Author Topic: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash  (Read 6910 times)

Offline NeoKaede

  • Posts: 201
  • Cookies: 4
  • We're watching you... scum.
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #40 on: October 09, 2008, 05:09:23 PM »
He did.  He just never textured/released it.  There was a thread on BCU about it, but I see that those threads are most likely all gone now.

Pity. I love LC's work.

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #41 on: October 09, 2008, 05:38:06 PM »
I vote Galaxy. IMO, Ambasador nacelles are fugly. They're just glowy boxes. The Galaxy's have a dynamic to them.

So far, looking good.

Offline Captain_April

  • Posts: 103
  • Cookies: 5
  • hardpointer - CXP
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #42 on: October 12, 2008, 10:16:21 PM »
great job.  cookie for turning something that I wouldn't give a second thought to installing into something I will consider blowing up, maybe even playing as if its a good HP (I think we can trust that it will be)

Offline Starforce2

  • Master Hardpointer
  • Retired Staff
  • Posts: 1483
  • Cookies: 882
  • Skype: LizardWranger
    • Facebook
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #43 on: October 12, 2008, 11:54:40 PM »
How about I do both? A canon and non-canon, but the canon will probably get done first.

Doing both sounds great.

IMO, canon (or what is considered "quasi-canon") first. As you already stated.

Non-canon (Galaxy nacelles) 2nd.

Be sure to throw in Venture nacelles with the phasers on them. The ship could use an update to deal with dominion threats.
I just realised something. I've released over 300 fully modded ships for bridge commander. Bow to your master :D
Read my mod blog!
http://bcs-tng.com/forums/index.php?action=viewblog;u=1129

Offline Kirk

  • Posts: 1438
  • Cookies: 139
    • My Released Mods
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #44 on: October 13, 2008, 08:10:23 AM »
Ah, good idea, I will.

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #45 on: October 13, 2008, 10:36:06 AM »
thats a really good idea...

Offline FekLeyr Targ

  • DS9FX Team
  • Posts: 492
  • Cookies: 538
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #46 on: October 16, 2008, 03:52:25 PM »
Wait a second. I thought that the Springfield uses Nacelles similar to the ones the Cheyenne class has.
TaH pagh, Tah be.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #47 on: October 16, 2008, 03:58:18 PM »
Wait a second. I thought that the Springfield uses Nacelles similar to the ones the Cheyenne class has.

Yes it does but kirkeys doing 2-3 versions.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline FourChan

  • Admiral Noel Vermillion
  • Posts: 608
  • Cookies: 4
  • Starfleet Technologies Development Center
    • Twitter Four Channel
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #48 on: October 16, 2008, 06:21:56 PM »
I can't wait for the Springfield pack though with the Galaxy Class nacelles, it's a small ship and I feel the Nacelles should be more streamlined.