Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 167663 times)

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3740 on: January 11, 2013, 02:11:07 PM »
This weeks Friday Screenshot


Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3741 on: January 11, 2013, 02:36:06 PM »
Didn't know there was an Ambassador coming.  Looks pretty good.  Always nice to see the C before the Romulans got a hold of her.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3742 on: January 11, 2013, 02:53:44 PM »
I believe it has to do with the 3 Year Anniversary, Denise Crosby is also involved in a STO project.

This years anniversary will also have a free ship. here is hoping its the Ambassador.

Then they'll pull an Odyssey and have a better C-Store version in a couple months.

Don't care, its free.

Offline flarespire

  • The one who breaks the cycle.
  • Posts: 1230
  • Cookies: 47
  • God Green God Dammit!
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3743 on: January 11, 2013, 03:49:47 PM »
wow cryptic have actually managed to make a canon ship look rather nice.  :readme:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3744 on: January 11, 2013, 05:17:52 PM »
People on the STO forums are complaing about missing details.

I think it looks fine based on what was seen in Yesterday's Enterprise.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3745 on: January 11, 2013, 06:27:32 PM »
Ehhh...am I still crazy if I would rather have the JJ-verse Constitution? :hide

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3746 on: January 11, 2013, 07:43:04 PM »
Ehhh...am I still crazy if I would rather have the JJ-verse Constitution? :hide

No, I'd like one too, but it will never happen.

Offline BFGfreak

  • Posts: 96
  • Cookies: 3
    • My Twitch.TV livestreaming channel
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3747 on: January 11, 2013, 10:54:32 PM »
I'd just like to play with the connie refit.
In the battle of ghosts vs robots, robots always win....except in anime.
-Sarge

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3748 on: January 12, 2013, 09:37:56 AM »
Oh my! I didn't realise there was a shot up of the ambo!  Looking forward to giving her a run. 
I *really* wish they would stop it with the "pure white" light blob thing on the bottom of the saucer though.  It looks horribad on pretty much anything, oddy, regent, whatever.  It's like the designer just went "What can I put on the bottom of the saucer....Idk.  Meh, WHITE BLOB THING!"  But I can forgive them for this boat, as it's on there in canon.

I'd love to see a fleet retro of the connie refit! Actually, I wouldn't mind seeing a fleet retro of the T1 centaur and miranda too.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline candle_86

  • Posts: 249
  • Cookies: 2
  • Position Gamma Hydra sector 10
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3749 on: January 15, 2013, 11:52:39 AM »
do people still play and if so how do i find people to play with, I havn't played in a good 2 years but wouldn't mind giving it another go

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3750 on: January 15, 2013, 12:14:06 PM »
I still play from time to time, when my computer feels like it can handle it.  POS blue screened at Earth Spacedock the other day.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline candle_86

  • Posts: 249
  • Cookies: 2
  • Position Gamma Hydra sector 10
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3751 on: January 15, 2013, 01:49:37 PM »
Well I reinstalled STO hit me up sometime my handle is @candle_86 lol. I'll prolly be on my old main Spork.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3752 on: January 15, 2013, 02:43:47 PM »
There's been a literal f*ckton of changes since then. 
I miss :bigdance:

Offline JB2005

  • Scripter, Lawyer, Soldier, Spy
  • Posts: 197
  • Cookies: 58
    • Captain's Orders Blog
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3753 on: January 15, 2013, 03:33:31 PM »
I tried to load STO the other day...4gb patch :( I can't afford that when I only get 2gb a day!
http://captainsordersdevelopmentblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/preview-no-1.html- Captains Orders Development Blog - Last Updated 10/12/2011

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3754 on: January 15, 2013, 04:40:56 PM »
4GB patch? Is that it?  Lucky you, on more than one occasion I've had to DL more than 10GB of patches in one sitting to get the game to run!  Thankfully, most patches are rarely more than a couple hundred MB.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline ACES_HIGH

  • BCC Roleplay Game Narrator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1678
  • Cookies: 54
  • while(!(succeed=try()));
    • BCC Roleplay Games
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3755 on: January 16, 2013, 02:54:38 AM »
If you play it often that's not as big of a problem, since alot of that is probably little patches you've missed since the last time you were on.  Even when they do have big patches, they prepatch for a couple of weeks before release, to lessen the load on patch day.  Also, if you enable on demand patching it'll only patch what you need, when you need it,  Going to some of the new maps might be a problem for someone like JB2005, with a limit like that, but you could at least spread the patches out easier.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3756 on: January 18, 2013, 06:05:07 PM »
Today's Screenshot, I'm assuming its the KDF equilivent of the Ambassador, looks like a Vorcha K'tinga Hybrid

http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showpost.php?p=7535921&postcount=1


Offline Killallewoks

  • RNR
  • Posts: 1179
  • Cookies: 175
  • Innuendo implier extordanaire.
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3757 on: January 18, 2013, 06:12:52 PM »
That is actually quite a nice looking ship.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3758 on: January 18, 2013, 07:05:50 PM »
It doesn't look too bad.  I don't like those nacelles though and the neck could do with shortening imo.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline King Class Scout

  • Posts: 1775
  • Cookies: 893
  • the other half of SFRD
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #3759 on: January 19, 2013, 09:55:02 AM »
somebody make a version of that for BC, please.  ME WANT!
OS novel fan

Coming Soon: King's Mod Tuning Shop

best line I've ever read
Me: mine [my bridges] would probably be simple to get the characters to use.  the only person that sits is the captian.
Baz: space is vast there[sic] legs will be tired by the time they get to the next planet