Author Topic: Eclipse Class RELEASED  (Read 59471 times)

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #140 on: March 24, 2009, 09:32:22 PM »
Very, very nice DJ.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Aeries

  • Posts: 1446
  • Cookies: 226
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #141 on: March 25, 2009, 12:37:11 AM »
gorgeous work, dude. She's really growing up to be a fine gal.

Offline Hellsgate

  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
  • Posts: 195
  • Cookies: 2
  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
    • =^=Star Trek: New Worlds=^=
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #142 on: April 03, 2009, 11:43:04 PM »
L-O-V-E this ship! I'd like the artist's permission to use it in future fan fiction.

April 3 2381 - The U.S.S. Nairobi NCC 79255 (Eclipse-Class), is assigned to DS9 in the wake of rising tensions between the breakaway Imperial Romulan State and The Klingon Empire. Starfleet placates The Bajoran Provisional Government by urging Captain Elias Vaughn to sign-off on re-assigning Ro Laren (DS9's Chief of Security,) to the Nairobi's Executive Officer position.
If At First You Don't Succeed, So Much For Skydiving.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #143 on: April 05, 2009, 10:03:35 PM »
2381 is a bit early...  Considering that DJ intends this ship to exist in the 25th century. :lol:

Anger

  • Guest
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #144 on: April 21, 2009, 06:51:53 AM »
For such an advanced ship I would recommend a new power source then the standard Matter/Anti-Matter reaction. I was thinking a bit of Romulan inspiration with a twist would be an order. How about a ship powered by a singularity core, except this core has two singularities orbiting around each other at a very high speed.



"The rotating motion of both singularities effectively caused them to be orbiting each other. This has actually made containing and stabilizing the singularities more efficient then what is found in any single singularity core. The rotating motion also provides more power. The only drawback to such a design was that the orbiting speed has to be strictly regulated to reflect the core's power output. In then end though, the dual singularity design proved more then adequate to provide ample power to larger vessels. Although such a core cannot be effectively downsized without losing its effectiveness as a viable power source." - Doctor Jared Samson, Daystrom Research Institute.

The core's design was a sort of idea I had when I was re-imagining a new fleet revamp project after the Federation had nearly been wiped out. It's a bit of fan fic that involves the destruction of StarFleet Command as an organization and the near complete dissolving the the Federation as a whole. The Federation won the great war with the help of the Klingons but were left completely devastated. Left with some relative peace some surviving members of the Federation began rebuilding the Federation's foundation.

In the early years of the rebuilding several of the remaining StarFleet admirals came together and began what was simply known at the time as "The New Beginning Project". The idea was to rebuild StarFleet on a completely new and fresh technological foundation. The project began with revamping the way resources are harvested or mined. The project was formed with near total secrecy with only some of the highest members of both the Federation and the Klingon Empire being aware of the research being done.

The project was founded on a burning determination to not only restore the Federation but completely revamp it. After about 10 years the project would have designed 5 new ship designs featuring all new sensors, weapons, propulsion and power systems (including the new Dual Singularity Core).

Yeah I'm just rambling on. It's a bit of a story idea I've had brewing in my head for a few years, and this would be the first time I actually speak of it to anyone else. If you guys want me to flesh the story out I could do so, but the purpose of this post was to suggest a fresh core design for DJ to work with.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #145 on: April 21, 2009, 04:35:02 PM »
I thought experiments with quantum singularities are banned within the Federation.

Besides, this is a post better confined to the PM system.  Plus this could count as resurrecting an old thread.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #146 on: April 21, 2009, 06:58:44 PM »
I thought experiments with quantum singularities are banned within the Federation

More accurately, Subspace Weapons are outlawed by the Khitomer Accords. However, this hasn't necessarily been followed. The USS Voyager used tricobolt devices which are classified as "subspace weapons", capable of obliterating starbases. Essentially, a weapon of mass destruction. The Son'a regularly uses subspace weaponry, which in a run-in with the USS Enterprise, caused a subspace rift. Only way to seal the rift, was to cause a massive antimatter explosion near/in the rift. In this specific case, a warpcore.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Cmdr. Madden

  • Posts: 40
  • Cookies: 0
  • does it look like i need my leg pulled?
Re: The Next Enterprise
« Reply #147 on: April 22, 2009, 12:42:40 AM »
if anyone has any ideas for the underside of the saucer, please share.  I'm a little stumped.


why not just build a valiant class into the bottom of the saucer..... the eclipse class seems big enough to be able to fit one on the underside
does this thing ever get old? seriously.... i've been here for ever and nothing new happened. this must be purgatory

Offline FourChan

  • Admiral Noel Vermillion
  • Posts: 608
  • Cookies: 4
  • Starfleet Technologies Development Center
    • Twitter Four Channel
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #148 on: April 22, 2009, 01:06:32 AM »
On the back of the nacelles, the pipe like things. Those are going to glow right? I mean those have to glow.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #149 on: April 22, 2009, 07:30:02 AM »
They are impulse engines after all.

Hoorah for resurrecting old threads... :?

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #150 on: April 22, 2009, 08:00:39 AM »
I'm no expert at this, but I really think the next post should go to DJ Curtis. I'm sure he'll update this when/if he has something new to add.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #151 on: April 22, 2009, 09:28:53 AM »
couldnt have said it better myself :)

guys - it would be best to please let this thread rest until DJ has anything to add...

thx :)

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #152 on: June 09, 2009, 01:23:21 AM »
just to confirm... there's no problem with using textures in BC that aren't of square dimensions, is there?

For example, where your standard texture might be 1024x1024

I'd like to use one for example that is 1024x512.

No problem with that, right?

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #153 on: June 09, 2009, 01:31:51 AM »
HOLY SHIZNO YOU'RE STILL ALIVE!

And I wouldn't know.  :lol:

Offline Adonis

  • Ze Meister xP
  • Posts: 670
  • Cookies: 84
  • Da Death Squad ???
    • Star Trek Excalibur
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #154 on: June 09, 2009, 02:36:22 AM »
I'd like to use one for example that is 1024x512.
None at all :) As long as the resolution is power of two it'll work.
Easy is the path to wisdom for those not blinded by themselves.


Offline gdata

  • STLegacyFiles Site Manager
  • Posts: 126
  • Cookies: 4
  • LegacyFiles Site Manager
    • Legacy Files
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #155 on: June 09, 2009, 03:57:31 AM »
I'd like to use one for example that is 1024x512.
None at all :) As long as the resolution is power of two it'll work.

I think for tga everything works, but when you want to convert to dds (Excal?) width and height of the image need to be a power of two. But 1024*512 will work with both formats. Not sure how BC handles targas which have resolutions that are no powers of two, some of Redragons ships use them, but I'm not sure whether they have ever been put into BC.

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #156 on: June 09, 2009, 10:25:42 AM »
thanks guys.  I thought it was possible but wanted to confirm before I put a bunch of work into something.

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #157 on: June 09, 2009, 11:01:35 AM »
I don't even wish a wasted texture on my worst of enemies. Good to see you're about still dude, and I'm looking forward to whenever the next update comes (As I'm sure a lot are! :lol:)


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline Adonis

  • Ze Meister xP
  • Posts: 670
  • Cookies: 84
  • Da Death Squad ???
    • Star Trek Excalibur
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #158 on: June 09, 2009, 02:44:38 PM »
Not sure how BC handles targas which have resolutions that are no powers of two

Not gonna draw them for example  :arms:

Read posts carefully mate :!:
Easy is the path to wisdom for those not blinded by themselves.


Offline gdata

  • STLegacyFiles Site Manager
  • Posts: 126
  • Cookies: 4
  • LegacyFiles Site Manager
    • Legacy Files
Re: Eclipse Class
« Reply #159 on: June 09, 2009, 04:40:55 PM »
Not sure how BC handles targas which have resolutions that are no powers of two

Not gonna draw them for example  :arms:

Read posts carefully mate :!:


I wasn't entirely sure whether you referred to targa, the BC engine, dds (2^x makes sense here, because of mipmapping).
 Anyway, DJ's question has been answered and so we don't need to talk about this anymore.