Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 169256 times)

Offline majormagna

  • English Idiot
  • Posts: 513
  • Cookies: 5
  • Bail Out!
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2860 on: February 04, 2012, 05:24:47 PM »
The turning issues of both ships can be fixed with an RCS Accelerator.

The issue with RCS Accelerators is that it reduces your survivability; in my experience, the Sovereign is better at endgame (STFs etcetera).

I did a blog postoutlining why I don't think the Odyssey is really that good at STFs... http://www.majormagna.co.uk/?p=111
Did you know I'm on Twitter?

Offline Morgan

  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1340
  • Cookies: 65535
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2861 on: February 05, 2012, 12:32:50 AM »
I don't think the Odyssey is terrible looking, actually I think most of it looks pretty decent.  I think the pylons are little narrow though; a little disproportionate to the rest of the ship.  If they were to fix that I'd probably consider it one of my favorite designs...

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2862 on: February 05, 2012, 03:49:52 AM »
It occurs to me that it seems like a very bad idea to have the transwarp gate to an area of space under heavy Borg and Undine attack right next door to Risa.

And is it just my imagination, or is Betazed nowhere to be found?

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2863 on: February 05, 2012, 07:21:11 AM »
The consoles don't do much for the oddy. They buff by percentage and not a set number if I remember correctly.  The percentage of the veeery low numbers of the oddy is an even lower number which equals a slightly less veeery low number.

I'm sticking with my (ridiculous) Excelsior. Slightly less hull points but just as much fire power and much much better manoeuvrability.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2864 on: February 05, 2012, 12:57:18 PM »
You know, if the bow of the Bortas were a little better looking, it might be tolerable.

And who decided that there should be windows on the warp engines?

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2865 on: February 05, 2012, 01:44:04 PM »
Not me that's for sure!

But is it just me or does cryptic simply not know how to make a good look ships bow? Just look at the sovvie (or any ship with a saucer remotely like that) and you will see my point.
It's a shame they didn't just, ya know, ask us if they could use our models. 
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2866 on: February 05, 2012, 02:24:47 PM »
well, their models are low poly to avoid lag on fleet action situations etc.. would you want it to lag like BC does when there's 50+ ships against each other?
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2867 on: February 05, 2012, 03:39:17 PM »
well, their models are low poly to avoid lag on fleet action situations etc.. would you want it to lag like BC does when there's 50+ ships against each other?

Who said they had to use the very best models? I'm there are some much lighter ones polywise that look almost as good!
I always believed that texture res and not polys that killed performance quicker.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2868 on: February 05, 2012, 03:45:13 PM »
YO! Sto servers full!? DUDE :o

queue position 1533 of 1666 :O
I miss :bigdance:

Offline 1DeadlySAMURAI

  • Posts: 578
  • Cookies: 139
  • Do'h
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2869 on: February 05, 2012, 05:13:30 PM »
Yeah, first time I see a que in that game.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2870 on: February 05, 2012, 07:03:04 PM »
Yet not the first time to see a Q. ;)

Anyways, yeah, I saw that too, and it's the first time I've seen it as well.

And speaking of Q, am I the only one that hears John de Lancie's voice even though it's not supposed to be his Q?

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2871 on: February 05, 2012, 07:22:39 PM »
I hear him.  Even in my sleep. :funny

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2872 on: February 05, 2012, 08:51:16 PM »
It occurs to me that it seems like a very bad idea to have the transwarp gate to an area of space under heavy Borg and Undine attack right next door to Risa.

And is it just my imagination, or is Betazed nowhere to be found?

Betazed used to be on the Galactic Map in between to sector blocks where you can't go, its gone now after they updated the map to remove references to planets/systems that didn't exist, and also to be higher res.

Offline majormagna

  • English Idiot
  • Posts: 513
  • Cookies: 5
  • Bail Out!
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2873 on: February 05, 2012, 09:40:37 PM »
And is it just my imagination, or is Betazed nowhere to be found?

I like how you pick up on a missing Betazed, yet not Telar, a founding member of the UFP  :P

It's in the 'missing sector' between the Sirius block and the Beta Ursae block.
Did you know I'm on Twitter?

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2874 on: February 06, 2012, 12:16:28 AM »
I like how you pick up on a missing Betazed, yet not Telar, a founding member of the UFP  :P

It's in the 'missing sector' between the Sirius block and the Beta Ursae block.

Bah, forgot about the Tellarites homeworld.  You see more Betazoids than Tellarites.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2875 on: February 06, 2012, 01:02:03 AM »
Bah, forgot about the Tellarites homeworld.  You see more Betazoids than Tellarites.

Because christmas. ;)  :funny
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2876 on: February 06, 2012, 06:10:57 PM »
Won't be on this week.  Helping out backstage at some kids theatrical groups performance including all the rehearsals this week and setting up.
Started at 0800 and I didn't finish until 2230.  Am shattered goodnight.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2877 on: February 07, 2012, 12:39:43 AM »

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2878 on: February 07, 2012, 01:11:44 AM »
To quote Jim Kirk, "Sounds like fun."

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #2879 on: February 07, 2012, 03:31:08 AM »
time to work on getting my Borg set..  :D
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."