Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 167621 times)

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4720 on: January 28, 2014, 03:54:04 PM »
Great. Now if only they could do something about upgrading Science ABILITIES as well.

Pipe dream I suppose.

You will have your shield drain on plasmonic leech, and you will LIKE IT! :P
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Raven Night

  • Models/Textures
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 531
  • Welcome to the Dark Side
    • Personal ModDB site
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4721 on: January 28, 2014, 03:56:43 PM »
You know, I really liked this game, but when I found out that they would no longer develop interiors I left the game. I understand the choice they made, but I still feel it was not a wise one. I heard there were some interior refinements, but overall interiors are still devoid of any interesting use.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4722 on: January 28, 2014, 04:21:09 PM »
You will have your shield drain on plasmonic leech, and you will LIKE IT! :P

Sorry. I don't buy into the Lottery Lockboxes :P
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4723 on: January 28, 2014, 05:08:40 PM »
You know, I really liked this game, but when I found out that they would no longer develop interiors I left the game. I understand the choice they made, but I still feel it was not a wise one. I heard there were some interior refinements, but overall interiors are still devoid of any interesting use.

Refinements? I don't know of any that they've done, other than one or two texture changes which weren't applied to bridges or ship interiors.  

Oh, and "Hi Raven" :P


EDIT

Honestly, I have no idea why I said plasmonic leech in my previous post....  I meant tykens rift....
I miss :bigdance:

Offline 3 of 12

  • Posts: 260
  • Cookies: 15
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4724 on: January 28, 2014, 05:45:15 PM »
Because you guys are a bit slow at posting links to new dev blogs (just kidding of course :P)

Anniversary rewards: http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=1086771

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4725 on: January 28, 2014, 05:59:10 PM »
Because they're posting them so fast. And I've been playing Starbound all day.

I'm trying to make sense of this blog.

There are 2 4 set bonuses?


Jesus 3 blogs today!

http://sto.perfectworld.com/blog/?p=1086941

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4726 on: January 29, 2014, 09:25:32 AM »
Oh man, those stats on the hirogen boats look good.  You know something else? I think I'd buy a fleet cheyenne if it was based off of the mirror cheyenne! xD
I miss :bigdance:

Offline BarnesSFC

  • Posts: 60
  • Cookies: 1
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4727 on: January 29, 2014, 10:33:40 AM »
Oh man, those stats on the hirogen boats look good.  You know something else? I think I'd buy a fleet cheyenne if it was based off of the mirror cheyenne! xD
Or just get the mirror cheyenne as it's the same thing, with a LT Cmdr SCI station!

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4728 on: January 29, 2014, 11:11:07 AM »
Or just get the mirror cheyenne as it's the same thing, with a LT Cmdr SCI station!

Actually, no.  Mirror boats are rather weaker, having only 9 consoles, less hull, lower impulse mods and lower shield mods.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4729 on: January 29, 2014, 12:41:31 PM »

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4730 on: January 29, 2014, 03:08:06 PM »
Ship Stats

http://sto.perfectworld.com/blog/?p=1088571

The 3 ships are not exact clones of each other it seems, they have some stat differences.

They have a turn rate of 13, and a Inertia Rating of 50.

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4731 on: January 29, 2014, 07:01:36 PM »
Not sure if my eyes are screwy, but does it say when exactly the event starts?
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4732 on: January 29, 2014, 07:17:53 PM »
Tomorrow (Thursday) after maintenance (probably 10:00 AM PST)
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline BarnesSFC

  • Posts: 60
  • Cookies: 1
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4733 on: January 29, 2014, 09:38:23 PM »
Tomorrow (Thursday) after maintenance (probably 10:00 AM PST)
9AM EST to 1pm EST

(click here to view in your timezone, just add 4 hours and done: www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20140130T06&p1=224)

Offline BarnesSFC

  • Posts: 60
  • Cookies: 1
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4734 on: January 29, 2014, 10:24:34 PM »
PrimetimeUGC had ANOTHER geko interview and this was the best ship news all month:

New obscure IP ship, that's ready to go, no abilities as of yet. Not the Yager, and an upgrade Negh'var refit on the horizon.

Watch all here:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4735 on: January 30, 2014, 07:46:46 AM »
9AM EST to 10AM EST

(click here to view in your timezone, just add 4 hours and done: www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20140130T06&p1=224)

Don't you mean 9AM To 1 PM EST?

Offline BarnesSFC

  • Posts: 60
  • Cookies: 1
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4736 on: January 30, 2014, 08:18:19 AM »
Don't you mean 9AM To 1 PM EST?
Yep  :hithead:

Also, I forgot to mention the Galaxy-X seperation is finally on the schedule and so is incorporating the Odyssey tech for the Galaxy and Prometheus.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4737 on: January 30, 2014, 08:34:53 AM »
New obscure IP ship, that's ready to go, no abilities as of yet. Not the Yager, and an upgrade Negh'var refit on the horizon.

Could be the norway, or maybe the raging queen/curry class? Perhaps the Soyuz?
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4738 on: January 30, 2014, 12:41:01 PM »
4 Year Anniversary Info-graphic


Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4739 on: January 30, 2014, 02:34:39 PM »
That mission was amazing, I loved it. One of their best yet.