« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: USSP Stargazer  (Read 5973 times)

Offline Aeries

  • Posts: 1446
  • Cookies: 226
Re: USSP Stargazer
« Reply #20 on: July 20, 2009, 08:51:15 PM »
Quote from: Barihawk on July 20, 2009, 06:46:36 PM
Dude, if you are sitting at 5.5k tris, you should feel obligated to add detail wherever you can, even if it does not exist :P.

Also, the roof is going to murder your polycount.

You sure? With the Mithra bridge I find the chairs and consoles do so more than the ceiling. Maybe it's just the different ways we build things. :P
Logged

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: USSP Stargazer
« Reply #21 on: July 29, 2009, 07:24:43 AM »
status report, please  :)
Logged
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: USSP Stargazer
« Reply #22 on: July 29, 2009, 07:34:20 AM »
I'm remaking the bridge, I realized an inconsistency with the raised platform that the stargazer has but the battle bridge doesn't, and with a 23k poly limit I can make it look a lot better, which I think it needs. :lol:
Logged


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline limey BSc.

  • JL Studios - Co-Founder
  • Posts: 1152
  • Cookies: 421
  • JL Studios - Co-Founder
Re: USSP Stargazer
« Reply #23 on: July 29, 2009, 07:41:58 AM »
Quote from: Lionus on July 29, 2009, 07:24:43 AM
status report, please  :)

It's an unwritten rule (and basic etiquette) not to ask people for updates. When the author has something worth an update, they will post it.
Logged
MUSE!!!

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: USSP Stargazer
« Reply #24 on: July 29, 2009, 10:53:29 AM »
  :mrgreen:
Logged

Offline MLeo

  • Retired Staff
  • Posts: 3636
  • Cookies: 833
  • Software Simian
    • the Programming Pantheon
Re: USSP Stargazer
« Reply #25 on: July 29, 2009, 01:29:05 PM »
Logged
I still can't read peoples minds, nor can I read peoples computers, even worse, I can't combine the two to read what is going wrong with your BC install...

"It was filed under 'B' for blackmail." - Morse, Inspector Morse - The dead of Jericho.

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: USSP Stargazer
« Reply #26 on: July 31, 2009, 11:38:08 AM »
Mods spamming? It can't be. :arms:
Logged


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »