Author Topic: Doctor Who Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers (Read 77806 times)

Vortex · « **Reply #560 on:** July 03, 2010, 11:24:14 PM »

Looking at that, they were speculating her to appear at the end of the current series.

The biggest problem with River being a Doctor is that she wouldn't have needed to call on him for the Library. Moffat has also said that it wouldn't be anything obvious.

Daystar70 · « **Reply #561 on:** July 03, 2010, 11:31:15 PM »

I really am leaning on her being Romana, i hope she is, i really feel Romana was the "one" perfect mate in the Doc's life, i have a feeling she may have been olne of his many wives (i know its never been canon confirmed but moffat said in an interview back in the 70's and 80's all british tv was non sexual like that, which is why RTD somehow inferred sarah jane had a crush on tom bakers doc when i saw no hint of a love interest on tv, if anyone was "implied" to be snoggin him as close as the old series could muster it was Romana, Especially in "city of death".)

Billz · « **Reply #562 on:** July 04, 2010, 04:24:09 AM »

Long lost relative

Don't tell me you all don't know who Susan Foreman is?

Technically, she was never seen to have died in the original series so if she ends up coming back, I wouldn't be surprised. She is technically a Time Lady without regenerations.

Vortex · « **Reply #563 on:** July 04, 2010, 08:55:18 AM »

I was thinking Susan at first, but wasn't she adopted?

Daystar70 · « **Reply #564 on:** July 04, 2010, 10:45:53 AM »

Yes it could be susan , veru good point. NO susan was not adopted, on the commentaries of the VHS release of the 1st doctor years ago, the actress commmented that the production team was very clear she was his blood, and her real grandfather.

Actually, they never said she couldnt regenerate. they had not invented regenerations yhet because the issue of william hartnell leaving was not one to address yet.

Daystar70 · « **Reply #565 on:** July 04, 2010, 11:17:14 AM »

I was rewatching "The Big Bang" earlier and y'know..i had to mention that i LOVED the ending of this episode better than any series finale Dr. Who has had to date.. Usually when a couple tie the knot on a series they settle down for a mundane existance together and it spells tyhe end for their time on a show.

But the lesson and i think an impotrtant one, or message that can be derived from this ending is , Amy and Rory finally get hitched and YET, they BOTH choose to remain with the Doctor..to often on television couples sacrifice adventure and excitement for marriage as if they HAVE to be mutually exclusive. The idea of a married couple travelling with the Doc is very very exciting to me, and well done on Stephen Moffats part IMO.

I edited and uploaded the scene to youtube.

Billz · « **Reply #566 on:** July 04, 2010, 12:31:36 PM »

Quote from: Daystar70 on July 04, 2010, 11:17:14 AM

I was rewatching "The Big Bang" earlier and y'know..i had to mention that i LOVED the ending of this episode better than any series finale Dr. Who has had to date.. Usually when a couple tie the knot on a series they settle down for a mundane existance together and it spells tyhe end for their time on a show.

But the lesson and i think an impotrtant one, or message that can be derived from this ending is , Amy and Rory finally get hitched and YET, they BOTH choose to remain with the Doctor..to often on television couples sacrifice adventure and excitement for marriage as if they HAVE to be mutually exclusive. The idea of a married couple travelling with the Doc is very very exciting to me, and well done on Stephen Moffats part IMO.

I edited and uploaded the scene to youtube.

BBC don't believe in sharing.

Daystar70 · « **Reply #567 on:** July 04, 2010, 12:46:33 PM »

I got a messege from the BBC they are allowing me to keep it up but its blocked in some countries..odd

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #568 on:** July 04, 2010, 01:50:15 PM »

Quote from: Daystar70 on July 04, 2010, 12:46:33 PM

I got a messege from the BBC they are allowing me to keep it up but its blocked in some countries..odd
[/quote

Its because of Copyright. I can't watch it

Vanguard · « **Reply #569 on:** July 05, 2010, 04:45:46 AM »

When you see it, you'll ?@"? bricks.

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/DarthKillious/vlcsnap-15724812.png

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/DarthKillious/vlcsnap-15727127.png

Billz · « **Reply #570 on:** July 05, 2010, 05:12:27 AM »

Quote from: Vanguard on July 05, 2010, 04:45:46 AM

When you see it, you'll ?@"? bricks.

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/DarthKillious/vlcsnap-15724812.png

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/DarthKillious/vlcsnap-15727127.png

You're two weeks late, unless the USA are 2 weeks behind the UK in the airing of the episodes.

Dalek · « **Reply #571 on:** July 05, 2010, 11:22:09 AM »

Legally, yes.

Vanguard · « **Reply #572 on:** July 05, 2010, 05:41:21 PM »

Yes yes, I saw the episodes two weeks ago, as I live in the UK. But anyway. Look at the right of the image, it was something my friend pointed out to me the other day... Or did I miss it being discussed earlier...

Dalek · « **Reply #573 on:** July 05, 2010, 05:51:08 PM »

I see Egyptian statues/mummies, 2 things that technically shouldn't be on open display.

Thinking possibly about a link with the Egyptian Goddess loose on the Orient Express?

Billz · « **Reply #574 on:** July 05, 2010, 05:56:11 PM »

Quote from: Vanguard on July 05, 2010, 05:41:21 PM

Yes yes, I saw the episodes two weeks ago, as I live in the UK. But anyway. Look at the right of the image, it was something my friend pointed out to me the other day... Or did I miss it being discussed earlier...

I don't see anything odd besides the 2 Amy Ponds.

Bricks have yet to be shat.

Vanguard · « **Reply #575 on:** July 05, 2010, 06:25:45 PM »

Dark robed figure?

(Not a shadow, he/she/it has he/she/it's own, look at he/she/it's 'feet')

Billz · « **Reply #576 on:** July 05, 2010, 06:36:39 PM »

Quote from: Vanguard on July 05, 2010, 06:25:45 PM

Dark robed figure?

(Not a shadow, he/she/it has he/she/it's own, look at he/she/it's 'feet')

Oh you mean the Trickster (MAKE...IT...HAPPEN...MOFFAT...!!!). Noticed that when the episode aired.

Vanguard · « **Reply #577 on:** July 05, 2010, 06:50:31 PM »

Not the Trickster!

I'm hoping for Omega...

The Trickster is overused in Sarah Jane Adventures already...

Billz · « **Reply #578 on:** July 05, 2010, 06:54:22 PM »

Quote from: Vanguard on July 05, 2010, 06:50:31 PM

Not the Trickster!

I'm hoping for Omega...

The Trickster is overused in Sarah Jane Adventures already...

The Daleks are overused in NewWho.

What's your point?

Vortex · « **Reply #579 on:** July 06, 2010, 08:40:35 AM »

Yeah, let's switch trade the Daleks for the Trickster for a series or two. :p

News:

Author Topic: Doctor Who Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers (Read 77806 times)