Bridge Commander Central

Recreational Forums => Other Sci-Fi Discussion => Topic started by: Nebula on July 19, 2006, 04:34:12 PM

Title: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 19, 2006, 04:34:12 PM
We need this here 2.

*changed title*
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on July 19, 2006, 04:38:27 PM
Agreed. stickied
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Mark on July 19, 2006, 04:46:20 PM
is the new series any good?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 19, 2006, 04:46:58 PM
yah it's getting real good.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 19, 2006, 04:47:41 PM
Season 10 and Season 3 (SG1/SGA respectively) are great I think.



Although I miss "The O'Neill"  :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Sean on July 19, 2006, 04:47:57 PM
hell yea its good!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 19, 2006, 04:50:11 PM
Quote from: darkthunder
Season 10 and Season 3 (SG1/SGA respectively) are great I think.



Although I miss "The O'Neill"  :(




Whos to say he wont pop up now and then.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Sean on July 19, 2006, 05:18:11 PM
Quote from: Nebula
Quote from: darkthunder
Season 10 and Season 3 (SG1/SGA respectively) are great I think.



Although I miss "The O'Neill"  :(




Whos to say he wont pop up now and then.




not sure whether hes talking about the character or the ship  :?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 19, 2006, 05:50:51 PM
Quote from: Nebula
Whos to say he wont pop up now and then.


I know he's suppose to do some guest appearences on the shows in a near future. But I meant that I mostly miss him as a regular on the show. He made the show pretty much. Had it not been for O'Neill, I would have quit after season 1 or 2. I went into watching SG-1 despite that I originally hated the movie. Now SG-1 and SGA are among my favorite shows on tv :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Sean on July 19, 2006, 06:06:39 PM
Quote from: darkthunder
Quote from: Nebula
Whos to say he wont pop up now and then.


I know he's suppose to do some guest appearences on the shows in a near future. But I meant that I mostly miss him as a regular on the show. He made the show pretty much. Had it not been for O'Neill, I would have quit after season 1 or 2. I went into watching SG-1 despite that I originally hated the movie. Now SG-1 and SGA are among my favorite shows on tv :D




I have to agree i miss his convos with daniel... they were funny.... loved the ep he and teal'c were in that time loop... funny as hell



And yea.. i gotta  say i love SG ... maybe more than trek in recent years
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 19, 2006, 07:08:12 PM
Quote from: Sean
Quote from: darkthunder
Quote from: Nebula
Whos to say he wont pop up now and then.


I know he's suppose to do some guest appearences on the shows in a near future. But I meant that I mostly miss him as a regular on the show. He made the show pretty much. Had it not been for O'Neill, I would have quit after season 1 or 2. I went into watching SG-1 despite that I originally hated the movie. Now SG-1 and SGA are among my favorite shows on tv :D




I have to agree i miss his convos with daniel... they were funny.... loved the ep he and teal'c were in that time loop... funny as hell



And yea.. i gotta  say i love SG ... maybe more than trek in recent years




yah I have to say the same
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on July 19, 2006, 08:02:06 PM
O'Neill will be in the 300th episode.



It's shaping up to be fantastic stuff :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on July 19, 2006, 10:14:42 PM
Quote from: Sean
I have to agree i miss his convos with daniel... they were funny.... loved the ep he and teal'c were in that time loop... funny as hell



And yea.. i gotta  say i love SG ... maybe more than trek in recent years
Yea, love that episode!



(http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/9287/whaaaackohc0.jpg)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2006, 02:11:40 AM
LOL that ep RULES!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on July 20, 2006, 03:45:46 PM
It's definately their best "Side" episode.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on July 22, 2006, 11:34:05 AM
Yeah that episode is the best!

The cerials he's eating are called "time loops". They had a lot of trouble getting the company who owns the trademark to let them use it.

Got to love O'Neills references to Star Trek as well.

A semi recent one (for me, since we are halfway season 7) is this:
Quote
Jack walks in where Sam is working on something.

O?NEILL: They didn?t go for it.

CARTER: They didn?t approve the mission?

O?NEILL: Oh no, they did that. Once they knew the stakes and the fate of the universe stuff. Both the President and Hammond realised we had no choice. He sends good luck, godspeed and all those things he says when he thinks we?re gonna die.

CARTER: So what didn?t they go for?

O?NEILL: The name I suggested.

CARTER: For the ship?

O?NEILL: Yeah.

CARTER: Yeah Sir, we can?t call it the Enterprise.

From http://www.moon-catchin.net/gatenoise/sg1transcripts/s6/612unnaturalselection.htm
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 22, 2006, 11:54:53 AM
Quote from: MLeo
Yeah that episode is the best!

The cerials he's eating are called "time loops". They had a lot of trouble getting the company who owns the trademark to let them use it.

Got to love O'Neills references to Star Trek as well.

A semi recent one (for me, since we are halfway season 7) is this:
Quote
Jack walks in where Sam is working on something.

O?NEILL: They didn?t go for it.

CARTER: They didn?t approve the mission?

O?NEILL: Oh no, they did that. Once they knew the stakes and the fate of the universe stuff. Both the President and Hammond realised we had no choice. He sends good luck, godspeed and all those things he says when he thinks we?re gonna die.

CARTER: So what didn?t they go for?

O?NEILL: The name I suggested.

CARTER: For the ship?

O?NEILL: Yeah.

CARTER: Yeah Sir, we can?t call it the Enterprise.

From http://www.moon-catchin.net/gatenoise/sg1transcripts/s6/612unnaturalselection.htm


hehe yah they sneak one in almost every ep. lol (even actors)

Now did anyone catch the last 2 new eps of SGA and SG1??
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on July 23, 2006, 12:50:02 PM
Of course, God bless the internets ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 29, 2006, 01:09:41 AM
OMFG ROFLMAO I loved todays SG1 ep!
Spoiler: show
Ori ship go BOOOM,
that was fun to watch.

we need those spoiler tags here....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on July 29, 2006, 11:01:04 AM
wow.... creative. you made the exact same comment over at bcu *applauds loudly and slowly*
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 29, 2006, 12:54:53 PM
hmm only so people at BCU who don't go here can see what I said about it. heh
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: BCDS on July 29, 2006, 02:23:10 PM
Didn't I telling you earlier on today, Discussion of How you got your episodes from the internet is strictly forbidden on this site. Any further mention of this and i'll bring it to the Staff pages for deliberation and sentancing of a suitable punishment.

Discussion of ANY warez, Bit-torrent or illegal content is strictly to be kept off these boards.


Pegasus

Brings back the 'ole BSG Re-invisioned series memories, when at least one aussome series use to be exclusive to the UK.

I think its hotting up quite a lot in the new series, it is (Spoiler)not fun that they are getting canned by the Ori though, i mean, an entire fleet, the korelov destroyed, by 3 ships....lol(/EndSpoiler)

Anyone notice how its going very trek though, as in, space battle wise.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 29, 2006, 02:37:36 PM
have you noticed that many of the characters are old trek characters.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on July 29, 2006, 02:56:08 PM
Quote from: Nebula
have you noticed that many of the characters are old trek characters.


Actually, they're being sucked in from lesser sci-fi shows.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 29, 2006, 04:20:28 PM
Quote from: Pegasus
Quote from: Nebula
have you noticed that many of the characters are old trek characters.


Actually, they're being sucked in from lesser sci-fi shows.


Like?? ..... btw what did you think of the ep???
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on July 29, 2006, 08:29:57 PM
Quote from: Nebula
Quote from: Pegasus
Quote from: Nebula
have you noticed that many of the characters are old trek characters.


Actually, they're being sucked in from lesser sci-fi shows.


Like?? ..... btw what did you think of the ep???


Moi? that was a shitcool episode :mrgreen:
SGA was kinda boring though.

(
the opening scene with the Odessy gliding through the clouds was really something to see, just a really nicely done bit of work :) Great to see the ship in planitary flight.

Could see the Ori ship getting nuked like that from a mile away, but it was still great to see. Can remember the supergare splash being a little bigger though. Still excellent to see the nuclear blasts being channeled  though the small gate. Thuroughly ejoyable episode :)

Though one small problem is that now they've gone and created a supermassive blackhole from the supergate which will lens out and kinds fuck up a big part of space ;))
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 29, 2006, 11:08:47 PM
Darn it its not showing in canada untill I think next year! (Unless you have Satalite) Tho we did get season 2 of SGA finished before the 3-4th episode finsished in America wooo.

We need spolier tags lol.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on July 30, 2006, 10:03:44 AM
I'm so glad we are currently halfway in Season 7.

Stargate Atlantis will be shown in September (2 episodes of Stargate SG1 a week so far).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Glempius on August 01, 2006, 08:48:47 AM
I've only seen the end half of season 8 and first half of season 9 of Star Gate sadly :( (along with the odd random episode). And although O'Neil hasn't featured in what I've seen of season 9 I'm certainly liking the new bloke. He did good stuff in Farscape and I don't think he got enough credit for that
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: RCgothic on August 01, 2006, 07:58:48 PM
I get the Sci-Fi channel via sky, but it doesn't have the same schedule as the american Sci-Fi channel. Anyone know when I can catch new Stargate episodes?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 02, 2006, 06:22:28 AM
you say you get the american Sci-Fi channle? What time zone are you in? Its plays 9/8 central time on friday I dunno what that is in GMT
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: RCgothic on August 02, 2006, 07:36:11 AM
no, I think I get the UK Sci-Fi channel. Kinda sucks.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on August 02, 2006, 09:53:02 AM
Yesh, you get the uk version.

The american version is different i'm affraid :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 04, 2006, 12:07:43 PM
I Just watched the whole first season of Atlantis in one sitting


On a side note some guy was trying to pass this off as a startrek leagcy shot on a star wars forum.

http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/7876/borgvsfedsjw4.jpg
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on August 04, 2006, 12:25:15 PM
Quote from: Kori Barnes
I Just watched the whole first season of Atlantis in one sitting


On a side note some guy was trying to pass this off as a startrek leagcy shot on a star wars forum.

http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/7876/borgvsfedsjw4.jpg

Not exactly the right place, but that's CG sovereign in max with a real CGI nebula and possibly the other ships as well.
And all that in Max or similar.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 04, 2006, 12:45:19 PM
thar neb is a retexer. its ezrons (sp?) neb retexure for someones neb.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: blaXXer on August 04, 2006, 01:29:06 PM
what now?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 04, 2006, 05:22:04 PM
Quote from: MLeo
Quote from: Kori Barnes
I Just watched the whole first season of Atlantis in one sitting


On a side note some guy was trying to pass this off as a startrek leagcy shot on a star wars forum.

http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/7876/borgvsfedsjw4.jpg

Not exactly the right place, but that's CG sovereign in max with a real CGI nebula and possibly the other ships as well.
And all that in Max or similar.


actually MLeo that was taken in BC by phyco... and that neb is actually a remodeled and retextured p81 model by ezron.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on August 05, 2006, 06:34:40 PM
Oh my goodness...

Saw the Season 7 episode Chimera (post half). I love the humour they put into this show! They managed to get Carter hum the theme tune! Brilliant!

:mrgreen:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on August 06, 2006, 01:04:09 AM
Quote from: Nebula
actually MLeo that was taken in BC by phyco... and that neb is actually a remodeled and retextured p81 model by ezron.
Thanks, Nebula.  I was just about to say that.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 11, 2006, 11:52:49 PM
now that was 2 very good eps of SG....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on August 12, 2006, 04:57:29 AM
Indeed.

Spoiler: show
[/color]
Seeing an Ancient city-ship in flight was cool too. Too bad the Atlantis team can't get their own city-ship to fly. But damn, the 2nd Ancient city-ship was huge (when it was on the ground). Although the SG-1 team "shouldn't" be relaxing =P. They got the Ori threatening to take over our galaxy, Baal and his clones on the loose and after this weeks Atlantis episode, they also have a renewed Replicator-threat.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 12, 2006, 01:51:02 PM
Quote from: darkthunder
Indeed.

Spoiler: show
[/color]
Seeing an Ancient city-ship in flight was cool too. Too bad the Atlantis team can't get their own city-ship to fly. But damn, the 2nd Ancient city-ship was huge (when it was on the ground). Although the SG-1 team "shouldn't" be relaxing =P. They got the Ori threatening to take over our galaxy, Baal and his clones on the loose and after this weeks Atlantis episode, they also have a renewed Replicator-threat.


yah.... I wonder how this is all going to play out..... btw did any of you catch the preview of the next ep of SG?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 18, 2006, 10:04:47 PM
OMFG the 200th ep of SG was Hilarious! I couldn't stop laughing.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: BCDS on August 19, 2006, 07:16:29 AM
The ending was extremely funny, but, is Richard Dean Anderson coming back, thats the feel i got from the ending? It would be aussome if he would return to the show....General DoTheLaundry is not a good general.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: blaXXer on August 19, 2006, 07:22:46 AM
You mean Richard Dean Anderson, right?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 19, 2006, 11:32:23 AM
Quote from: BCDS
The ending was extremely funny, but, is Richard Dean Anderson coming back, thats the feel i got from the ending? It would be aussome if he would return to the show....General DoTheLaundry is not a good general.


oh come on he's not that bad...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on August 21, 2006, 05:32:46 PM
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!


http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/istargate_sg-1i_cancelled_iatlan.shtml


*Get's a stroke and a heart attack at the same time*
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 21, 2006, 05:49:00 PM
yah I know I can't believe it either.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: RCgothic on August 21, 2006, 06:22:38 PM
*sob*
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Master Thief on August 27, 2006, 06:16:47 AM
I watched Flesh And Blood just there, and my word it does own :mrgreen:

I cant wait to see how this season of SG1 pans out. Now, to watch Atlantis
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on August 27, 2006, 11:24:14 AM
It gets better, the next episode on your list isn't great, but the third in season 10 is amazing :mrgreen:


this weeks one was pretty damned good, <Is it just my or does Adria have a freakishly long neck?
Also, I was really hoping that they'd have gotten away with taking out another Ori ship, ah well, cna't win em' all.>
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Glempius on August 27, 2006, 03:37:49 PM
These past few days I've been watching my way through stargate from the begining, jsut finished season 3. I've found it's rather too addictive
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on August 27, 2006, 05:15:50 PM
Yeah, i've also gone through the seasons. I'm on early season 8 now. :wink:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on August 27, 2006, 05:17:58 PM
I myself am slowly getting there.

Saw Season 7 finale part 1 last saturday, and next week I'll see part 2 and the first ep of Season 8. After that week, they will start on Atlantis!

Though, I'm currently fearing very much that the timeline won't be as good.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on August 28, 2006, 01:04:52 AM
In what way?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on August 28, 2006, 01:40:57 PM
Quote from: Pegasus
In what way?

It may _just_ work out.

I fear that O'Neill hasn't been cured yet for when Atlantis is aired.
And if my sources are correct, O'Neill is in that.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 13, 2006, 11:02:55 PM
2 things that runied stargate for me I'll kepp wtaching till the end tho (not counting the cast cost for a shwoing running for 10 years)

1. RDA Leaving. (Its understandable he wated to be with his family)
2. To much damn funnys and Humor

I just went back i watched season 1-7 on dvd you know what I noticed? More Sereisesness (Parden my spelling 12 in the morning here) I went and watched 8-9 on dvd and it kinds runined the feeling for stargate for me with all thes little jokes, and the acters doing funny things.

Like in one episode of season 9 (3rd last i think) after dainial figures out how to make them visable again he does this "girly" Shurg and tilts his head like it was nothing, think of that times 3 threw out 8 and mostly 9 and 10 .



Also good news!

Quote
MGM has given a green light for the show's creators to produce two direct-to-DVD movies based on SG-1. Executive producer Brad Wright let TV Guide in on the news this week.

"It's the climax of the Ori story line," Wright said of the first film. The movie will tie up the loose ends from the show's tenth season, which is expected to conclude its U.S. television run in June. The film will be written and directed by current SG-1 executive producer and show-runner Robert C. Cooper.


Read more here (http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/10/istargate_sg-1i_movies_coming_to.shtml)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on October 31, 2006, 05:26:56 PM
More good news:
http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/10/deluxe_movie_soundtrack_now_avai.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on November 27, 2006, 09:33:31 PM
SGA Seasons 3.5 is now running somewhere in the world, so for those who don't want to wait for it to be on TV, you know what to do ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Cube on December 01, 2006, 09:44:47 PM
Just watched episode 200. Great episode.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Glempius on December 02, 2006, 05:28:18 AM
The little farscape parody still makes me laugh
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on December 15, 2006, 05:48:41 PM
Well this is good news

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/12/exclusive_third_istargatei_serie.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on December 15, 2006, 07:19:41 PM
Good news indeed. I'm interested to find out what the 3rd series will be about. We know that they are planning on making two SG1 movies: One involving the Ori, and one involving timetravel. I'd like for either the SG1 or Atlantis series to offshoot into this third series and bring over 1 or more familiar face from a past show (O'Neill comes to mind :P).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on December 20, 2006, 09:12:33 PM
So, anyone else check out last weeks episode of Atlantis?

Was a real cool McKay one :)

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on December 21, 2006, 06:30:26 AM
Last week.... i have no clue, don't new episodes start until March?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on December 21, 2006, 08:08:45 AM
Last week.... i have no clue, don't new episodes start until March?
He most likely means in the UK.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on December 21, 2006, 05:47:03 PM
Last week.... i have no clue, don't new episodes start until March?
He most likely means in the UK.

they're still on in canada, Atlantis doesn't take the mid season break, which means episode 16 just aired. And if it's on in Canada, it means it's available bu "other" means ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on December 21, 2006, 05:53:20 PM
Last week.... i have no clue, don't new episodes start until March?
He most likely means in the UK.

they're still on in canada, Atlantis doesn't take the mid season break, which means episode 16 just aired. And if it's on in Canada, it means it's available bu "other" means ;)
Ok, now that's novel, I hadn't considered the possibility that an American show would be further in another country...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on December 22, 2006, 05:26:22 PM
Last week.... i have no clue, don't new episodes start until March?
He most likely means in the UK.

they're still on in canada, Atlantis doesn't take the mid season break, which means episode 16 just aired. And if it's on in Canada, it means it's available bu "other" means ;)
Ok, now that's novel, I hadn't considered the possibility that an American show would be further in another country...

It is filmed in Canada.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on December 22, 2006, 05:27:05 PM
Last week.... i have no clue, don't new episodes start until March?
He most likely means in the UK.

they're still on in canada, Atlantis doesn't take the mid season break, which means episode 16 just aired. And if it's on in Canada, it means it's available bu "other" means ;)
Ok, now that's novel, I hadn't considered the possibility that an American show would be further in another country...

It is filmed in Canada.
But the "owner" is American? Right?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: El on January 20, 2007, 04:16:51 PM
Anyone seen the latest ep of Atlantis? The one with the exploding tumours (seriously).

Can't believe they did that to one of the best characters!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on January 20, 2007, 10:11:50 PM
Saw the episode. Although I heard the actor was leaving the show, I never thought they would actually kill the character off. I thought it would be that they either left the expedtion, or was "lost" on a mission. The writers actually suggested a while back, that the character would remain alive, so that was sort of a shock seeing him/her get killed off like that. Although he/she did get a fitting ending, I grant you that. Fits well with the character.

edited to hide gender of character so as not to give it away.  Pegasus

Edited again cos you missed a bit. El
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on January 24, 2007, 08:49:56 AM
Yeah poor thing... could see it coming just before it happened. It was nice in the final scene, Rodney imagining talking to the departed. :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on January 30, 2007, 12:05:46 PM
yeah, tho that person is suppose to be recurring next season according to gate world, probably flash backs.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on January 30, 2007, 02:55:34 PM
Guy's have you ever thought of Ascension??
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on January 30, 2007, 05:44:43 PM
To ascend, the person would have to actively want to ascend. Since the death of this character happened so suddenly, I doubt he/she had the time to even think about ascension. Granted, it is possible that the character ascended somehow, and thus could come back at a later show if he/she chooses to retake human form.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Master Thief on January 31, 2007, 01:18:47 PM
What?

no

no

how could this happen HOW THE FUCK COULD THIS HAPPEN?




Now how am i supposed to relate to anyone on Atlantis :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on January 31, 2007, 03:40:46 PM
Ya poor fucker.

I just watched the new episodes of SG1 "the Shroud" and SGA "Vangance" and all i ahve to say is wow, great viewing.

Vengance introduces us to some pretty gruesome new enemies.... kinda creepy.

As for The Shroud.... Wow, I think the last time my heart was beating that fasr was for Ressurection Ship in BSG. I could litterally feel it in my chest...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on January 31, 2007, 04:18:06 PM
I WANT TO SEE THESE EPS NOW!!!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on February 05, 2007, 06:05:23 PM
Wooo just got some of season 10 down :D and wow :D :D :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on February 07, 2007, 10:22:40 AM
Any of you seen the Atlantis episode yesterday on Sky One? (I think it was Sky One)They just finished season 3 before the US has even started the second half

are there spoiler tags on this forum?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on February 07, 2007, 03:13:33 PM
Any of you seen the Atlantis episode yesterday on Sky One? (I think it was Sky One)They just finished season 3 before the US has even started the second half

are there spoiler tags on this forum?

No it wasn't SkyOne. It's a tv channel in Canada that's still playing it. SkyOne are only ahead on SG1.
And no there aren't any spoiler tags AFAIK
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on February 08, 2007, 04:15:37 AM
Any news on Atlantis Season Four

I HAVE TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SEASON THREE EPISODE 20!!!!

I must know now  :shock: :shock: :shock:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on February 08, 2007, 11:00:07 AM
Any news on Atlantis Season Four

I HAVE TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SEASON THREE EPISODE 20!!!!

I must know now  :shock: :shock: :shock:

I have a probable idea...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on February 08, 2007, 02:46:01 PM
What what when who where how :D

How could they leave it like that arggghhh nooo I must have season four!!!!!!!!!11!!1!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on February 15, 2007, 02:48:34 PM
Anyone know when SG-Atlantis will come back with season four?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on February 17, 2007, 06:45:47 PM
Anyone know when SG-Atlantis will come back with season four?

Starts in the US in June I think.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on February 18, 2007, 08:27:28 PM
Woot thanks

I know then when to hit the ******* website  :o :o

Edited: Comments/Discussions about how to obtain illegal versions of anything are not allowed. El.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on February 18, 2007, 08:48:57 PM
Woot thanks

I know then when to hit the ******* website spoiler removed

Edited: Comments/Discussions about how to obtain illegal versions of anything are not allowed. El.
Edit: Sorry about that, guess I was too lazy to remove the spoiler section :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on February 19, 2007, 09:27:42 PM
Edited: Comments/Discussions about how to obtain illegal versions of anything are not allowed. El.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on February 20, 2007, 09:12:25 AM
BY time it hits the UK the entire world will have seen it :( besides once it's on dvd box set I always pre-order them online I need a new bookcase for all my ENT,VOY,DS9,TNG dvd sets  :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on February 27, 2007, 06:27:09 PM
BY time it hits the UK the entire world will have seen it :( besides once it's on dvd box set I always pre-order them online I need a new bookcase for all my ENT,VOY,DS9,TNG dvd sets  :lol:

Not really... SG1 is getting it's world premiers on Sky1 at the moment.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on March 07, 2007, 06:21:16 AM
Not really... SG1 is getting it's world premiers on Sky1 at the moment.

Yeah Canada and the UK both have finished seasons of SGA and SG-1 respectively before the US.

I think episode 19 was on last night for SG-1 on Sky1?

That means only 1 more ep to go till the series finale... *cries*

Source: http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/index.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: LJ on March 09, 2007, 11:24:31 AM
Yea I just watched it!  I can't believe it will be the last one!! *cries too*  :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on March 09, 2007, 12:38:03 PM
I just cannot wait for season 4 of Atlantis
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on March 13, 2007, 04:52:56 PM
wtill watching the SG1 finale, really liking the episode :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darran on March 13, 2007, 05:00:26 PM
its all over *sob* my sci-fi fix is rapidly deminishing, i only have atlantis and BSG left, oh well least i got the the dvd movie to look forward to, so its not farewell yet just ttfn
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on March 13, 2007, 06:03:08 PM
its all over *sob* my sci-fi fix is rapidly deminishing, i only have atlantis and BSG left, oh well least i got the the dvd movie to look forward to, so its not farewell yet just ttfn

Get in the know.... there is a new Stargate Series in the works too. Also, try Heroes.

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darran on March 13, 2007, 07:17:04 PM
i did hear something about a new series, and i did see several episodes heroes the other day but my work schedule means i miss episodes and tht just puts me off, i'll wait for the dvd set. but still wont be the same without sg-1, tho i hear carters of to atlantis, funny wudda thought it be jackson tht wud end up there.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on March 13, 2007, 07:29:23 PM
I just cannot wait for season four.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on March 13, 2007, 07:50:30 PM
I just cannot wait for season four.

You already said that....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on March 13, 2007, 07:52:27 PM
You already said that....

And not a crime to restate it is it?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on March 14, 2007, 06:58:00 AM
And not a crime to restate it is it?

No... but it's a crime to say it over and over without adding anything interesting to the thread. This is a no spam thread, which means you can't just say the same thing over and over and over again.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: El on March 15, 2007, 09:18:02 AM
SPOILER WARNING!

Pft, last ep of SG1 would have been better if....
They hadn't killed off the Asgard (wtf!!!, what about Hermiad and Vasiir, not to mentione Thor, plus Atlantis and the new series could probably have used them, they make the ultimate 'get out' clause)
Tried to cram 5 different sub-plots into 45 mins, could have done with half a season or leave some of the sub-plots out.
Done some decent effects for the new Asgard beams on the Odessey, for Ori bashers they looked pretty poor.

Felt rushed, and packed, like doing all your revisioing the night before the exam....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on March 17, 2007, 06:33:28 AM
*Heavy booming voice* JACK IS BACK! */Heavy booming voice*

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2007/03/anderson_confirmed_for_icontinuu.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on April 02, 2007, 03:13:45 PM
13th April

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2007/02/season_four_to_premiere_this_fal.shtml

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on April 12, 2007, 10:34:57 PM
Good news on the Atlantis Front

Carson will be back in Season 4 of Atlantis for 3 episodes, a 2 parter and a single.

http://www.savecarsonbeckett.com/2007/04/09/exclusive-carson-to-resurface-on-atlantis/ (http://www.savecarsonbeckett.com/2007/04/09/exclusive-carson-to-resurface-on-atlantis/)


Quote
Q: Will it be ?our? Carson Beckett or an alternate version?

A: Well, I don?t want to give too much away but I can say it won?t be an AU version of Carson - or a time-hopping Dr. Beckett either.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on April 13, 2007, 07:40:32 AM
Good news on the Atlantis Front

Carson will be back in Season 4 of Atlantis for 3 episodes, a 2 parter and a single.

http://www.savecarsonbeckett.com/2007/04/09/exclusive-carson-to-resurface-on-atlantis/ (http://www.savecarsonbeckett.com/2007/04/09/exclusive-carson-to-resurface-on-atlantis/)



He better not have ascended..... At best it better be a flashback.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on April 13, 2007, 11:18:08 AM
you know he will have. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on April 13, 2007, 12:47:56 PM
If Oma Desala is still around, i'm sure she would have ascended him :P ... Carson was just as much, if not more... a nice guy compared to Daniel Jackson, whom she ascended not once, but twice.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Master Thief on April 13, 2007, 01:44:52 PM
I go to school with his second cousin or some such shit like that :v:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on April 20, 2007, 11:28:18 PM
well those were some big (intelligent) whales...fish...or what ever they were. lol
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on April 21, 2007, 10:31:51 AM
potatoes...yes he has become a mutant potatoe. 
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on May 11, 2007, 03:38:27 PM
Anyone in America getting any updates on Atlantis Season Four yet?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on May 11, 2007, 04:08:26 PM
???

Well the New SG and SGA seasons just started for us hmm 3...4 weeks ago.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on May 12, 2007, 07:52:15 AM
Season Four Atlantis  :shock:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on May 12, 2007, 12:34:40 PM
season 4 oh wait... were in the last half of season 3....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on May 13, 2007, 06:17:12 PM
season 4 oh wait... were in the last half of season 3....

Not me, i'm done with Season 3 ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on May 13, 2007, 08:44:52 PM
Same here, cannot fracking wait for season4 :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 30, 2007, 01:38:11 AM
Update!

Season 4 Starts in the US on the 28th of September (not coming here to Canada first :O) for the Uk October 9th and the Canadian movie network October 1st.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 29, 2007, 12:49:49 AM
Well the new season has started and wow it was good.... next ep seems to be even better.

what did anyone think of the midpoint station??
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on September 29, 2007, 01:25:42 AM
I thought the Midway station looked cool. But it was pretty much what you would expect. A basic "jump off station" where you exit one gate, and enter the other.

Did they ever explain in any past episode how it's possible to have those two gates in such close proximity to one and other, without the wormhole "jumping" to the closest gate by accident? I.e, if Pegasus dialed the Midway "Pegasus" gate, and it jumped to the Midway "Milky Way" gate, they'd end up automatically at the SGC would they not?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on September 29, 2007, 05:19:14 AM
I thought the Midway station looked cool. But it was pretty much what you would expect. A basic "jump off station" where you exit one gate, and enter the other.

Did they ever explain in any past episode how it's possible to have those two gates in such close proximity to one and other, without the wormhole "jumping" to the closest gate by accident? I.e, if Pegasus dialed the Midway "Pegasus" gate, and it jumped to the Midway "Milky Way" gate, they'd end up automatically at the SGC would they not?

Imagine playing spin the puddle jumper...could run bets on which galaxy it would end up in.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Glempius on September 30, 2007, 06:59:14 AM
Part way through the first episode I couldn't help shouting "bring me my...BONE SAW!"

Does this make me a bad person?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on September 30, 2007, 08:52:03 AM
I thought the Midway station looked cool. But it was pretty much what you would expect. A basic "jump off station" where you exit one gate, and enter the other.

Did they ever explain in any past episode how it's possible to have those two gates in such close proximity to one and other, without the wormhole "jumping" to the closest gate by accident? I.e, if Pegasus dialed the Midway "Pegasus" gate, and it jumped to the Midway "Milky Way" gate, they'd end up automatically at the SGC would they not?
Different gate systems.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: LJ on December 17, 2007, 04:41:27 PM
I can't wait to see the Teal'c vs Ronan episode. :mrgreen:  Get your warrior on!! lol
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on January 09, 2008, 09:02:36 PM
My GOD 4x11 was good!!

Spoiler: show
Quote from: McKay and Sheppard; Be All My Sins Remember'd
SHEPPARD: What are you working on, anyway?

McKAY: Well, you'd be surprised to hear that removing a planet from the database is actually a lot of work.

SHEPPARD: I thought you'd be pretty good at that by now.

McKAY (irritated): You really just can't resist bringing up the fact that I once accidentally destroyed a couple of planets, can you?

SHEPPARD: It was an entire solar system.

(Rodney sighs, then offers him the laptop.)

McKAY: You wanna do the honours?

SHEPPARD: No, go ahead.

McKAY: All right. (He looks at the wallscreen showing the Replicator system.) M7R-227, you were a constant pain in the ass. It's good to see you go.

(He presses the Enter key on his laptop. On the screen, the dot designating M7R-227 beeps and flashes, then goes out.)

SHEPPARD: If only that easy in real life.

McKAY: Mmm. Area 51's working on it.


I SOO hope that was a little teaser, and not just a joke!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: CaptainGMAN on January 18, 2008, 01:02:28 PM
My GOD 4x11 was good!!

Spoiler: show
Quote from: McKay and Sheppard; Be All My Sins Remember'd
SHEPPARD: What are you working on, anyway?

McKAY: Well, you'd be surprised to hear that removing a planet from the database is actually a lot of work.

SHEPPARD: I thought you'd be pretty good at that by now.

McKAY (irritated): You really just can't resist bringing up the fact that I once accidentally destroyed a couple of planets, can you?

SHEPPARD: It was an entire solar system.

(Rodney sighs, then offers him the laptop.)

McKAY: You wanna do the honours?

SHEPPARD: No, go ahead.

McKAY: All right. (He looks at the wallscreen showing the Replicator system.) M7R-227, you were a constant pain in the ass. It's good to see you go.

(He presses the Enter key on his laptop. On the screen, the dot designating M7R-227 beeps and flashes, then goes out.)

SHEPPARD: If only that easy in real life.

McKAY: Mmm. Area 51's working on it.


I SOO hope that was a little teaser, and not just a joke!

I loved that one too limey hope there will be a show and not just a joke.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Shinzon on January 22, 2008, 10:07:16 PM
well continuing with the discussion, who's watched episodes 12 and 13 yet? o and did you see episode 11 ending... wow, loved the space battle (yay the daedalus and apollo finally have the asgard upgrades that the odyssey got in sg1)

Especially with episode 13... new relationships afloat (specifically Ronon)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on January 23, 2008, 05:51:39 AM
The space battle was awesome!

I thought that kiss between Ronon and Keller was a long time coming! I like that, in "Quarantine" Zelenka gets to be the hero, and the fact that McKay is stuck in a Botany Lab getting ill!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Shinzon on January 23, 2008, 10:41:23 AM
ya McKay always denying that zelenka is smart

o and what the heck is with zelenka and pigeons
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on January 24, 2008, 08:09:38 AM
Dunno really. Just some quirky thing they wanted to add probably!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Shinzon on February 17, 2008, 01:25:30 PM
Just watched the Teal'c/Ronon episode. They sure do kick butt when they're working together.

Hilarious episode, with just the right amount of action.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on February 18, 2008, 08:30:36 AM
yeah, Teal'c looked funny with the hair.

And it as fun to see those two go one-on-one for an hour and peoples where taking bets.
To bad carter had to brake it off.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Shinzon on February 23, 2008, 01:25:10 PM
wow, last night's episode...  :shock:

looks like the producer wasn't kidding when he said that carson was coming back.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on February 23, 2008, 03:07:59 PM
wow, last night's episode...  :shock:

looks like the producer wasn't kidding when he said that carson was coming back.

yeah that ep was full of twists o.o
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on February 23, 2008, 06:14:58 PM
Anyone think "Michael" gets creepier each appearance? :P

Boggles the mind to think of how this Carson Beckett came to be. They made mention that he was held in a Wraith Prison, and that Carson was forced to help Michael with the retrovirus. Is it possible this Carson is the real one, and the one that died in an explosion was some sort of clone/copy, or hell even a replicator?

Btw Mark: We need a spoiler tag added here. I intentionally made the "spoiler" text really small to the point of being unreadable as a precaution :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Starforce2 on March 07, 2008, 11:37:44 PM
I'm currently watching the 48000 years episode, can someone explain who the hell micheal is? (or what?) I am completely lost on that part.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on March 08, 2008, 12:37:26 AM
hybrid human / wraith
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 08, 2008, 04:32:42 AM
Interesting episode. Thought they resolved the whole timetravel part of the episode a bit too quickly thou. Nevertheless it was pretty cool, and I hope we won't have to wait too long to see the continuation.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on March 08, 2008, 10:15:46 AM
I thought that episode was awesome! Though I do think the being stuck 48,000 years into the future would have been a better cliff hanger.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Brett007 on March 08, 2008, 07:30:48 PM
I'm currently watching the 48000 years episode, can someone explain who the hell micheal is? (or what?) I am completely lost on that part.
Near the end of season 2 they captured a wraith and used a drug becket was working on to turn wraith into humans. The drug worked but he realised who he was and escaped. He reverted into a sort of Half Human/Wraith hybrid. He's been a recurring villian ever since.
And has since removed his need to feed on humans to stay alive.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nalan on March 08, 2008, 08:08:32 PM
Yeah that episode was great. I can't wait for the next season!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on March 09, 2008, 07:55:21 PM
not THAT is how you end a season.

Great episode :) I love these kind of "What if" stories (best description i could think of without giving it away)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nalan on March 25, 2008, 10:04:11 PM
I wish they would do it every friday again soon... I hate that stupid Jericho show being on when I usually have a nice hour every friday of watching a new episode of SG Atlantis. It's been two weeks since they've aired a new Atlantis Episode... I sure hope the next season starts out really awesomely...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Mustang on May 05, 2008, 11:47:58 AM
I just watched Season 1 on DVD. Yes, I'm behind.

I really liked this show! My favorite episodes are "The Storm" and "The Eye". Those were awesome episodes!

Can't wait for more...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on June 14, 2008, 02:14:27 PM
I just watched Season 1 on DVD. Yes, I'm behind.

I really liked this show! My favorite episodes are "The Storm" and "The Eye". Those were awesome episodes!

Can't wait for more...

"KOLYAAAAAAAAAAAA!" Yeah, awesome eps, but, Australia = Slow. We haven't gotten S4 yet... I want to see Sam again!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on June 25, 2008, 04:50:39 PM
Good first episode of Season 5, thank god the void left by BSG has been promptly been filled.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 01, 2008, 04:44:18 PM
Well, due to a lack of Sky around my house I've only seen season 2. I've ordered Season 3 and 4 of Amazon (shocking isn't it?) but am going to have to wait a while coz S4 hasn't come out yet. Damn!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on August 08, 2008, 01:00:15 PM
S5 is good so far 5x04 was excellent.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 09, 2008, 11:59:55 AM
Watched all of S3 now. It's good! Just beginning to watch S4. Flying though space without enough power, a shield only protecting the tower. Don't tell what happens next!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on August 10, 2008, 10:31:40 AM
Watched all of S3 now. It's good! Just beginning to watch S4. Flying though space without enough power, a shield only protecting the tower. Don't tell what happens next!

Everyone dies in the galaxy. :arms:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 10, 2008, 10:46:53 AM
The Last Episode was awesome (Daedalus Variations)

Freaking fine episode. Favourite S5 episode so far.

Also interesting note, Sci-Fi is going to air SGA straight through, no mid season breaks.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Shinzon on August 10, 2008, 12:32:05 PM
YES!!! finally a season with no mid-season breaks!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 10, 2008, 12:59:28 PM
Watched all of S3 now. It's good! Just beginning to watch S4. Flying though space without enough power, a shield only protecting the tower. Don't tell what happens next!

Everyone dies in the galaxy. :arms:

Actually, I think Dr Weir is brought back with nanites but is captured by the Replicators when Mckay, Sheppard and Ronon decide to nick a ZPM from their homeworld since McKay managed to give a puddle jumper hyperdrive capabilities because Atlantis was drifting near the Replicator homeworld. Now Colonel Sam Carter is in command and Ronon nearly flys off with his buddies but he then kills them when he realises they're Wraith Worshippers. Then the psychiatrist dies in a dream caused by Sheppard touching a crystal on a tree which travels in him and gets to others by touch. :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: LJ on August 20, 2008, 06:48:08 PM
What did you reckon to the kicking off of S5?  :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on August 20, 2008, 08:16:34 PM
Bloody awesome! They must have upped the budget this series. In the first 5 episodes there are so many awesome CGI scenes! The awesome 53 second long pre-credit thing. The Deadalus vs Cruiser fight ("Major Marks, please make that ship go away" :lol:). The close up city shots in episode 2. The EXTREME close ups of the Deadalus in episode 4 as well as the dog fights.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 20, 2008, 11:59:10 PM
Guys! It has been cancelled  :(

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2008/08/istargate_atlantisi_will_end_thi.shtml
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6589329.html

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on August 21, 2008, 05:52:53 AM
FFS, at this rate all tv will be is reality shows.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: LJ on August 21, 2008, 09:30:30 AM
I am gutted.  :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on August 21, 2008, 01:21:14 PM
Well, they are going to make movies. And weren't they not already planning a third series during SG1?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on August 21, 2008, 03:13:17 PM
Judging by Continuum, an Atlantis movie will be so awesome! They can put what must be an entire series budget into 2 hours :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on August 21, 2008, 09:08:42 PM
Well, they are going to make movies. And weren't they not already planning a third series during SG1?

Working title is "Stargate Universe". I hope with the cancellation of SGA, that they follow through on their idea to start up another spin-off. Considering the final SGA episode is gonna be a cliffhanger and titled "Enemy at the Gate", and get wrapped up in the SGA movie... it's possible they may use this "enemy" to kick-off the new series. Since they said they'll most likely use either the SG1 movies or SGA to kick-start SG:U
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 22, 2008, 08:19:43 PM
Well, they are going to make movies. And weren't they not already planning a third series during SG1?

Working title is "Stargate Universe". I hope with the cancellation of SGA, that they follow through on their idea to start up another spin-off. Considering the final SGA episode is gonna be a cliffhanger and titled "Enemy at the Gate", and get wrapped up in the SGA movie... it's possible they may use this "enemy" to kick-off the new series. Since they said they'll most likely use either the SG1 movies or SGA to kick-start SG:U

The last episode of Atlantis is not going to be a cliffhanger.

Plus the news series has been green lit by sci-fi and MGM.

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2008/08/istargate_universei_has_a_go.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on August 22, 2008, 10:34:25 PM
The last episode of Atlantis is not going to be a cliffhanger.

Plus the news series has been green lit by sci-fi and MGM.

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2008/08/istargate_universei_has_a_go.shtml

Yes I can read as well... can you?

Quote from: GateWorld
Season Five will go out on a cliffhanger, with "Enemy At the Gate" expected to premiere in January. Expect the first Atlantis movie to wrap up that hanging storyline.

Source: http://www.gateworld.net/news/2008/08/istargate_atlantisi_will_end_thi.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 22, 2008, 11:01:44 PM
The last episode of Atlantis is not going to be a cliffhanger.

Plus the news series has been green lit by sci-fi and MGM.

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2008/08/istargate_universei_has_a_go.shtml

Yes I can read as well... can you?

Quote from: GateWorld
Season Five will go out on a cliffhanger, with "Enemy At the Gate" expected to premiere in January. Expect the first Atlantis movie to wrap up that hanging storyline.
Source: http://www.gateworld.net/news/2008/08/istargate_atlantisi_will_end_thi.shtml


No it isn't.

According to an interview on their site with Brad Wright it isn't.

Plus Joe Mallozzi even said in his blog it isn't.
http://josephmallozzi.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/august-21-2008-all-good-things/


It was an error in Gateworld's article.

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on August 22, 2008, 11:19:15 PM
I apologize in that case. I had not seen the blog post.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on August 23, 2008, 01:58:10 AM
S5?!?!? Crap! I'm so behind! Damn Aussie Scifi channel! Though a new series would be awesome, even if I'll miss Sam.. :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Ryles on August 23, 2008, 05:38:12 AM
Stargate: Voyager, eh?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 23, 2008, 06:59:11 AM
S5?!?!? Crap! I'm so behind! Damn Aussie Scifi channel! Though a new series would be awesome, even if I'll miss Sam.. :(

Hey, up until a cupole of weeks ago, I hadn't seen series 3!  :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on August 23, 2008, 09:56:19 AM
man i'm really behind on my stargate.

and my bsg!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on August 24, 2008, 08:23:33 AM


Well, say goodbye to Atlantis, it's being sh*tcanned at the end of this season :evil:

those f*cking retards don't know how to hold onto a good sci-fi series. W*nkers.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: El on August 24, 2008, 11:36:43 AM
The Sci-fi channel, the only channel that has less and less Sci-fi.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 29, 2008, 08:02:00 AM
Heres something I didn't know.

Jewel Staite (Dr Jennifer Keller) also played the Wraith child (Ellia) in Season 2 Episode 7.

Just a little trivia.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on August 29, 2008, 08:47:11 AM
Christopher Heyerdahl played Halling, Todd the Wraith and the scientist guy in Revisions that Sam convinces to remove The Link.
Paul McGillion played the young Ernest Littlefield in Torment of Tantalus.
Most scenes containing Peter DeLuise (a director who wrote himself into most of his episodes) and Dan Shea (Sgt. Siler and also the stunt coordinator for the show) contained a huge spanner!
Amanda Tapping appeared in an episode of Due South as an Air Force scientist studying UFO's on Earth.
Jonas come from Kelowna on the planet Langara. Lagara is a local golf course used by the producers and Kelowna is the name of a town near where SG-1 was filmed.

And now a trivia question to put to you all:

Name the actors who have appeared in all 10 series of SG-1.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 29, 2008, 08:52:53 AM
OK:


 Amanda Tapping ...? Major Samantha Carter / ... (211 episodes, 1997-2007)

 Christopher Judge ...? Teal'c / ... (211 episodes, 1997-2007)

 Michael Shanks ...? Dr. Daniel Jackson / ... (196 episodes, 1997-2007)

 Richard Dean Anderson ...? Colonel Jack O'Neill / ... (175 episodes, 1997-2007)

 Don S. Davis ...? Major General George Hammond / ... (160 episodes, 1997-2007)
 Gary Jones ...? Sgt. Walter Harriman / ... (108 episodes, 1997-2007)

 Teryl Rothery ...? Dr. Janet Fraiser / ... (75 episodes, 1997-2006)
 Dan Shea ...? Sgt. Siler / ... (43 episodes, 1998-2007)

 Ben Browder ...? Lt. Colonel Cameron Mitchell (40 episodes, 2005-2007)

 Beau Bridges ...? Major General Hank Landry / ... (40 episodes, 2005-2007)

 Claudia Black ...? Vala Mal Doran / ... (29 episodes, 2004-2007)

 Corin Nemec ...? Jonas Quinn (26 episodes, 2002-2004)
 Tony Amendola ...? Master Bra'tac (26 episodes, 1997-2007)

 Carmen Argenziano ...? Selmak / ... (25 episodes, 1998-2005)
 Peter Williams ...? Apophis (20 episodes, 1997-2005)
 Bill Dow ...? Dr. Bill Lee (20 episodes, 2001-2007)
 Eric Breker ...? Colonel Reynolds / ... (16 episodes, 1998-2007)

 Peter DeLuise ...? Airman / ... (16 episodes, 1999-2006)

 Colin Cunningham ...? Major Paul Davis (15 episodes, 1999-2005)

 Cliff Simon ...? Ba'al (15 episodes, 2001-2007)
 Laara Sadiq ...? Technician / ... (14 episodes, 1998-2000)

 Dan Payne ...? Kull Warrior / ... (13 episodes, 2002-2005)
 Martin Christopher ...? Major Marks / ... (12 episodes, 2005-2007)
 Tom McBeath ...? Colonel Harry Maybourne / ... (11 episodes, 1998-2005)

 Ronny Cox ...? Senator Robert Kinsey / ... (11 episodes, 1998-2005)

 David Palffy ...? Anubis / ... (11 episodes, 1999-2004)

 Lexa Doig ...? Dr. Carolyn Lam (11 episodes, 2005-2007)
 Tracy Westerholm ...? SF / ... (10 episodes, 1997-2002)
 Gary Chalk ...? Colonel Chekov (10 episodes, 2001-2006)

 Dion Johnstone ...? Chaka / ... (9 episodes, 1999-2003)

 Daniel Bacon ...? Technician (9 episodes, 1999-2001)
 Vince Crestejo ...? Yu-huang Shang Ti / ... (9 episodes, 1999-2005)

 Alex Zahara ...? Alien #1 / ... (8 episodes, 1998-2003)
 Bill Nikolai ...? Technician Vern Alberts (7 episodes, 2000-2004)

 JR Bourne ...? Lantash / ... (7 episodes, 1998-2006)

 David Hewlett ...? Dr. Rodney McKay (7 episodes, 2001-2007)

 Robert Picardo ...? Richard Woolsey / ... (7 episodes, 2004-2007)
 G. Patrick Currie ...? Fifth / ... (6 episodes, 2002-2004)
 Obi Ndefo ...? Rak'nor (6 episodes, 2000-2005)
 Neil Denis ...? Rya'c (6 episodes, 1997-2004)
 Rob Lee ...? Major Pierce / ... (6 episodes, 2000-2004)
 Peter Flemming ...? Agent Malcolm Barrett (6 episodes, 2001-2007)

 Barclay Hope ...? Colonel Lionel Pendergast (6 episodes, 2004-2006)
 Greg Anderson ...? Administrator / ... (6 episodes, 2001-2007)

 Simone Bailly ...? Ka'lel (6 episodes, 2003-2006)
 Doug Abrahams ...? Prior / ... (6 episodes, 2002-2007)

 Morris Chapdelaine ...? Tenat / ... (6 episodes, 2004-2006)

 Bruce Woloshyn ...? Capt. Gerald E. Jennings / ... (6 episodes, 2001-2007)
 Matthew Glave ...? Colonel Paul Emerson (6 episodes, 2006)
 Anna-Louise Plowman ...? Dr. Sarah Gardner / ... (5 episodes, 2000-2004)
 Jay Acovone ...? Major Charles Kawalsky / ... (5 episodes, 1997-2005)

 Alexis Cruz ...? Skaara / ... (5 episodes, 1997-2003)

 Tobias Mehler ...? Lieutenant Graham Simmons (5 episodes, 1998-2002)
 John de Lancie ...? Colonel Frank Simmons / ... (5 episodes, 2001-2002)
 Steve Bacic ...? Camulus / ... (5 episodes, 2000-2004)
 Steve Makaj ...? Colonel Makepeace (5 episodes, 1997-2000)

 William deVry ...? Aldwin (5 episodes, 1999-2002)

 Michael Adamthwaite ...? Her'ak (5 episodes, 2002-2004)

 Kevan Ohtsji ...? Oshu (5 episodes, 2003-2005)

 Colin Lawrence ...? Major Lawrence / ... (5 episodes, 1997-2002)
 Matthew Walker ...? Merlin / ... (5 episodes, 1998-2007)
 Jeff Judge ...? Aron (5 episodes, 2004-2006)

 Louis Gossett Jr. ...? Gerak (5 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Rob Hayter ...? Sergeant / ... (5 episodes, 2003-2007)

 Chelah Horsdal ...? Lt. Womack (5 episodes, 2004-2006)

 Morena Baccarin ...? Adria (5 episodes, 2006-2007)
 Eric Steinberg ...? Netan (5 episodes, 2006-2007)

 David DeLuise ...? Pete Shanahan (4 episodes, 2004-2005)
 Robert Wisden ...? Lt. Colonel Bert Samuels / ... (4 episodes, 1997-2005)
 Kevin McNulty ...? Dr. Warner (4 episodes, 1997-1999)
 Mark Gibbon ...? M'zel / ... (4 episodes, 1997-2004)
 Douglas Arthurs ...? Heru'ur / ... (4 episodes, 1998-2000)

 Isaac Hayes ...? Tolok / ... (4 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Gillian Barber ...? Ambassador Dreylock / ... (4 episodes, 1998-2004)
 Karen van Blankenstein ...? Nurse (4 episodes, 2001-2003)
 Eric Schneider ...? Dr. McKenzie / ... (4 episodes, 1997-2001)
 Jacquie Janzen ...? Aide / ... (4 episodes, 2000-2003)

 Michael Jonsson ...? F-302 Pilot / ... (4 episodes, 1998-2005)
 Kendall Cross ...? Julia Donovan (4 episodes, 2002-2007)

 Biski Gugushe ...? SF Guard / ... (4 episodes, 1999-2006)
 Herbert Duncanson ...? Douglas Anders / ... (4 episodes, 2001-2006)
 Dion Luther ...? Asgard Council Member / ... (4 episodes, 2001)
 Brian Jensen ...? Freyr / ... (4 episodes, 1997-2002)

 Noah Danby ...? Cha'ra (4 episodes, 2004-2007)
 Geoff Redknap ...? Alien #2 / ... (4 episodes, 1999-2006)

 Gardiner Millar ...? Yat'Yir (4 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Ocean Bloom ...? Female Jaffa / ... (4 episodes, 2000-2005)

 Vanessa Angel ...? Anise / ... (3 episodes, 2000)

 William Devane ...? President Hayes (3 episodes, 2004)
 Suanne Braun ...? Hathor (3 episodes, 1997-1999)

 Willie Garson ...? Martin Lloyd (3 episodes, 2000-2006)

 Vaitiare Bandera ...? Amaunet / ... (3 episodes, 1997-1999)

 Jacqueline Samuda ...? Nirrti (3 episodes, 1999-2003)
 Garwin Sanford ...? Narim (3 episodes, 1998-2001)

 Mitchell Kosterman ...? Colonel Tom Rundell / ... (3 episodes, 1999-2004)
 Marie Stillin ...? High Chancellor Travell (3 episodes, 2000-2001)

 Peter Wingfield ...? Tanith / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2001)
 Vincent Hammond ...? Unas / ... (3 episodes, 1997-2001)

 Gerard Plunkett ...? High Councilor Tuplo / ... (3 episodes, 1997-1998)
 Peter LaCroix ...? Ashrak / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2003)

 Jason Schombing ...? Dr. Robert Rothman (3 episodes, 1999-2000)
 Courtenay J. Stevens ...? Lieutenant Elliot (3 episodes, 2001-2002)
 Ron Halder ...? Cronus (3 episodes, 1999-2001)
 Alessandro Juliani ...? Katep / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2005)

 Frida Betrani ...? Lya (3 episodes, 1997-2000)

 Erick Avari ...? Kasuf (3 episodes, 1998-2001)
 Steven Williams ...? General Vidrine (3 episodes, 2000-2003)

 Jennifer Calvert ...? Ren'al (3 episodes, 2001-2002)

 Michael Kopsa ...? General Kerrigan / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2001)

 Bill Marchant ...? Adrian Conrad / ... (3 episodes, 2001-2002)

 Ingrid Kavelaars ...? Major Erin Gant (3 episodes, 2003-2004)
 Lucas Wolf ...? Jennings (3 episodes, 2004-2005)
 Peter Bryant ...? Hoskins / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2004)
 Mel Harris ...? Oma Desala (3 episodes, 2002-2005)
 Stephen Park ...? Harrid / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2005)

 Christian Bocher ...? Dr. Levant / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2006)
 Russell Ferrier ...? Major Griff / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2001)
 Shawn Reis ...? Jaffa / ... (3 episodes, 1999-2002)

 Finn Michael ...? Councilman #3 / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2003)
 Roger Haskett ...? Doctor / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2001)

 Darryl Scheelar ...? Co-pilot / ... (3 episodes, 1999-2002)

 Kevin Durand ...? Zipacna (3 episodes, 2000-2002)
 Mar Andersons ...? Bob / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2005)
 Andrew Kavadas ...? Zipacna's Jaffa / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2002)

 Torri Higginson ...? Dr. Elizabeth Weir (3 episodes, 2004-2006)

 Matthew Bennett ...? Jarrod Kane / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2006)
 Michael Rogers ...? Col. Richard Kendrick / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2006)

 Peter Kent ...? Kintac / ... (3 episodes, 1999-2007)

 Phillip Mitchell ...? Guy #1 / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2006)
 Jason Calder ...? Alien #1 / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2004)

 Sean Tyson ...? Agent Singer / ... (3 episodes, 2002-2007)
 Brad Kelly ...? Jaffa / ... (3 episodes, 2001-2004)

 John Prowse ...? Col. Pearson / ... (3 episodes, 2004-2006)
 Shawn Stewart ...? Jaffa / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2003)
 John Ulmer ...? Firefighter / ... (3 episodes, 2003-2004)
 Nicholas Harrison ...? Black Knight / ... (3 episodes, 2000-2006)
 Ian Robison ...? Frank / ... (3 episodes, 1998-2007)

 Martin Wood ...? Firefighter / ... (3 episodes, 2003-2006)

 Ed Anders ...? Former Football Player / ... (3 episodes, 2004-2007)

 Ken Kirzinger ...? Jaffa / ... (3 episodes, 2004-2006)
 Tony Todd ...? Lord Haikon (3 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Tim Guinee ...? Tomin (3 episodes, 2006-2007)

 Jolene Blalock ...? Ishta (2 episodes, 2003-2004)

 David McNally ...? Hanno / ... (2 episodes, 1998-1999)

 Andrew Airlie ...? Dr. Carmichael / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2004)

 Christopher Cousins ...? Ambassador Joseph Faxon / ... (2 episodes, 2001)
 Patrick McKenna ...? Jay Felger (2 episodes, 2002-2003)

 Saul Rubinek ...? Emmett Bregman (2 episodes, 2004)
 Elisabeth Rosen ...? Air Force Cadet Jennifer Hailey / ... (2 episodes, 2001)
 Tamsin Kelsey ...? Gairwyn (2 episodes, 1997-1998)
 George Touliatos ...? Pyrus / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2003)

 Brook Susan Parker ...? Drey'auc (2 episodes, 1998-2001)

 Sarah Douglas ...? Garshaw of Belote / ... (2 episodes, 1998)

 Aaron Pearl ...? Lieutenant George S. Hammond / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2004)
 Christopher Kennedy ...? Dr. Larry Murphy (2 episodes, 2002)

 Jessica Steen ...? Dr. Elizabeth Weir (2 episodes, 2004)
 Katie Stuart ...? Cassandra (2 episodes, 1997-1998)
 Jay Brazeau ...? Harlan (2 episodes, 1998-2001)
 Colleen Rennison ...? Ally / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2001)

 Musetta Vander ...? Shan'auc (2 episodes, 2000-2003)
 Dorian Harewood ...? Thoran (2 episodes, 2002)

 Peter Stebbings ...? Malek (2 episodes, 2002)
 John Novak ...? Colonel William Ronson (2 episodes, 2003-2004)

 Kira Clavell ...? Amaterasu (2 episodes, 2004)

 Christina Cox ...? Lieutenant Kershaw / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2002)
 Tom Butler ...? Major General Trofsky (2 episodes, 1999)
 Frank Roman ...? Rafael (2 episodes, 2003)

 Roger R. Cross ...? Captain Conner / ... (2 episodes, 1997-1998)

 Jerry Wasserman ...? Chief Of Staff / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2004)
 Tiffany Lyndall-Knight ...? Evalla / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2003)

 Daryl Shuttleworth ...? Commander Rigar / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2002)
 Robert Lewis ...? Dr. Peter Tanner (2 episodes, 2000-2001)

 James McDaniel ...? General Francis Maynard (2 episodes, 2004)
 David Bloom ...? Scavenger / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2001)
 Stuart O'Connell ...? Marine / ... (2 episodes, 1998-1999)
 Winston Rekert ...? Cordesh (2 episodes, 1998)
 Bob Dawson ...? Bynarr (2 episodes, 1999)
 Kristina Copeland ...? Second / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2002)

 David Kopp ...? Lieutenant Grogan (2 episodes, 2001-2002)

 David Lewis ...? Cameron Balinsky (2 episodes, 2004-2005)
 David Hurtubise ...? Dr. Kleinhouse / ... (2 episodes, 1997-2002)
 Brent Stait ...? Louis Ferretti / ... (2 episodes, 1997-1998)

 Kirby Morrow ...? Militia Man / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2002)

 Robert Duncan ...? Melburn Jackson / ... (2 episodes, 1998-1999)

 Richard de Klerk ...? Dominic / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2001)

 Samantha Ferris ...? Dr. Raully (2 episodes, 1999)

 Link Baker ...? Artok / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2002)

 Richard Leacock ...? Colonel Brogen / ... (2 episodes, 1998-1999)
 Joy Coghill ...? Saroosh / ... (2 episodes, 1998)

 Tobias Slezak ...? Tech Sergeant Dale James (2 episodes, 2004)
 Mark Houghton ...? Ori Prior / ... (2 episodes, 2005)

 April Telek ...? Sallis (2 episodes, 2005)

 Zak Santiago ...? Rogelio (2 episodes, 2003)
 Jill Teed ...? Stacy Monroe / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2006)
 Martin Sims ...? Dol'ok / ... (2 episodes, 2002)

 Christopher Redman ...? Airman Shep Wickenhouse (2 episodes, 2004)
 Michael Tiernan ...? Horus Warrior / ... (2 episodes, 1998)
 Christopher Pierce ...? Bosworth (2 episodes, 2004-2005)
 Adrian Hughes ...? Lieutenant Baker / ... (2 episodes, 1997-2004)

 Michasha Armstrong ...? Shak'l (2 episodes, 1997-1998)
 Rob Fournier ...? Airman Mansfield / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2005)

 Kirsten Williamson ...? Jalen / ... (2 episodes, 2001)
 Peter Kelamis ...? Coyle Boron / ... (2 episodes, 2002-2003)
 Benjamin Easterday ...? Ra's Jaffa Commander (2 episodes, 2005)

 Adam Harrington ...? Goa'uld #2 / ... (2 episodes, 1997-2002)
 Nikki Smook ...? Nictal / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2003)

 Aaron Douglas ...? Jaffa / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2002)

 Adam Baldwin ...? Colonel Dave Dixon (2 episodes, 2004)

 Benita Ha ...? Brooks (2 episodes, 2004)
 Tosca Baggoo ...? Tok'ra Council Woman (2 episodes, 1998)
 Glynis Davies ...? Ambassador Noor / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2003)

 Kyle Cassie ...? Eurondan Soldier / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2002)

 Trevor Jones ...? Alien / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2003)
 Anthony Ulc ...? Mansfield (2 episodes, 2001-2002)

 Aleks Paunovic ...? Shaq'rel (2 episodes, 2002)
 Dmitry Chepovetsky ...? Boris / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2005)
 Raoul Ganeev ...? Lt. Colonel Sergei Evanov / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2003)
 Julius Chapple ...? Senior Airman Simon Wells (2 episodes, 2004)

 Woody Jeffreys ...? Guard / ... (2 episodes, 1998)
 Kimberly Unger ...? Infirmary Nurse / ... (2 episodes, 2003)
 Rik Kiviaho ...? Anubis / ... (2 episodes, 2005)

 Jim Thorburn ...? SF Guard #2 / ... (2 episodes, 1998-1999)

 Kurt Max Runte ...? Col. Kirkland / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2004)

 Mark Pawson ...? Reporter / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2004)

 Victor Favrin ...? Chalo (2 episodes, 2003)
 Johannah Newmarch ...? Sina (2 episodes, 2003)
 Stephen Tibbetts ...? Guard (2 episodes, 1998)

 Eli Gabay ...? Jumar (2 episodes, 1999)
 Wycliff Hartwig ...? Unas / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2003)
 Paul Moniz de Sa ...? Fannis (2 episodes, 2005)
 Tanya Reid ...? Jolinar / ... (2 episodes, 1999)
 Sean Millington ...? Ronac / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2004)

 Kwesi Ameyaw ...? Olokun (2 episodes, 2001-2002)

 Holly Dignard ...? President's Aide (2 episodes, 2004)
 Colleen Winton ...? Dr. Greene / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2004)

 Robert Clarke ...? Science Candidate #3 / ... (2 episodes, 2002-2005)
 Christopher Pearce ...? Senior Airman Jake Bosworth (2 episodes, 2004)
 Christine Kennedy ...? Young Samantha Carter (2 episodes, 1999)
 Igor Morozov ...? Roadblock Soldier / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2004)

 Suleka Mathew ...? Kali (2 episodes, 2001-2002)
 Sean Amsing ...? Tobay (2 episodes, 1997-2003)
 Dillon Moen ...? Charlie O'Neill (2 episodes, 1999)

 Paul Anthony ...? Slave (2 episodes, 2001-2002)

 Scott Owen ...? Sgt. Mackenzie / ... (2 episodes, 2004-2005)
 Penelope Corrin ...? Dr. Lindsay / ... (2 episodes, 2005)
 Simon Hayama ...? Jarren (2 episodes, 2001-2002)

 Natasha Khadr ...? Bastet (2 episodes, 2001-2002)
 Bonnie Kilroe ...? Morrigan (2 episodes, 2001-2002)
 Elizabeth Hoffman ...? Catherine Langford / ... (2 episodes, 1997-1998)

 Robin Mossley ...? Dr. Reimer / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2006)

 Alisen Down ...? Dr. Brightman (2 episodes, 2004)

 Aaron Craven ...? Captain Kyle Rogers / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2007)

 Anne Marie DeLuise ...? Amy Vandenberg / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2007)

 Ty Olsson ...? Col. Barnes / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2005)
 Desiree Zurowski ...? Minister Chaska / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2006)
 David Lovgren ...? Darrel / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2007)

 Kavan Smith ...? Major Evan Lorne (2 episodes, 2003-2007)
 Maury Chaykin ...? Nerus (2 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Kenton Reid ...? Ori Soldier / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2006)

 Thomas Milburn Jr. ...? Hazmat Officer / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2005)

 Adrian Holmes ...? Detective Ryan / ... (2 episodes, 2002-2006)
 Darcy Laurie ...? Cave-Dweller / ... (2 episodes, 1997-2005)
 Dean Paul Gibson ...? Man From Store / ... (2 episodes, 1997-2001)

 Benjamin Ratner ...? Dr. Hutchison / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2006)
 Scott McNeil ...? Kefflin / ... (2 episodes, 2002-2006)

 Sonya Salomaa ...? Athena / ... (2 episodes, 2005-2006)
 Brian Drummond ...? Attendant / ... (2 episodes, 2000-2006)
 Pierre Bernard Jr. ...? Master Sergeant O'Brien / ... (2 episodes, 2004-2006)

 Mike Dopud ...? Colonel Chernovshev / ... (2 episodes, 2005-2007)

 Fulvio Cecere ...? Col. Davidson / ... (2 episodes, 2007)
 Sean Campbell ...? Sergeant / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2006)

 Veena Sood ...? Abydonian Leader / ... (2 episodes, 2003-2006)

 Joey Aresco ...? Mr. Parker / ... (2 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Emy Aneke ...? Baal's Jaffa / ... (2 episodes, 2005)
 Efosa Otuomagie ...? Jaffa / ... (2 episodes, 1999-2004)

 Don Thompson ...? Props Guy / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2006)
 Paul Lazenby ...? Jaffa / ... (2 episodes, 2003-2007)

 Julian Sands ...? Doci / ... (2 episodes, 2005)

 Ivan Cermak ...? Captain Hagman / ... (2 episodes, 2002-2005)
 O. Feoktistov ...? Korolev Pilot / ... (2 episodes, 2002-2006)
 Alistair Abell ...? Jayem Saran / ... (2 episodes, 2005-2007)
 Michelle Comens ...? Television Crew Member / ... (2 episodes, 2001-2006)
 Wojciech Jakubowski ...? Soldier (2 episodes, 2001)
 Tony Morelli ...? Jaffa #7 / ... (2 episodes, 2003-2004)
 Terrance Morris ...? Jaffa / ... (2 episodes, 2003-2004)
 Chris Sayour ...? Jaffa / ... (2 episodes, 2003-2004)
 Joey Shea ...? Girl Riding Bike / ... (2 episodes, 2003-2004)
 Terrance Leigh ...? Abydonian #2 / ... (2 episodes, 2003)
 Ryf Van Rij ...? VP Assistant (2 episodes, 2004)

 Cameron Bright ...? Orlin (2 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Dawn Chubai ...? News Reporter (2 episodes, 2005-2006)

 William B. Davis ...? Damaris (2 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Kurt Evans ...? Col. Johnson (2 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Jarvis W. George ...? Volnek (2 episodes, 2005-2006)

 Jason Winston George ...? Jolan (2 episodes, 2005-2006)
 Dagmar Midcap ...? News Reporter (2 episodes, 2005-2006)
 Steve Archer ...? Ori Commander (2 episodes, 2006-2007)
 Timothy Paul Perez ...? Vashin (2 episodes, 2006-2007)

 Mark Oliver ...? French Representative LaPierre (2 episodes, 2006)
 Tamlyn Tomita ...? Shen Xiaoyi (2 episodes, 2006)

 Bruno Verdoni ... Netan's Lieutenant.

Happy, limey?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on August 29, 2008, 08:55:06 AM
No, as in actors who have appeared at least once in every series.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 29, 2008, 09:07:31 AM
Oh. Too late!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on August 29, 2008, 10:41:02 AM
Ah Atlantis, I'll be sad to see it go.. But what I won't be sad about is meeting David Hewlitt and Michael Shanks! :P I met Joe Flanigan last year, he was awesome, and this was back when S4 was just starting to air.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 29, 2008, 10:46:24 AM
You've already met Sheppard and you're going to meet McKay and Jackson? Not fair! Where are you going to meet them?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 24, 2008, 05:49:13 PM
 :argh: :argh: :argh: :argh: :argh: :argh:

I hate that Atlantis has been cancelled. It really f***ing ticks me off. I have been stuck in hospital for a month and I didn't really want to see that news.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: AndrewJ on September 28, 2008, 04:47:00 PM
You guys thought 5x10 was good, hit the youtube for 5x11 preview..

*mind explodes in sheer awesomeness*
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on September 28, 2008, 04:58:10 PM
Yeah, I saw the 5x11 preview. That that was a nice surprise.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on September 28, 2008, 04:58:22 PM
You guys thought 5x10 was good, hit the youtube for 5x11 preview..

*mind explodes in sheer awesomeness*

Wow, so like... you weren't kidding. Question is if these guys will turn out to be "good guys" or "bad guys". Tune in next week I guess :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 04, 2008, 01:13:16 PM
QUIZ TIME!!!!

What is Sam humming near the beginning of the S8 episode 'Chimera'?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 05, 2008, 01:50:11 AM
QUIZ TIME!!!!

What is Sam humming near the beginning of the S8 episode 'Chimera'?

That's easy... The Stargate theme :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 05, 2008, 06:55:07 AM
Yup. I thought that was a great addition :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 05, 2008, 07:06:28 AM
?!? Okay, I think I need to start buying DVD's instead of waiting for Scifi channel to show them...

As for meeting the guys, I go to the local scifi con. ;) Adam West! :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Pegasus on December 29, 2008, 10:18:49 AM
Hooooooly Sh*t.

Just saw the final 2 episodes of Atlantis Season 5. Hell of a way to send off the series, though the final episode felt rushes. Would have done better with a 90minute screened. C'est la vie....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: LJ on December 29, 2008, 10:26:25 AM
Hooooooly Sh*t.

Just saw the final 2 episodes of Atlantis Season 5. Hell of a way to send off the series, though the final episode felt rushes. Would have done better with a 90minute screened. C'est la vie....

Have they been broadcast in the UK (sky1/2) yet? I can't wait to see them! :mrgreen:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on December 29, 2008, 10:39:46 AM
The penultimate episode is aired in America on the 2nd of Jan, the last episode on the 9th. I would have thought they would be aired over here on the 8th and the 15th.

EDIT: Just watched them :shock: EPIC! Enemy at the Gate felt, as Podge said, rushed. They should have taken out one like Outsiders to make room for a 3 part arc.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on December 30, 2008, 10:48:15 AM
McKay (Sarcasticly): Yes, he probably got a job as a Klingon at Star Trek: The Experience
Woolsey: That shut down.
Zelenka: Really?! Damn, I wanted to see that.

xD
It's lines like that that make Stargate so awesome!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Senator on January 21, 2009, 08:28:06 PM
One a sidenote, did you know that there is a Stargate control console "simulation"?
http://stargateworlds.filefront.com/file/Stargate_Dialing_Simulator;40905

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Starforce2 on March 18, 2009, 06:51:06 PM
I am currently watching an ep where they are stealing multiple stargates from bhal's ship, and one thing that has just hit me...all these fires burning on the ship in those pedistal pans...wouldn't that not overwhealm any filtration systems?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on March 18, 2009, 06:54:19 PM
Can remember the episode, can't remember the fires.
But I would say they did an "Accidental-Phase-Cloak-on-a-person". ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on March 22, 2009, 10:58:31 PM
there is a preview for SGU here:

http://stargate.mgm.com/
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 23, 2009, 09:07:37 AM
Hah, I wonder if there'll be a Full Monty reference.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Senator on March 24, 2009, 07:26:02 PM
So...

What happens if you throw inside a Stargate, the Stargate you just dialed to?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on March 24, 2009, 08:47:24 PM
The Stargate is to big to fit in another. But if possible? Probably Destroy the universe.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on March 26, 2009, 04:42:33 PM
or just destabilize the tunnel and shut it down.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on March 27, 2009, 11:56:50 PM
Well for the first time I got to see "Stargate the arc of truth" thx to scifi.

Not a bad movie imo, ( though the box that was supposed to be the arc seemed kinda cheep )

Next week we have stargate continuum.

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on March 31, 2009, 09:42:41 AM
You know, I think that McKay and Carter have a competition going on.. as in which one of them destroys more solar systems. Then again, Carter did it on purpose, McKay did it accidentally..

Question is, which one of them has the lead at the moment?  I'd say Mckay has  the lead.. first that ancient weapon went haywire and solarsystem went boom, then he nearly destroyed parallel universe with exotic particles, and finally the replicator homeworld blew up.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on April 05, 2009, 01:14:19 PM
I accidentally a whole solar system k?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on April 05, 2009, 02:57:54 PM
and finally the replicator homeworld blew up.

That was a joint effort between McKay and Carter.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on April 17, 2009, 03:17:03 PM
 :) oh fine, a joint effort. McKay still has the lead. then again, didn't carter come up with a way to stop the Ori assault? I can't exactly recall the method..
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on June 07, 2009, 09:53:05 PM
for those who can watch this... a new SGU vid

http://www.scifi.com/universe/video/
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on June 07, 2009, 10:16:45 PM
telfords uniform looks retarded
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on June 07, 2009, 10:27:47 PM
^If we have a smite option, I would have used it for that comment.

Anyway, I like it. Sounds like SGU is going to be a bit like Stargate: Galactica, not that I mind. I liked BSG. :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on June 07, 2009, 10:33:27 PM
^If we have a smite option, I would have used it for that comment.

Anyway, I like it. Sounds like SGU is going to be a bit like Stargate: Galactica, not that I mind. I liked BSG. :D
My thoughts exactly, though I'm kind of perplexed as to how they can make it work, since there are Stargates all over the place (maybe they just can't figure out how to work the DHD? :P).  Maybe their home is destroyed, and they're looking for a new one (though that sounds waaay too familiar).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on June 07, 2009, 10:44:03 PM
no nothing like that...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on June 07, 2009, 11:12:06 PM
The SGU crew end up on a distant ship somewhere in the far reaches of the galaxy. Cut off the Milky Way gate-network (the one which would lead them home), they must ultimately find another means of getting back.

Basically, the ship they end up on is the very same ship which once flew all around the galaxy seeding the stargates on the various planets, and in some cases even in planetary orbits. Will be interesting to see how they pull it off, but i'm not very happy that they cancelled SG:A to make room for the new show.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on June 07, 2009, 11:24:23 PM
I am quite curious to see if there are any gate pieces left over. Would be cool to see how the Tau'ri handle that... Can't wait for this show!  :argh:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on June 08, 2009, 06:23:49 AM
telfords uniform looks retarded

^If we have a smite option, I would have used it for that comment.

He's right though :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on June 08, 2009, 06:58:03 AM
Anybody else really hate Robert Carlyle or is it just me?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on June 08, 2009, 08:42:46 PM
Thanks, Darkthunder, though Nebula explained that to me over MSN pretty much right after I posted.

I don't think SGA was canned to make room for this new show.  I think it was canned because it started sucking really badly and, consequently, it's ratings fell like a rock.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on June 08, 2009, 08:45:50 PM
No that wasn't the reason... From what I heard SGA was canned because of the rising set costs....
SGA's sets were to large to maintain for any longer.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on June 09, 2009, 03:16:06 AM
this new series won't count as official spinoff until they a.) meet proper baddie withe glowing eyes, life munching hands or such b.) destroy a solar system or c.) make fun of star wars, star trek and galaxy quest in single episode. :arms:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on June 09, 2009, 08:24:54 AM
No that wasn't the reason... From what I heard SGA was canned because of the rising set costs....
SGA's sets were to large to maintain for any longer.

That, plus ofcourse the rising salaries for the actors. For every new season, generally the contracts need to be re-negotiated, and each year the salaries tend to go upwards. This was likely Sci-Fi (SyFy)'s way of getting ahead of the contract negotiations and simply cancelling it from the get-go. And thus bringing in cheaper actors for SGU.

I doubt we'll get more than 1 SGA movie, if any.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on June 10, 2009, 10:13:06 PM
Ha!  So they put themselves out of a job by seasonally demanding a pay increase.  Oh, the irony!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on June 11, 2009, 08:27:20 AM
It's fairly common practice in the television industry, that you re-negotiate contracts every so often, which generally leads to a higher or lower salary. But in this case, MGM/Sci-Fi (SyFy) decided to go before the contract negotiations, and cancel the show right away. Bring in a younger, cheaper cast for SGU.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on June 11, 2009, 11:02:51 AM
Returning to the vid Neb posted...I thought it had an almost BSG quality to it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on June 12, 2009, 03:54:42 PM
Quote
The SGU crew end up on a distant ship somewhere in the far reaches of the galaxy. Cut off the Milky Way gate-network (the one which would lead them home), they must ultimately find another means of getting back.

Basically, the ship they end up on is the very same ship which once flew all around the galaxy seeding the stargates on the various planets, and in some cases even in planetary orbits. Will be interesting to see how they pull it off, but i'm not very happy that they cancelled SG:A to make room for the new show.

So.

They're on a ship in a distant place far away from home trying to get back to their home as fast as possible...

This sounds familiar...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on June 12, 2009, 03:58:32 PM
Stargate Voyager. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on June 12, 2009, 04:16:25 PM
Stargate Voyager. :P

Yeah, they could have some Ancient acting as Q, and some replicators for Borgs..  :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on June 12, 2009, 05:19:25 PM
Stargate Voyager. :P

Yeah, they could have some Ancient acting as Q, and some replicators for Borgs..  :P
Oh wait! They did on previous series. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on June 12, 2009, 05:30:35 PM
OH SHI-
Mleo speaks the truth. :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on June 13, 2009, 07:38:26 AM
Indeed.  :)  Hmm.. perhaps they could follow the plot of Star Wreck..  :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on June 15, 2009, 06:23:23 PM
This does beg the question...

Who will be species 8472...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on June 15, 2009, 06:27:08 PM
from what I've heard, they're going to try and have less humanoid species.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on June 30, 2009, 08:27:24 PM
hmm I would think that be expected heh
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 09:32:17 AM
First look at the SGU Gates.... and a virtual tour of the gate room http://stargate.mgm.com/photosynth/index.html

(http://img.trekmovie.com/images/sfs/stargateuniverse-2-large-071809.jpg)
(http://img.trekmovie.com/images/sfs/stargateuniverse-1-large-071809.jpg)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 20, 2009, 09:39:14 AM
They're certainly...different. If anything they look newer than the current SG gates.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 09:40:22 AM
edited my post look up ^
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: NeoKaede on July 20, 2009, 10:33:22 AM
Wow, a dark Gate in a dark room of darkness :lol:

Still, the gate itself looks good, kinda Giger-ish to me.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on July 20, 2009, 10:37:14 AM
I dig the new Address Markers.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 20, 2009, 11:05:00 AM
Why is it wonky though? My expectations from this series have gone up and down a lot, but looking at this, they're starting to slip down a little.
Just have to wait and see though.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 11:12:32 AM
what makes it wonky?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on July 20, 2009, 11:13:16 AM
There's gotta be some good reason. Perhaps the ancients in that corner had bad eyes. But there's no way they'd do it like that without a good reason.

what makes it wonky?

Look at how the Chevrons sit.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 11:16:48 AM
look at the two pics... the Chevrons are slightly off... when the two pics were taken the gate was positioned differently.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 20, 2009, 11:19:20 AM
Hmm. Maybe the chevrons spin around and the glyphs stay still?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 11:24:58 AM
no I don't think that's it...

I think they just didn't put the gate in its proper position yet when they took that second pic...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on July 20, 2009, 11:25:55 AM
Looking at the virtual tour the renders posted here are wrong indeed.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 20, 2009, 03:44:18 PM
The latest trailer showed the whole gate spinning.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 03:49:47 PM
huh you're right... though that might be something special to the ship...



hmm that reminds me... if you look in the virtual tour, on the floor at the base of the gate there is an embedded chevron.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 20, 2009, 03:51:37 PM
So its the chevrons that turn this time. Most interesting,
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 04:04:35 PM
No it's the whole gate that spins to lock the 9th chevron.... that's what I figure now...

The first 7/8 lock the way the Atlantis and SG1 gates did... then this one spins the gate last to lock the extra one.  

here is a pic of that floor chevron...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 20, 2009, 04:26:15 PM
No it's the whole gate that spins to lock the 9th chevron.... that's what I figure now...

The first 7/8 lock the way the Atlantis and SG1 gates did... then this one spins the gate last to lock the extra one. 

To quote Ambassador Spock... Fascinating. It's been confirmed that the 2 hour series pilot, will be aired on October 2nd which guest stars among others Michael Shanks and Amanda Tapping. The 3rd part of the "pilot" will air in the regular timeslot a week later.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on July 20, 2009, 05:59:52 PM
The gate looks strange with the chevrons spinning :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 20, 2009, 06:39:49 PM
The gate looks strange with the chevrons spinning :lol:

"But, it's round... it has to spin. I'm the General. I want it to spin." - Gen. George Hammon (Episode 200)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on July 20, 2009, 10:15:24 PM
"But, it's round... it has to spin. I'm the General. I want it to spin." - Gen. George Hammon (Episode 200)

Indeed! :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 21, 2009, 12:07:23 AM
The gate looks strange with the chevrons spinning :lol:

"But, it's round... it has to spin. I'm the General. I want it to spin." - Gen. George Hammon (Episode 200)

LOL Best ep ever!! :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: NeoKaede on July 21, 2009, 06:51:51 AM
The gate looks strange with the chevrons spinning :lol:

I'm not sure... The first time the chevrons are spinning, but the second time looks like all the Gate is spinning.

Anyway, as long as there's some spinning involved, I'll be happy :mrgreen:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on July 21, 2009, 12:35:41 PM
Hmm if the whole gate has to sping won't that make if difficult to activate the gate manually? Because that was the basis of a lot of episodes right there, especially if it is laying on its side.

Oh well instead of judging this as a new SG show, I'm thinking I'm going to forget everything I know about SG and go into this show fresh, I'm worried they have ruined the franchise by pushing to much of a good thing
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 21, 2009, 12:37:48 PM
Hmm if the whole gate has to sping won't that make if difficult to activate the gate manually? Because that was the basis of a lot of episodes right there, especially if it is laying on its side.

you give the same reason for the Atlantis gate, how the heck do you Manually dial that?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 21, 2009, 12:41:56 PM
Hmm if the whole gate has to sping won't that make if difficult to activate the gate manually? Because that was the basis of a lot of episodes right there, especially if it is laying on its side.

you give the same reason for the Atlantis gate, how the heck do you Manually dial that?

The answer is: You don't.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 21, 2009, 12:54:55 PM
I'm assuming that NONE of these gates ever were "welded" into the floors, and are able to be moved and relocated as needed.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on July 21, 2009, 02:04:29 PM
I'm assuming that NONE of these gates ever were "welded" into the floors, and are able to be moved and relocated as needed.

Yeah, more likely it's just a hatch covering the underside.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 21, 2009, 02:06:51 PM
Thats what I never got: When the Stargate "puddle" forms, anything that gets in the way gets cut off. For example the top of Kawalski's head in series 1. Yet in Atlantis, it never cuts out a hole in the bottom of the floor.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 21, 2009, 02:11:08 PM
Neither do any of the gates partially sunk into the dirt on planets when people enter or leave them. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on July 21, 2009, 02:18:31 PM
It's the unstable vortex that disintegrates. The vortex only forms in the middle but not out on the edges.
That's why the floor don't get disintegrated.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 21, 2009, 02:33:03 PM
What I've never understood is why the iris placed over the gate in SG-1 never disintigrated!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 21, 2009, 02:35:42 PM
The iris was placed 1 mm in front of the vortex in the gate....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 21, 2009, 02:41:23 PM
The iris was placed 1 mm in front of the vortex in the gate....

So?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 21, 2009, 02:44:08 PM
The iris never touches the vortex... that's why it never disintegrates....

It is close enough to prevent objects from exiting the gate and allowing them to reform.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 21, 2009, 02:45:59 PM
But people have been disnitegrated by the wooshey bit. The iris comes online before the wooshey bit appears so yes, why isn't it destroyed?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 21, 2009, 03:07:10 PM
The iris never touches the vortex... that's why it never disintegrates....

It is close enough to prevent objects from exiting the gate and allowing them to reform.

It's close enough to prevent matter from reintegrating, yes, but, as proven by Sokar, high energy things, like the kawoosh, can reintegrate.
Besides, the kawoosh is a vital part of the activation sequence. It can't be magically turned off by a thin sheet of trinium!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 21, 2009, 03:13:33 PM
just checked Gate world...

says the Iris is so close to the gate it stops the kawoosh from forming all together.

my original est was off...

The Iris forms a barrier less than 3 ?m from the Whirlpool.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: MLeo on July 21, 2009, 05:07:08 PM
Perhaps the flushing needs space to form? And it only disintegrates when it actually forms? Meaning the energy (that disintegrates) dissapates before it gets to a level that can disintegrate anything.

There was that episode where O'Neill was stranded on a planet due to a meteorite crash directly onto the gate, and they needed a particle cannon to make room between the debris, so the kawoosh didn't disintegrate the debris infront of it.

Thinking of it, the flushing vortex, in real life, can also be stopped to form if obstructed (while the actual water can flow freely).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 21, 2009, 06:14:59 PM
But people have been disnitegrated by the wooshey bit. The iris comes online before the wooshey bit appears so yes, why isn't it destroyed?

Because by placing the iris 1mm above the event horizon of the wormhole, effectively assumes the gate has been "buried". However this hasn't always been consistent, but when is anything ever 100% consistent from one episode to the next?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 21, 2009, 06:21:13 PM
Because by placing the iris 1mm above the event horizon of the wormhole, effectively assumes the gate has been "buried". However this hasn't always been consistent, but when is anything ever 100% consistent from one episode to the next?

As has been said, its a few micrometers, not millimeters. And if it assumed the gate had been buried, it wouldn't even make a connection.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 21, 2009, 09:04:38 PM
As has been said, its a few micrometers, not millimeters. And if it assumed the gate had been buried, it wouldn't even make a connection.

I was mistaken. You are indeed correct that it usually sits a few micrometers in front of the horizon. Enough to allow the wormhole to form, but not allow matter to reintegrate. Anyone trying to come through the wormhole will be immediately crushed against the iris.

In one episode of SG1, they moved the iris slightly which in effect made the gate appear "buried". I confused the two facts.

http://www.gateworld.net/omnipedia/technology/i/iris.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on July 21, 2009, 11:49:33 PM
There was that episode where O'Neill was stranded on a planet due to a meteorite crash directly onto the gate, and they needed a particle cannon to make room between the debris, so the kawoosh didn't disintegrate the debris infront of it.

Acctually as I remember it, the hot rocks cooled into a very hard "case" the particle beam was used to break the hard rock case so the "whoosh" could clear a big enough room for someone to enter. Maybe the "whoosh can't destroy very hard objects?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on July 22, 2009, 12:02:58 AM
There was that episode where O'Neill was stranded on a planet due to a meteorite crash directly onto the gate, and they needed a particle cannon to make room between the debris, so the kawoosh didn't disintegrate the debris infront of it.

Acctually as I remember it, the hot rocks cooled into a very hard "case" the particle beam was used to break the hard rock case so the "whoosh" could clear a big enough room for someone to enter. Maybe the "whoosh can't destroy very hard objects?

I just checked the episode.
The rocks did form an iris of sorts. The particle cannon was used to create a pocket of superheated gas thus allowing the vortex to form to disintegrate the rocks and create an even larger cavity.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on July 22, 2009, 03:56:13 AM
The splash the wormhole causes when it's activated is actually perfectly safe, provided you can get the entire object within it.

But people have been disnitegrated by the wooshey bit.

Jack has dived into the splash before. At least I think it was Jack. The reason it cuts that guys head off is because it expands and contracts, right? If it popped out and stayed out, then it'd be as safe as the event horizon is after connection, right?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 22, 2009, 05:11:38 AM
The splash the wormhole causes when it's activated is actually perfectly safe, provided you can get the entire object within it.

But people have been disnitegrated by the wooshey bit.

Jack has dived into the splash before. At least I think it was Jack. The reason it cuts that guys head off is because it expands and contracts, right? If it popped out and stayed out, then it'd be as safe as the event horizon is after connection, right?

Not in the slightest :P
Jack has never dived into the kawoosh. Kawalskis head being sliced had nothing to do with the kawoosh. It was placed inside the event horizon when the workhole was shut down.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: NeoKaede on July 22, 2009, 07:28:24 AM
Yeah, the splash always kills organic beings (remember that first season episode when SG1 ended in a prison cavern and those guys were throwing themselves into the vortex to "leave"?). I suppose it's some kind of residual energy that can't cut through hard materials, and that's why burying the gate works.

Jack has never dived into the kawoosh. Kawalskis head being sliced had nothing to do with the kawoosh. It was placed inside the event horizon when the workhole was shut down.

Imagine when someone finds a quarter of a head in some forgotten planet on the other side of the galaxy :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 22, 2009, 08:31:21 AM
It's also been estabilished, that the gate doesn't "transmit" anything until the whole object has passed through the event horizon (SG: Atlantis episode). Thus, I doubt any piece of Kawalsky's head would've ended up on some remote alien planet :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 22, 2009, 09:25:20 AM
It's also been estabilished, that the gate doesn't "transmit" anything until the whole object has passed through the event horizon (SG: Atlantis episode). Thus, I doubt any piece of Kawalsky's head would've ended up on some remote alien planet :P

Ah, but as soon as it is cut off by the closing wormhole, thats is a whole object since it isn't connected anymore.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 22, 2009, 09:39:16 AM
No the head is lost... when one gate shuts down the other gate shuts down....
No time to transmit anything...

Remember that ep when.. was it Tilk?.. who got stuck in the gate... after the sending gate was destroyed??
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: NeoKaede on July 22, 2009, 12:12:17 PM
No the head is lost... when one gate shuts down the other gate shuts down....
No time to transmit anything...

Remember that ep when.. was it Tilk?.. who got stuck in the gate... after the sending gate was destroyed??

Ah, yes. The character was trapped in the pattern buffer ( :lol:) and they had to force the gate to generate an exit hole without an entry one.

What I liked the most was when Carter said the SGC computer had to bypass aronud 400 safety procedures just to generate a hole. Suddenly, every gate failure in the show made sense :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on July 22, 2009, 01:25:24 PM
Yeah, the splash always kills organic beings (remember that first season episode when SG1 ended in a prison cavern and those guys were throwing themselves into the vortex to "leave"?). I suppose it's some kind of residual energy that can't cut through hard materials, and that's why burying the gate works.

No, all objects. Not just organic.
They used the vortex to separate the link between Jackson and Vala with the Ancient intergalactic communicator.
In the prison the shoes didn't disintegrate because they never got caught by the vortex.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Judge King on July 24, 2009, 05:52:23 AM
By the way, here is the new SGU trailer from the San Diego Comic Con.
Link (http://www.gateworld.net/video/newsandfeatures/1248429391.shtml)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on July 24, 2009, 06:22:00 AM
Hmm. Looking at that, it seems that the chevron looking things might not be the actual chevrons. When they show the new gate spinning up, theres another light that goes on.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 24, 2009, 06:36:35 AM
Looks like the spinning lights are just Christmas decorations. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on July 24, 2009, 08:16:09 AM
Were those Goa'uld gliders I saw? Where did they come from?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 24, 2009, 08:24:39 AM
Yeah, those were Death Gliders. Perhaps there's a rebel sect thats got some tech and are using it against the humans? And what about that planet right at the end? I'm assuming its the Icarus base planet but could a self destructing Stargate do that much damage e.g. doing a "Vulcan": Where the whole damn planet explodes.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 24, 2009, 09:24:25 AM
Hmm. Looking at that, it seems that the chevron looking things might not be the actual chevrons. When they show the new gate spinning up, theres another light that goes on.

hmmm... according to the vid the actual chevron for the ship seems to be that circle above the door behind the gate....
It could be a normal gate with normal chevrons on any other planet but this ship must override it somehow.

thinking about it though the camera would have to be at an odd angle... maybe there is another one higher up on that wall....

EDIT: actually you can just see the dark outline of that circle/chevron above the larger one in the pic.
EDIT: indeed it is on the wall also all the other chevrons even the one on the floor light up.
EDIT: edited image.

going back to this img again:
(http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/7749/stargateuniverse2large0.th.jpg) (http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/7749/stargateuniverse2large0.jpg)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Judge King on July 24, 2009, 09:52:42 AM
Yeah, those were Death Gliders. Perhaps there's a rebel sect thats got some tech and are using it against the humans? And what about that planet right at the end? I'm assuming its the Icarus base planet but could a self destructing Stargate do that much damage e.g. doing a "Vulcan": Where the whole damn planet explodes.

It could be that planet destroying weapon that McKay said Area 51 was working on.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 24, 2009, 09:56:03 AM
Yeah probably. :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 24, 2009, 10:05:20 AM
http://www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/comic-con-booth-shows-off-destiny-new-stargate-universe-footage/

this news post basically explains it, plus other footage shown at comic-con.

yes, the Ball at the top of the gate acts like the 7th chevron does on the other gates. It also serves as a MALP I believe.


I just watched the trailer again, it is pretty awesome. I love the Star wars reference. Apparently Dr. Rush is fan of Star Wars (I'm guess it was him that said it by the accent, and that Eli was just explaining)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 24, 2009, 10:13:50 AM
Heh, not bad. Although there inability to spell goes to prove why they renamed to "SyFy". xD
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 24, 2009, 10:15:24 AM
Heh, not bad. Although there inability to spell goes to prove why they renamed to "SyFy". xD

Spelling mistake? where? lol
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 24, 2009, 10:20:49 AM
isosoles = isosceles ??  xD
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 24, 2009, 10:21:06 AM
Yup. Thats the one.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 24, 2009, 10:25:28 AM
Well good thing Gateworld is a fan site and not an official site lol. Though, sometimes it is better then official site.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Ryles on July 24, 2009, 02:49:08 PM
My girlfriend, who hates Star Gate, is at Comicon right now. She's gushing telling me that SGU looks awesome.



I'm not sure if this is a good sign or not.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on July 24, 2009, 03:03:32 PM
It means you can watch a TV show together without fighting each other for the controls. :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 24, 2009, 09:56:09 PM
Here is a higher quality version of the Universe Trailer

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: davies78 on July 25, 2009, 12:54:27 PM
Just loving the look of this series. God i got goosebumps i don't think i can wait another two months. So how long till someone takes on doing that ship for bc. Good luck to whoever takes it on the detail will be a nightmare. But i would love to see it in game :lol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 17, 2009, 02:58:14 PM
Quote
The first season of "SGU: Stargate Universe" will be accompanied by 30 webisodes that will be made available on a weekly basis either on Syfy.com or Stargate.MGM.com. 

Interesting
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on August 17, 2009, 04:44:28 PM
Quote
The first season of "SGU: Stargate Universe" will be accompanied by 30 webisodes that will be made available on a weekly basis either on Syfy.com or Stargate.MGM.com. 

Interesting

F***K!!!! Those kinds of things are never available outside of USA.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on August 17, 2009, 04:49:31 PM
How is something on the internet not available worldwide?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on August 17, 2009, 04:50:34 PM
How is something on the internet not available worldwide?

Easy. Try watching something on BBC's iPlayer.

Fortunately, YouTube will come to the rescue :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 17, 2009, 04:57:13 PM
According to Joe Mallozzi's blog (Writer on SGU, Producer/Writer on SGA) the network says that they will be mad available world wide eventually.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 18, 2009, 10:29:20 AM
That's going to make people happy.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on August 18, 2009, 02:32:00 PM
I'm still waiting on more SG1 moves as well as the SGA movie. Curse them, for cancelling SGA only to bring in SG:90210 (aka SGU).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on August 22, 2009, 08:10:30 PM
To be honest, Atlantis was beginning to... Dry out so to speak. It was becoming more Star Trek: Atlantis seeming as they spent most of their time on ships... I mean the promo shots were even done on the ship sets for season 4! Season 5 was beginning to get it back on track though... The city has so much potential with so much unexplored, it just seemed the writers would rather blow up the wraith sometimes.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on August 22, 2009, 10:08:03 PM
Meh, the characters actually seemed to lose depth as the show went on.  Chock that up to poor writing, along with worse and worse plots.  The universe of Stargate was starting to stagnate with that show, despite having a lot of potential (again, bad writing).  Having a revolving door of leaders didn't help things, either.

Hopefully, SGU will inject some new life into the franchise.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 23, 2009, 08:31:34 AM
I just hate their uniforms! :x
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 23, 2009, 06:09:36 PM
What i think started to kill SG-1 in the last 3 seasons. Was the humor. after RDA started doing less shows, and when he left, they tried to hard to keep his humor in the show. I noticed it. They over did it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Starforce2 on August 27, 2009, 12:21:07 AM
swill SGA lead into SGU? Also, when is SGU schedualed to air?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on August 27, 2009, 12:24:49 AM
some time this fall....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on August 27, 2009, 04:00:06 AM
First SGU episode is due to air on October 2nd. It will have no obvious tie-in to SGA, however both Richard Dean Anderson and Michael Shanks will be guest-starring in the pilot episode. Much like they both did during SGA's pilot.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 27, 2009, 10:34:00 AM
First SGU episode is due to air on October 2nd. It will have no obvious tie-in to SGA, however both Richard Dean Anderson and Michael Shanks will be guest-starring in the pilot episode. Much like they both did during SGA's pilot.

Micheal Shanks will also show up again later this season, and so will RDA and Gary Jones.

Carter is also in the Pilot.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on August 27, 2009, 11:15:09 AM
Carter is also in the Pilot.

Not sure about that one. Says nothing about her being in the SGU pilot either on IMDB.com or Gateworld.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0850102/
http://www.gateworld.net/universe/s1/101.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 27, 2009, 12:55:11 PM
Well the preview at Comic-Con showed Carter in command of the George Hammond. Which I believe is the ship Eli is picked up in.

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/comic-con-booth-shows-off-destiny-new-stargate-universe-footage/2/

Also, since when have the ships in Stargate been referred to with "USS"
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 27, 2009, 01:29:01 PM
On the uniforms of the Odyssey and Apollo crew, it says "USS".
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Ryles on August 27, 2009, 01:34:56 PM
It's very visible in the Season 3 finale of Atlantis. :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on August 27, 2009, 03:18:55 PM
I must admit, I'm getting more excited the more spoilers I hear.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 27, 2009, 03:22:51 PM
On the uniforms of the Odyssey and Apollo crew, it says "USS".

It's very visible in the Season 3 finale of Atlantis. :)

I must be blind.  Haha, some I'm guessing it stands for United States Spaceship of United States Ship.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on August 27, 2009, 03:26:32 PM
It's certainly less of a mouthful than "United States Air Force - <insert name here>". :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on August 27, 2009, 05:41:24 PM
well at least they just say "Earth Ship" when the contact other ships.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on September 04, 2009, 09:24:15 PM
A sneak peak scene from universe has been released.



Looks like Amanda Tapping is in it also...

<3 Major Marks =P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on September 04, 2009, 09:51:34 PM
Looks like Amanda Tapping is in it also...

I knew it :P lol
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 04, 2009, 10:27:25 PM
OMG that looked awesome!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on September 05, 2009, 11:08:14 AM
But I want it now! :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on September 05, 2009, 01:15:25 PM
Now if only we knew why Goa'uld ships were attacking...

<3 Major Marks =P

Yeah. :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on September 05, 2009, 03:49:00 PM
They might be the Lucian (Lucid?) Alliance...

Or things with the Jaffa may have gone to pot XD.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 05, 2009, 07:29:35 PM
Has anyone considered the possibility that it might have been a minor Goa'uld who quickly rose to power due to the lack of major System Lords because of the Tok'ra, Humans, Rebel Jaffa, Replicators and Ori?

Just because the Lucian alliance were a major pain in the a$$ in SG-1 season 10, doesn't mean it is automatically them attacking ICARUS base.

Oh, and I knew Amanda Tapping would get a cameo. It just adds to her awesome level. I wonder what Teal'c does now? He's either gone back to Chulak or is teaching hand-to-hand combat at the SGC.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Ryles on September 05, 2009, 08:50:29 PM
Or, its Teal'c attacking.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on September 05, 2009, 09:31:08 PM
Sweet!  This looks very well done!

I'm eager to learn the back-story to all of this, and of course, where it will go!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on September 06, 2009, 04:23:28 PM
this looks amazing
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on September 07, 2009, 11:11:34 AM
A little bit of news (well its news to me anyway):

The Stargate Atlantis film is to be called "Stargate: Extinction"

More stuffs here: http://www.gateworld.net/movies/05.shtml
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 07, 2009, 01:37:14 PM
Wasn't the Stargate Atlantis movie put on hold indefinatly?

PS: What happened to the emoticons? Theres some different ones here but most of them have vanished when clicking on the [more] tab next to them.  :wtf
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on September 07, 2009, 01:46:18 PM
There's no mention of such a thing. It has already been confirmed that Amanda Tapping and Christopher Heyerdahl will be in the film and that was announced in May, along with the name of the film. Clearly if it was on hold, it isnt anymore.

Edit: For the smileys, look here. (http://bc-central.net/forums/index.php/topic,6351.msg123216.html#new) I would recommend as a fellow member that anything about the smileys should go there to avoid Jimmy's best friend, spam.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on September 19, 2009, 07:17:31 PM
Moar trailaz!

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 19, 2009, 08:37:14 PM
Moar trailaz!

.... you don't just post the youtube code in there... it's supposed to be the whole link.

EDIT: nvm it finally loaded after ages... meh
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on September 19, 2009, 09:10:32 PM
"Reinvent the Wheel"

Not too much please. I like it the way it was. :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 20, 2009, 07:15:38 PM
I wonder what kind of weapons, if any, the Destiny has.

Also, the gate on the Destiny literatly spins and has a DHD that looks like its from BioShock. Would the off-ship SGU gates spin the same way and have the same sort of DHD or do the off-ship SGU gates dial in a completely different manner?

Any ideas?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 20, 2009, 07:33:42 PM
I think it's special to the ship and all off world gates dial the normal way.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on September 20, 2009, 07:47:50 PM
There are no off world DHDs. [Citation needed]  (I can't remember my source, but it was official though)
I know, confusing.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on September 20, 2009, 10:44:29 PM
I think it's special to the ship and all off world gates dial the normal way.
That's what I think, as well.  I don't have any evidence to support this, mind you.  I just think that if the ship is special, it's gate would look special, too (just because that's how it tends to work in showbiz).

That trailer had my first look at the ship from the outside.  Very nice!  And it's called 'Destiny', huh?  Interesting.  I'll bet the new crew gave it that name.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on September 21, 2009, 09:40:45 PM
Well, the off ship gate looks exactly the same as the on ship gate.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 21, 2009, 09:50:09 PM
Yes so do the ones in the SG and SGA galaxies....
BUT... That doesn't mean the gates behave the same.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: candle_86 on September 21, 2009, 10:20:47 PM
hmm does anyone know if universe is going to be rooted, SG-1 i stopped watching after season 6, things just got way to out there at that point for me. Earth FTL ships, super weapons ect. I kinda liked SG-1 and Earth as the guys constantly screwing something up, being under armed and unprepared for there threats, then suddenly they became experts over night on such matters. They went from a minor power to a major power in steller relations and somehow still hid the Stargate from everyone else on Earth, somewhat unbelivable if you ask me. So unlike Atlantis and the last few seasons of SG-1 is Universe more tradtional to the original feel of SG-1 from any news you have read. Or is it like Atlantis just gonna be skipped over by me.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 21, 2009, 11:01:26 PM
You missed a lot and no they weren't experts at everything....
Earth FTL isn't really their FTL... it's reversed engineered from the goa'uld ships.
 
Now about SGU it has a much darker theme and seems to have because of this a BSG feel to the show.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on September 22, 2009, 11:20:33 AM
Earth FTL wasn't even Goa'uld. After awhile, they just gave up and the Asgard gave them hyperspace drive that was good for intergalactic travel.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: candle_86 on September 22, 2009, 12:16:06 PM
You missed a lot and no they weren't experts at everything....
Earth FTL isn't really their FTL... it's reversed engineered from the goa'uld ships.
 
Now about SGU it has a much darker theme and seems to have because of this a BSG feel to the show.

well i tried to watch Atlantis and tried to tune into SG-1 in the later seasons, I just couldnt get into it. My appeal was the fact we where the underdogs and could be conquered any second
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 22, 2009, 03:15:26 PM
we still were... we just got lucky....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on September 22, 2009, 11:17:19 PM
Accutally I think the ring stays in place and the ship spins around it giving the illusion the ring is spinning :funny I dunno, I'm going to wait till the show starts before I start picking on what is borrows, takes, or copies. I never got into SGA like I did for SG1 even thought I thought it was a pretty good show. It just kinda felt like the last season or 2 of SG1 during the whole run of SGA
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 23, 2009, 05:51:22 AM
Accutally I think the ring stays in place and the ship spins around it giving the illusion the ring is spinning :funny

 :wtf
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on October 03, 2009, 01:08:14 AM
OMG that was crazy!!

Can't wait till next week!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 03, 2009, 01:24:27 AM
OMG that was crazy!!

Can't wait till next week!

Agreed! I liked it more then I thought I would.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 03, 2009, 06:14:50 AM
Hurry up and get here Octorber 6th.  :'(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on October 03, 2009, 02:11:25 PM
So, was it any good?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on October 03, 2009, 03:26:50 PM
I'd say so, yea.  This series has a lot of potential.

I still can't shake the feeling that this series is a take-off (or more accurately, an adaptation) of BSG.  But it works with the Stargate universe (no pun intended).  The writers did a good job of making it fit with the established canon.

I like that the ship has a different design aesthetic than Atlantis and other ancient ships and bases.  In my opinion, it's much more in-line with the Milky Way stargate than anything else we've seen that's Ancient.  That's something that I think the set and prop designers sort of went  :eek about when the writers decided the Gou'uld weren't the original gate builders.  If you look at Gou'uld props, ships, weapons, and armor, they share the same design aesthetic as the Milky Way stargates, unlike Atlantis, which has only a couple of simliar details plastered on that appear forced and unnatural.

Anyway, I think this show has potential, and I look forward to watching the next few episodes to see where it goes.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 04, 2009, 01:35:16 AM
I liked it too, but is it me or did the director, art, set design, sound, video, ect ect all work for for BSG before this because this does not feel like Star Gate at all, if feels very much like BSG just by the scene angles, talk, characters, and over all feel. Is it me?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on October 04, 2009, 02:59:59 AM
well, I did watch this, and while the pilot was blatant copy of the first episode of SGA ( with the exception of the communication ability with earth almost right away), I'd say that it has potential.. but I'll be damned if they will have more generic human-shaped "aliens". give us xenomorphs, eight legged freaks, but no more of those bloody medieval villages with hapless farmers betraying the team every bloody time.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on October 04, 2009, 07:18:01 AM
i would have hated to watch this as someone who had never seen stargate before. they had to cram in so much background info
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 04, 2009, 09:23:19 AM
well, I did watch this, and while the pilot was blatant copy of the first episode of SGA ( with the exception of the communication ability with earth almost right away), I'd say that it has potential.. but I'll be damned if they will have more generic human-shaped "aliens". give us xenomorphs, eight legged freaks, but no more of those bloody medieval villages with hapless farmers betraying the team every bloody time.

The producers have said that there will be non-humanoid aliens. Apparently they encounter a life form this season (I think its a good bet there will be, it would be pretty stupid if they didn't)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on October 04, 2009, 10:31:42 AM
and what was up with Hammond's weakness? no kamehameha-asgard beams, no visible firing from railguns, no missiles launched.. it just took pounding like.. dare I say.. Enterprise D?  :evil
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 04, 2009, 12:31:56 PM
well, I did watch this, and while the pilot was blatant copy of the first episode of SGA ( with the exception of the communication ability with earth almost right away), I'd say that it has potential.. but I'll be damned if they will have more generic human-shaped "aliens". give us xenomorphs, eight legged freaks, but no more of those bloody medieval villages with hapless farmers betraying the team every bloody time.

The producers have said that there will be non-humanoid aliens. Apparently they encounter a life form this season (I think its a good bet there will be, it would be pretty stupid if they didn't)

Gee I guess that will make a new SG1 team, gotta have the leader, the smart guy that can't fight, the other smart guy but trained to fight, and the alien to help them, sigh, I was disappointed a little in SGA for following that obvious theme. I wonder if this new alien force will speak english cause we know everyone in the universe speaks english with no explantion I can remember, no universal translators here. Other wise I love stargate, I'm seeing this as a show thats trying to pull itself from the star gate mold unlike SGA that followed the SG1 old. I'm very interested on how this turns out, I think I'm going to be hooked on this show
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on October 04, 2009, 12:48:40 PM
about the english part.. perhaps Samuel L. Jackson went to there before anyone else..

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3664/3488240618_2622e49030.jpg)

"English, MotherF***er, do you speak it?!"
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on October 06, 2009, 07:00:03 PM
Quote
well, I did watch this, and while the pilot was blatant copy of the first episode of SGA ( with the exception of the communication ability with earth almost right away)

Lulwut?

They shared some similar elements, however the premise was entirely different, for starters, quick episode side by side (from what I can remember of both)

SGA
-Start on antarctic outpost
-Sheppard sits on a chair, this leads to the gate address being found or something
-About a year of preparation is finally put into use, people chosen flown in, tonnes of supplies at the ready
-Arrive at Atlantis
-ZOMG POWER LOSS
-Send Sheppard and Sumner through gate with people to find power source
-Meanwhile city rises
-ZOMG WRAITH! Abductions!
-Go back to Atlantis
-Take team to X planet in Jumper
-PEW PEW WRAITH
-WE WON BAI
-End

SGU:
-Start on ship
-flashback
-moar ship
-flashback
-ship stuff, LIFE SUPPORT FAILZ!
-flashback
-stuff about life support, senator bla bla
-Rush revelation
-CHRAGE
-The gate dials weeeeeee
-drop out of FTL
-Dial planet

Yes, both involved going through the gate to a distant place, but SGA was planned out nicely, SGU they had to rush through and had extremely limited supplies...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: NeoKaede on October 07, 2009, 01:35:00 PM
Well, it wasn?t bad.  Your usual pilot episode, showing the new characters and explaining their stories, passed through the BSG-filter: yelling, crying, shouting and lights set at darkness level. Rush looks like a great character (pity he's going to dissappear in the next episodes, very likely after getting Young killed), but the rest are pretty meh. I'll watch it but, right now, Atlantis looked more interesting than this in it's pilot.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on October 09, 2009, 09:17:32 PM
First few mins of this ep answer a few questions about the gate.

Another hit ep imo
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 09, 2009, 10:40:03 PM
its epic so far,

 also official answer on aliens.

Quote
HBMC writes: ?I thought SGU was trying to avoid alien cultures that spoke perfect modern English or were just humans in prosthetics??

Answer: Any aliens originating from any of these new galaxies will be very different from the aliens we?ve encountered in either the Milky Way or Pegasus.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Furyofaseraph on October 10, 2009, 12:21:13 AM
All sci-fi series (most series in general, too) need a season to grow into itself, sometimes two (Riker's Beard-effect). I just saw the premiere tonight. I liked it. I like that they are shifting to a character-driven story instead of a plot-driven. I think it has the potential to be very interesting. Will it be? We'll find out by second season.

I think I like Eli the best. Yes, he's a mini-mackay (though not nearly as annoying) but I think he (and Cloe as well) are going to represent the Everyday-person forced into a dire situation (ie: Xander). I love spontaneous heroes like that.

There isn't a character - thus far - that I don't like. Rush i love to hate - which is perfect for an internal-semi-antagonist. It's refreshing to not have an external antagonist for once - same with the one overseer woman (Min-Li?).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 10, 2009, 06:25:55 AM
All sci-fi series (most series in general, too) need a season to grow into itself, sometimes two (Riker's Beard-effect). I just saw the premiere tonight. I liked it. I like that they are shifting to a character-driven story instead of a plot-driven. I think it has the potential to be very interesting. Will it be? We'll find out by second season.

I think I like Eli the best. Yes, he's a mini-mackay (though not nearly as annoying) but I think he (and Cloe as well) are going to represent the Everyday-person forced into a dire situation (ie: Xander). I love spontaneous heroes like that.

There isn't a character - thus far - that I don't like. Rush i love to hate - which is perfect for an internal-semi-antagonist. It's refreshing to not have an external antagonist for once - same with the one overseer woman (Min-Li?).

(Ming-Na) actually. (Sounds like minger, which is a british way of saying unnattractive, which she isn't. Poor choice for a name though. I blame the parents).

But I pretty much agree with you on your statement. The only thing I don't like about SG:U is the Kino (flying M.A.L.P ball) as it kinda eliminates the 'into the unknown' element that we are mean't to be feeling when SG:U is concerned. Definatly not as stupid as Rodney's 'M.A.L.P. on a stick' though.  :funny
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 10, 2009, 07:07:11 AM
But I pretty much agree with you on your statement. The only thing I don't like about SG:U is the Kino (flying M.A.L.P ball) as it kinda eliminates the 'into the unknown' element that we are mean't to be feeling when SG:U is concerned. Definatly not as stupid as Rodney's 'M.A.L.P. on a stick' though.  :funny

It's still stepping into the unknown. Just stepping knowing whether or not you'll be able to breathe!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: King Class Scout on October 10, 2009, 11:32:36 AM
I got to see a repeat of the SGU pilot last night.  My mother is totally intrigued, and even I'm going Hmm...but, there's one problem.  I won't get to see any of it.  the person who dominates the TV sticks with big movies about nothing at all, watches everything ONCE, and never again, and uses the TV set to sleep by.  and then they have the bearings to complain I'm on the Computer all the time?  there isn't much left in the way of entertainment.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 10, 2009, 01:51:17 PM
I wonder what that pod thing that flew off the ship was at the end. It diffidently didn't match the style of the ship.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on October 10, 2009, 02:49:19 PM
i warmed up to eli in the last episode
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 10, 2009, 03:19:22 PM
I wonder what that pod thing that flew off the ship was at the end. It diffidently didn't match the style of the ship.

I thought it looked like the pod from last weeks episode, that the Senator was in.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 10, 2009, 04:59:21 PM
No, that was at the front of the ship, this came off the side.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 10, 2009, 05:33:09 PM
No, that was at the front of the ship, this came off the side.

I haven't seen episode 3 yet, but from the sound of it, and various screencaps thanks to GateWorld, I think it could be some kind of escape pod. I see 2 possible reasons why it would of been launched:

1. It was damaged like much of the Destiny and simply launched as a result of random malfunctions, further emphasizing that the only chance that Eli and the rest of them have to get home, is with the Destiny herself.

or

2. There was someone or thing onboard the escape pod that we are not mean't to know about yet, which would be a great way to set up for an episode later on in the series.

I'm hoping for the former.  :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 10, 2009, 10:09:46 PM
This is from Joe Mallozzi's blog

Quote
Michael Jones also writes: ?Who or what took the Shuttle that detached from Destiny at the end??

Answer: That wasn?t a shuttle.

I'm thinking maybe its an alien pod/probe of some sort. Also, Joe hinted that the Destiny has been attacked over the Thousands of years its been exploring. Thats why the ship was in such bad shape even when no one was on it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on October 10, 2009, 10:29:06 PM
I like that they are shifting to a character-driven story instead of a plot-driven.
This isn't really a character-driven story.  The whole premise of the show is to get home, just like with Star Trek Voyager.  A true character-driven story would be something like Grey's Anatomy.

It's refreshing to not have an external antagonist for once.
Here here!  Though I'm expecting some external force to slowly make its presence known over the course of the season.

I'll be surprised if they don't introduce one, because while they can keep up what they have right now--the only external threat being their ship falling apart around them--they really can't keep that up indefinitely.  There's so much "magical" technology in the Stargate universe that they're pretty much destined to fully repair the ship.  Being a mechanical engineer, how they manage to repair the ship holds much appeal to me.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 12, 2009, 02:32:00 AM
I wondering if thier just going to keep the ship moving and the series final will be them just getting off the ship in time as it falls apart, just a thought

I'm hoping to see something like voyager where they meet new aliens and such, some hostile some friendly, the hostile ones will fight them for a story arc and off to a new one. Friendlys will help them repair and better understand whats happening

They have shown the building of relationships between characters in the commercials, so I'm seeing this will be a heavily character driven plot
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 12, 2009, 07:47:58 AM
http://www.gateworld.net/gallery/albums/uni_season1/103-AirPart3/screencaps/sgu_103_1412.jpg

http://www.gateworld.net/gallery/albums/uni_season1/103-AirPart3/screencaps/sgu_103_1405.jpg (Bottom left corner)

That pod diffidently isn't of Alteran design.

Side note, gateworld has HD (720) screen captures of the three parts of Air

http://www.gateworld.net/gallery/index.php?cat=57
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on October 12, 2009, 09:16:48 PM
Wow.  Nice find!  Yea, that pod is definitely not of Ancient design.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 13, 2009, 07:34:49 PM
If had to guess, I'd say that pod looks distinctly Asgard-esque.  :D

Anyway, does anyone know why 'Air' parts 1, 2 and 3 are not avaliable for HD download in the UK iTunes store? I really want to see some HD Stargate for a change.  :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: King Class Scout on October 13, 2009, 09:54:21 PM
If had to guess, I'd say that pod looks distinctly Asgard-esque.  :D

Anyway, does anyone know why 'Air' parts 1, 2 and 3 are not avaliable for HD download in the UK iTunes store? I really want to see some HD Stargate for a change.  :D

Conversion to HD PAL format probably isn't easy.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 14, 2009, 06:37:37 PM
We don't get it in HD here in Canada either on iTunes.. Well not last week anyways. I'll check later.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 15, 2009, 11:02:49 AM
Bring on Ep 4, I'm hooked!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 15, 2009, 11:04:10 AM
Bring on Ep 4, I'm hooked!

Yeah, my initial misgiving have so far proved erroneous.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 15, 2009, 11:07:36 AM
Keno's.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 15, 2009, 04:04:26 PM
Keno's.

Kino

Still don't like them. Everything else about the show is great.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on October 16, 2009, 10:08:45 PM
well this SGU is on a roll!!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on October 17, 2009, 10:25:12 PM
If had to guess, I'd say that pod looks distinctly Asgard-esque.  :D
Looks a lot like Wraith tech to me, though I'd be very surprised if that were the case.


Keno's.

Kino

Still don't like them. Everything else about the show is great.
Really?  I like them!  They're cute.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 20, 2009, 07:39:21 PM
Haven't watched 'Darkness' (SGU season 1, ep. 4) yet so forgive me if this has by any chance, been addressed in the episode, but I saw in a few pictures that some of the Ancient controls have labels next to them with their english translations, placed there by the people currently trapped on-board the Destiny.

My question relates to the communication stones. What is the range on them? Also, everytime they are used on the Destiny, the user seems to occupy whoever is in that room in the Pentagon just like what happened with Daniel Jackson and Vala Mal Doran in 'Avalon Pt. 2' (SG1 season 9, ep. 2) and then again with Jennifer Keller and Neeva Casol in 'Identiity' (SGA season 5, ep. 18).

To further stretch the point, why doesn't someone use a communication stone to connect to whoever is in that room at the Pentagon at the time, get the person who is using the stone to get Daniel Jackson to the Pentagon, then re-establish contact when Daniel is sitting in that room at the Pentagon, transporting Daniels consciousness to the Destiny so that he could do some translating and help the crew?

I know, series wise, Cooper and Wright don't really want lengthy crossovers into SGU, but, character wise, it would be pretty stupid for the people trapped on the Destiny to not at least try.

lol, tired fingers.  :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 20, 2009, 08:58:06 PM
There has been no estabilished distance limit to the communication stones. One could assume it can atleast traverse the distance of multiple galaxies (as seen from the Destiny's starchart of it's travel from the Milky Way galaxy).

Granted you have a point: Just get Carter, McKay and Daniel in the Pentagon, connect 3 stones from the Destiny to the Pentagon, and wham... got the 3 best scientists (incl Daniel) working on fixing the Destiny, translating all the ancient text and so on and so forth. But that would be too easy, wouldn't it?

I have no doubt one or more of them will appear on the show at some point. IMDB lists 4 entries on Michael Shanks for appearing in SGU, and he has thus far only appeared (briefly) in the first two episodes. Richard Dean Anderson also has atleast 3 more appearances on SGU according to IMDB.

One thing confused me about the pilot episode... We know Rush used the communication stones to "link" with Dr Lee back at the Pentagon (Why Lee is at the Pentagon now, instead of the SGC I dunno)... But, why didn't we see "Lee" walking around on the Destiny after Rush linked with him?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 20, 2009, 09:34:23 PM
There has been no estabilished distance limit to the communication stones. One could assume it can atleast traverse the distance of multiple galaxies (as seen from the Destiny's starchart of it's travel from the Milky Way galaxy).

Granted you have a point: Just get Carter, McKay and Daniel in the Pentagon, connect 3 stones from the Destiny to the Pentagon, and wham... got the 3 best scientists (incl Daniel) working on fixing the Destiny, translating all the ancient text and so on and so forth. But that would be too easy, wouldn't it?

I have no doubt one or more of them will appear on the show at some point. IMDB lists 4 entries on Michael Shanks for appearing in SGU, and he has thus far only appeared (briefly) in the first two episodes. Richard Dean Anderson also has atleast 3 more appearances on SGU according to IMDB.

One thing confused me about the pilot episode... We know Rush used the communication stones to "link" with Dr Lee back at the Pentagon (Why Lee is at the Pentagon now, instead of the SGC I dunno)... But, why didn't we see "Lee" walking around on the Destiny after Rush linked with him?

Considering that we don't even know how long Rush was 'linked' to Lee, its quite possible that Lee was just waiting for the link to be broken. Meaning, his level of interaction on-board the Destiny while linked, wouldn't have been very high. Maybe he was in shock by the fact that he had just switched bodies with someone on-board an Ancient ship half a universe away, lol.

I know that Lee knows how the stones work, but knowing how they work, and actually experiencing it first hand would, I imagine, be a little creepy at first.

I also have a possible theory why the SGC isn't in SGU. Because the SGC was located under N.O.R.A.D., and since SGU is set in 2009 (so we assume), and N.O.R.A.D. has supposdly closed down (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/28/AR2006072801617.html), it could've been written into SGU that the SGC closed down along with N.O.R.A.D. in Cheyenne Mountain, there-by meaning that all stargate-related operations would've been moved to the next highest level facility in the US, being the Pentagon since Area 51 wass kamikazed by a couple of Wraith darts in 'Enemy At The Gate' (SGA, season 5, ep. 20).

Area 51 would've otherwise been a perfect place for the SGC if it hadn't been severly comprimised.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 20, 2009, 11:34:33 PM
Another idea could be that Atlantis is still on Earth (perhaps permanently). Thereby not having a need for 2 stargates (since one would always be primary), perhaps the SGC was closed down, and the IOA elected to make the Atlantis base the new base of operations for all things related to the Stargate. General O'Neill as far as I know is still in charge of Homeworld Security (unofficial name ofcourse), and this department is likely housed at the Pentagon.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 21, 2009, 06:11:17 AM
Another idea could be that Atlantis is still on Earth (perhaps permanently). Thereby not having a need for 2 stargates (since one would always be primary), perhaps the SGC was closed down, and the IOA elected to make the Atlantis base the new base of operations for all things related to the Stargate. General O'Neill as far as I know is still in charge of Homeworld Security (unofficial name ofcourse), and this department is likely housed at the Pentagon.

One could argue though, that Atlantis would have to be permanently cloaked for this to make sense. It did land failrly close near the Golden Gate Bridge so it would be hard to otherwise miss it.

Its more likely that all stargate-related operations are based at the Pentagon. Maybe even Earths stargate is there somewhere. It would be good for plausible deniability.

There are 2 things, maybe 3, that could have happened with Atlantis:

1. It is still floating near San Fransisco, while cloaked.

2. Somehow, power was restored for a limited time, enableing someone to be able to fly Atlantis somewhere temporally, possibly the moon, with its shields up, untill full power can be restored in order to send it back to the Pegasus Galaxy.

or

3. Full power was somehow restored already and the 'wormhole drive (SG translation of Deus Ex Machina, lol  :funny )' was used to send Atlantis back to Pegasus quickly.

Point is, it makes more sense to have all stargate-related operations continue from the Pentagon.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 21, 2009, 06:30:09 AM
Or perhaps the SGC set was dismantled and they simply decided to use the Pentagon instead :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 21, 2009, 06:31:58 AM
Or perhaps the SGC set was dismantled and they simply decided to use the Pentagon instead :P

Were being geeks here. Let us have our moment, lol.  :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 21, 2009, 06:33:26 AM
The SGC Set is still standing I believe, its still dressed as Icarus base though.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 26, 2009, 02:39:01 PM
I think Light was a damn good episode, I think Rush is putting on a "I know everything" face when he really doesn't I think he expected Destiny to do something, but I don't think we sure till it acctually happened. I kinda like the who Cloe love triangle side plot, eventhough I'm not a big fan of love triangle stuff in scifi, but I'm keeping a open mind to it all. I find it funny Matt is off screw the dark curly hair woman in the begining, and not a few days later is having sex with Cloe for some reason. I see this is a show that I'm going to have to watch every episode in order so I don't get lost like I did is BSG. Thank god for internet episode
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: ACES_HIGH on October 27, 2009, 03:23:03 AM
The SGC Set is still standing I believe, its still dressed as Icarus base though.

yeah, last I heard, both the SGC and Atlantis are still standing, pending more movies, of course the SGC is remaining redressed for the time being, because the next movie planned is an Atlantis one, of course the movies are on hold until the economy picks back up.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on October 27, 2009, 06:47:53 AM
There is an SG1 one planned too...

RDA apparently said that he's going to get 'fitter' for it...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 27, 2009, 08:14:22 AM
Now all we need is for the show to get it's chance, and not get axed.  :mad
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 27, 2009, 08:45:09 AM
I love the concept of SGU, but realistically, I don't see it lasting more than 2 seasons.

With the only mission being 'survival', plus the lack of a constant 'bad guy', its not looking like it will last very long, which is a damn shame.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 27, 2009, 08:52:14 AM
I love the concept of SGU, but realistically, I don't see it lasting more than 2 seasons.

With the only mission being 'survival', plus the lack of a constant 'bad guy', its not looking like it will last very long, which is a damn shame.

It all depends on the hipsters who can be bothered to turn on the TV. If it makes them roll over, it will last, if it doesn't, then...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on October 27, 2009, 10:22:54 AM
Quote
I love the concept of SGU, but realistically, I don't see it lasting more than 2 seasons.

With the only mission being 'survival', plus the lack of a constant 'bad guy', its not looking like it will last very long, which is a damn shame.

Doctor Who, Star Trek Voyager.

Both based solely upon survival (though Doctor Who to a lesser extent) and don't have constant bad guys (although they do have recurring ones)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 28, 2009, 12:36:27 AM
Voyager was nice because every season there were new enemys, not the same ones with just "new" evil plans

I think the Pod leaving Destiny goes to show they might have a enemy to look forward too. Obviously the repicators could be come back, because who says they destoyed? They seem to be in every galaxy so why not?. I'm hoping for the no humanoid aliens, heck non humans would be nice for a change
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: King Class Scout on October 28, 2009, 09:32:20 AM
like prime said, it depends on what the viewers react to.  it also depends on what the executives say and do.  their may also be executive meddling.  I'm surprised anything got done in this budget crunch.

and, sorry to say, CG is still expensive as crap.  don't count on non rubber forehead aliens.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 28, 2009, 09:43:48 AM
and, sorry to say, CG is still expensive as crap.  don't count on non rubber forehead aliens.

Actually, in an interview with one of the cast members, they said that the only aliens in series 1 are CG.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 30, 2009, 10:05:24 AM
Just saw what would be last week's episode for you guys, and I can't believe I didn't see Destiny being solar-powered. So, after much forehead slapping and facepalming, it was an awesome episode. What's the deal with the next one? The ad hinted at it being some kind of airborn virus?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on October 30, 2009, 08:20:26 PM
I'm thinking seeming as the episodes name is 'water'  it might have something to do with the 'water' creature from episode 3.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 30, 2009, 08:26:27 PM
As far as I know, its about a dangerous mission to replenish their water supplies on an ice planet.
Also, that "water" creature was actually a sand creature :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 30, 2009, 08:28:39 PM
The Preview for "Water" here in Canada, showed the 'sand swirl' from Air 3.

Also the EV Suits they're going to use are the same suits the Asgard used in Atlantis, only with different helmets Gate world had HD Screencaps of one of the SGU trailers that showed them.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on October 30, 2009, 10:01:18 PM
yup saw that too for the previews here.... oh and the ep was very good :D
next weeks ep looks just as good.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 30, 2009, 10:14:29 PM
Just started here, we get it an hour after Sci-Fi. But we get Sanctuary an hour before.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 01, 2009, 08:32:01 AM
Water was an awesome episode, for sure. and that glare between Young and Rush... I sense a Street Fighter re-enactment.

EDIT: Necrons made Destiny, not Alterans.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on November 01, 2009, 09:16:46 AM
One gripe I have with the episode. They said the planet was at -47 degrees, yet Young's UMP worked fine!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on November 02, 2009, 08:35:07 AM
Just watched it. The overall episode was good. Not as Great as 'Light' but still way up there.

Anyone else feel that 'SGT. Spencer' is basically going to turn out to be the 'Col. Maybourne' of SGU?

The CGI effects of the ice planet and off-ship gate were not that great to be honest.

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 02, 2009, 08:52:24 AM
After watching the latest episode, I can think of a half-dozen or so people that I think should get "offed" due to "unusual circumstances". Sgt. Spencer being a prime candidate for this, and a few of the civilians.

Not a huge fan of the whole "Lt. Scott is always in jeopardy" plot they have going, and that he's basically making out with anyone of the opposite gender. Atleast on 2 occasions he's neglected his duties (turned off radio), while screwing around with a woman (unknown chick on Icarus Planet, Chloe in this episode).

Rush and Young need to have a genuine "heart to heart" and try and work out their differences. Last week they seemed to have gotten better along, then Young suspected Rush knew the ship would survive all along, and in this episode they are back to the pilot episode behaviour.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 02, 2009, 09:01:03 AM
Rush needs a lot of work XD
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 02, 2009, 09:24:47 AM
Rush needs a lot of work XD

Indeed xD
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on November 02, 2009, 10:08:08 AM
(unknown chick on Icarus Planet, Chloe in this episode).

Not unknown. 'Twas Lt James (the one who Riley was trying to spy on with the Kino, and who pulled Eli away while Chloe was showering).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on November 03, 2009, 09:46:53 PM
Ahh.  Thanks, Limey.  That had been bugging me!

As for Rush, I was really off-put by the end of 'Light', where we are supposed to believe that Rush might have actually known what would happen.  That's ridiculous, in my opinion.  Had he known, he would have kept the rest of the crew from launching the shuttle.  I just found that to be bad writing--trying to force drama into a situation when it's totally unnatural.

I hope that Rush's character evolves.  When he compliments Eli* he seems like a really sweet guy (I imagine the actor is in real life).  I want to see more of that, and to see him warm up to those around him.  At the very least, I want to see the crew start to respect him more.

*He complimented him twice: when Eli launched the Kino from the shuttle airlock, giving Rush a view of Destiny from the outside, and when Eli came up with the "hoverboard" of Kinos.

It's still a good show, though, and I'll keep watching for the foreseeable future.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 03, 2009, 11:15:43 PM
He also put Eli down a bit in the latest episode, where Eli was talking a bit too much. "You need to learn when to shut up"

Although, I agree completely with Rush in that instance. Eli was doing mothing more than aggrivating the situation. Theres nothing that Col. Young could've done to help get rid of the "bugs", so there was no need for Young to even know about what was happening onboard ship.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 04, 2009, 02:29:22 AM
Well, Rush hasn't exactly been up front about everything, and seeing as he's their Daniel Jackson, he's the only one with enough knowledge to get things done (Granted reading ancient is impressive, but this guy knows how to operate Ancient Tech, and he never got a guest spot on SG1!).

Him and Young have that natural dislike for each other, so I am guessing we'll see them almost get along, and then some tiny thing will start it off again.

To Phaser: Rush seems quite greedy, and we know that he's only interested in Destiny, not the survivors. Less people means less resources and rations used, unless of course, a swarm of reproducing, superintelligent bugs weasel through an active wormhole and get thirsty. In short, Rush would suffer no remorse from people leaving by their own will. Besides, perhaps he just wanted to watch Destiny as she burnt up. I personally think that'd be a pretty epic way to die... On a space ship thousands and thousands of years old, careening into a sun, with your favourite song on your MP3 player.

Personally I don't hate any of the characters (yet), Scott is a little annoying, which is weird, I figured Eli would've driven me out of my skull, but he's growing on me, despite his supermoral "omg u lie". I find Greer is a pretty neat character, the ability to hold a straight face no matter what he's saying and the constant tone of his voice makes him seem unpredictable. Rush and Young take the cake though, they argue so well. :P

I agree with Darkthunder, too. Eli was just making it worse. All of that information could've waited until they had managed to get the bugs to the gate, or gotten them close. Or even after they'd gotten back and WEREN'T WASTING PRECIOUS MINUTES OF AIR.  :mad

Bring on the next episode!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on November 04, 2009, 12:15:35 PM
I like Eli's realistic moral outrage at the situation. As computer nerds and Stargate/Star Trek fans, we're pretty conditioned to expect whiter-than-white behaviour from our military chums. Eli being one of us means that reaction rang true for me.

Young's suspicion of Rush makes no sense whatsoever, as you said, Phaser. I find Scott very annoying for myriad reasons. Was anyone else blindsided by Scott and Chloe getting it on all of a sudden in Light? Where did that relationship come from?

I for one found Light very predictable, in plot terms. As soon as Darkness closed out (after that stunning aerobreaking maneuver - wow!) I knew the ship was going to save them by recharging from the sun. What I didn't expect was for the ship to dive in. That was pretty absurd. Are we expected to believe that the Alterans had shielding and hull technology that could stand up to direct contact with a star hundreds of thousands of years ago?!

It kinda makes Atlantis look like an economised construction job! Most of the crises the Atlantis expedition faced were related to shield failures, hull breaches and power constraints, even when they had all three ZPMs!

What makes it worse is that this seems to be one of the mechanics of the show - every time they're low on power, just take a jaunt into a star, and presto!

The shuttle rescue was unnecesary. It was clearly there to fill airtime, and the slingshot maneuver around the planet was so unlikely and mental.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 04, 2009, 12:47:20 PM
Quote
Are we expected to believe that the Alterans had shielding and hull technology that could stand up to direct contact with a star hundreds of thousands of years ago?!

I think we are... After all Atlantis is actually older (EXTREMELY SO) than Destiny... ( I still think the time-line is a little wacked though...)

about the shuttle.
I guess I'm the only one who found a reason for the shuttle launch.....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Barihawk on November 04, 2009, 12:52:25 PM
Different shuttle, though. The mystery shuttle launched while they were in hyperspace.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 04, 2009, 01:00:04 PM
That's not the shuttle were talking about....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 04, 2009, 02:35:33 PM
Quote
Are we expected to believe that the Alterans had shielding and hull technology that could stand up to direct contact with a star hundreds of thousands of years ago?!

I think we are... After all Atlantis is actually older (EXTREMELY SO) than Destiny... ( I still think the time-line is a little wacked though...)

about the shuttle.
I guess I'm the only one who found a reason for the shuttle launch.....

Its funny someone in the show mention if they need the genetic therapy for the atlantian gene and rush said no because the ship predates that technology.

They again its a show and plots are made for they reason
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on November 04, 2009, 05:38:01 PM
I thought Destiny was older than Atlantis?

Considering Atlantis was abandoned 10,000 years ago.

And to quote Rush in the pilot

"It was launched, hundreds of thousands of years ago"
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on November 04, 2009, 08:53:59 PM
Wow, Rush is a jerk, but a cool jerk. Am I the only one who really likes his character?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 04, 2009, 08:57:56 PM
Wow, Rush is a jerk, but a cool jerk. Am I the only one who really likes his character?

Nope. I like him too. He's a lot of work :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 06, 2009, 06:47:27 AM
Rush is awesome. Partly because it's Carlyle and partly because I just like the character. :lol: How long until episode 7 airs over there?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on November 06, 2009, 07:41:08 AM
Rush is awesome. Partly because it's Carlyle and partly because I just like the character. :lol: How long until episode 7 airs over there?

You mean in the States? Should be on 9pm tonight on SyFy.

I've heard of a new release of the feature film on Blu-ray but its only getting released in the States. VLC player can play imported DVDs if your drive has been locked on a region after using up the 5 chances you have to change it. Would it be able to play imported Blu-Ray discs aswell?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: captain_obvious on November 06, 2009, 05:08:04 PM
Wow, Rush is a jerk, but a cool jerk. Am I the only one who really likes his character?

Nope. I like him too. He's a lot of work :P

I think he's Greg House, stargate style.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Barihawk on November 06, 2009, 10:07:32 PM
I thought Colonel Telford was an ass this entire episode. Especially in the last six minutes of the episode. And then in the final seconds, he hit ultimate asshole status.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 07, 2009, 12:06:15 AM
I thought that was a great episode, plus we got to see Destiny fire its weapons, I hope the SG modders took notes lol. I like the Eli character is going beyond comic relief like I thought he was going to be. Rush is also turning into a hell of a character, hes very cunning, and he always seems to be several steps ahead of everyone, but I get the feeling he isn't, hes just very very quick thinking. Over all I thought this was a great episode
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on November 07, 2009, 07:44:27 AM
great episode. about 100x better than last weeks.

what the hell is telford up to?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 07, 2009, 09:09:07 AM
great episode. about 100x better than last weeks.

what the hell is telford up to?

Agreed.

Regarding Telford, his reason for confining Greer to the brig, is because something happened between them in the past which resulted in Greer "punching Telfords lights out". His other behaviour while on Destiny, is primarily caused by influence from the IOA, and orders from General O'Neill. Didn't really like how they portrayed O'Neill in this episode. He knows more than anyone, that sometimes you need to "bend" rules and orders in order to get things done.

As usual, anytime the IOA gets involved, things immediately go from bad to worse. What happened in this episode is just the latest incident.

Anyone notice the apparent new name for the SGC? "Homeworld Command Center"

No word whatsoever on what exactly happened to the SGC under Cheyenne Mountain, and no word yet on if Atlantis is still cloaked outside of San Fransisco, or if it returned to the Pegasus galaxy.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on November 07, 2009, 10:21:35 AM
They're probably waiting for the SGA and SG1 direct to DVD movies to reveal what happened to the SGC and Atlantis.

As for Telford, I have a feeling he might be about to 'abuse' his knowledge of Youngs relationship.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on November 07, 2009, 03:17:31 PM
I had a feeling he was going to pose as Young and try to get some. That scene with the stones cutting out in mid-shag was utterly inspired. I winced for Young. Telford's stunned reaction was just perfect.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 07, 2009, 03:30:04 PM
Brilliant. Just brilliant. Telfords face mid-shag was indeed priceless. Curious as to what he had heard when he dropped the glass, but the instant it cut to Youngs wife at the end I knew it had to be him. Writers are really bashing on Young.

Rush just gets more and more badass. Telfords little chat with him kind of made it a little clearer to me that lots of people don't trust Rush at HCC, and I'm very eager to find out what he did that brought that on. Eli is getting more amusing too, great entertainment. Phillip Fry? :funny

As for O'Neill, he's older, and has a very serious position. When he's serious the scenario typically calls for it, so I think it was out of necessity, and, as Darkthunder said, when the IOA is involved, things just get much, much worse.

When Telford just nodded to the others as they thought the ship was going to explode, I was so frustrated. Was the same kind of frustration I got from Admiral Caine, anyone else get that or am I just crazy?

I think it's safe to say I love this show, and it's just what scifi needed after BSG raised the bar by so much. But on the other hand... Episode 8 is a week away!  :mad
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on November 07, 2009, 03:58:20 PM
next episode looks good
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on November 07, 2009, 08:27:30 PM

Anyone notice the apparent new name for the SGC? "Homeworld Command Center"

I'm guessing the Homeworld Command Centre is just the command centre for Homeworld Security, that was mentioned way back when Hammond left the SGC to head it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 13, 2009, 10:01:20 PM
Time =  OMG!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 14, 2009, 03:05:33 AM
Time =  OMG!!

WOW just wow
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 14, 2009, 03:31:19 AM
Okay, that episode ended.... weird. Doesn't look like it's supposed to be a 2-parter either.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on November 14, 2009, 05:57:47 AM
I think/hope it'll be wrapped up in the beginning of next episode...

Either that or it'll be left as a cliffhanger with us just guessing that the Destiny crew worked it out.

But... That episode... WOW... If I had any doubts about SG:U left... They're gone now, that's the best sci-fi I've seen in... Years.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on November 14, 2009, 08:24:27 AM
yeah that was sweet
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 14, 2009, 12:37:49 PM
That has to have been possibly the best thing I've ever seen on TV! The whole episode had me leaning closer and closer to the screen, I think I actually was sitting on air by the end of it.

Just... Wow.

I think/hope it'll be wrapped up in the beginning of next episode...

Either that or it'll be left as a cliffhanger with us just guessing that the Destiny crew worked it out.

But... That episode... WOW... If I had any doubts about SG:U left... They're gone now, that's the best sci-fi I've seen in... Years.

It did get wrapped up. The solar flare started, he turned it off and assumably threw it into the gate. The episode technically doesn't exist! It's easily the first impressive use of time travel, and the first time I've seen a time-travel story and not been bored instantly. This show is definitely as good as Battlestar, with a chance to surpass it if it keeps up that level of... There's just not even a word. Just wow.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on November 14, 2009, 05:56:39 PM
Trailer for life is up.


The ending of that trailer... =O
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: RCgothic on November 15, 2009, 07:54:40 AM
I missed the first 7 episodes, got stuck in with Time. Nasty little Tyranid Rippers, weren't they. :D I think I'm hooked. I've now caught up episodes 1-3 and 7-8.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: martyr on November 15, 2009, 11:34:10 AM
of course they have to tie up the last episode.

the water is still tainted!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on November 15, 2009, 12:51:59 PM
I think they're assuming the Audience will assume they got the message and cured the water. They assume to much.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on November 15, 2009, 09:28:38 PM
Yes, the end of the episode was meant to convey that the crew of the Destiny would now have enough information to avoid catastophe.  That was definitely my favorite episode of series thus far.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: NeoKaede on November 17, 2009, 05:31:36 PM
Well, for the typical kill-em-all-reset-button-everyone-lives! episode, it was very entertaining. And all that Kino-vision? got on my nerves (which I suppose was what they were aiming for). Nice :)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on November 17, 2009, 09:19:48 PM
Those Goa'uld were doing it wrong.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 24, 2009, 05:03:05 AM
Life was a little dull. I (for some reason) didn't expect them to do an entire damned episode of drama.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on November 24, 2009, 07:30:00 AM
I'm seriously getting bored. If the series keeps it up like this it won't last to a second season.

I can't believe they canceled Atlantis for this crap.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 24, 2009, 12:16:40 PM
Seriously if your going to base a new series off a of few "bad" episodes then no series would last to the second season, I haven't see a show yet where every episode during the first season, heck any season was perfect. Theres always a few annoying episodes, but so far I love the show, is it perfect, no, but very very few shows are and I have yet to see a perfect show
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 24, 2009, 05:45:37 PM
Seriously if your going to base a new series off a of few "bad" episodes then no series would last to the second season, I haven't see a show yet where every episode during the first season, heck any season was perfect. Theres always a few annoying episodes, but so far I love the show, is it perfect, no, but very very few shows are and I have yet to see a perfect show

Then you haven't seen the show NCIS. I personally think that all episodes from the first one of season one, up until the most recent have all been excellent.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Barihawk on November 24, 2009, 07:07:10 PM
Every good series that follows a central storyline needs some episodes to back off and set up for later episodes. This episode does exactly that. It also gives a good portrayal of how people are coping with all the stress.

We see the scientist dude happy because his plants are starting to grow
Young gets to beat Telford's ass
Lisa Park does her service to the men of the ship
and even Rush attempts to contribute to morale (which works, and I hope that Camile was able to keep her mouth shut about it).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 27, 2009, 07:33:34 AM
Wait, "Mid-Season Finale"?  :argh: Not this sh*t again.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: NeoKaede on November 27, 2009, 09:21:42 AM
What? :wtf
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 27, 2009, 12:46:36 PM
Ad for the next episode aired here, due in (wait for it) 2 weeks, as the apparent mid-season finale.  It really is BSG:U!  :funny
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on November 28, 2009, 12:34:35 PM
Are you referring to the mid-season break as being BSG like? It really isn't. Lots of shows do it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 29, 2009, 06:02:23 AM
There was a time where TV Shows aired for their full season, maybe off for a week or two for reasons like important events. :arms:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on November 29, 2009, 06:04:46 AM
There was a time where TV Shows aired for their full season, maybe off for a week or two for reasons like important events. :arms:

I don't know why theres a week break now, but the mid-series break is for Christmas (ie an important event :P)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 29, 2009, 06:09:12 AM
They don't film the episodes the week they're shown.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 29, 2009, 09:19:00 AM
There was a time where TV Shows aired for their full season, maybe off for a week or two for reasons like important events. :arms:

I don't know why theres a week break now

thanksgiving week/weekend....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on December 04, 2009, 09:32:27 PM
There are already blu-ray/dvd commercials for the first half of SGU season 1 called: "SGU Season 1.0"

this is BSG all over again XD
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on December 04, 2009, 09:35:34 PM
There are already blu-ray/dvd commercials for the first half of SGU season 1 called: "SGU Season 1.0"

this is BSG all over again XD

Saw the artwork for the first half of season 1 on Blu-Ray. TBH, a 5 year old with Photoshop could do a better job then the market department at MGM!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on December 04, 2009, 09:55:05 PM
Link/pic upload?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on December 04, 2009, 10:02:25 PM
well Rush is screwed unless that ship they found can be fixed and has the same speed as well you know....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on December 04, 2009, 10:23:49 PM
Link/pic upload?

(http://www.thehdroom.com/images/bluray/large/5461.jpg)

The full season boxart had better be alot better than this garbage.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on December 04, 2009, 11:09:16 PM
well Rush is screwed unless that ship they found can be fixed and has the same speed as well you know....

Or mister chair guy wakes up, he knows how to control the ship, and go back for Rush's 'body'.

Or aliens.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on December 04, 2009, 11:51:15 PM
Well, it's pretty much a definite that Rush will be back one way or another. Robert Carlyle is the only actor on the show with any amount of star power. I pretty much lost all respect for Colonel Young after this and the previous episode (Life). No fan of putting the IOA in charge of the ship either, but neither Young or Rush are cut out to be the "commander" of the ship after recent events.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on December 06, 2009, 09:17:28 AM
Spoiler: show
 Robert Carlyle ...  Dr. Nicholas Rush (20 episodes, 2009-2010)


I like that the stress and pressure is really starting to show in the various characters. That episode was pretty shocking, especially that very last scene.

I want to be the one who comes up with the zaniest idea, so:

That thing that "fell" off of Destiny during Air may very well be following behind, possibly even the same race as this newly discovered ship. I think it'd be cool for Rush to be making a dash after Destiny, though. Show what he's like when he's alone by no choice of his own.

Either way, I hate that we have to wait to find out!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on December 06, 2009, 09:35:40 AM
from what I could tell using side by side comparisons, the ship they find on the planet is the same as the one that detached from the hull in Air part 3.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on December 06, 2009, 09:53:48 AM
They're not even vaguely the same. The one found on the planet has a shape at the front not all that dissimilar from the shuttle on Destiny, the thing that detached from the hull at the end of Air pt III was circular.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on December 06, 2009, 10:00:47 AM
The ship looks smaller than the UFO off of Destiny. Could be their version of a shuttlepod.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on December 08, 2009, 10:19:28 AM
The ship looks smaller than the UFO off of Destiny. Could be their version of a shuttlepod.

I doubt it. For one, the ship on the planet has obviously been there for a long time, way before the Destiny even showed up in that system.

I think it could be possibly one of the gate seeder ships that was sent out ahead of Destiny. The gate seeder ships could be a lot older than the Destiny and technology does take on new characteristics over time so this is a possible theory.

There is maybe 2 ways Rush could get back on-board Destiny. Both involving that ship on the planet.

1. If the energy source is still intact and powerful enough, tie it into the gate on the planet and simply dial the Destiny's address. It would have to be significantly powerful though for this to be a possibility, even though it would technically be a 8 symbol address since the planet that the ship is on is still a hell of a lot closer to Destiny than Icarus was.

2. Fix the crashed alien ship and simply catch up with the Destiny and somehow get back on-board without Young waiting to throw him out an air lock.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on December 09, 2009, 01:55:10 AM
Only problem with the second is destiny is a huge ship, and uses the stars to fuel it's systems. A majority seems to go into the weird FTL it uses. Either it's inefficient, which doesn't sound very Ancient, or it's quick. I don't think a small ship like that could keep up let alone attain those speeds.

Would be cool for him to be able to rig it up to the gate, and it's a far more likely event, but seeing as it's been 10 episodes in without an "intelligent" alien life-form (Aside from the bugs), I am heavily leaning towards him getting help.


I'd still prefer a few episodes showing Destiny falling apart without him, and him falling apart without people to show his facade to though. Show us Rush's true self!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on January 05, 2010, 06:56:18 PM
Thats one well written episode, by far one of my favorites, nuff said
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on January 05, 2010, 07:18:02 PM
wait what? ok... why a sep thread?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on January 05, 2010, 07:44:55 PM
This thread should be moved to the main stargate thread.

Kudos on starting it off with a discussion about a great episode though.  :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on January 05, 2010, 11:51:36 PM
Good point, I was so used to going to that thread for the SGU discussion that I forgot it was for all star gate discussions
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Sean on February 15, 2010, 02:54:40 AM
merged
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on February 21, 2010, 10:52:51 AM
Chapter 11 strikes again.  :'(

It is looking increasingly unlikely that Stargate Worlds will be finished, let alone released.
http://www.gateworld.net/news/2010/02/stargate-video-game-developer-files-for-bankruptcy/
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on February 21, 2010, 02:30:53 PM
Oh for crying out loud..  :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on February 21, 2010, 05:12:00 PM
I'm not gonna mourn it, as far as Sci-Fi MMOs go, this looked worse than Star Trek Online.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on February 21, 2010, 07:17:26 PM
I'm not gonna mourn it, as far as Sci-Fi MMOs go, this looked worse than Star Trek Online.

I agree with you.

I am just more annoyed with the fact that the stargate franchise has never had a successful game released (SGR sucks).
It seems to be cursed when it comes to games.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on February 21, 2010, 10:19:55 PM
I'm not gonna mourn it, as far as Sci-Fi MMOs go, this looked worse than Star Trek Online.

Yeah, no kidding. I was on beta testing from August to December of '08.
I didn't like what I was seeing there.
I considered dropping out because it was just too damn boring.
Didn't matter to me it was "just early beta".
The way I see it there's no way they would change it enough that it would be a good game.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on February 21, 2010, 11:31:07 PM
Don't see how could it be bad, you can use gates to go to different worlds, you could be a few different races, lots of potential for fighting and quests for "artifacts" to get more power. How hard can it be?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on February 22, 2010, 12:43:05 AM
This is just another nail in the SG coffin'. It's worse than the persistant rumours about Star Trek's imminent demise, prior to the latest movie. SG1 was a great show, which unfortunately ran for too long (should've ended at season 8 when RDA left the show). SGA was another great show (thou not as good as SG1), which was cancelled prematurely to make room for:

SGU, which imho is the most boring and bland incarnation of Stargate to date. I've tried to enjoy the show for the first 10 episodes, and from time to time, it's had it's moments. What really pisses me off about SGU, comes down to 3 simple facts:

- 1. The scientists on the ship are either inept or bored, and have no interest in "exploration" of the ship or through the gate.
- 2. The military on the ship are under-qualified, and under-disciplined, prone to sexual encounters with fellow officers at a whim.
- 3. No "structured" leadership on the ship, instead resorting to use of communication stones to "chat with Earth".

It's been 10 episodes so far, and all we've had are people having sex with each other in almost every episode, scientists and civilians alike, whining about wanting to get home, and the constant bickering between lead characters Rush and Young. I think by now, the SGU audience, knows that the people on the ship are in constant peril, and that they are trying to get home. Instead of shoving it in our faces in every episode, they should let the characters do some actual "Stargate" exploration of both the ship itself, the knowledge it may contain as well as the use of the onboard stargate.

In any command structure, one would assume that the officers behave in a suitable manner. A clearcut chain of command should be estabilished, and the actual leadership should be given to a civilian (my nomination is on Rush or Wray). Neither the IOA or Homeworld Command on Earth should have any say-so, of what goes on aboard Destiny. I am confident, that given enough time, the ship and/or crew will eventually make it back to Earth. So far when Earth has had any involvement in a "rescue attempt", it has instead resulted in further jeopardy.

In short: If the next 10 episodes of SGU is the same bland and repetitive crap we've seen thus far, I would like the show cancelled, and SGA brought out of mothballs. The producers have promised 2 additional Stargate movies (1 SG1 & 1 SGA), which currently most likely will never be made.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on February 22, 2010, 06:39:06 AM
This is just another nail in the SG coffin'. It's worse than the persistant rumours about Star Trek's imminent demise, prior to the latest movie. SG1 was a great show, which unfortunately ran for too long (should've ended at season 8 when RDA left the show). SGA was another great show (thou not as good as SG1), which was cancelled prematurely to make room for:

SGU, which imho is the most boring and bland incarnation of Stargate to date. I've tried to enjoy the show for the first 10 episodes, and from time to time, it's had it's moments. What really pisses me off about SGU, comes down to 3 simple facts:

- 1. The scientists on the ship are either inept or bored, and have no interest in "exploration" of the ship or through the gate.
- 2. The military on the ship are under-qualified, and under-disciplined, prone to sexual encounters with fellow officers at a whim.
- 3. No "structured" leadership on the ship, instead resorting to use of communication stones to "chat with Earth".

It's been 10 episodes so far, and all we've had are people having sex with each other in almost every episode, scientists and civilians alike, whining about wanting to get home, and the constant bickering between lead characters Rush and Young. I think by now, the SGU audience, knows that the people on the ship are in constant peril, and that they are trying to get home. Instead of shoving it in our faces in every episode, they should let the characters do some actual "Stargate" exploration of both the ship itself, the knowledge it may contain as well as the use of the onboard stargate.

In any command structure, one would assume that the officers behave in a suitable manner. A clearcut chain of command should be estabilished, and the actual leadership should be given to a civilian (my nomination is on Rush or Wray). Neither the IOA or Homeworld Command on Earth should have any say-so, of what goes on aboard Destiny. I am confident, that given enough time, the ship and/or crew will eventually make it back to Earth. So far when Earth has had any involvement in a "rescue attempt", it has instead resulted in further jeopardy.

In short: If the next 10 episodes of SGU is the same bland and repetitive crap we've seen thus far, I would like the show cancelled, and SGA brought out of mothballs. The producers have promised 2 additional Stargate movies (1 SG1 & 1 SGA), which currently most likely will never be made.

You seem to have utterly missed the point of the whole show.

1- They're not inept or bored, they simply have no desire to explore. They want to get home.
2- Under-qualified? They were supposed to be providing security for a top secret base in the Milky-way, not running a ship. Under-disciplined? Other than the bald guy, they've all followed orders almost without question. Prone to sexual encounters? Scott and James, Scott and Chloe and that scientist woman and Greer hardly counts as "prone". Besides, they're all alone on the other side of the universe, you can't really expect them not to pair off.
3- There's not enough people for a full hierachical command structure. Young is in command (Weir/Hammond/Gen O'Neill), Wray is like PR, Rush is lead scientist (Jackson/McKay) and Scott is the actual main Military guy (Col O'Neill/Mitchell/Sheppard). What more of a command structure do you need for about 3 dozen people?

Yes, the constant sexual substories are a little annoying, but its not like they're major plot points. And the whole premise of the series IS that they are in constant peril and trying to get home. Not explore.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on February 22, 2010, 10:33:00 AM
Limey: I've not missed the "whole point of the show". I realize the show is trying to be more realistic than it's predecessors. But in my opinion, it's trying too hard to be like BSG, and too little to be like Stargate. Which results in alienating a large amount of it's fans (including me).

1. If they wanna get home, why aren't they cracking codes on the computers trying to get information to help them get home faster? Instead of sitting around sulking and whining about it.

2. They've been stuck on the ship for what amounts to a few weeks. I'd say the whole "pairing off" happened a little too fast.

3. They are around 100 people aboard the ship, of which about 1/3rd is military personell. Perhaps they should get their command structure in order, before "beaming" back to Earth, to beat the crap out of people (Young vs Telford).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on February 22, 2010, 11:17:34 AM
Limey: I've not missed the "whole point of the show". I realize the show is trying to be more realistic than it's predecessors. But in my opinion, it's trying too hard to be like BSG, and too little to be like Stargate. Which results in alienating a large amount of it's fans (including me).

1. If they wanna get home, why aren't they cracking codes on the computers trying to get information to help them get home faster? Instead of sitting around sulking and whining about it.

2. They've been stuck on the ship for what amounts to a few weeks. I'd say the whole "pairing off" happened a little too fast.

3. They are around 100 people aboard the ship, of which about 1/3rd is military personell. Perhaps they should get their command structure in order, before "beaming" back to Earth, to beat the crap out of people (Young vs Telford).

1. That's exactly what Rush is doing. From what I gathered none of the other scientist speak Ancient, so can't really help. Plus, Rush obviously likes to work alone.

2. You forget, they've all been on a base for the last 6 months or so. You don't know that Greer and that scientist wern't screwing each other before. As for Scott and Chloe, I thought it was pretty obvious they were gonna get together after their little chat just after Senator Armstrong killed himself.

3. Well, around 70 or 80 and I think you're overestimating the number of military personnel. As for a command structure, what's wrong with their ranks? Besides, so far, with the exception of the bald marine guy, they've followed youngs orders without question.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on February 22, 2010, 03:14:45 PM
In SG:U. They're stranded, thousands of years from home, on a ship without any of their creature comforts, cut off from everybody they love. People are going to start to look for company with each other to try and make out for that abruptly formed hole in their psyche (probably not the right word). Hence the pairing begins, plus the constant threats, another incentive for people to 'pair off'...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on February 22, 2010, 04:01:41 PM
as I see it they seemed to start off as BSG with Star Gate Elements. I kinda like the story elements but I'm severely dissappointed by the lack of "star gateness" Although the sand creature stealing their water was a decent star gate like episode and so was the one about everyone being sick and using the time travel through the gate part. Those were worthy gate episodes, but the whole stone comunitcator kinda takes away, I liked it more where they had no communication, or limited. And I don't like how everyone has a agenda and planing against each other, very unlike SG to do. While SGA felt like more of the same, but eventually came into its own, I got a feeling SGU will to. I think with these 10 "pilot" episodes they are hopefully listening to the fans and taking suggestions.

As with the sex stuff, more than possible in the situation, we don't if Chloe and Scott had a previous relationship, they kinda hinted at it. But either way she may be falling hard for someone because her dad just died in front of her and it maybe how shes dealing with it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 04, 2010, 10:37:22 AM
Just under a month until the apparent return!  :dance

Psycho put it well imo, the show needs some time to properly come into its own, but I'm still more than entertained by it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 06, 2010, 01:00:17 PM
I just saw a advertisment for the new episodes coming up, looks like a enemy if finally popping up. I guess their going to explain what that pod was that left the ship and see some Destiny kicking some butt. I just hope these bad guys can't talk engish, I'll be very disappointed, thats one thing that always bothered me about SGA and SG1 after like the 2nd or 3rd season

Honestly you know what I want to see in a SG show, one that focuses on a Daedalous (sp?) class ship doing its thing. It could be a nice ST/SG combo show. I mean you stil have the alliance as a enemy, some Guald that still have influence, and other alien races. I would think it would be pretty neat
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on March 11, 2010, 03:01:25 PM


Don't watch this trailer if you don't want to be spoiled.

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 11, 2010, 04:12:29 PM
Oh wow, I see F302?? maybe Death Gliders? and a Daedulous (sp?) class and finally aliens that look like aliends. Sweet I hope they don't screw it up
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 12, 2010, 03:08:32 AM
Correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't that Telford in the 2nd half of the trailer? Onboard Destiny? He also looked injured, but... how is that possible? Side-effects of the communication stones, or has he somehow managed to gate aboard Destiny from the Milky Way?

While i'm technically not warmed-up to the series yet, this trailer does look promising. Some truly "alien" aliens, gate travel, mysteries etc.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on March 12, 2010, 03:54:23 AM
Given that there was a BC-304 (The Hammond perhaps?) and F302's, I think perhaps a ZPM powered 304 might have been sent after Destiny. Remember, it only took 2 or 3 days for the ZPM powered Daedalus to get to to Pegasus. That's perhaps a few weeks to get out as far as the Destiny.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 12, 2010, 06:50:41 AM
Given that there was a BC-304 (The Hammond perhaps?) and F302's, I think perhaps a ZPM powered 304 might have been sent after Destiny. Remember, it only took 2 or 3 days for the ZPM powered Daedalus to get to to Pegasus. That's perhaps a few weeks to get out as far as the Destiny.

You have a point. Thou, if a ZPM Powered Daedalus managed to catch up with Destiny, would they not evacuate everyone from the ship over to the Daedalus, and the series would end?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on March 12, 2010, 06:54:43 AM
You have a point. Thou, if a ZPM Powered Daedalus managed to catch up with Destiny, would they not evacuate everyone from the ship over to the Daedalus, and the series would end?

Not if they came under attack and were destroyed/forced to retreat before they could. You saw an attack happening and the warning from Telford.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: bankruptstudios on March 12, 2010, 08:54:48 AM


Did you guys see this, looks like Jackson is joining the cast.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on March 12, 2010, 11:49:56 AM
Did you guys see this, looks like Jackson is joining the cast.

Or perhaps it's just a 1 episode guest role. You can't tell anything from the 2 seconds he's on screen.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 12, 2010, 12:23:40 PM
Daniel Jackson will be back for 2 episodes during the back half of season 1. One of the episodes, takes place partially inside Rush's mind (likely a flashback to where/when he was recruited by Dr Jackson into the Stargate program).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on March 12, 2010, 01:30:26 PM
Finally some real enemies and not just some internal bickering.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 12, 2010, 02:13:09 PM
Epic! Nothing about that displeases me. Well.. Except for the airing date, of course.  :mad
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on March 17, 2010, 03:51:36 PM
Yeah! Why the long break?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on March 17, 2010, 04:39:11 PM
Yeah! Why the long break?

America. :P

And no wonder so many other American-produced programs are going bust, they have so many breaks inbetween episodes that people can't be bothered to stick with it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 18, 2010, 05:20:31 AM
^-This
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 18, 2010, 09:00:31 AM
Not really, its because the show is run by BSG makers cause I never remember SG ever taking a break midseason, but I remember BSG doing that. Honestly I don't think its a bad thing to take a break mid season, but not this long of a break, this is just stupid
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 18, 2010, 09:33:54 AM
Not really, its because the show is run by BSG makers cause I never remember SG ever taking a break midseason, but I remember BSG doing that. Honestly I don't think its a bad thing to take a break mid season, but not this long of a break, this is just stupid

What "BSG makers" are you referring to? Ron Moore has absolutely ZERO involvement with anything regarding Stargate.

Pretty much all tv-shows have a mid-season break that lasts between 1-4 months.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on March 18, 2010, 09:42:38 AM
Pretty much all tv-shows have a mid-season break that lasts between 1-4 months.

All US TV shows maybe. We rarely do that over here. There might occasionally be missed weeks, but in general, a series runs continuously.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 18, 2010, 04:19:04 PM
Not really, its because the show is run by BSG makers cause I never remember SG ever taking a break midseason, but I remember BSG doing that. Honestly I don't think its a bad thing to take a break mid season, but not this long of a break, this is just stupid

What "BSG makers" are you referring to? Ron Moore has absolutely ZERO involvement with anything regarding Stargate.

Pretty much all tv-shows have a mid-season break that lasts between 1-4 months.


Well I meant writers and what not
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on March 18, 2010, 04:56:59 PM
Not really, its because the show is run by BSG makers cause I never remember SG ever taking a break midseason, but I remember BSG doing that. Honestly I don't think its a bad thing to take a break mid season, but not this long of a break, this is just stupid

What "BSG makers" are you referring to? Ron Moore has absolutely ZERO involvement with anything regarding Stargate.

Pretty much all tv-shows have a mid-season break that lasts between 1-4 months.


Well I meant writers and what not

Again, anyone that has worked on BSG has nothing to do with the stargate franchise.
I think you are getting the 2 franchises mixed up because both BSG and Stargate Universe use the god awful 'shaky-cam' methos of filming.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on March 18, 2010, 05:08:09 PM
I think you are getting the 2 franchises mixed up because both BSG and Stargate Universe use the god awful 'shaky-cam' methos of filming.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on March 18, 2010, 05:13:11 PM
Kirk's picture.

 :wtf
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 19, 2010, 12:32:04 AM
Not really, its because the show is run by BSG makers cause I never remember SG ever taking a break midseason, but I remember BSG doing that. Honestly I don't think its a bad thing to take a break mid season, but not this long of a break, this is just stupid

What "BSG makers" are you referring to? Ron Moore has absolutely ZERO involvement with anything regarding Stargate.

Pretty much all tv-shows have a mid-season break that lasts between 1-4 months.


Well I meant writers and what not

Again, anyone that has worked on BSG has nothing to do with the stargate franchise.
I think you are getting the 2 franchises mixed up because both BSG and Stargate Universe use the god awful 'shaky-cam' methos of filming.

I thought some of the BSG people were working on SGU?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthorne on March 19, 2010, 02:46:48 AM
Actually its the SyFy (I really dont like the rename still) channel's doing... by splitting the season they can get away with halting production and calling it two seasons (they did it to farscape orderd two seasons split season 4 and called the split 2 complete seasons so they didnt have to fund a 5th season)  If you look how they advertised the last season of Battlestar they basicly tried to sell folks that the last half of the final season was a complete and seperate entity also.

I personally hate the practice, we see it now on other NBC-owned properties (Burn Notice on USA for example). It just gives a feeling like they are leaving ways to back out of any successful show (which imho SGU is not) for whatever reason they wish to. That cant be a good feeling for MGM who right now cant even afford to make some garunteed hit like a third SG-1 or Atlantis Movie and literally need to have a solid successful show in production with what is hopefully a very long run (Didnt they have the beginings of one in Atlantis?).

As for season 1.5 of SGU (if it tanks wonder if they will just call it season 2 and be done with it?) it looks promising but I really am not sure its going to deliver much. Only Time will tell
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on March 19, 2010, 07:13:03 AM
I thought some of the BSG people were working on SGU?

No.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: El on March 19, 2010, 07:50:49 AM
The problem with SGU, was the same fundamental problem that rBSG had; Lack of humour, little real team work.
Extended long mid-season breaks don't help with continuity (just look at V, on break after 4 eps!)

IMHO SGU has to seriously buck up its ideas, and be more tru to the franchise history.
Personally I think its the humour and teamwork that made SG1 and SGA so successful.

We don't need another soap opera in space (rBSG).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 19, 2010, 02:11:56 PM
The problem with SGU, was the same fundamental problem that rBSG had; Lack of humour, little real team work.
Extended long mid-season breaks don't help with continuity (just look at V, on break after 4 eps!)

IMHO SGU has to seriously buck up its ideas, and be more tru to the franchise history.
Personally I think its the humour and teamwork that made SG1 and SGA so successful.

We don't need another soap opera in space (rBSG).

Totally agreed, I like the back storys and the plot twists of BSG, but I also liked that sense of fun SG1 had. If they could get the 2 together awesome. It kinda reminds me of the X-files. That show could be dead serious, but still throw a funny joke in there, and also through some interest plot twist along the way. What I think that made the show is that it wasn't about the characters, it was about the story, and I think SG1 had this, the characters were the primary focus, the story was. SGU seems to be to try to push the characters on us by telling us all their back stories, thier feelings, everything they think, instead of it just coming out over time like SG1 did. The characters were part of the story, instead of being JUST the story.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 20, 2010, 11:33:35 AM
X-Files was also a masterpiece. Stargate is your run of the mill scifi (With comedy encouraged), X-Files was your run of the mill Twilight Zone (With comedy accepted).

I don't get it, I thought people liked character-driven stories?

What everyone seems to be missing is the fact that SGU was an unsure thing from the getgo, it was so radically different in terms of the Stargate flow (Much like Voyager actually, hurrdurr, not in the "OMG WE'RE OUT HERE STRANDED" sense) TV is rubbish these days, and if it doesn't sell immensely well straight up, the idea is thrown away and people are paid to come up with new ideas, or rehashes that the current generation can stare at the TV like the desensitized zombies they are and enjoy it for a while before they get bored again.

(This following is not typed in bias) I really don't blame anything on SGU for the first half of the season being purely for scene-setting and character backstories, writers just doing what they can to get as much in as fast as they can not only to keep themselves afloat but to try and appease the radically varying opinions that nitpickers and the generic scifi viewer/nerd will jump on (Inconsistencies, for example, or information that is just very fortunately divulged a minute before it becomes important, or technology that can solve a universe of problems "Why didn't Voyagers amazing deflector dish just send her back home?")

IMO, when we get to see this half is when we'll be able to see the show start to shine. Just watch.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on April 02, 2010, 05:26:55 PM
Reviving this topic, as Stargate Universe returns in the US, tonight on SyFy. Aussies will need to wait 1 week for the episode to air, and in the UK, it airs on April 13th. According to news, the back half of season 1, promises to be a major improvement over the first half. I hope this is true, as the first half was incredibly boring throughout most of the episodes so far.

This from TV-Guide: ( Spoilers ahead )
A snafu with the communications stones lands Col. Young?s consciousness in an unknown being, resulting in a standoff between the Destiny and an alien vessel and the abduction of Chloe.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on April 02, 2010, 09:28:23 PM
Watching now, must say, whether or not I would say this show is "Star Gate" or not, still awesome my jaw is on the floor
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on April 02, 2010, 10:02:45 PM
well I liked it :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on April 03, 2010, 06:58:24 PM
We british have to wait 1 week and 2 days for the mid season premiere.

Only one thing for it.

TO THE INTERNETS!!!
*cue 60's batman theme*
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on April 04, 2010, 04:13:12 AM
We british have to wait 1 week and 2 days for the mid season premiere.

Only one thing for it.

TO THE INTERNETS!!!
*cue 60's batman theme*

That's illegal.


Anyway, brilliant return, I honestly wasn't expecting them to come in straight away but still, it was very neat. Possibly my favourite first contact scenario ever. The dead, uneasy silence between the two ships spoke volumes to me. Can't wait for next week, because if they can keep this up...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on April 04, 2010, 05:38:14 AM
That's illegal.
There are legal sources to download movies, music and episodes these days.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on April 04, 2010, 05:51:09 AM
Point me to a website that lets me pay-for/legally download shows right after their american release (Outside the US) and I'll concede.  :dontcare:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on April 04, 2010, 10:26:56 AM
Well, Hulu.com is a good place to find them. And even non-US citizens can access the site, freely. There is nothing illegal about using a proxy server to access sites otherwise restricted by country/region.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on April 04, 2010, 12:32:26 PM
Well, Hulu.com is a good place to find them. And even non-US citizens can access the site, freely.

When last I checked, very, very little was available for non-US users

There is nothing illegal about using a proxy server to access sites otherwise restricted by country/region.

Actually, I'm pretty sure there is. The whole reason they region-lock things like Hulu is because they don't have copyright permission in other countries. Stargate, for example, can only be shown in the UK by BSKYB. They own the UK copyright to it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on April 04, 2010, 01:59:06 PM
Actually, I'm pretty sure there is. The whole reason they region-lock things like Hulu is because they don't have copyright permission in other countries. Stargate, for example, can only be shown in the UK by BSKYB. They own the UK copyright to it.

Well no, it's illegal for the site to break a copyright. That's why your Stargate example is UK only.
But it's not illegal for a visitor to that site to move around a region block.
It's to different laws so don't confuse them. ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on April 04, 2010, 02:32:24 PM
Well no, it's illegal for the site to break a copyright. That's why your Stargate example is UK only.
But it's not illegal for a visitor to that site to move around a region block.
It's to different laws so don't confuse them. ;)

What?

They're still serving content for which they have only a US copyright to a non-US resident.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on April 04, 2010, 05:16:02 PM
Doesn't matter now. The episode was spoiled for me so I won't try to watch it online anyway.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on April 04, 2010, 08:18:29 PM
There is nothing illegal about using a proxy server to access sites otherwise restricted by country/region.

Re-quoting myself. There is nothing inherently illegal about using a proxy server to access the internet. Oftentimes, used in order to protect your anonymity, and in countries such as Sweden, a necessity if you intend to have any personal freedoms remaining. Since December 1st, all telecommunication between Swedens citizens, and aboard has been monitored. This includes the Internet.

Ofcourse, an added bonus (thou still not illegal), is being able to access sites that are otherwise restricted.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: El on April 06, 2010, 08:29:05 AM
Come on guys, back on topic please.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on April 07, 2010, 10:48:33 AM
There is nothing illegal about using a proxy server to access sites otherwise restricted by country/region.

Re-quoting myself. There is nothing inherently illegal about using a proxy server to access the internet. Oftentimes, used in order to protect your anonymity, and in countries such as Sweden, a necessity if you intend to have any personal freedoms remaining. Since December 1st, all telecommunication between Swedens citizens, and aboard has been monitored. This includes the Internet.

Ofcourse, an added bonus (thou still not illegal), is being able to access sites that are otherwise restricted.

Like the US Defense network, so we can get proof of the Stargate Program?  :dance
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: JimmyB76 on April 07, 2010, 12:22:32 PM
*ahem*
Come on guys, back on topic please.
kthxbi :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on April 07, 2010, 01:09:48 PM
ROFL... we will be back on topic this Friday I bet. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on April 07, 2010, 04:52:22 PM
I never remember SG ever taking a break midseason, but I remember BSG doing that. Honestly I don't think its a bad thing to take a break mid season, but not this long of a break, this is just stupid

The last season of Atlantis had a Mid-season break, or maybe it was the 4th. I believe the 10th season of SG-1 had one as well.

Except here in Canada on the Movie Network, we didn't take the break for the 4th or 5th season of Atlantis so we were down before the Americans.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on April 10, 2010, 12:48:32 PM
I didn't like this last episode. It was back to the internal conflict of who's in charge.
Hope they settle that soon.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on April 10, 2010, 05:11:05 PM
I didn't like this last episode. It was back to the internal conflict of who's in charge.
Hope they settle that soon.

Oh noes!!! Drama! Kill it with fire! [/sarcasm]

Seriously, why do people have such a problem with the internal conflict? I think it adds realism. It adds character. It adds fantastic stories like this one!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on April 10, 2010, 07:51:27 PM
Well, I don't mind it an episode or two, but now it's been going on for a mind-numbing half season.
Get it done! Move on with other story arcs!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on April 10, 2010, 10:25:19 PM
They have, aliens, aliens that are trying to take destiny.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on April 11, 2010, 03:04:02 AM
They have, aliens, aliens that are trying to take destiny.

yea but instead of making that the main story and the internal conflict the back story, they swapped it again. Honestly I want to see more stuff with the aliens and the internal stuff more in the backround. Internal conflicts are great for stories, but only for back stories, trying to base the show off of it will get boring really fast
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: El on April 11, 2010, 08:29:05 AM
They have, aliens, aliens that are trying to take destiny.

yea but instead of making that the main story and the internal conflict the back story, they swapped it again. Honestly I want to see more stuff with the aliens and the internal stuff more in the backround. Internal conflicts are great for stories, but only for back stories, trying to base the show off of it will get boring really fast

Agreed.

So far this is direct plot rip from Voyager. How dull and predictable.
Where's all the SG originality gone?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on April 12, 2010, 09:19:07 AM
They have, aliens, aliens that are trying to take destiny.

yea but instead of making that the main story and the internal conflict the back story, they swapped it again. Honestly I want to see more stuff with the aliens and the internal stuff more in the backround. Internal conflicts are great for stories, but only for back stories, trying to base the show off of it will get boring really fast

Agreed.

So far this is direct plot rip from Voyager. How dull and predictable.
Where's all the SG originality gone?

Spoken like a true cynic. ;)

Latest episode was amazing, for the first half I was totally expecting the ship to be literally divided for a little longer though (If one side had shields, the other weapons, struggling to get along to survive against alien attack, sounds good to me.)

Anyway, everything is a ripoff of something when you think about it, it's just changed a little. Personally, I liked Voyager, I liked BSG, and I like this. I like stories where two completely different groups are thrown out of their comfort zone and have to figure out a working chain of command (Though in all cases the logical choice seems to be the Military. I'd prefer Young as a leader rather than Camille. I hate that cow.)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on April 21, 2010, 10:19:39 AM
I liked the new episode faith, very good, it was nice to see the crew starting to get along and acctually enjoying themselves. A surprise I've been expecting, although I expected it to happen to someone else really. I wonder if thier going to go with the story arc concerning this planet more or leave it at that though. It seems the show is starting to progress more from what it started with.

I decided though to stop judging this show from any other perspective other than a new show, I'm going to try to dump my notions of what is SG and what isn't concerning this show. I feel like SGU is to SG1/SGA as DS9 was to STO/STTNG. Their based off of the earlier shows, even keep some of the main elements, but other wise a different show in its own right. I'm just going to enjoy this show and quit comparing it
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on April 21, 2010, 11:32:55 AM
Most sensible thing I've heard on the internet in a long, long time.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on April 25, 2010, 01:14:26 AM
Well it appears Rush does have emotions, I know they hinted at it before, but this really shows it. I wonder what will happen next week with Eli and all. BTW I fudging hate spiders so damn much, I could have gone the rest of my life without seeing what the hell that was
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on April 25, 2010, 06:39:44 AM
One thing really bugged me about this episode (besides the ginormous spider):

When Franklin sat in the Ancient chair, and ended up comatose, Young complained that Rush didn't have the guts to sit in the chair himself. And in this episode, Rush volunteered to sit in the chair, despite his own claim "during the dream" that Eli would've been better suited. He even admitted to Eli being smarter than him in several ways.

And still Young ended up complaining, just because Rush didn't "ask permission" first.

Overall an 8/10 quality episode. Will be interesting to see how they manage to get back 4 of the main cast in next weeks episode.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on April 28, 2010, 10:27:26 AM
One thing really bugged me about this episode (besides the ginormous spider):

When Franklin sat in the Ancient chair, and ended up comatose, Young complained that Rush didn't have the guts to sit in the chair himself. And in this episode, Rush volunteered to sit in the chair, despite his own claim "during the dream" that Eli would've been better suited. He even admitted to Eli being smarter than him in several ways.

And still Young ended up complaining, just because Rush didn't "ask permission" first.

Overall an 8/10 quality episode. Will be interesting to see how they manage to get back 4 of the main cast in next weeks episode.

Few things bother me in life, spiders are one of them for sure.

Yea but that was when Young didn't want Rush on the ship, dead or alive. I think they both realize they need each other, and even if Eli is smart, Rush knows more about the systems of the ship than anyone, plus I think Rush is doing to prove he's the top scienctist, you can tell he hates the fact Eli could even be put in the same league Rush is in, let alone be smarter. I think its a progression episode showing more of peticular charactars, mainly Rush's backround and motives and also show Young  and Rush working together, not likeing each other, but dealing with each other and realizing they need each other rather then prior episodes where they were trying hard to "off" each other.

I can't wait to see how they get them back, it looks like their going to try to use the star gate to get back to ther planet, BUT they mention if they didn't get them this time, then their lost forever which to me seems like they star gates have a much more limited range possibly. I can't wait to see too, I just hope they don't have to deal with a ton of those nasty spiders
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Side 3 on May 02, 2010, 04:31:52 PM
Holy crap! How could the writers seriously leave that episode to end like that?! As soon as they left the planet, I was watching through the cracks between my fingers for the rest of the episode. :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on May 02, 2010, 05:14:27 PM
I can't wait to watch this one. I hear Greer dies. Is that true?  :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Side 3 on May 02, 2010, 05:28:58 PM
Now now, if we answered, we'd be spoiling anticipation!  :nono: You'll just have to find out when you watch it. ;)

Though I will say I'm sure you'll enjoy it if you liked the last episode! Might even be thumping your fist on the desk by the end of it (But not from laughing!) :uberlol:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on May 02, 2010, 11:44:19 PM
Yea a cliff hanger for sure, I can't wait to see how they get around this one, maybe the aliens? Or maybe new friendly aliens?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on May 08, 2010, 08:46:43 AM
SPOILER: He ascended. Near-catatonic state, and with the low room temperature he would've slowed his body down enough for the right numbers (ATL: The Tao of Rodney). Guess he just pulled too much info out on his own after stumbling on the library about Ascension. so that buffer they implemented isn't to protect them from the ship, but vice versa (imo).

Whoa, that episode was amazing! So many mysteries! I've been discussing how Scott, Eli and Chloe got back and while everyone seems to think it was too conveniant, I've got my own theories that the aliens dialled to see if they could send troops in through the gate.

Seeing Rush in his normal habits was... An interesting experience. I do really like how he's developing. All in all a great episode, can't wait for next week!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on May 08, 2010, 11:40:09 PM
I can't help but notice they've been focusing on Rush's character alot, I wonder why. I wonder what happened to the guy that was in the chair though? I wonder whats so special about the ship that keeps the aliens commiting resources to take it?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on May 09, 2010, 12:09:50 AM
Prime answered some of your thoughts lol :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on May 09, 2010, 07:42:02 AM
I can't help but notice they've been focusing on Rush's character alot, I wonder why. I wonder what happened to the guy that was in the chair though? I wonder whats so special about the ship that keeps the aliens commiting resources to take it?

If the blues got Destiny, what could they possibly do? Ancient technology all seems to posess the requirement for Alteran DNA. Even Destiny (Though it predates say, Atlantis). Humans have this advantage as they're the closest link of the Alterans (Like monkeys are to us). Of course in this case we know which genes are missing, and the SGC science teams managed to synthesize the ancient gene for those who lack it. The blues however are nowhere near related to humans, let alone Alterans. The ship is just a mystery to them, something precious. They're only attacking it because the Icarus team is there when the blues seem to believe in finders keepers.

As for Rush, he is kind of the Protagonist. Destiny is his obsession, and he's the best hope the team has of getting it running. Then there's all the complaints about him being too much of a stuck up smartass and such (even here. :P). Personally, I like the development, but I really enjoy his facade.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on May 09, 2010, 09:12:00 AM
If the blues got Destiny, what could they possibly do? Ancient technology all seems to posess the requirement for Alteran DNA. Even Destiny (Though it predates say, Atlantis). Humans have this advantage as they're the closest link of the Alterans (Like monkeys are to us). Of course in this case we know which genes are missing, and the SGC science teams managed to synthesize the ancient gene for those who lack it. The blues however are nowhere near related to humans, let alone Alterans. The ship is just a mystery to them, something precious. They're only attacking it because the Icarus team is there when the blues seem to believe in finders keepers.

No, they established early on that the Destiny predates the use of the Ancient gene. The aliens are attacking it to get ahold of it's technology. They see it as being more advanced, and they wants it. Yes they do, precious. They wants it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on May 09, 2010, 09:49:49 AM


No, they established early on that the Destiny predates the use of the Ancient gene. The aliens are attacking it to get ahold of it's technology. They see it as being more advanced, and they wants it. Yes they do, precious. They wants it.

Oh, right... Disregard then, they're just jerks.  :funny

Apparently, we can look forward to a familiar foe soon. THAT will be interesting.

Also, we're getting close to the season 1 two-part finale, think that's when we'll see Lou Diamond Phillips again? :P As much as I hate Telford, it's the good kind of hate. He's so... Aggrivating, but he's such a great character.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on May 21, 2010, 10:13:48 PM
umm WOW
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on May 22, 2010, 04:01:17 PM
Last nights episode was amazing! No new episode next week though, I don't think. Is there?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on May 22, 2010, 04:41:43 PM
Last nights episode was amazing! No new episode next week though, I don't think. Is there?

No, for some reason the next episode isn't in the US until 4/6
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on May 22, 2010, 05:15:06 PM
Last nights episode was amazing! No new episode next week though, I don't think. Is there?

No, for some reason the next episode isn't in the US until 4/6

Thats America for you. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on May 22, 2010, 07:59:54 PM
umm WOW

Agreed, I wonder how long Rush will delay them though. It was good to see Oniel in the episode and that they didn't change is character at all, it put a big smile on my face to see he is still funny and never seems to take anything serious even though he does.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on June 05, 2010, 03:28:18 AM
No, for some reason the next episode isn't in the US until 4/6

I believe its because of Memorial Day? I don't know. Not American.

Anyways wow this was a fun episode, very good. I hate Cliffhangers, can't wait for next weeks.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Morgan on June 05, 2010, 03:58:53 AM
I believe its because of Memorial Day? I don't know. Not American.
Memorial Day doesn't affect our TV schedule. It's probably just mid-season hiatus or something. That or it's one of those shows that only does one new episode every few weeks (some networks are jerks like that with really popular shows).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on June 05, 2010, 06:19:59 AM
Memorial Day doesn't affect our TV schedule. It's probably just mid-season hiatus or something. That or it's one of those shows that only does one new episode every few weeks (some networks are jerks like that with really popular shows).

Wrong and wrong. This gap was between episodes 18 and 19, not mid-series. This is the first time theres been a gap other than the mid-series gap 2 months back.

I'm quite surprised it wasn't a 2 parter last night.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on June 05, 2010, 04:03:03 PM
This arc is apparently a 3 parter like 'The Siege" was for SGA season 1, so last night was part 1 next week is part 2 and next season will have Part 3 (just with a different name)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on June 11, 2010, 10:24:39 PM
well..... that was an ending.... I don't think there is much to complain about this.... heh

now we have to wait till October.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on June 11, 2010, 11:07:41 PM
Just finished it... All I can say is.. WOW

Anyone in Canada that gets the Space channel they're doing a live show now about it, and David Blue and Andy Mikita will be on.

Also Alania Huffman and Louis Ferreira are doing a behind the scenes tour, its funny.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on June 12, 2010, 01:32:08 AM
I have a complaint, I have to freaking wait so long till the next season, that was a hell of a ending for sure
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on June 12, 2010, 06:38:03 AM
All this series, I've been thinking it's great. It's a worthy Stargate continuation, but not as good as around the middle of SG-1. But that was the single greatest series finale I have ever seen! I cannot wait to see how in the hell they fix it all.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on June 22, 2010, 10:41:19 AM
Yeah, Ep 20 was mindblowing. I can't even begin to imagine how great S2 is going to be without being so biased in favour.  :funny SGU's return sounds like a great birthday present!

Hey, has anyone noticed though... Destiny has three shuttlepads, one shuttle has been missing since before they got there... Wonder what happened for the ship to ditch it? Unless someone had managed to get onboard before the team did. :idk:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on June 23, 2010, 05:39:57 PM
Intriguing mystery.

They've only got the one shuttle now, right? Since they ditched the faulty one on the Genesis planet.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on June 30, 2010, 02:20:00 AM
Quote
Stargate Universe: S2 Mid-Season Finale! Destiny has a Destination!

News Tuesday, June 29 by Captain


On the set of Stargate Universe at Bridge Studios in Vancouver last week, a lucky moment allowed us a very quick sneak peek at the call sheet for Stargate Universe Episode #210, the mid-season finale of Season 2, called ‘Resurgence’.

It showed who was in what particular shot, and gave a brief description of what was being shot. What we glanced was a list of actors and a very brief description of them interacting with special effects.

What we inferred: a gigantic battle in space featuring an armada of alien spaceships, and possibly a planet-based battle, are coming to Stargate Universe. Great news for Stargate action junkies!

Here is a list of things that will very probably occur in the mid-season finale of Stargate Universe (don’t worry, not too spoilery, as the descriptions are just sketches):


“Wray sees an alien ship swoop up and over The Destiny.”

“Eli sees a holographic image of a battlefield.”

“A sea of wrecked ships.”


The other big, big news was officially announced by SGU creator Brad Wright in an interview - The Destiny has a destination of cosmic importance, so important that it overshadows the desire for the crew to get home, and that by fulfilling this new mission, it may in fact allow them to get home.

No further details of course, but it should have fans getting pretty intrigued and excited for the return of SGU in October.

http://www.scifitv.com.au/Blog/2010/06/sgu-scoop-season-2-midseason-finale-destiny-has-a-destination/

This is very intriguing... what would the destiny and its support ships be after? Not just to spread the gates over the universe? 
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 22, 2010, 06:40:19 PM
>.>

Destiny set walk though.

http://www.scifitv.com.au/Blog/2010/07/on-the-set-of-stargate-universe/
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 22, 2010, 07:06:06 PM
Episode 15 of season 2 is going to have 2 Atlantis characters

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2010/07/sgu-atlantis-crossover-is-a-go/

the 2 characters have not been announced yet. Maybe Comic-Con
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on July 22, 2010, 11:13:46 PM
Well McCay is a given being the scientist and all
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 22, 2010, 11:47:57 PM
Well McKay is a given being the scientist and all

McKay and Rush... that would be awesome
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 24, 2010, 04:09:48 PM
awesome :D

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2010/07/hewlett-and-picardo-to-appear-on-sgu/?cp=2#comments
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 24, 2010, 07:00:25 PM
Pretty obvious crossover selections:

- McKay as the foremost expert on all things ancient (thou, why Daniel hasn't been to Destiny yet, is anyones guess)
- Woolsey as a representative of the IOA

Seriously, send over McKay and Carter, or McKay and Daniel with the communication stones, and they would pretty much have full access to the ship and a few systems repaired within a week :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on July 24, 2010, 08:08:08 PM
Pretty obvious crossover selections:

- McKay as the foremost expert on all things ancient (thou, why Daniel hasn't been to Destiny yet, is anyones guess)
- Woolsey as a representative of the IOA


Because, after all the years of SG-1, Daniel is still an lingual archaeologist, not a technical expert. McKay is a scientist who deal's with the more technological side of the Ancients.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 24, 2010, 08:54:18 PM
Because, after all the years of SG-1, Daniel is still an lingual archaeologist, not a technical expert. McKay is a scientist who deal's with the more technological side of the Ancients.

Still... Daniel was also once an ascended ancient, who although "stripped of memories" was still able to retain some of the memories and experiences, and also had the knowledge of Merlin in his head for a while. Either way, having both McKay and Carter visit the Destiny would probably help a whole lot more than having the "crew" say hello to friends and loved ones every week.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on July 24, 2010, 09:40:00 PM
Still... Daniel was also once an ascended ancient, who although "stripped of memories" was still able to retain some of the memories and experiences, and also had the knowledge of Merlin in his head for a while.

Ascended being, not Ancient. There is a difference. :D He was only able to remember some memories from his time as an ascended being after RepliCarter probed his mind. He would have forgotten about them after the latest of his many "deaths" on-board the replicator ship.

And the knowledge from Merlin was pretty much gone (except for the lingering visions leadimg them to The Ark) after the Merlin consiousness in him died, reverting him back to "Daniel 1.0" before his succesful attempt to get the Sangraal back through the Ori supergate to their home galaxy.

Point is, while Daniel is awesome, his skills are again limited to his knowledge of the Ancients as a culture, and his ability to get hot alien booty despite being a geek stereotype, lol. :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on July 24, 2010, 09:50:57 PM
Well their still is some language barriers on the ship, and Daniel is the leading expert in Ancient language.....
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on July 24, 2010, 10:01:35 PM
Well their still is some language barriers on the ship, and Daniel is the leading expert in Ancient language.....

Exactly :P

Oh well, still glad to see some Atlantis characters show up. So that that show isn't entirely forgotten. Highly doubt we'll be seeing any Atlantis movies anytime soon. There is supposedly a 3rd SG1 movie planned as well, but I doubt we'll see that either. Mostly due to MGM's current financial problems.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on July 24, 2010, 10:11:28 PM
An Atlantis movie script has already been written it has just been delayed and is now awaiting approval with MGM.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on July 24, 2010, 10:14:21 PM
Exactly :P

Oh well, still glad to see some Atlantis characters show up. So that that show isn't entirely forgotten. Highly doubt we'll be seeing any Atlantis movies anytime soon. There is supposedly a 3rd SG1 movie planned as well, but I doubt we'll see that either. Mostly due to MGM's current financial problems.

I couldn't tell you what is going on with the 3rd SG-1 movie since I don't know myself, but GateWorld did have an article, mentioning that in Joe Mallozi's blog he said that the Atlantis movie was ready to be shot, but that it only needed to be greenlit and slightly altered because of the impending SGA/SGU crossover.

I want to know what happened with Atlantis itself though. I doubt a huge alien city with barely any power would stay hidden in San Francisco bay for very long, lol. I'm willing to bet that several naquadah generators were tied into it's systems, allowing it to either have a constant cloak, raise the shield so that it could rest on the bottom of the bay, or flown back to the Pegasus Galaxy via the "Deus Ex Machina drive" (wormhole drive), lol.

And they still need to get Teal'c on SGU dag nab it!  :bitch:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on July 24, 2010, 10:53:59 PM
I want to know what happened with Atlantis itself though. I doubt a huge alien city with barely any power would stay hidden in San Francisco bay for very long, lol. I'm willing to bet that several naquadah generators were tied into it's systems, allowing it to either have a constant cloak, raise the shield so that it could rest on the bottom of the bay, or flown back to the Pegasus Galaxy via the "Deus Ex Machina drive" (wormhole drive), lol.

From what I remember them saying in the last episode they said the city is going to stay cloaked till repairs are done, then their going to get fly it back
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on July 25, 2010, 12:22:46 AM
From what I remember them saying in the last episode they said the city is going to stay cloaked till repairs are done, then their going to get fly it back

Well obviously they would moved it. Thats a big area to Quarantine in the SF bay for no visible reason.

Now, I think atlantis would be an excellent place for Stargate Operations, also, as we know the Pegasus gates overrides the MW gates.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Kirk on July 25, 2010, 02:55:24 PM
Now, I think atlantis would be an excellent place for Stargate Operations, also, as we know the Pegasus gates overrides the MW gates.
Oh dear, that means all of the SGC's traffic should have accidentally been coming through Atlantis. :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on September 11, 2010, 12:21:23 PM
September 28th new episodes begin, I can't wait, I wonder why their moving it to tuesdays though
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on September 11, 2010, 01:48:23 PM
September 28th new episodes begin, I can't wait, I wonder why their moving it to tuesdays though
WWF is being scheduled for Fridays in SGU's old timeslot.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: JimmyB76 on September 11, 2010, 01:59:38 PM
lol

anyone who refers to "WWF" is definitely an oldschool wrestling fan like myself; i used to really love World Wrestling Federation in the late 80s/early 90s, around Wrestlemanias 2 - 8 genre lol  :D
i dont watch it anymore these days tho, its too stupid now lol  i gave up years ago, tho was a huge fan for a long time...  lost interest before it became WWE or whatever it is now lol

unless you meant World Wildlife Fund?

Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on September 11, 2010, 07:11:35 PM
lol

anyone who refers to "WWF" is definitely an oldschool wrestling fan like myself; i used to really love World Wrestling Federation in the late 80s/early 90s, around Wrestlemanias 2 - 8 genre lol  :D
i dont watch it anymore these days tho, its too stupid now lol  i gave up years ago, tho was a huge fan for a long time...  lost interest before it became WWE or whatever it is now lol

unless you meant World Wildlife Fund?



Heh, never been a wrestling fan myself tbh. Just that the abbreviation of WWF sounded appropriate as a response, when I meant to say that SGU on Fridays is being replaced by wrestling :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on September 13, 2010, 09:10:22 PM
So I just read startgate is going to loose it's position of longest running america. Scifi series to Smallville. While they have the same ammount of seasons, smallville will have more episodes. Also it is it's last season like SG-1
Sorry for any mistakes, on my iPod.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on September 28, 2010, 10:10:26 AM
Tonight at 9pm :yay: :dance :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 28, 2010, 10:02:01 PM
EPICCCCCCC!!!!!!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on September 29, 2010, 09:37:23 PM
Awesome episode, can't wait till next week.

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2010/09/sgu-season-two-opens-with-lackluster-ratings

Hopefully it will get better. I'm hoping it was because of the Tuseday night shift.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on September 29, 2010, 09:46:57 PM
didn't I hear that the ceo of syfy didn't really like scifi? that's why there is WWF nonsense on the channel?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 01, 2010, 06:48:49 AM
Simple plan to get SGU ratings back up:
1. Fire the Syfy CEO who hates sci-fi
2. Get rid of WWE (WTF is WWE on Sfyfy anyway?)
3. Move SGU back to Fridays

Personally, I can't wait for the season 2 premier next Tuesday on SkyOne!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 02, 2010, 09:40:34 AM
So, so glad this is back! I forgot just how awesome Greer is..  :funny
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 06, 2010, 12:58:20 PM
Damn, last night epsiode was just plain damn, I can't wait to see where they run with this
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 06, 2010, 06:10:26 PM
I can't wait for next weeks episode. The trailer is on the SyFy website. I don't think its American only, I can view it here in Canada
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on October 06, 2010, 06:38:41 PM
I can't wait for next weeks episode. The trailer is on the SyFy website. I don't think its American only, I can view it here in Canada

IIRC I think Canada is considered in the same region.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 09, 2010, 07:44:18 AM
Mind = blown. Really felt for Young this time, and I like the little extra insight into Rush and his way of thinking. Who would've guessed he of all people meant well for a change?  :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: JimmyB76 on October 09, 2010, 11:21:34 AM
i must admit embarrassment in that i have never once seen any Stargate episode in any of the series, and ive only seen the movie twice in my life lol   :doh:
  
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 09, 2010, 12:35:38 PM
i must admit embarrassment in that i have never once seen any Stargate episode in any of the series, and ive only seen the movie twice in my life lol   :doh:

Blasphemy! How can you not have seen a single episode of Stargate-SG1? The O'Neill. He is... legendary. The Asgard even named a ship after him :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 10, 2010, 04:32:43 PM
i must admit embarrassment in that i have never once seen any Stargate episode in any of the series, and ive only seen the movie twice in my life lol   :doh:
  

When I come to America, I am going to force you to watch all 10 seasons of SG-1, all 5 seasons of Atlantis and all the Universe episodes released.

I'll have to bring a tazer with me, but I will succeed!  :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Mustang on October 10, 2010, 09:56:44 PM
When I come to America, I am going to force you to watch all 10 seasons of SG-1, all 5 seasons of Atlantis and all the Universe episodes released.

I'll have to bring a tazer with me, but I will succeed!  :D

I second this.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on October 13, 2010, 05:53:48 PM
As do I. You will see that Teal'C + Ronon Dex = major kick ass.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 14, 2010, 08:22:08 AM
Well that was... Upsetting. I was really liking Lou/Telford as part of the cast, and for him to just get a fade-to-black outro... The Aliens seem friendly enough, and it seems safe to assume they only attacked because the seed ship was at risk of going dead. Who knows, maybe he'll come back?

He was only signed for 13 episodes. I suppose the ship could do without Telford and Young butting heads over command, as I'm sure that would've been inevitable.  :funny
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 14, 2010, 12:29:36 PM
I dunno, I think we will seem him at least one more time, no way they are just going to make him fade out like that. I think he is going to play some role later, like giving the aliens a edge over attacking destiny or something like that
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Mustang on October 14, 2010, 04:51:52 PM
I've recently been watching SG-1 from the beginning again. I've worked my way up to Season 7 in just a couple of weeks (I have no life lol) and I must say, it was just as fun the second time through as it was the first. Teal'c will never cease to amuse me.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Captain_AusDutchy on October 16, 2010, 11:16:19 AM
I've recently been watching SG-1 from the beginning again. I've worked my way up to Season 7 in just a couple of weeks (I have no life lol) and I must say, it was just as fun the second time through as it was the first. Teal'c will never cease to amuse me.

Indeed........... Undomesticated Equines could not keep me away
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on October 17, 2010, 07:36:24 AM
I've recently been watching SG-1 from the beginning again. I've worked my way up to Season 7 in just a couple of weeks (I have no life lol) and I must say, it was just as fun the second time through as it was the first. Teal'c will never cease to amuse me.

Apparently the same can be said about Chris Judge off camera, too. According to Ben Browder and Michael Shanks he's the real joker, so much so that he and Michael squeezed out a log of cookie dough into Ben browders toilet as a prank!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on October 17, 2010, 01:29:22 PM
IIRC I think Canada is considered in the same region.

Maybe for trailers, but not for anything else.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Vanguard on October 17, 2010, 08:13:41 PM
Another Mid-season break.

November-March apparently.

SG:U won't last if they keep this up, especially with the new Tuesday slot.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 17, 2010, 10:09:04 PM
Another Mid-season break.

November-March apparently.

SG:U won't last if they keep this up, especially with the new Tuesday slot.

I'm having a hard time actually liking this show. I was a big fan of the original (SG-1), and enjoyed SGA immensely. But SGU is just too damned different from either of its predecessors.

I've seen all of Battlestar Galactica, i've seen all of Star Trek Voyager, and i've seen all of Stargate. SGU definitely has elements of all of the above (Battlegate Voyager), and it's not combined in a good way either. With the show currently struggling for ratings (not surprising, given it's aired opposite shows like NCIS: LA), I have my doubts it will last past this season. Add to that, the current financial difficulties of MGM (owner of the Stargate property).
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 18, 2010, 05:03:24 AM
Add to that, the current financial difficulties of MGM (owner of the Stargate property).

That has absolutely nothing to do with it. They may own the franchise, but the series is entirely funded by Syfy. If anything, MGM will fight to keep it going. It's a steady stream of income. The only way MGM's financial problems will factor in is if they have to sell of assets, and Stargate goes to someone else who doesn't want to keep the current deal going.

and it's not combined in a good way either.

Personally, I couldn't dissagree more. I love SGU. I think they way they blended what elements they did from BSG and ST:Voy was fantastic. It really works. I think it's more consistantly good than most of SGA or SG-1. Both of those had fantastic episodes, but interspersed with quite bad ones. To me, SGU hasn't had that at all yet.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 18, 2010, 08:57:55 AM
We'll agree to disagree then. I may have seen all of SGU thus far, but I have yet to actually like any episode beyond the pilot.

Colonel Young needs to be relieved of command, or otherwise "put aside". His actions in dealing with the Lucian Alliance (both during their boarding of the ship, and afterwards), speak volumes on his being unfit. I would personally have hoped for Colonel Telford to take command, since it was him that was suppose to lead the mission originally. Young was more or less a pencil-pushing desk jockey back at Icarus base.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on October 18, 2010, 09:53:17 AM
Colonel Young needs to be relieved of command, or otherwise "put aside". His actions in dealing with the Lucian Alliance (both during their boarding of the ship, and afterwards), speak volumes on his being unfit. I would personally have hoped for Colonel Telford to take command, since it was him that was suppose to lead the mission originally. Young was more or less a pencil-pushing desk jockey back at Icarus base.

And you don't think that makes it all so much better? They said in the first episode, with the exception of a few of them, they're all the wrong people for the job. Young's unorthodox methods add tension between him and Rush and Wray.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 18, 2010, 11:33:21 AM
And you don't think that makes it all so much better? They said in the first episode, with the exception of a few of them, they're all the wrong people for the job. Young's unorthodox methods add tension between him and Rush and Wray.

As was stated in a recent episode: "Prisoners have rights". Young tried to kill one of the prisoners by smashing the guys head against the deckplate. How does that make him a good leader?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Dalek on October 18, 2010, 11:39:34 AM
they're all the wrong people for the job.

Wrong people for the job = Young tried to kill one of the prisoners by smashing the guys head against the deckplate.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on October 21, 2010, 10:07:39 AM
Good episode in my opinion, I'm wondering what Rush is planning to do with Cloe now and I'm wondering, is he crazy, is the ship really talking to him, OR are they really ancients talking to him???? I'm seeing alot of relationships degrading too, which I guess after a few monthss would be normal given the situation and all
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: mckinneyc on October 22, 2010, 05:55:44 AM
I think the best is yet to come although I would have prefered Sky One to conclude season one of Caprica instead of having to wait even longer for it.

I think long mid season breaks can be damaging especially with envolved, complex stories like Caprica and SGU. I was just starting to get into both and then boom mid season breaks and then when SGU came back I found I couldn't get back into it again so I only watched the season 1 finale as I wanted to give it another go when season 2 began.

I feel a different tone with this season, I get the sense that something is out there and Destiny's relationship with her passengers gets more intriguing.

But again I would have prefered to finish Caprica first then have SGU back for its second season.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 03, 2010, 12:53:23 AM
I knew the should could sense their needs, but this is more than I expected. I think its a good episode
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on November 08, 2010, 11:04:01 AM
Anyone else think the Nelson rating system is effing stupid? There should develop another way to track viewings.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 08, 2010, 02:03:46 PM
Well one would think with cable and satilite tv they can better track who is watching what
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: mckinneyc on November 09, 2010, 07:06:38 AM
Do they take into account how many people record it for later viewing now? I have done that with both Caprica and SGU as I sometimes work late or nights so can't always watch it when broadcast
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on November 09, 2010, 10:21:12 AM
There are DVR additions.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 09, 2010, 11:52:30 PM
Hmm the plot thickens with this episode
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 10, 2010, 05:38:44 AM
2 episodes in a row now, have had the potential to be considered "great" episodes. Both of which ended with a P.O.S and near meaningless ending. I really enjoyed this latest episode, and I was happy that the "truth was finally revealed". And then the episode ends on a really stupid place, especially if it results in the loss of 1 or more of the better characters on the show.

If the continuation shown next week results in what I fear it will be (writers are really stupid), then that episode will also be the last SGU for me. I've really tried to give the show a chance, and at times the episodes have been REALLY good. Other times, within the SAME episodes, it's really lousy.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: 1DeadlySAMURAI on November 10, 2010, 05:56:38 AM
mostly lousy thou as far as I'm concerned.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 10, 2010, 08:06:40 AM
2 episodes in a row now, have had the potential to be considered "great" episodes. Both of which ended with a P.O.S and near meaningless ending. I really enjoyed this latest episode, and I was happy that the "truth was finally revealed". And then the episode ends on a really stupid place, especially if it results in the loss of 1 or more of the better characters on the show.

If the continuation shown next week results in what I fear it will be (writers are really stupid), then that episode will also be the last SGU for me. I've really tried to give the show a chance, and at times the episodes have been REALLY good. Other times, within the SAME episodes, it's really lousy.

looks only like the lady is going to die from the previews for the next ep + maybe 1 or two of the new members.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on November 10, 2010, 09:13:53 AM
What exactly was wrong with that episode? How was it a near meaningless ending?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 10, 2010, 02:43:09 PM
What exactly was wrong with that episode? How was it a near meaningless ending?

Well, you have a couple of characters that have been on the show for multiple episodes, let the audience start to care about these characters, only to have the writers kill them off in a meaningless manner? "I don't like that your talking to them. I'll kill you now". The final scene of the episode was so stupid, given that the "guy" was guarded at all times prior to this scene. Where were the guards now? Where was Greer, who has been keeping close tabs on this guy the whole time?

If these characters truely are killed off by next episode, it will be the end of SGU for me, and i'm sure many others. The ratings have been slipping for a few weeks now. Killing off characters that people care about will only make matters worse.

(note: Spoilerfree review of said final scene)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 10, 2010, 04:28:47 PM
I don't think their going to kill her off, they never said she was dead or showed her dead, they showed them finding her body thats about it.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on November 10, 2010, 04:33:19 PM
Well, you have a couple of characters that have been on the show for multiple episodes, let the audience start to care about these characters, only to have the writers kill them off in a meaningless manner? "I don't like that your talking to them. I'll kill you now". The final scene of the episode was so stupid, given that the "guy" was guarded at all times prior to this scene. Where were the guards now? Where was Greer, who has been keeping close tabs on this guy the whole time?

If these characters truely are killed off by next episode, it will be the end of SGU for me, and i'm sure many others. The ratings have been slipping for a few weeks now. Killing off characters that people care about will only make matters worse.

(note: Spoilerfree review of said final scene)

Why are you assuming shes dead? For all we know, he's just going to talk to her. It's a little thing called........suspense.
I thought it was pretty clear that he had slipped away from (or perhaps even knocked out) his guard, and Greer can't be there all the time.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 10, 2010, 04:38:52 PM
limey did you see the ep preview?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 10, 2010, 04:57:12 PM
Why are you assuming shes dead? For all we know, he's just going to talk to her. It's a little thing called........suspense.
I thought it was pretty clear that he had slipped away from (or perhaps even knocked out) his guard, and Greer can't be there all the time.

Given that the actress playing her (body self), is not listed as appearing in any future episodes past the current one (The Greater Good), I think it's fairly self-evident that she won't be around (i.e dead). Which if true, means I will no longer follow this show which has been sporadically good, sporadically bad at best.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on November 11, 2010, 10:40:23 AM
The Wikipedia description for the next episode reveales her fate.

But there is no source listed sooo... Don't take it as truth.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 11, 2010, 07:11:59 PM
The Wikipedia description for the next episode reveales her fate.

But there is no source listed sooo... Don't take it as truth.
The promo for next weeks episode also reveals her fate.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on November 14, 2010, 01:24:59 PM
Not to mention in the preview Eli walks up to Young and simply says "Give me your gun." IMO that alone would've been enough for me to figure it out.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on November 14, 2010, 08:58:36 PM
Not to mention in the preview Eli walks up to Young and simply says "Give me your gun." IMO that alone would've been enough for me to figure it out.

Same preview clearly said that "He killed Ginn." too. Pisses me off either way.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on November 16, 2010, 11:23:32 PM
Wow, this episode was better then last weeks! preview for next weeks looks interesting.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on November 30, 2010, 10:27:13 AM
Well tonight is the mid season finale sigh..... anyways I really liked last weeks episode, even though I thought the only reason they did it is so they could get another shuttle for destiny. I didn't like the cloe sub plot though, they could have really rewritten that
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on November 30, 2010, 10:33:52 PM
oooh interesting ep! Also Telford's back.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on December 01, 2010, 09:44:48 AM
oooh interesting ep! Also Telford's back.

Agreed. Guess we'll see how the ratings fare in the US after a 3-6 month hiatus. Really pisses me off when they have super long breaks between "mid seasons". Surely, it would be enough to break for Christmas, and return sometime in January? (like most shows do)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on December 01, 2010, 10:49:53 AM
Agreed. Guess we'll see how the ratings fare in the US after a 3-6 month hiatus. Really pisses me off when they have super long breaks between "mid seasons". Surely, it would be enough to break for Christmas, and return sometime in January? (like most shows do)

indeed.. I believe the CEO wants to kill off all Scifi on the channel so he can rename it again to something more to his liking >.>
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: eclipse74569 on December 01, 2010, 11:54:02 AM
Something like the WWE....seems that's the only thing they want on SyFy right now is fricken "wraslin'" :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Meteorafallen on December 02, 2010, 05:42:47 AM
Something like the WWE....seems that's the only thing they want on SyFy right now is fricken "wraslin'" :(

I know I can't stand that! Now If they added the effects to the wrestlers moves like they show in the commercials I might watch it LOL.

I personally am also not a fan of these mid season finales, by the time it comes around for the shows to come back on you almost completely forgot what happened and have to catch yourself up.

Something tells me though that that seed ship is either going to be destroyed or become a new toy for the Destiny, almost like in Power Rangers where they start to find/discover all the other zords. First they got their fresh off the factory line shuttle, and now they are getting the seed ship...again. That ship is just going to get bigger and bigger until it's big enough or fast enough to get them back to earth, and continue/finish Destiny's original mission on the way.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on December 02, 2010, 04:06:57 PM
I think cloe is going to stop the aliens somehow honestly, the fight was going pretty badly
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on December 16, 2010, 06:13:20 PM
http://www.gateworld.net/news/2010/12/syfy-cancels-stargate-universe-after-two-seasons/

 :banghead: :bitch:  :lostit:  :( :( :(

Goodbye stargate franchise. You have been a great companion since 1994.  :cry:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on December 16, 2010, 09:30:25 PM
that sucks, I can see why because it is a very different show from the other 2 stargate shows, I read alot of star gate fans didn't like the show much. I hope another network will pick them up, maybe AMC or somthing like that. Personally I was hoping for a third season is for them to feature maybe the crew of a daedelus class ship exploring and stuff like that, but with the same mood SG1 and SGA had
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on December 16, 2010, 09:58:41 PM
that sucks, I can see why because it is a very different show from the other 2 stargate shows, I read alot of star gate fans didn't like the show much. I hope another network will pick them up, maybe AMC or somthing like that. Personally I was hoping for a third season is for them to feature maybe the crew of a daedelus class ship exploring and stuff like that, but with the same mood SG1 and SGA had

One major problem, is that one of the showrunners to SGU stated that SGU was a "Drama-centric" show, and not as much of a "SciFi-centric" show. I think comments like this is what drove alot of the previous Stargate fans away. Throughout Season 1, SGU was pretty much nothing but internal bickering and drama. The first half of Season 2 was admittedly alot better, with some actual gate activity and mythology thrown into the mix. But seeing as most people who get into a show, judge it by how it began, the damage was sort of done already. Add to that, putting the show on Tuesday nights, the busiest night of the week, and going up against power-shows like NCIS:LA did nothing to improve it's already shoddy ratings. Sanctuary which still airs on Fridays, is still doing good in the ratings area.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on December 17, 2010, 12:00:48 AM
true, but most spin off shows seem to always suffer during their first season to find their place, TNG, DS9, and heck Fraiser (HA wasn't expecting that reference) come to mind but went on to be great shows once they made their own personality. I like the second season also so far, but I think these mid season finales are not helping at all, I can see the show starting to develop too, thats why I hope another network picks them up, I think this can be a great show as long as it doesn't fall into the Voyager or Lost pitfalls. Its a different creature than SG1 and SGA, SGA felt more of the same but was still a fun show that I still enjoyed
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on December 17, 2010, 12:46:29 PM
I'm still blaming Tuesday nights.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on December 17, 2010, 03:59:00 PM
Meh. This new show-like thing never caught my interest. Good riddance I say. Now, if they would continue Atlantis instead.. LIKE THEY SHOULD'VE DONE IN THE FIRST PLACE! :bitch:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: ACES_HIGH on December 20, 2010, 04:38:10 PM
yeah, it's those damn tuesdays, not only is is competing with both NCIS shows, but also Glee, The Event and a ton of other shows, I'm glad I don't have a nielsons box, because I almost never get to watch it on time, my family always insists on watching glee and the event instead.  It was better on fridays, what the heck is Syfy doing airing wrestling anyway?!?  This just proves that Syfy isn't worth watching anymore.

Who's going to be sending in tissue boxes this time? :bitch:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on December 23, 2010, 04:56:16 PM
I just learned about this today. I was really starting to enjoy this show. It was wobbly, but there were really starting to be some lovely science fictional plots in it!

It can't possibly wrap everything it's set up in a hacked-together final?, or in some telemovie... so it's just gonna shudder to a stop.

I think they should blow up the ship. That'd at least be an end for the story. An unsatifactory end, but an end.

The real thing that pisses me off is that with Caprica gone, and Misfits and Doctor Who off the air til the new seasons begin, I've got nothing to watch! Worse still, barring Star Wars The Clone Wars (which is more like an espresso shot compared to the full-course dinner of a 45-minute show like BSG or SGU) there is NO space opera on the air.

And if Blood and Chrome tanks, there will be NO space opera on the air for quite some time to come!

We needs the space operas!

If there's some decent space opera I'm not aware of, PLEASE! LET ME KNOW!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on December 23, 2010, 07:15:57 PM
I just learned about this today. I was really starting to enjoy this show. It was wobbly, but there were really starting to be some lovely science fictional plots in it!

It can't possibly wrap everything it's set up in a hacked-together final?, or in some telemovie... so it's just gonna shudder to a stop.

I think they should blow up the ship. That'd at least be an end for the story. An unsatifactory end, but an end.

The real thing that pisses me off is that with Caprica gone, and Misfits and Doctor Who off the air til the new seasons begin, I've got nothing to watch! Worse still, barring Star Wars The Clone Wars (which is more like an espresso shot compared to the full-course dinner of a 45-minute show like BSG or SGU) there is NO space opera on the air.

And if Blood and Chrome tanks, there will be NO space opera on the air for quite some time to come!

We needs the space operas!

If there's some decent space opera I'm not aware of, PLEASE! LET ME KNOW!

There's this little franchise that started in the 60's. You may have heard of it. It's called Star Trek. Apparently, it's popular but don't quote me on that.

(J/K  :funny  :D )

In all seriousness though, the CEO at SyFy is trying to kill off the sci-fi genre. That much is clear. I'm going to miss the stargate franchise. It has been a great companion since 1994.

Like you said though, apart from the Doctor Who christmas episode airing tomorrow (tecnically, it's now the 24th where I am, so I'm right, lol), the start of season 3 of Misfits (I knew I wasn't the only fan  :dance ), and with Chuck (it's a spy comedy, with nerds) on it's midseason break until sometime next year, there isn't much sci-fi going on at the moment.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on December 25, 2010, 06:28:02 PM
Yeah, Misfits is great. Though I worry that it's teetering on the precipice (of nonsensical crap) that Heroes gleefully dove headlong into in it's season one finale, and hasn't been heard from since.

Just clocked the Doctor Who Chrimbo Special, it was alright.

And Trek Star? WTF is that? *stands up from chair and tugs bottom of tunic down*

But yeah... space opera that I haven't seen that isn't Babylon 5 is what I'm looking for.


And more topically, damn, I really liked this CMBR pattern plot they have just set up. Wish we could have seen that blossom. Here's hoping another network picks it up, but that hardly ever happens. The only show I remember that happening for was... oh! Stargate SG-1...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on January 05, 2011, 11:27:41 AM

But yeah... space opera that I haven't seen that isn't Babylon 5 is what I'm looking for.


(http://aaro5.nettisivu.org/files/2010/03/star-wars-950c0.png)

problem solved.  ;) *runs*
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on January 10, 2011, 09:42:38 AM
Not sure I get the joke, really - sorry!

I liked Revenge Of The Sith. It was perhaps the most palatable of the new trilogy, hovering around the same level as Attack of The Clones. I appreciate Star Wars, but I'm not a huge fan. I certainly don't evangelise the original trilogy at the expense of the new, but I do think the original was better. For a kids show, as I said, the clone wars is surprisingly good. I get the feeling they're tweaking their demographic up beyond teenager into the 18-24 bracket in the latest season. Lots of meaty political plots, very little moralising.

Anyway, as regards Stargate, I hope we get at least one more movie before the franchise is laid to rest in a shallow grave beside the dumpsters on SyFy's backlot.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 09, 2011, 10:06:09 AM
New episode was great, glad it's back finally. Annoyed at Chloe's magical recovery thanks to the blue's, but overall I liked it. The small touch where they're working on the probe and Brody backs up twice as far as the others had me giggling. Just wondering what the calculations Chloe wrote were for, as Rushs expression seemed suss.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 09, 2011, 12:21:01 PM
Sadly, even if the remaining 9 episodes are as good as this weeks episode was, i'm assuming there is no turning back from cancellation at this point. Several of the actors have already been signed onto new acting jobs.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 09, 2011, 06:20:14 PM
It was a good episode for sure I think, I just don't see how their going to wrap things up in 9 episodes though
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 09, 2011, 06:42:42 PM
It was a good episode for sure I think, I just don't see how their going to wrap things up in 9 episodes though

That's the thing... The filming had already concluded on Episode 20 (final episode), before the announcement of cancellation. So the show will literally end on a cliffhanger, if it's absolutely impossible to renew it. With actors being moved over to other acting jobs, I doubt we'll see a continuation, much less likely any SGU movies.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on March 09, 2011, 08:10:39 PM
That's the thing... The filming had already concluded on Episode 20 (final episode), before the announcement of cancellation. So the show will literally end on a cliffhanger, if it's absolutely impossible to renew it. With actors being moved over to other acting jobs, I doubt we'll see a continuation, much less likely any SGU movies.

Actually, the writers are hopeful for a film. MGM still love Stargate, even if SyFy don't.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 09, 2011, 09:02:05 PM
Actually, the writers are hopeful for a film. MGM still love Stargate, even if SyFy don't.

Only time will tell. MGM also promised the SG-fans both a 3rd SG-1 movie, and an SGA movie. Both of which are now definitely shelved.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on March 15, 2011, 01:03:43 AM
Just wanna remind the US people at these forums, that Stargate Universe airs on Mondays. As many as possible -need- to watch the show these next few weeks, if there is gonna be ANY possibility of a 3rd season, or a movie.

I know i've been mostly critical of the show in the past (I still find most of Season 1 appauling), but Season 2 has been like a total reversal for me. The first 10 Season 2 episodes were all largely very good, except for the imho senseless killing of Ginn after building up the relationship she had with Eli, and making viewers care for the character. Since SGU's return (On Mondays), both episodes so far have been FAR above my expectations during Season 1, and I dare say it, among the best episodes of the series. Now i'm actually HOPING for a continuation, especially after the events of tonights episode, which opened up quite a few possibilities, and a bit of new "questions" as to what may come.

My views on SGU from the get-go, were probably colored by the cancellation of Atlantis, a show which I greatly enjoyed. The only reason I kept watching "Stargate" was because of the promise of future Atlantis movies. As of now, all Stargate movie plans are currently on hold, but I'm holding out slight hope that the show might still get some form of continuation. Even if some of the SGU actors have already begun on other projects.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 15, 2011, 01:29:26 AM
well said darkthunder

Anyways I thought this was a good episode, went against a couple of my expectations, a few nice suprises, I liked it alot. Its a shame this show may go the way of firefly though
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 17, 2011, 08:09:50 AM
I am... So, SO confused right now. Rush was acting weird toward the end of the last episode, and the most recent one only left me scratching my head moreso. That said, it was brilliant. [Spoiler] When Future Rush pushed Telford I freaked out! As soon as they mentioned Telford being back on Earth I'm kind of thinking it was all to balance out the paradox, but still... What has my scratching my head is the little conversation at the very end. [Spoiler] Anyone catch Brodys Trek reference in the episode? Cookie to the first one to point it out.

All in all, I agree with Dark entirely. While I enjoyed S1 myself, Season 2 really seems to have found its stride. The show has gotten orders of magnitude more intense and captivating, we're going to need all the fans for the remaining episodes...
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: genty on March 17, 2011, 09:59:51 AM
I'm guessing it's this line
'I don't know, things that make it go?'  :funny
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Villain on March 17, 2011, 01:16:45 PM
I'm guessing it's this line
'I don't know, things that make it go?'  :funny

Cookied. Laughed out loud when he said it. Had just watched the Pak'led episode on TV a few hours before.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Nebula on March 22, 2011, 03:49:05 PM
surprised no one commented on this weeks ep.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 22, 2011, 11:24:58 PM
its recorded, I just haven't had time to watch it yet, I think I may go right now a watch it
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on March 29, 2011, 01:02:54 AM
Hope was a good episode I think, very cool A and B plots and McCay is guest staring next week!!! It was a serious episode that didn't really push the serious to hard, I don't think its the best episode but it felt solid
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on March 30, 2011, 08:46:13 PM
Yeah, I enjoyed it. Also Spracht Zarathustra is awesome, and the way they used it sent shivers down my spine, and then made me laugh out loud.

Very enjoyable episode and the return of a certain recurring character has a friend of mine over the moon.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Phaser on March 30, 2011, 10:03:38 PM
I love SGU.  I was appalled to learn of its cancellation a couple months ago.  I've found it to be a breath of fresh air for the Stargate universe (no pun intended), after the snooze-fest that Atlantis became.  It will be quite sad when it ends, but I'm thoroughly enjoying it in the mean time!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on May 10, 2011, 12:01:16 AM
This show was really getting good, I really didn't like the ending, but I know its all they could work with and all. I really don't know what else to say, its a real shame
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on May 10, 2011, 06:43:06 AM
When 'Enterprise' went off the air back in 2005, atleast I/we had Stargate to watch (at the time, SG-1/SGA). Now that 'SGU' goes off the air, what do we have? Nothing... :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Joshmaul on May 10, 2011, 08:21:30 PM
Am I the only one who got a little choked up with the music at the end of the last episode, and the scenes of Destiny going dark and Eli standing there alone? (I've only seen the last couple episodes of this season, which means I'll have to Netflix it, lol...I think the last five episodes of season 2 are still unavailable as of yet.)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Psyco Diver on May 10, 2011, 11:54:47 PM
Am I the only one who got a little choked up with the music at the end of the last episode, and the scenes of Destiny going dark and Eli standing there alone? (I've only seen the last couple episodes of this season, which means I'll have to Netflix it, lol...I think the last five episodes of season 2 are still unavailable as of yet.)

Yea that part was good, but it feels so unresolved, and I know they planned a movie, but they annouced that isn't happening either, it sucks

Yea there isn't much, well at least BSG is coming to the BBC, at least I can watch that from the begining, I never saw the begining, and damn scifi doesn't do reruns like normal networks
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: limey BSc. on May 11, 2011, 06:30:27 AM
Yea that part was good, but it feels so unresolved, and I know they planned a movie, but they annouced that isn't happening either, it sucks

Yea there isn't much, well at least BSG is coming to the BBC, at least I can watch that from the begining, I never saw the begining, and damn scifi doesn't do reruns like normal networks

They'll be edited down to 30 minutes though.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Joshmaul on May 11, 2011, 01:22:04 PM
I never saw the begining, and damn scifi doesn't do reruns like normal networks

I noticed that both SyFayl and BBC America have been running episodes of TNG these last few months.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on May 11, 2011, 01:38:32 PM
It sucks that, now when the show is finally becoming more "Stargate" (compared to the BSG-drama of season 1), they closed it down. Most of season 2 had alot of great episodes (including the finale).

The one thing i'm glad about, is that it ended in such a way to leave it completely open for a possible continuation in a few years.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on May 12, 2011, 06:09:29 PM
If you ask me, SGU had the kind of finale BSG should have had. Elegant, beautiful, and sombre.

And they didn't even know they were writing a finale!

Well, at least even if it doesn't get renewed somehow (like when the Syfy channel execs who cancelled it stop taking so many Stupid Pills), It now has an amazingly unorthodox TV finale that works to end the series with at least some sense of completeness.

I found it really lovely, and it might just be a better piece of Science Fiction for having been cancelled. If you've seen it, you'll know what I mean.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on May 12, 2011, 07:58:32 PM
I firmly believe, that SGU would've fared better if it had been paired up alongside SGA, rather than cancelling SGA in the first place. SGA benefitted for several years, by having SG-1 as it's lead-in show. SGU never had that opportunity. Furthermore, the SGU pilot had lower ratings/viewers, than the average ratings/viewers of SGA's last season. That if anything should've been some kind of indicator to the execs.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Trim on September 11, 2011, 08:01:49 AM
Well I was bored the other day so I took a chance and decided to check out SGU on Netflix and I must say that I am really impressed.  I just finished the 1st season and am about 4 episodes into season 2, really a good show IMO, not sure why it was cancelled.  I've never watched Stargate Atlantis either, is it as good or better than SGU?
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 11, 2011, 08:12:52 AM
Well I was bored the other day so I took a chance and decided to check out SGU on Netflix and I must say that I am really impressed.  I just finished the 1st season and am about 4 episodes into season 2, really a good show IMO, not sure why it was cancelled.  I've never watched Stargate Atlantis either, is it as good or better than SGU?

Atlantis is more comparable to SG1 than SGU is. SG1 and SGA were both excellent, but they had their bad points aswell. SGU is a whole other flavor, and one which I think the franchise really needed. The problem is, that when the "SGA Only" fanboys got word about the cancellation of SGA, they instantly set upon not supporting SGU, and making other "SG1 Only" and "SGA Only" fans do the same, which really hurt the SGU ratings.

True fans, like me, would have enjoyed the franchise as a whole. The "SGA Only" fans were just being petty. Didn't help that advertising for SGU was done incredibly poorly aswell thanks to Syfy.

Syfy also wouldn't leave the scheduling alone, shifting it around so much because of wrestling (again, why the f*ck is that sh*t on Syfy?), which really hurt the franchise as a whole. The stargate franchise found it's place on Friday nights, and it fit perfectly. If anyone is to blame for the downfall of stargate, it's Syfy!  :mad:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: KrrKs on September 11, 2011, 08:49:12 AM
Well I was bored the other day so I took a chance and decided to check out SGU on Netflix and I must say that I am really impressed.  I just finished the 1st season and am about 4 episodes into season 2, really a good show IMO, not sure why it was cancelled.  I've never watched Stargate Atlantis either, is it as good or better than SGU?

IMO SGA was the best Stargate series. At least once you get beyound the first (and a half or so) Season. SGA got constantly better, unlike SG1, were the last Season seemed to me like they were forcing to much.
On the other hand I am one of those who absolutely dislike SGU, so maybe you won't like SGA.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: CDR_Daxian on September 12, 2011, 12:31:09 AM
IMO SGA was the best Stargate series. At least once you get beyound the first (and a half or so) Season. SGA got constantly better, unlike SG1, were the last Season seemed to me like they were forcing to much.
On the other hand I am one of those who absolutely dislike SGU, so maybe you won't like SGA.

I like SGA, and i Also like SGU. No offense to anyone, but i think SGU should've gone on longer (at least one season more), maybe coincide with some more characters (Sheppard, Carter, Mitchell, etc). i would've liked to see a solution for a supply line at the (near) end of the implied season here and maybe a solution of Rush's discovery. i'm surprised it got cancelled, cause i really liked how it had ancient technology, but was older tech, not to mention the completely new characters, and using the communication stones more often.

SGA did get constantly better, and i'm more surprised that it got cancelled than SGU. they should've done a sixth season where they returned to the Pegasus galaxy, and went into an all out battle with all the remaining enemy wraith. (because of complications with Todd and his crew)

another thing they should've included in any one of the previously mentioned seasons of SGA/SGU would be the X-305/BC-305, a new warship designed to be tougher on the Lucian Alliance/Wraith.

Unfortunately, that never happened. there is however an animated third season of SGU going on.

No kidding about the SGA/SGU only fans, i think that's why Universe got cancelled.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 12, 2011, 06:42:17 AM
another thing they should've included in any one of the previously mentioned seasons of SGA/SGU would be the X-305/BC-305, a new warship designed to be tougher on the Lucian Alliance/Wraith.


That wasn't ever going to be introduced in the franchise because it's not an official design! It's a fan made ship! You are the second person that I've had to explain this to!
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on September 12, 2011, 01:29:04 PM
That wasn't ever going to be introduced in the franchise because it's not an official design! It's a fan made ship! You are the second person that I've had to explain this to!

Who says that "the fan made BC-305/X-305 is the ONLY X-305, or for that matter the unofficial one? Surely whoever designed the canon/official 301, 302, 303 and 304 could've designed a canon 305 as well.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Trim on September 12, 2011, 06:17:44 PM
SGU kind of has a BSG meets Voyager feel to it.  I like.   :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 12, 2011, 09:33:44 PM
Surely whoever designed the canon/official 301, 302, 303 and 304 could've designed a canon 305 as well.

Yes, they could have. But they didn't. And they had never announced anywhere that they were going to. My reply, was in response to what someone believed to be an official ship design and designation, which they were wrong about.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bones on September 13, 2011, 04:07:38 AM
SGU kind of has a BSG meets Voyager feel to it.  I like.   :D
Indeed, I can't understand why they had to drop the series when it became really good + cliffhanger at the end of season 2, but there is still hope I guess ;) IIRC Seaquest was cancelled after season 2 and then it was picked up after few years tho most of original cast felt like WTF! after season 2 so they quit... maybe SGU will get restarted some day :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on September 13, 2011, 09:17:58 AM
Indeed, I can't understand why they had to drop the series when it became really good + cliffhanger at the end of season 2,

Ratings, its all about ratings.

Apparently SGU did really well in Canada, better then US By %. But we have a smaller Population.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on September 13, 2011, 10:43:49 AM
SGU was doomed as soon as SGA was canceled, which was the worst thing to do in the first place. Finally, when we had familiarized ourselves with the new (sexy) team and galaxy and accepted it as successor of SG1, what do they do? A clumsy, badly done end to it to make room for wannabe BSG..
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bones on September 13, 2011, 02:45:14 PM
Well I've gone through season 1 of SGA (it was on AXN Sci-fi recently I think) and got to say I was really unimpressed ... dunno, it felt somehow cheap compared to SGU... I would really have to watch more episodes to say more about SGA.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on September 13, 2011, 03:52:48 PM
Well I've gone through season 1 of SGA (it was on AXN Sci-fi recently I think) and got to say I was really unimpressed ... dunno, it felt somehow cheap compared to SGU... I would really have to watch more episodes to say more about SGA.

Well for one thing, compare season 1 of SGA and season 2 of SGU. Both started under the premise that they would be at a distant location and cut off from Earth. In SGA's case, they were completely cut off from communicating with Earth. In SGU, they regularly contacted people back on Earth using the communication stones. The excessive use of the stones in SGU, is one aspect which really pissed me off about the show. Despite the fact that the ship was millions of lightyears away (further away than Atlantis), they were able to stay in regular contact with Earth, and even "send" personnel to Earth whenever they felt like it. That made the whole distance-aspect of the show, moot.

TL;DR ... After having seen all of SG-1, SGA and SGU, I prefer SG-1 and SGA. I highly recommend you watch the full SGA series.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bones on September 13, 2011, 06:36:11 PM
Yeah that was a bit far fetched ... I will watch more SGA as soon as I get the chance, always liked the kind of stranded feel to the movies/series ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Trim on September 13, 2011, 08:31:44 PM
Well, I've got one final episode of SGU to watch which kinda sucks.  Think I'll save it for tomorrow.  Guess I shall start watching SGA after that, hopefully it will satisfy my scifi craving.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Trim on September 15, 2011, 06:35:59 PM
That was certainly a nice way to end the entire show, now I can see why everyone was so pissed off when syfy said they weren't going to renew it for a 3rd season.  Shit on a stick.  :lostit:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bren on September 15, 2011, 07:40:48 PM
But, taken as a finale, and not a cliffhanger, didn't it rock?  :yay:

I'd love to see a show write an intentional finale that was that brave.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 16, 2011, 06:12:29 PM
At least it was better than the Torchwood: Miracle Day finale! :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Bones on September 16, 2011, 07:22:15 PM
kinda sad, poor Eli, at least he ended up as someone more than he would become on earth (I guess that was the point of those episodes on earth)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 16, 2011, 08:27:11 PM
kinda sad, poor Eli, at least he ended up as someone more than he would become on earth (I guess that was the point of those episodes on earth)

Indeed. We can only hope that he found some way to fix the stasis pod before his 2 week rations ran out. Although, given the fact that there will not be a season 3, I'm guessing that Eli died off-screen, meaning that the rest of Destinys' crew will never awaken. :(
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on September 16, 2011, 10:47:47 PM
Indeed. We can only hope that he found some way to fix the stasis pod before his 2 week rations ran out. Although, given the fact that there will not be a season 3, I'm guessing that Eli died off-screen, meaning that the rest of Destinys' crew will never awaken. :(

I thought they had it set to automatically open when they reach the other Galaxy.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on September 17, 2011, 02:38:39 PM
I thought they had it set to automatically open when they reach the other Galaxy.

It's been months since I watched the series finale so there is a strong possibility that I got it wrong, and that you are correct.

I know I am right about Eli having only 2 weeks worth of power and rations available to him, by which time, he should have either fixed the pod, or make the "sacrifice". If he doesn't, his continued use of life support means that Destiny would fall short of the next galaxy, meaning that there would not be enough power to keep the stasis pods going, meaning people would start dying inside them.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Trim on October 07, 2011, 08:07:35 PM
Just finished my last episode of SGA, now what to watch. 
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 11, 2011, 10:00:29 PM
Just finished my last episode of SGA, now what to watch. 

I assume that you've watched the whole of SG-1 aswell? If not, you should. ;)
But if you have, and want to try something different, I suggest that you watch either:

"A Town Called Eureka"
"Warehouse 13"
or
"Chuck"

from the very beginning. They are all awesome shows! :D
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on October 11, 2011, 10:24:08 PM
Just want to point out, "A Town Called Eureka" is generally referred to (and even advertised as), simply 'Eureka'.

The rest, I agree 100% :P
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Billz on October 12, 2011, 06:54:33 AM
Just want to point out, "A Town Called Eureka" is generally referred to (and even advertised as), simply 'Eureka'.

The rest, I agree 100% :P

Not over here it isn't. ;)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on October 12, 2011, 08:18:54 AM
Just finished my last episode of SGA, now what to watch. 

Stargate movies, naturally.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on December 13, 2012, 08:57:55 PM
Sorry for the bump but...

David Hewitt posted 2 interesting tweets today

https://twitter.com/dhewlett/status/279282394018762752
https://twitter.com/dhewlett/status/279290999367417856
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on February 08, 2013, 08:51:46 PM
So a trailer for a new Stargate game coming out on Mobile devices has been released.

http://ca.ign.com/videos/2013/02/06/stargate-sg-1-unleashed-teaser-trailer (http://ca.ign.com/videos/2013/02/06/stargate-sg-1-unleashed-teaser-trailer)

Its being called an Interactive Adventure game
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on February 09, 2013, 03:17:47 AM
That NEEDS and MUST be released on consoles and PC or it is just another wasted chance..  :bitch:
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on February 09, 2013, 12:43:03 PM
its an Interactive adventure game, so its probably just a point and click game, nothing exciting.
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on February 13, 2013, 02:57:53 PM
More info on the game

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2013/02/new-details-emerge-on-sg-1-unleashed/ (http://www.gateworld.net/news/2013/02/new-details-emerge-on-sg-1-unleashed/)
Title: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on March 04, 2013, 11:24:10 PM
Some gameplay

Title: Re: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Saquist on May 30, 2013, 01:27:54 PM
That NEEDS and MUST be released on consoles and PC or it is just another wasted chance..  :bitch:

Cellular device apps make 3-5 times more money than $60 games on consoles.
Title: Re: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: hobbs on May 30, 2013, 06:12:02 PM
That NEEDS and MUST be released on consoles and PC or it is just another wasted chance..  :bitch:

or get/invent an app emulator that lets you use apps on a pc :D
Title: Re: RE: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Lionus on May 31, 2013, 01:29:31 AM
Cellular device apps make 3-5 times more money than $60 games on consoles.

I don't care. Not everyone has the urgent need to be hip with smartphone with touchscreen, wifi and whatchamacallits. I remember times when phones were for calling and text messaging for petes sake.. :bitch:
Title: Re: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Tuskin38 on March 19, 2014, 10:13:21 PM
The Scrapped Atlantis Movie may become a comic

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2014/03/boom-unfilmed-stargate-extinction-movie-script-may-be-a-comic-series/
Title: Re: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Judge King on December 08, 2019, 07:35:22 PM
Here are several images showing the canon specifications of several ships from Stargate. The images come from the Stargate Now facebook page and are made using the actual CGI models from the series.

https://imgur.com/gallery/8bxvZua (https://imgur.com/gallery/8bxvZua)
Title: Re: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
Post by: Darkthunder on December 08, 2019, 08:24:41 PM
The BC-304 is one of my favorite "Human made" Starship designs, and looks fairly plausable even with our current tech level (minus FTL tech).

The "canon" size of 200 meters is laughable, when shown side-by-side with the canon size of the F-302 fighters. I tend to go with the "model" size of 650 meters which feels more accurate. Also means the ship is right in-between the lengths of the Galaxy Class (643 meters) and Sovereign Class (680 meters)