Author Topic: TREK XI - Images, Footage, Trailers, Enterprise, Discussion, etc. Thread (WARNING: SPOILERS) (Read 207034 times)

FarShot · « **Reply #700 on:** March 13, 2009, 09:56:57 AM »

It has to be less than 1 deck, that is if they didn't rescale it 3 times its TOS size.

086gf · « **Reply #701 on:** March 13, 2009, 04:43:41 PM »

Yeah, those have to be torp tubes.

Ok, heres some closeups of the missles in action against the Kelvin. Interesting that it starts out as one warhead and then has about 8-12 mini warheads that scatter off of it that turns it from a normal missle into a barrage weapon. They do seem to have a kind of Tholian look to them.

http://forums.filefront.com/4835269-post37.html

FarShot · « **Reply #702 on:** March 13, 2009, 08:57:19 PM »

Hey, little tiny buggers like that absolutely have to be devastating. Besides, I can see those as a mining implement used to loosen up hard rock formations for easy mining.

lint · « **Reply #703 on:** March 13, 2009, 11:29:40 PM »

wouldn't having spotlight all around an aft torpedo launcher kind of like painting a target on you're hull?

FarShot · « **Reply #704 on:** March 13, 2009, 11:34:53 PM »

Hardly matters. What about the big bright bulb on top of the bridge? Oh yeah, that definitely is painting a target. And that is on other ships besides the JJPrise, mind you.

WileyCoyote · « **Reply #705 on:** March 14, 2009, 08:56:47 PM »

Kellogg's is doing a Star Trek movie promotion. There is a small image of the Enterprise and it shows the bussard collectors glowing blue.
http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/14/kelloggs-begins-new-star-trek-movie-promotion/

FarShot · « **Reply #706 on:** March 14, 2009, 09:12:52 PM »

I guess it matches TMP nacelles better.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #707 on:** March 15, 2009, 01:30:35 PM »

Leggo my Star Trek Eggos!!

Anyway, that MIGHT just be a promotional image seeing as how other shots with the ship at warp at that angle don't have glowing bussards. :? I wish Intel would update their site with a rotatable model of the Enterprise...

baz1701 · « **Reply #708 on:** March 18, 2009, 05:09:44 AM »

just found this.

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #709 on:** March 18, 2009, 10:19:45 AM »

I seen that a few weeks ago on Trek Core. Pretty cool Layout. I'm starting to like it.

JimmyB76 · « **Reply #710 on:** March 18, 2009, 11:22:27 AM »

i dont like that bridge

those stupid windows are in the way lol

mckinneyc · « **Reply #711 on:** March 18, 2009, 11:26:19 AM »

I too dislike the bridge to a certain degree.

Dalek · « **Reply #712 on:** March 18, 2009, 12:18:56 PM »

You know, it looks almost TNG from that angle. If it was with a few tweaks, I'd have it!

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #713 on:** March 19, 2009, 06:48:05 PM »

On topic then, here's a link to a Flicker photo set showing off the three Enterprise models displayed at the ArcLight cinema.
Thank baz for the link. ;)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/megamanex/sets/72157614933396812/

086gf · « **Reply #714 on:** March 20, 2009, 02:14:38 PM »

Quote from: Shadowknight1 on March 19, 2009, 05:25:04 PM

Especially Yelchin. At least the others look somewhat like the character they're supposed to be, Yelchin's way off.

At least they kept true to the character and have him saying "wessle" each time.

Quote from: Kori Barnes on March 19, 2009, 08:29:55 PM

I bet ya there will a Lost reference in the move some where. A hidden Dharma logo? (Branch of Section 31 anyone? lol)

Well, there is a Cloverfield reference in the movie so I don't doubt that one bit...plus this is JJ we're talking about here...its a requirement lol.

Quote

One thing I don't like about the XI Ent is the bottom of the saucer is very bare, it looks incomplete to me.

That and the appearent lack of belly phasers...or any phasers elsewhere other than the six on the saucer.

WileyCoyote · « **Reply #715 on:** March 20, 2009, 02:25:51 PM »

Quote

That and the appearent lack of belly phasers...or any phasers elsewhere other than the six on the saucer.

...which makes it similar to a Phase II version. Keeping the same weaponry as TOS and adding a few TMP elements. I'm just happy that there is still some life in Star Trek after all these years.

086gf · « **Reply #716 on:** March 20, 2009, 02:32:43 PM »

Except for that half sphere phaser thing above the shuttlebay on the TOS connie.

JimmyB76 · « **Reply #717 on:** March 20, 2009, 03:04:32 PM »

Quote from: lmm086gf on March 20, 2009, 02:14:38 PM

Quote from: Kori Barnes on March 19, 2009, 08:29:55 PM
I bet ya there will a Lost reference in the move some where. A hidden Dharma logo? (Branch of Section 31 anyone? lol)
Well, there is a Cloverfield reference in the movie so I don't doubt that one bit...plus this is JJ we're talking about here...its a requirement lol.

ooh good point... i am a big fan of the Lost series, and i thought Cloverfield was pretty decent...
maybe then i'll go see this movie just to keep an eye out for any hidden references lol

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #718 on:** March 20, 2009, 03:15:04 PM »

One thing to think about on the phasers though, if the Super Bowl commercial was any indication, they seem to be treating the phasers on the saucer as individual turrets, which means unless something gets right behind the saucer the phasers would be able to hit them.

Darkthunder · « **Reply #719 on:** March 20, 2009, 03:33:44 PM »

Quote from: Shadowknight1 on March 20, 2009, 03:15:04 PM

One thing to think about on the phasers though, if the Super Bowl commercial was any indication, they seem to be treating the phasers on the saucer as individual turrets, which means unless something gets right behind the saucer the phasers would be able to hit them.

If the phasers are "phaser turrets" much like the phase cannons of ENTERPRISE, that might be a good thing. Gives the ship a lot better phaser coverage than most of the "Pre-JJverse" ships.

News:

Author Topic: TREK XI - Images, Footage, Trailers, Enterprise, Discussion, etc. Thread (WARNING: SPOILERS) (Read 207034 times)