Author Topic: Star Wars VII The Force Awakens Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers  (Read 10763 times)

Offline 1DeadlySAMURAI

  • Posts: 578
  • Cookies: 139
  • Do'h
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2012, 04:39:47 PM »
I think of it this way. No matter how crappy it turns out, it can't be as bad as Jar Jar Binks.
So too me the new trilogy can only be a good thing.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2012, 05:59:34 PM »
I think of it this way. No matter how crappy it turns out, it can't be as bad as Jar Jar Binks.
So too me the new trilogy can only be a good thing.

Star Wars Episode VII: Return of the Binks.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Trim

  • BCN/BCU Veteran
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 323
  • Cookies: 74
  • Moderator of redundancy Moderator
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #22 on: November 02, 2012, 06:00:41 PM »
I'm not really sure how this will turn out, the only way I would remotely support more Star Wars movies is if they included the original cast members.  Anyway, not gonna judge and be all dramatic until I see the finished product, we may all be surprised.   :dontcare:

Offline CyAn1d3

  • MacDill Shipyards Design Team
  • Posts: 1656
  • Cookies: 420
  • RETIRED
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #23 on: November 02, 2012, 07:37:21 PM »
.....I would remotely support more Star Wars movies is if they included the original cast members.

i could JUST see Carrie Fishers mentally lost self stumbling about a set now...  :funny

IIRC from the commentary, Seth Macfarlane had to SERIOUSLY coax her into doing the third Star Wars spoof. she wants nothing to do with it.

plus i think Hamills totally retired... he stopped doing the joker FFS
I came, i saw, i added a Sig.
Later gents, i have Youtube to take over.
Cy - 1-12-15

Offline Trim

  • BCN/BCU Veteran
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 323
  • Cookies: 74
  • Moderator of redundancy Moderator
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #24 on: November 02, 2012, 07:59:47 PM »
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/01/mark-hamill-talks-star-wars-episode-vii

Time will tell I suppose, after all William Shatner was 60 and Deforest Kelley was 71 when they did ST 6. 

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #25 on: November 02, 2012, 11:11:15 PM »
i could JUST see Carrie Fishers mentally lost self stumbling about a set now...  :funny

IIRC from the commentary, Seth Macfarlane had to SERIOUSLY coax her into doing the third Star Wars spoof. she wants nothing to do with it.

plus i think Hamills totally retired... he stopped doing the joker FFS

I doubt Fisher would come back.  I don't think she hates the franchise, but I don't think she'd be up for it.

And Mark Hamill is NOT retired.  Not in the slightest.  He's doing a ton of voice-over work.  He just said that Arkham City was his last go-round as Joker(which is what Nimoy said about Spock back in Star Trek VI and we all know how that went).

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline B5

  • The One Who Will Be
  • Posts: 203
  • Cookies: 11
  • Babylon 5: The Last of the Babylon Stations.
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #26 on: November 03, 2012, 06:30:32 AM »
I really don't know what to think on this one... really don't know :doh:
On a pirateship talking piracy with pirates. Arrrr me hearties. There be whirlpools here. And another pirate ships. Full of pirates... from pirateland... and piratebay... Pirates... piiiiiiratessssss.

http://www.fanfiction.net/s/8396544/1/Conundrum

Pirates.

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #27 on: November 03, 2012, 11:36:29 AM »
I will wait until it's on TV in about 6-7 years. Then I'll watch it and determine whether I should be glad I didn't spend money on it.
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #28 on: November 03, 2012, 12:04:25 PM »
Why are people so negative? Disney bought Marvel a few years back, and that turned out pretty okay (The Avengers made over 1.5 billion dollars at the box office). I remember similar negativity in regards to JJ Abrams being handed over the reigns to running Star Trek.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Bones

  • Moderator
  • Posts: 3354
  • Cookies: 639
  • SPAAAAAAAAACE !!!
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #29 on: November 03, 2012, 01:23:23 PM »
Why are people so negative? Disney bought Marvel a few years back, and that turned out pretty okay (The Avengers made over 1.5 billion dollars at the box office). I remember similar negativity in regards to JJ Abrams being handed over the reigns to running Star Trek.

indeed... looking back at how quickly ST been sinking before JJ revived the franchise with fresh aesthetics and even better approach to ST, Disney's SW might be similiar rebirth of SW franchise

Offline Cube

  • Posts: 143
  • Cookies: 5
    • DJcube
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #30 on: November 03, 2012, 02:02:33 PM »
No preexisting canon will be used - it is an "entirely original" trilogy.

They can still use elements that already exist. It would be awesome is Kyle Katarn made an appearance, even if he was just at the new Jedi temple or something like that.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #31 on: November 03, 2012, 07:26:58 PM »
I think it'll be set more like a hundred years fore or aft of the six.  If they set it within two dozen years of either side, they'd just be stepping toes on all of the EU stuff out there, and then tons of royalties and such would have to be handled regarding all of the authors.  It's just a legal crapstorm and it also limits the scriptwriters, concept artists, and casting way too much.

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2012, 06:22:09 AM »
Or they could just do what Trek does, and completely disregard everything that's not the movies or the series. Close to NOTHING from Trek novels - not even the novelizations of the movies - is considered canon, nor is anything from video games. Likely because, more often than not, those things conflict. We've had several books that have featured Vulcan, and they're all drastically different both from not only the canon, but from each other, too. The major difference between Star Wars' EU and Star Trek's is that Star Wars' is a lot more structured, so that there ISN'T constant retconning or multiple variations of stories in the same time frame. Granted, the release of the prequel trilogy kinda messed things up a bit, but nonetheless.

The trouble with "dumping the EU", though, is the fact that, without it, there would frankly be no Star Wars fandom, as the best stories and characters have been EU creations - or original movie characters with expanded stories in the EU (i.e. Han Solo). If there IS to be a new trilogy, despite what they've said, they HAVE to take the EU into account, or there will be fan outrage the likes of which have not been seen before...and frankly, Lucas would not be this rich snob he is now if it weren't for the millions of loyal fans (including the many thousands of complete zealous fanatics...i.e. the ones who go in costume).
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2012, 11:30:59 PM »
I agree with FarShot, they should set it way in the future, or just ignore EU.

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #34 on: November 05, 2012, 07:16:39 PM »
And as usual with Disney ep7-9(again will be post ep6) are just the beginning.
All hail the messiah!

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #35 on: November 06, 2012, 11:46:50 PM »
I love some of Yahoo's ideas for directors for the next Star Wars.  Two of them would be awesome but utterly impossible.  One was Joss Whedon, and he'll be neck deep in The Avengers 2.  The other was J.J. Abrams.  I am not sure exactly HOW impossible that would be, but I think working on Star Trek probably precludes the possibility.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #36 on: November 07, 2012, 12:50:26 AM »
Matthew Vaughn rumoured for director's chair of Episode VII (also Harrison Ford interested in revisiting Han Solo character):
http://www.imdb.com/news/ni40077542/

Matthew Vaughn is primarily known for directing Kick-Ass, and X-Men: First Class.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #37 on: November 07, 2012, 06:40:00 AM »
Kyle Katarn.  Enough said.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline 1DeadlySAMURAI

  • Posts: 578
  • Cookies: 139
  • Do'h
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #38 on: November 07, 2012, 03:31:04 PM »

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #39 on: November 07, 2012, 04:35:35 PM »
BWAHAHAHA! :thumbsup:

To Boldly Go...Again.