Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 169160 times)

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4140 on: June 28, 2013, 07:08:57 PM »
Hooray for improved screen accuracy!

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4141 on: June 29, 2013, 11:50:53 AM »

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4142 on: June 29, 2013, 09:21:51 PM »
Btw lads, for those of you with orion fem toons or boffs, there is a work around for getting them into swimwear (of a sort)!  
sadly, it doesn't work for anyone who cannot get the orion loincloth :(

edit
 Yeah, I thought I noticed a change in the models in azure.  Those new voiceovers are a bit weird though imo.  Sounds like she took a load of helium!
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4143 on: June 30, 2013, 11:00:37 AM »
Before I hop into the Risa stuff what all do I have to do to get both a pet bird and one of those Risan ships?

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4144 on: June 30, 2013, 01:15:09 PM »
For the pet bird? You just do the "Horgan hunt" and rarely, you'll pick up an egg.  Take that egg to the ornithologist and it goes from there.  Similar process to the epohh raising.

For the risan ship, you have to do the air race thing.  Just grab a floater, talk to the girl next to him and go fly through some rings a few times. 
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4145 on: June 30, 2013, 03:47:45 PM »
Huh.  Sounds simple enough.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4146 on: July 01, 2013, 08:56:00 PM »
Scimitar stats Dev Blog, comes out tomorrow with a patch since Thursday is a Holiday.

http://sto.perfectworld.com/blog/?p=930741

Console stats (from http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=766291 )

http://imgur.com/a/u7hdR

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4147 on: July 02, 2013, 01:31:19 AM »
So, overpowered here we come...

Scimitar is an overall larger ship than any previous Romulan/Reman ship including the D'deridex. Yet the Scimitar ingame will have a higher base turn rate (of 7) compared to the D'deridex which is stuck at a measly 5.5 (less than the previous bricks, Galaxy and Odyssey, which have 6).

As for the consoles, you have the Cloaked Barrage which essentially allows this ship (with it's 5 forward weapons) to fire while cloaked. You also have the Singularity Distributor Unit which allows your shields to remain online even while cloaked. And lastly, you have the Secondary Shields which does exactly as it suggests; It adds a second layer of shielding before your primary shields are even touched, and long before your hull can take any damage.

Owning 2 or more of these consoles, gives you the Rapid Maneuvering Thrusters, which again increases the ships overall turn rate. It has the added benefit of keeping your "turn rate bonus" from decloaking, making the Scimitar and it's variants, both formidable and nimble ships.

Lastly, owning all 3 consoles gives you the dreaded Thalaron Pulse, which functions essentially like it did in Star Trek: Nemesis, as well as how certain NPC ships function ingame. A high damage ability with a long "warm up" time before firing. Anyone caught within it's firing arc will be severely damaged.

So, summary:
- High hitpoints (40'000)
- Cruiser with 5 fore weapons
- Higher base turn rate than most Cruisers, WITH turn rate bonuses/consoles
- Overpowered "Godlike" ability if you own all 3 consoles (Thalaron Pulse)
- Fire while cloaked (1 console)
- Fire while cloaked AND with shields up (2 consoles)
- Fire while cloaked, shields up AND a secondary shield (3 consoles)

The Scimitar should never have been made into a playable starship. Yet so many people moaned and complained about it, here it is. If it was intended to be added, it should've been released as a true veteran ship (1000 day+) with no immediate access for lifetime subscribers. Must have subscription for 1000 days+ post purchase of Lifetime.

Next thing you'll know, they'll reveal plans for a Playable Borg faction. There's really only 2 new player factions they could add; Cardassians and Borg. Cardassians would be easiest since it could follow the same model as the Romulans (ally with either side at level 10). While the Borg would either be ridiculously overpowered compared to the other factions, or ridiculously neutered (as in, making the Voyager Borg look powerful).
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4148 on: July 02, 2013, 10:35:42 AM »
Heh, they could probably make pvp scenarios that are just stfs converted to have borg faction players vs the feds/klink/rom players xD

But with this new boat, I think power creep just kicked into a higher gear.  Bad idea!
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4149 on: July 02, 2013, 12:42:56 PM »
Okay, what in the flying hell is going on?!  I try to open STO, it's running in processes, I have the icon in the notification box next to the clock, and I have it showing in the bar, but I cannot open it and don't see a launcher at all. :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4150 on: July 02, 2013, 06:06:09 PM »
There's a workaround for that on the sto forums iirc..


EDIT

Here it is!
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4151 on: July 02, 2013, 06:55:27 PM »
I've read the Thalaron weapon is useless in PVP since it takes 15 seconds to charge, so you would need to tractor him in place, or have buddies to do it.

It isn't as powerful as the NPC version of the weapon.

Someone who apparently did test with one of them said that its not fun to play with in PVP.

I plan on buying them, but I don't even have a level 50 Romulan yet, only 24. I level 2 from 1-50 on the test server, which was a bad idea because I now have no motive to level one on live.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4152 on: July 03, 2013, 09:03:03 AM »
Oh, a friend of mine is reliably making 60-70k hits with his thalaron blast, but earlier I saw 4 scis running scimitars in azure trying to take out the group guarding the 2 pointer they were at.  They went in using the thalaron first, but between them they did no more than 60k between them.  It was hilarious that my kdf eng in her fleet torkhat soloed 3 spawns before they got that one dealt with!
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4153 on: July 03, 2013, 10:02:23 AM »
There's a workaround for that on the sto forums iirc..


EDIT

Here it is!

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!  Risa, here I come!

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Jb06

  • Posts: 1295
  • Cookies: 968
  • JL Studios Co-Founder
    • JL Studios
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4154 on: July 03, 2013, 07:18:55 PM »
I'd rather have this Scimitar :P



Offline Eloi

  • Posts: 118
  • Cookies: 67
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4155 on: July 04, 2013, 10:57:38 PM »
STO ships certainly can't be accused of being terribly... high quality.  Especially in the original design department.
USS Scott download - http://bit.ly/Y4pmbR

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4156 on: July 05, 2013, 10:58:44 PM »
Bought and I love the Scimitar, I'm having fun.





Offline eclipse74569

  • Roger Smith of the U.S.S. Lollypop, a good ship
  • Webmaster
  • Posts: 2240
  • Cookies: 65535
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4157 on: July 06, 2013, 02:14:40 AM »
At least the bridge is SUPPOSED to be big.....y'know for when you knock a reman with a phaser riffle?
Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return, to obtain, something of equal value must be lost.  That is alchemy's first law of equivalent exchange.  In those days we really believed that to be the world's one and only truth~Alphonse Elric

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4158 on: July 06, 2013, 07:37:36 AM »
At least the bridge is SUPPOSED to be big....

ooohrah.
Btw, any of you fellas any good with sci builds?
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4159 on: July 06, 2013, 10:40:54 AM »
So one of the fighters you can get for the Scimitar are "Romulan Drones" based off the drone ships seen in Enterprise, they will turn into a mimic ships of another faction then who you're fighting.

Well, I had one of them turn into the NX-Class, though that was funny.



You guys must agree, the current model is like 100 times better then the original seen here http://hydra-images.cursecdn.com/sto.gamepedia.com/6/68/Romulan_Scimitar.png