Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 169016 times)

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3240 on: May 03, 2012, 07:26:26 PM »
please tell me how to get it. I really have no idea.

It's in the lobi store.  You can either go to drozhana station or put your lobi in your inv and "use" it.  That way you can access the store from anywhere.

It's only 15 lobi while the next decent thing in the store is like 500 lobi! Pretty ace for a melee weapon that does 88dmg PER STRIKE.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3241 on: May 03, 2012, 08:19:06 PM »
Some of that stuff would really be nice, especially the whip...I need lots more lobi though.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3242 on: May 16, 2012, 11:59:02 AM »
Are they f'ing kidding me?!

http://www.startrekonline.com/node/3161  :bitch:
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3243 on: May 16, 2012, 01:01:24 PM »
Eh...that oughta make the ridge-heads with a furry fetish happy. :funny

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3244 on: May 16, 2012, 02:05:51 PM »
Are they f'ing kidding me?!

http://www.startrekonline.com/node/3161  :bitch:

This has been known for a long time.

They were trying to get the cat species from TAS but they couldn't get the rights.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3245 on: May 16, 2012, 02:41:38 PM »
The Kzinti?  Why would they need to get any different rights?  They probably have a ton of access already.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3246 on: May 16, 2012, 04:06:14 PM »
I don't remember the exact reason, I think it was something like the Kzinti are not owned by CBS, they're owned by the writer who created them for TAS. Must have been in his contract or something.

Kinda like in Doctor Who, the original K9 can't be used a whole lot because hes owned by the writer it costs a bunch of money to use him.

edit:

According to this wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kzinti_Hegemony

They were created by Larry Niven for his Known Space stories (one of which was adapted for a TAS episode). Maybe since they're not an Original Star Trek creation they are not covered under CBS's license.

Offline King Class Scout

  • Posts: 1775
  • Cookies: 893
  • the other half of SFRD
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3247 on: May 16, 2012, 05:35:00 PM »
yup  the Kzin belong to the original author AND his children, I believe.  and everyone knows how Anal a creator's children are when it comes to something that generates their inheritance money.

besides, every time I see a cover for a Kzin set of stories, etc...it's different every time.
OS novel fan

Coming Soon: King's Mod Tuning Shop

best line I've ever read
Me: mine [my bridges] would probably be simple to get the characters to use.  the only person that sits is the captian.
Baz: space is vast there[sic] legs will be tired by the time they get to the next planet

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3248 on: May 17, 2012, 06:43:12 PM »
Is it just me or do the ferasans look almost exactly like the caitians but with some fangs and different colours?
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3249 on: May 17, 2012, 07:20:08 PM »
Well, the blog post says they're closely related.  But I think that's the general point.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3250 on: May 18, 2012, 03:55:06 PM »
Kinda like in Doctor Who, the original K9 can't be used a whole lot because hes owned by the writer it costs a bunch of money to use him.

Ironically, isn't that also the case with the Daleks being owned by Terry Nation's estate? (And they get used an awful lot, heh.)
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3251 on: May 21, 2012, 06:50:36 AM »
Well, the blog post says they're closely related.  But I think that's the general point.

Imo there's closely related then there's slightly modifying existing content and passing it off as all new.

Everyone got their pimp canes and reman boffs then? :D
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3252 on: May 21, 2012, 02:45:18 PM »
Hey, they have to cater to the furry-lovers in the Klingon faction too. :P

Cane, yes, new Bridge officer, no.  I've got a Borg drone and a Jem'Hadar soldier on my bridge, I don't think I need a Reman too.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline sovereign001

  • Posts: 639
  • Cookies: 77
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3253 on: May 21, 2012, 08:21:32 PM »
http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=269329&page=17

No feature episodes in the future? wtf?

This game is getting smashed to bits by cryptic.. I loved playing these featured episodes, especially the last one! Now, they are gonna remove it. Remember dstahl saying that first it were gonna be 12 episodes a year, then 8 a year, and now, they are just gonna cancel them...

Lol, reruns of the mothballed missions, i guess..

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3254 on: May 21, 2012, 08:51:22 PM »
I think it's pretty obvious, with the addition of the "Foundry" system, and the recent "Foundry Spotlight" promotions, Cryptic wants players to make the content FOR THEM, so that they don't have to do the work. In short: We pay the money, they do none of the work. What a great business concept, don't you think?

If it's true that there won't be any more Feature Episodes, or even "Cryptic-designed missions", it will be the final nail in the coffin for STO. Even now, I have very little reason to login to the game, other than to complete and accept assignments (5 min activity). Removing any future Cryptic-designed missions, will make it even less interesting to play the game than it already is.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline sovereign001

  • Posts: 639
  • Cookies: 77
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3255 on: May 21, 2012, 09:17:39 PM »
jup,

the only thing season 6 includes, is some new textures for ships, or some new ships and fleet stuff. That's it.. I have little faith in it left and the game is catching dust. I'm afraid if cryptic keeps this level of attitude, it will not survive a next anniversary.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3256 on: May 21, 2012, 09:37:24 PM »
As of January 5th, i'm a Silver player, and have no intention of re-subbing anytime soon. The drought of 2011 pretty much killed the game for me (both Atari and Cryptic's fault). Only reason I log in at all, is because it's free. There really isn't a major reason to sub for the game, other than to get the "free" 400 C-point stipend.

The new "fleet stuff" sounds cool (in theory), but it means very little to me, since i'm part of a "dead" fleet consisting of a bunch of friends (most of which, haven't logged into the game in many months). I heard rumours of "ship crafting" being attached to the new Fleet Starbase system, but have no idea on what kind of ships can be crafted, or how. I would however like to see the craftable ships being able to be "packaged", and tradable (and thus possible to sell at the Exchange). Would give a reason to actually CRAFT them, as well as being a major income source for players (and allowing single players, such as myself access to the new ships without the aid of a fleet).
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline 1DeadlySAMURAI

  • Posts: 578
  • Cookies: 139
  • Do'h
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3257 on: May 22, 2012, 04:42:23 AM »
Darkthunder: Cookie!

Offline Nihilus

  • Posts: 407
  • Cookies: 14
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3258 on: May 22, 2012, 05:45:26 AM »
I have a question about the different Odyssey variations.  It's my intention to eventually purchase one when I can afford to do so and I'm currently debating on whether or not I should get the Tactical Cruiser or the Operations Cruiser.  I'm interested in knowing how the Aquarius Escort stacks up against the Separated Saucer when it comes to supporting you in combat.  I'm thinking the Aquarius Escort would be a better fighter overall because she's part of the Tactical Cruiser, but the Operations Cruiser would probably benefit from better maneuverability while separated. I'm just wondering if anyone who has one or the other, (or both), can offer an opinion of what they personally think is the best way to go.  Right now I'm leaning towards Operations for Saucer Separation. In a perfect world I would just get the bundle and have both abilities but I can't do that right now so it's one or the other.

Offline sovereign001

  • Posts: 639
  • Cookies: 77
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3259 on: May 22, 2012, 06:14:04 AM »
Was a sub my self in the beginning until it became free. No content came free, only moneygrabbing stuff. They should let some content free, i'm not talking about completely new environments, just use the same assets as before, but create some nice stories. The crap they are now doing with 'just replay and find some loot' is just boring. Hence, the game is just boring now. I don't even know what to do if i log into this game.. I did all the missions, the foundry, oke they are some good stuff between them but there is some junk too. Those nebula exploration missions are rubbish.