • Cookies: 151
  • Screenshot Master
    • My DA page
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #325 on: February 04, 2013, 03:35:33 PM »
I read somewhere or heard in an interview this film is set 4 or 5 years after the first.

Also that damaged ship falling into the planet's atmosphere has to be the Enterprise. In order for viewers not to be confused they will avoid having another ship that looks exactly like the Enterprise and let alone with a '170X' registry.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #326 on: February 04, 2013, 03:59:02 PM »
No mckinneyc, they've confirmed it was only about 6 months later, not years. http://trekmovie.com/2012/12/26/lindelof-on-how-destruction-of-vulcan-ties-into-into-darkness-much-more/

EDIT: After rewatching the three trailers we have so far...it really seems like JJ's toned down the lens flares since 2009.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline mckinneyc

  • Screenshot Master
  • Posts: 1600
  • Cookies: 151
  • Screenshot Master
    • My DA page
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #327 on: February 05, 2013, 01:28:56 PM »
Cheers for that article Shadow, glad only 6 months has passed

Offline ShaunKL

  • Posts: 177
  • Cookies: 3
  • Semper Exploro
    • My YouTube Channel
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #328 on: February 06, 2013, 12:35:39 AM »
My friend and I have a theory that the Enterprise will be knocked out of commission early in the movie due to battle/crash damage, and come back near the end with a minor refit.  (It has been mentioned, I believe by Bob Orci, that we're going to get an awesome beauty pass in the movie.)
Thanks for letting me know the forum was back up, guys.  I thought everyone died.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #329 on: February 06, 2013, 01:18:21 AM »
Cheers for that article Shadow, glad only 6 months has passed

Pity it hasn't been 6 months of real-time... 4 years wait is pretty long, if you wanna keep people interested in the franchise again. Then again, it was 7 years after Nemesis.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #330 on: February 06, 2013, 01:38:55 AM »
Pity it hasn't been 6 months of real-time... 4 years wait is pretty long, if you wanna keep people interested in the franchise again. Then again, it was 7 years after Nemesis.

Might be another 4 years wait if Paramount wants Abrams to direct the next one too.  Certainly won't happen in two.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline mckinneyc

  • Screenshot Master
  • Posts: 1600
  • Cookies: 151
  • Screenshot Master
    • My DA page
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #331 on: February 06, 2013, 01:23:40 PM »
I think the studios are realising you can flog a movie franchise to death and also having shorter intervals between movies can damage the quality of the films.

Also the reason I am glad only six months has passed is that very few film franchises deal with the consequences of what happened in a previous film anymore

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #332 on: February 08, 2013, 01:17:39 PM »
New KREO-O merchandise has sorta spoilers.



The Klingon minifigure has what is clearly a Bat'leth, though definitely not exactly like the ones from TNG-onwards.  And to the left of the Enterprise set is a Klingon Bird of Prey set.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #333 on: February 08, 2013, 01:45:55 PM »
Not really spoilers. The trailer clearly shows a battle taking place against Klingons (Bat'leth is seen), and they were supposed to be in the previous movie, but the scenes were cut (On Rura Penthe).
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #334 on: February 11, 2013, 09:34:33 PM »
Hot Wheels are releasing some new ships this year, the Narada, the U.S.S. Excelsior, the U.S.S. Kelvin, and a fourth unknown ship.



Kelvin looks great.

EDIT:
This'll end well.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Darran

  • Posts: 138
  • Cookies: 19
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #335 on: February 21, 2013, 05:29:34 AM »
Just finished reading Countdown to Darkness 2, all I can say is "oooooo! aaaaaahhhhh!"

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #336 on: February 21, 2013, 05:30:31 AM »
Just finished reading Countdown to Darkness 2, all I can say is "oooooo! aaaaaahhhhh!"

Might the comics provide -some- hint as to who 'Peter Weller' will be playing?
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Darran

  • Posts: 138
  • Cookies: 19
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #337 on: February 21, 2013, 05:39:44 AM »
Tut tut Darkthunder.... Spoilers :p

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #338 on: February 21, 2013, 10:28:21 AM »
Tut tut Darkthunder.... Spoilers :p
Tell us, or we will eat you :twisted:
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #339 on: February 21, 2013, 11:23:59 AM »
I completely forgot about this comic, I have Part 1.