Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 169104 times)

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3860 on: March 06, 2013, 02:52:52 AM »
All I'd heard was that they were making big big changes to the creator.

Well, if the icons Kori showed us are any indication, I'd say those are pretty damned big changes.
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3861 on: March 06, 2013, 10:04:13 AM »
Well, if the icons Kori showed us are any indication, I'd say those are pretty damned big changes.

I wasn't referring to that.  I was referring to the character creator and only the CC.  When I heard that big changes were coming to the cc I had visions of everyone having to re-roll due to all classes being made tacs :P
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3862 on: March 06, 2013, 11:18:38 AM »
I wasn't referring to that.  I was referring to the character creator and only the CC.  When I heard that big changes were coming to the cc I had visions of everyone having to re-roll due to all classes being made tacs :P

Wait, you mean we're not?! :eek
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3863 on: March 06, 2013, 03:54:07 PM »
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3864 on: March 08, 2013, 03:05:35 PM »
Teaser site update, new image and text.

http://startrekonline.com/sto_may2013

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3865 on: March 08, 2013, 07:07:21 PM »
The suspense is killing me...no, that's the pain in my knee. Nevermind. *chuckles*

Seriously, however...they're hyping us up again, this had better be worth it.
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3866 on: March 08, 2013, 07:13:27 PM »
Call me cynical, but with every "hype" update, I'm thinking... "Meh". Trying not to get too excited, since I have 3+ years of experience with Cryptic and their hype-machine. Been disappointed far too many times, to get excited over much of anything that Cryptic does these days.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3867 on: March 15, 2013, 04:07:50 PM »
http://startrekonline.com/sto_may2013

Teaser Page has been updated, and Dan has been doing rounds on the forums responding to story related posts and giving hints

http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/search.php?searchid=51746041 (need to be logged in to see that, its the dev tracker)

If you remember Temporal Ambassador, Admiral T'Nae appeared to have been left on the Enterprise-C

http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showpost.php?p=8601211&postcount=198

Almost implies she might be involved.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3868 on: March 16, 2013, 10:39:11 AM »
Oh boy, they're going up against the wishes of the JJ xD

That made me smile :)
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3869 on: March 16, 2013, 12:24:27 PM »
According to an interview with Captain Geko, more then just Romulus was originally going to be destroyed in the comic. He didn't go into details of what, but they managed to get it down to just Romulus.

Originally Romulus was going to be big part of missions and they already had work done, but they had to scrap that idea since JJ blew it up.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3870 on: March 16, 2013, 05:47:20 PM »
A shame they wouldn't just use the old "alt timeline" trick lol.
Old romulus would have been awesome imo.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3871 on: March 21, 2013, 03:42:10 AM »
German/French STO sites seems to have jumped the gun on the countdown. Gotta say, if it turns out to be legit, i'd be rather impressed.

http://sto.de.perfectworld.eu/legacyofromulus
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline JB2005

  • Scripter, Lawyer, Soldier, Spy
  • Posts: 197
  • Cookies: 58
    • Captain's Orders Blog
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3872 on: March 21, 2013, 06:42:49 AM »
They've taken it down now, so i'd say legit!
http://captainsordersdevelopmentblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/preview-no-1.html- Captains Orders Development Blog - Last Updated 10/12/2011


Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3874 on: March 21, 2013, 08:46:29 AM »
Romulan faction....
Oh hell :(
I miss :bigdance:

Offline JB2005

  • Scripter, Lawyer, Soldier, Spy
  • Posts: 197
  • Cookies: 58
    • Captain's Orders Blog
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3875 on: March 21, 2013, 08:51:18 AM »
For weeks I've been trying to work out why the countdown ends at 2pm - it seems so random! - then I looked at the notice about maintenance and realised it's actually 7am in the timezone they're working!
http://captainsordersdevelopmentblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/preview-no-1.html- Captains Orders Development Blog - Last Updated 10/12/2011

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3876 on: March 21, 2013, 09:04:08 AM »
Countdown completed...

Romulan Faction, CONFIRMED!!!
http://sto.perfectworld.com/legacyofromulus
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3877 on: March 21, 2013, 09:47:20 AM »
I saw this coming a mile away, but the fact that they're actually branding it as an "expansion" is both appropriate and somewhat inspiring of dread. I dread it primarily for two reasons: One, this may end up being a total disaster and the faction may be a broken mess, just like the KE now (though supposedly it's getting fixed - we'll see). And two...they're labelling this as an expansion pack. Usually for things that get labelled "expansion pack", they charge extra. And given the scale of the expansion, I'm wondering just how much. TOR's "expansion", Rise of the Hutt Cartel, cost only five bucks - because it's one frigging planet. STO:LoR basically adds an entire faction, new player ships, new quests (for the 1-50 Roms and the 1-25 Klingons)...
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3878 on: March 21, 2013, 09:56:02 AM »
According to branflakes, it's free... Lemme dig up that post..

The fact that kdf and rommies are both going to be 1-50 factions now, isn't really filling me with hope.


EDIT

Post number #22
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3879 on: March 21, 2013, 10:35:17 AM »
I do see a bit of silver lining in otherwise murky clouds, and that is the fact that they are calling it an "expansion". Up until now, we've had "Season" sized updates, which have been hit-or-miss. Reason for not calling this next update a "Season" was because it was deemed too large for that title.

I remain cautiously optimistic, but I gotta say I do like the look of the new UI styles:
http://images-cdn.perfectworld.com/en/sto/redesign2012/legacyofromulus/large/s8.jpg
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera