Author Topic: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers (Read 123533 times)

Darkthunder · « **Reply #220 on:** June 11, 2009, 08:27:20 AM »

It's fairly common practice in the television industry, that you re-negotiate contracts every so often, which generally leads to a higher or lower salary. But in this case, MGM/Sci-Fi (SyFy) decided to go before the contract negotiations, and cancel the show right away. Bring in a younger, cheaper cast for SGU.

Dalek · « **Reply #221 on:** June 11, 2009, 11:02:51 AM »

Returning to the vid Neb posted...I thought it had an almost BSG quality to it.

Vanguard · « **Reply #222 on:** June 12, 2009, 03:54:42 PM »

Quote

The SGU crew end up on a distant ship somewhere in the far reaches of the galaxy. Cut off the Milky Way gate-network (the one which would lead them home), they must ultimately find another means of getting back.

Basically, the ship they end up on is the very same ship which once flew all around the galaxy seeding the stargates on the various planets, and in some cases even in planetary orbits. Will be interesting to see how they pull it off, but i'm not very happy that they cancelled SG:A to make room for the new show.

So.

They're on a ship in a distant place far away from home trying to get back to their home as fast as possible...

This sounds familiar...

Dalek · « **Reply #223 on:** June 12, 2009, 03:58:32 PM »

Stargate Voyager.

Lionus · « **Reply #224 on:** June 12, 2009, 04:16:25 PM »

Quote from: Dalekanium2 on June 12, 2009, 03:58:32 PM

Stargate Voyager.

Yeah, they could have some Ancient acting as Q, and some replicators for Borgs..

MLeo · « **Reply #225 on:** June 12, 2009, 05:19:25 PM »

Quote from: Lionus on June 12, 2009, 04:16:25 PM

Quote from: Dalekanium2 on June 12, 2009, 03:58:32 PM
Stargate Voyager.

Yeah, they could have some Ancient acting as Q, and some replicators for Borgs..

Oh wait! They did on previous series.

Kirk · « **Reply #226 on:** June 12, 2009, 05:30:35 PM »

OH SHI-
Mleo speaks the truth. :lol:

Lionus · « **Reply #227 on:** June 13, 2009, 07:38:26 AM »

Indeed.

Hmm.. perhaps they could follow the plot of Star Wreck.. :lol:

Vanguard · « **Reply #228 on:** June 15, 2009, 06:23:23 PM »

This does beg the question...

Who will be species 8472...

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #229 on:** June 15, 2009, 06:27:08 PM »

from what I've heard, they're going to try and have less humanoid species.

Nebula · « **Reply #230 on:** June 30, 2009, 08:27:24 PM »

hmm I would think that be expected heh

Nebula · « **Reply #231 on:** July 20, 2009, 09:32:17 AM »

First look at the SGU Gates.... and a virtual tour of the gate room http://stargate.mgm.com/photosynth/index.html

Dalek · « **Reply #232 on:** July 20, 2009, 09:39:14 AM »

They're certainly...different. If anything they look newer than the current SG gates.

Nebula · « **Reply #233 on:** July 20, 2009, 09:40:22 AM »

edited my post look up ^

NeoKaede · « **Reply #234 on:** July 20, 2009, 10:33:22 AM »

Wow, a dark Gate in a dark room of darkness :lol:

Still, the gate itself looks good, kinda Giger-ish to me.

Villain · « **Reply #235 on:** July 20, 2009, 10:37:14 AM »

I dig the new Address Markers.

limey BSc. · « **Reply #236 on:** July 20, 2009, 11:05:00 AM »

Why is it wonky though? My expectations from this series have gone up and down a lot, but looking at this, they're starting to slip down a little.
Just have to wait and see though.

Nebula · « **Reply #237 on:** July 20, 2009, 11:12:32 AM »

what makes it wonky?

Villain · « **Reply #238 on:** July 20, 2009, 11:13:16 AM »

There's gotta be some good reason. Perhaps the ancients in that corner had bad eyes. But there's no way they'd do it like that without a good reason.

Quote from: Nebula on July 20, 2009, 11:12:32 AM

what makes it wonky?

Look at how the Chevrons sit.

Nebula · « **Reply #239 on:** July 20, 2009, 11:16:48 AM »

look at the two pics... the Chevrons are slightly off... when the two pics were taken the gate was positioned differently.

News:

Author Topic: StarGate + Series Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers (Read 123533 times)