Author Topic: Kyoto Class  (Read 37616 times)

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #60 on: March 02, 2007, 12:37:17 AM »
**updates coming soon**

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #61 on: May 27, 2007, 01:38:12 AM »
**update**

Ok , some update here at last... First beta it's in test stage...
Still needs corrections on textures and model (perhaps, lol)

HP it's on the design board already...





Offline Glenn

  • Starfleet Command
  • Posts: 371
  • Cookies: 190
  • Captain - USS Explorer
    • Captain Elgy's Star Trek Files
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #62 on: May 27, 2007, 08:27:18 AM »
Not bad at all Gdluque, I look forward to downloading this baby!!  :D 8) :)

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #63 on: May 27, 2007, 08:51:06 AM »
Me too. I look forward to ripping it apart with a borg cutter beam  :D

Seriously though, it looks excellent.
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #64 on: May 27, 2007, 01:33:39 PM »
Me too. I look forward to ripping it apart with a borg cutter beam  :D

Seriously though, it looks excellent.

lol

BTW, watching your signature, I'm seriously thinking about to make a Selfridge 2.0...

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #65 on: May 27, 2007, 02:01:32 PM »
lol

BTW, watching your signature, I'm seriously thinking about to make a Selfridge 2.0...

Well I wasnt going to say anything

but...
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Shinzon

  • Posts: 230
  • Cookies: 9
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #66 on: May 27, 2007, 07:21:27 PM »
great work G!

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #67 on: May 27, 2007, 09:29:50 PM »

Offline Cube

  • Posts: 143
  • Cookies: 5
    • DJcube
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #68 on: May 28, 2007, 04:39:50 PM »
lol

BTW, watching your signature, I'm seriously thinking about to make a Selfridge 2.0...

You mean a Selfridge 2 2.0? Or another version of the original Selfridge?

Offline Mustang

  • Resident Movie Critic
  • Posts: 386
  • Cookies: 46
  • Muse Fan
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #69 on: May 28, 2007, 04:55:54 PM »
Damn nice.

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #70 on: May 28, 2007, 10:33:09 PM »
You mean a Selfridge 2 2.0? Or another version of the original Selfridge?

I mean an improved version of the one in that sign

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #71 on: May 29, 2007, 03:28:29 AM »
**update**

Weaponary test: Tachyon Pulse.






Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #72 on: May 29, 2007, 05:08:30 AM »
 :shock: :shock: :shock:
Me Wantty
Looks awesome.

Offline ACES_HIGH

  • BCC Roleplay Game Narrator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1678
  • Cookies: 54
  • while(!(succeed=try()));
    • BCC Roleplay Games
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #73 on: May 29, 2007, 04:03:14 PM »
this looks amazing

Offline Phaser

  • Star Trek Canon Authority
  • Posts: 387
  • Cookies: 231
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #74 on: May 30, 2007, 08:51:26 PM »
Wow!  That looks pretty wicked.

Offline ACES_HIGH

  • BCC Roleplay Game Narrator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1678
  • Cookies: 54
  • while(!(succeed=try()));
    • BCC Roleplay Games
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #75 on: May 30, 2007, 09:19:56 PM »
wow

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #76 on: May 30, 2007, 09:22:07 PM »
LOL you already posted above phaser but thx again :)
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline ACES_HIGH

  • BCC Roleplay Game Narrator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1678
  • Cookies: 54
  • while(!(succeed=try()));
    • BCC Roleplay Games
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #77 on: May 30, 2007, 09:30:38 PM »
must have not seen that post

Offline Bigkap

  • Posts: 112
  • Cookies: 5
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #78 on: May 30, 2007, 09:43:59 PM »
This looks way better :P

Nice job

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #79 on: May 31, 2007, 02:27:07 AM »
lol, definitly we have a Warship as we were looking for. Another name for her could be "USS BAK" (Borg Ass Kicker)
Definitly we have a Borg Hunter...

I'm getting improvments whit the HP, but I'm still feeling that it's a bit overpowered... To much for my taste... More balance it's required, and yeah Neb, we have a mighty Warp Core here... (I'm working on some balance decreasing the capacity of the reserve power looking for no abuse of the seccondary strategic weapons, like Cloaking Device and Tachyon Beam)

Ok, this is what we have so far until this point:(Note that this weaponary will suffer changes, this is just for alignment and contruction pourpouses)

Weapons:

-2 Dorsal Main Phaser Banks
-2 Dorsal-Lateral Phaser banks
-2 Dorsal-Backward Phaser banks
-Tachyon Pulse (Main deflector emitter)
-2 Pulse Klingon Type Cannons
-2 forward torpedo launchers
-2 backward torpedo launchers
-Phalatium Wave (optional-just for testing pourpouses)

Systems / Tactical:

-Primary Shields
-Seccondary Shields
-1 Gravity Generator
-Enhanced Sensor System
-Cloaking Device
-Rear and front Shuttle Bays
-2 Tractor Beams
-Advanced Warp Core


Since this ship it's between the size of Defiant and Intrepid classes, I'm making her just agile between both types of ships...

Ok, updates will come soon, and here you have a couple of screenies more...