Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread (Read 167662 times)

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #2840 on:** February 03, 2012, 01:38:24 AM »

If I'm at 47, how long will it take me to get up to VA so I can use my Odyssey?

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #2841 on:** February 03, 2012, 01:55:20 AM »

3-4 hours

captain_obvious · « **Reply #2842 on:** February 03, 2012, 08:12:57 AM »

I had.
A battery.

Lionus · « **Reply #2843 on:** February 03, 2012, 11:01:26 AM »

I'm so not interested of the Odyssey, but got it anyways..

what an overweight and slow pig..more agile than the new Klingon ship, but pig anyways..

captain_obvious · « **Reply #2844 on:** February 03, 2012, 11:46:57 AM »

I just think it's ugly.

Lionus · « **Reply #2845 on:** February 03, 2012, 12:21:27 PM »

That too. Then again, Klingon ship looks like someone smashed winnebago and powerboat together and called it a day..

captain_obvious · « **Reply #2846 on:** February 03, 2012, 01:15:47 PM »

Quote from: Shadowknight1 on February 03, 2012, 01:38:24 AM

If I'm at 47, how long will it take me to get up to VA so I can use my Odyssey?

Not long. I guess you're a VA by now?

ACES_HIGH · « **Reply #2847 on:** February 03, 2012, 03:02:55 PM »

Quote from: Kori Barnes on February 02, 2012, 02:29:48 PM

Yes, Q is there in Club 47 with his own little daily quest

Also got mah ship

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/596961300021615996/06EF6A163C69AD4C56212928DA77D1CD5851356B/

Also correction for your sig flarespire, the Sao Paulo is an Escort not a Cruiser.

I know, we don't use the STO designations in the 9thFleet sigs. When I started making 9th fleet sigs, I was told to use the SFC designations for ships. I've never played SFC3, but I was told that Defiants are "Light Cruisers" in it, so that's what I used.

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #2848 on:** February 03, 2012, 04:11:18 PM »

Quote from: Lionus on February 03, 2012, 12:21:27 PM

That too. Then again, Klingon ship looks like someone smashed winnebago and powerboat together and called it a day..

I think the Bortas looks too much like the Terran battle cruiser from Starcraft 2

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100717012438/starcraft/images/d/d9/Hyperion_SC2_DevRend1.jpg

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/596961300021619542/BC2A6BD093FD710162BA66546B9B1CAF78E9672F/

Bones · « **Reply #2849 on:** February 03, 2012, 05:11:57 PM »

Quote from: captain_obvious on February 03, 2012, 11:46:57 AM

I just think it's ugly.

It is ugly

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #2850 on:** February 03, 2012, 05:45:32 PM »

I dunno I love it. I've been using it more then my Defiant.

I've liked all their recent ship designs, Sao Paulo and the Bellerophon the most.

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #2851 on:** February 03, 2012, 07:38:00 PM »

New friday screenshot

Canon Wormhole

BFGfreak · « **Reply #2852 on:** February 03, 2012, 07:44:54 PM »

Quote from: Kori Barnes on February 03, 2012, 04:11:18 PM

I think the Bortas looks too much like the Terran battle cruiser from Starcraft 2

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100717012438/starcraft/images/d/d9/Hyperion_SC2_DevRend1.jpg

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/596961300021619542/BC2A6BD093FD710162BA66546B9B1CAF78E9672F/

You're not the only one, now all we need is some way to make the character look like the portrait and say "Battlecruiser operational" whenever he joins a map. Bonus points if he doesn't equip shields.

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #2853 on:** February 03, 2012, 08:26:12 PM »

According to the official webpage there is a C-Store update next Thursday, I hope its the canon Defiant Interior. It has been mostly done since December and last I heard it was suppose to be released around the same time as the FE series.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #2854 on:** February 03, 2012, 11:57:17 PM »

Quote from: captain_obvious on February 03, 2012, 01:15:47 PM

Not long. I guess you're a VA by now?

Nope, I'm a procrastinator.

The Odyssey looks good to me, a bit weird from some angles. I just like the fact that if you keep it set up with beam arrays like whatit comes with when you're testing her out, she broadsides like crazy.

Lionus · « **Reply #2855 on:** February 04, 2012, 09:46:45 AM »

I also had a nice long convo with couple fellas on TeamSpeak last night about both Odyssey and Bortas. Odyssey seems to be more of all rounder and broadsider where as more clumsy Bortas is more of alpha striker..

captain_obvious · « **Reply #2856 on:** February 04, 2012, 10:08:10 AM »

All-rounder LOL nice pun!

Joshmaul · « **Reply #2857 on:** February 04, 2012, 11:20:39 AM »

Quote from: BFGfreak on February 03, 2012, 07:44:54 PM

You're not the only one, now all we need is some way to make the character look like the portrait and say "Battlecruiser operational" whenever he joins a map. Bonus points if he doesn't equip shields.

I really have to go...Number One.

Having flown both the Odyssey (Admiral Underwood, U.S.S. Adelbert Ames-E) and the Bortas (General Devaneaux, I.K.S. Doomhammer), I have to say that the Odyssey has *slightly* better turning rate than the Bortas - it's not exactly a whale like people were saying, but it's not like my Excelsior, either (then again, my Excelsior is probably half the size of this beast, heh). The Bortas, however, that is a whale. Not exactly great for solo combat, heh...then again, somebody commented that the Bortas seemed more like it was built to operate alongside a carrier.

captain_obvious · « **Reply #2858 on:** February 04, 2012, 12:11:48 PM »

Is anyone else having problems with the exchange? Things simply aren't displaying. It's like Cryptic just wiped the whole thing.

Meteorafallen · « **Reply #2859 on:** February 04, 2012, 04:46:49 PM »

The turning issues of both ships can be fixed with an RCS Accelerator. I personally like the Odyssey, it sure can take some hits and its great for broadsiding Borg with Antiproton arrays with

Also do we have a thread for everyone's ingame IDs?

If anyone feels like hittin me up in game feel free @meteorafallen

News:

Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread (Read 167662 times)