Author Topic: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...  (Read 1182 times)

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« on: July 06, 2010, 09:21:46 PM »
in Wiley's thread, there has been mention of the differences between the 2 Sovereign Class ships...

you know, i must embarrassingly admit, i never really took notice to the FC and Nem Sovereign Classes as far as how they are different...
to me, they seem pretty much the same - i was wondering if anyone could point out the differences?  please use as much reference material as youd can (pics, screenshots, schematics, etc)...  i am curious and would like to see how different they are (if it is very much so or just a few slight things) that i never took notice to before...  then again, i have a habit of missing things that are blindingly obvious sometimes lol

Offline Morgan

  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1340
  • Cookies: 65535
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2010, 09:28:50 PM »
The biggest differences are the twin torpedo launchers added aft of the bridge (a location I really don't agree with as they're inconveniently right above an airlock), the addition of phasers to the nacelle pylons, and also the warp nacelles were moved forward slightly.

I know DITL isn't exactly known for accuracy but the article "Sovereign Changes" over there is actually quite thorough about the differences.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2010, 09:30:53 PM »
Rather than elaborate, I'll just point here.  If you read this article, you'll know everything worth knowing plus about 10x more. ;)
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/sovereign.htm

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5499
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2010, 09:45:58 PM »
Of course they never did update that article with the now released orthographic view of the nem sov.
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Lurok91

  • Posts: 1309
  • Cookies: 2062
  • SPMod Developer (Retired)
    • Lurok91 Mods
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2010, 10:16:52 PM »
And of course different bridges  :facepalm:

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5499
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2010, 10:20:26 PM »
what about the bridge?? it's the same... unless you're talking about the inside which only has a diff view screen and updated displays.
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2010, 10:40:54 PM »
what about the bridge?? it's the same... unless you're talking about the inside which only has a diff view screen and updated displays.

And the handrails...
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Locke

  • Posts: 535
  • Cookies: 36
  • Cannot find REALITY.SYS - Universe Halted
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2010, 02:22:32 AM »
All the colors in the Nemesis Sovereign were changed.  In FC, the colors were mostly blues and lighter reds (I think) and in Nemesis everything was deep red and brown.

Offline metalnick

  • Posts: 291
  • Cookies: 13
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2010, 04:53:44 AM »
I've always liked the FC version better.
Nothing Is True. Everything Is Permitted....

Offline Locke

  • Posts: 535
  • Cookies: 36
  • Cannot find REALITY.SYS - Universe Halted
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2010, 12:21:47 PM »
I've always liked the FC version better.

I very much liked the look of some parts of the Nemesis interior.  The conference room in particular.  It looked more statesman-esqe, which was important since one of her major roles was first contact duties and ambassadorial trips.

Offline Morgan

  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1340
  • Cookies: 65535
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2010, 12:32:44 PM »
On the whole I prefer the First Contact version, much better looking, but I would keep the nacelle pylon phasers added in Nemesis since they take care of a pretty bad blind spot. I'd probably keep the shuttle bay torpedo launchers as well but lose the ones added behind the bridge - the positioning just doesn't make sense, since any torpedoes stored there would be blocking the airlock right below the tubes...

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5499
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2010, 12:38:36 PM »
I doubt it blocks it... you could have a roof rail for the torps or the torp tunnel in the ship could be in the airlock chamber... the door and area around it looks like it has enough room.
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline deadthunder2_0

  • Posts: 1181
  • Cookies: 39
  • Tech, Nonstop, General- Modders Of Steel
    • Modders of Steel Home page
Re: FC Sovereign vs Nemesis Sovereign...
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2010, 02:05:11 PM »
or it could be this design  where the torpedoes are transferred into the tube from the side

    ____
   |____-----------------------
  |_-__
  |_-__
   |      ----------------
Support the Post TNG Ship Pack

Tech, Nonstop, General- Modders Of Steel,
We are the Modders that take everything to the next level, We are the Modders of Steel