Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 165098 times)

Offline Dawg81

  • Posts: 733
  • Cookies: 29
  • I am Dawg; Resistence is futile
Star Trek Online thread
« on: January 19, 2008, 11:15:43 AM »
I was on my clan forum earlier when i found out about P2 plans read here http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/startrekonline/news.html?sid=6184895

Does not look good at all in fact we may never see ST Online

intrepid90

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2008, 11:34:02 AM »
hmm engine only...
that doesnt sound good.

Offline Glenn

  • Starfleet Command
  • Posts: 371
  • Cookies: 190
  • Captain - USS Explorer
    • Captain Elgy's Star Trek Files
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2008, 03:17:39 PM »
Q) Star Trek Online?????? Will we ever see it.

A) God I hope not, it looks totally S**t!!!
  :lol: 8) :lol:

Offline Spade

  • I'VE GOT TONE! FOX TWO! FOX TWO!
  • Posts: 41
  • Cookies: 12
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2008, 04:42:10 AM »
Its looking like Cryptic is going to be picking up the IP. Cryptic is the same company that made City of Heroes/City of Villains.

Offline blaXXer

  • Your Leader
  • Posts: 479
  • Cookies: 96
  • The proud result of slave labor
    • blaXXer.design
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2008, 11:49:52 AM »
Kill it, I say.

YOU suck, get a life, moran.

COME TO MY PLACE clicketh me!

Offline Spade

  • I'VE GOT TONE! FOX TWO! FOX TWO!
  • Posts: 41
  • Cookies: 12
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2008, 05:00:09 PM »
Well it will probably be made regardless of what we say, it looks as though Paramount/CBS now has it in their heads that this type of game would make them more money so all I can do is hope that they can make a good game.

Offline Dawg81

  • Posts: 733
  • Cookies: 29
  • I am Dawg; Resistence is futile
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2008, 10:13:21 AM »
To be honest i think we shouldnt hedge our bets on ever seeing online. I can wait till Excalibur

Offline blaXXer

  • Your Leader
  • Posts: 479
  • Cookies: 96
  • The proud result of slave labor
    • blaXXer.design
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2008, 12:42:43 PM »
To be honest i think we shouldnt hedge our bets on ever seeing online. I can wait till Excalibur

Very much agreed. everybody is much too keen on duplicating WOW's success these days - an effort that'S bound to fail, utterly.

YOU suck, get a life, moran.

COME TO MY PLACE clicketh me!

Offline Glempius

  • Master of Science!
  • Posts: 115
  • Cookies: 51
  • Dyin' inna fiar, plz hold
    • My Page -- Team Lynxifer
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2008, 08:11:26 AM »
WoW is only sucessful because Blizzard developed a way to beam crack cocaine directly into the brains of its players

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2008, 08:33:48 AM »
Pfft, ST:O.

 :arms:

You can use first person and third person views on custom made maps in Elite Force. You can control a ship in Bridge Commander.

ST:O is simply those games mixed into one.

Good thing about those 2 games is you don't have to pay to play them.

Kill ST:O  :arms:
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Adm_willie

  • Posts: 70
  • Cookies: 1
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2008, 01:25:49 PM »
I hope we never see it, I mean, who actualy made this ship:



Sorry to say it but it looks ugly like hell :?

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5499
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2008, 02:17:03 PM »
heh I actually like it.
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Excal_Luke

  • Posts: 123
  • Cookies: 31
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2008, 02:27:50 PM »
lol that ship is actually called excalibur

- i was looking forward to ST:O :(

Offline lint

  • Posts: 599
  • Cookies: 211
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2008, 02:33:14 PM »
it looks like a phaser..

Offline Shinzon

  • Posts: 230
  • Cookies: 9
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2008, 12:04:30 AM »
LOL my thoughts exactly

stefmarster

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #15 on: April 28, 2008, 01:08:22 AM »
HAHAHA... Year!

I just think you can do a hell a lot more with this big Phaser.  :lol:

Offline Aeries

  • Posts: 1446
  • Cookies: 226
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2008, 01:01:19 PM »
it looks like a phaser..

Exactly! Though with a tweak or two, it could really look kinda cute... I kinda like the idea...

Back on topic...

I dunno, I was kinda looking forward to ST:O, but... eh, it doesn't really matter to me if it makes it or not. I just want Excalibur. Once Excalibur is released, I'll scream, cry, and urinate myself in pure joy. But from what I've seen thus far, we can kiss ST:O goodbye. :/ Just darn wait for Excalibur, I say.

AndrewJ

  • Guest
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2008, 02:18:13 PM »
No ST-O ahhh crap, today sucks, that game had promise. :(

Offline blaXXer

  • Your Leader
  • Posts: 479
  • Cookies: 96
  • The proud result of slave labor
    • blaXXer.design
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #18 on: May 01, 2008, 08:08:45 AM »
promise? you're kidding right?

YOU suck, get a life, moran.

COME TO MY PLACE clicketh me!

Offline 1DeadlySAMURAI

  • Posts: 578
  • Cookies: 139
  • Do'h
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #19 on: May 01, 2008, 06:48:53 PM »
I gave up on ST-O a long time ago. Now I'm waiting for stargate worlds instead.