I understand I may be messing with the bull here, but I tend to disagree with some points made, and find some other points more dismissive than compelling.
It was insinuated that Raffi did not have a replicator and was living in squalor...she even derided Picard for living in luxury while she suffered in poverty and abused drugs and alcohol. I suppose it is possible she had a replicator, but then why was she living the way she was if that is the case?
I feel the violent decompression point is an excuse that follows a mistake...a way to excuse a pretty huge canon error. Nothing in the actual script for the episode indicates that they died from injuries...it indicates...or more accurately insinuates they died from exposure to space (based on her scripted reaction)....which has already been shown to be impossible. One could argue they needed time to adjust, but then that is an excuse to follow a mistake...with no canon support.
Now, one could argue she was mad that the collective activation effort was somehow disrupted by the ejection, but I think it is pretty likely they wanted viewers to believe the Borg were killed by the ejection.
Not sure where the barn fire information comes from, the sources I read indicated it was a house fire, killed all three of them, and almost destroyed the house. It was rebuilt some time after 2371 (fire) but before 2383 (for first harvest of 2386, vintage of 2399).
If that is incorrect, so be it. If the house survived than obviously so did the furniture.
And yes, I hated the Maddox and dress up episodes. And the idea that "despair" destroyed the Borg in a cube. And the McGuffin repair device.