Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 167628 times)

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4300 on: October 07, 2013, 09:05:51 PM »
I had high hopes for that ship design.  That forward-ventral 3/4's killed it for me though.  The deflector was passable, but the pylons?  Ugh.

Offline nxadam1701

  • Posts: 491
  • Cookies: 20
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4301 on: October 07, 2013, 11:56:08 PM »
Looks like a clunkier version of my Polaris.

Please. It hurts my eyes to read. Don't compare your beautiful design to that piece of c@&$. It's terrible.

Adam

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4302 on: October 08, 2013, 12:04:47 AM »
Avenger Class opinion:

Dorsal View: Looks pretty decent, except for the clunky nacelles
Ventral View: Ugh, looks like crap.

Summary: Cryptic can't design good looking ships worth a damn.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4303 on: October 08, 2013, 06:35:31 AM »
More Angles, not mine,

http://imgur.com/a/8S6mC#7

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4304 on: October 08, 2013, 10:00:01 AM »
That stardrive needs a serious re-work. From the top it doesn't look too bad, but sideways, or seen from below, it looks like junk. A garbage scow, as the Klingons would say.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4305 on: October 08, 2013, 10:25:43 AM »
That stardrive needs a serious re-work. From the top it doesn't look too bad, but sideways, or seen from below, it looks like junk. A garbage scow, as the Klingons would say.

The whole damn thing needs redoing from scratch imo.  It's the culmination of an (IMO) awful set of design rules for the 25th century feds.  It looks rather like they took an oddy (yuck), a vesta (double yuck) and a regent (MULTI yuck) bashed them all together (ULTRA yuck) and greebled the results a bit (M.m.m.m.mm.mmm MONSTER yuck..uck...uck..uck).

For some reason, the ventral bow shot looks reminiscent of the jjprise...

Looks like a clunkier version of my Polaris.

That is not unprecedented Wiley.  A lot of people who I've shown the century class to (the true ent-f imo) have remarked on just how similar to it the oddy looks.  A few of them called the oddy a rip off actually. 
I miss :bigdance:


Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4307 on: October 08, 2013, 03:19:08 PM »
I just linked to that 2 posts up :P

Also I don't see how it looks anything like the JJ Prise. Looks closer to the Vengeance then anything. Especially with that VATA thing.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4308 on: October 08, 2013, 03:42:35 PM »
I just linked to that 2 posts up :P

Also I don't see how it looks anything like the JJ Prise. Looks closer to the Vengeance then anything. Especially with that VATA thing.

Actually, what you linked was only one shot.  I linked a whole gallery :P

if you look at it from almost any angle below it, the JJprise silhouette is there as clear as day.  The layout of the neck, secondary hull and pylons especially.

EDIT

Weird. Earlier your link was only one shot rather than a gallery.  Meh.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4309 on: October 08, 2013, 04:10:30 PM »

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4310 on: October 08, 2013, 05:27:32 PM »
I nearly burst out laughing at this: "Taking the 2409 Federation design of traditionally elegant sweeping lines". Their designs may have improved, but they aren't really elegant.

After liking that first shot they showed, I knew the ventral would be a let down. Wouldn't have been so bad if only they'd have at least attempted to integrate the secondary hull into the under saucer. I like the idea for the deflector, but not the execution.

Still, it's a damned sight better than the Odyssey.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4311 on: October 08, 2013, 05:35:31 PM »
Only things I don't like are the textures, secondary hull, and pylon fronts.  Everything else is good.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4312 on: October 08, 2013, 07:52:14 PM »
You can see the Avenger now on Redshirt in the ESD Window, no public testing

Quote
We conducted focus testing this past weekend with a group on Redshirt and have made a few changes to the ship based on the feedback we've been mulling over. While there will not be open testing for the ship on our test severs, the stats for the Avenger will punished in tomorrow's Dev Blog.

Cheers,

Brandon =/\=

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4313 on: October 09, 2013, 12:55:43 AM »
At least they're punishing the stats. Bet they won't remodel, though. :(

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4314 on: October 09, 2013, 09:43:21 AM »
At least they're punishing the stats. Bet they won't remodel, though. :(

Aye. Shield mod of 1.21 on a cruiser is way too high, especially one with the kind of teeth and layout that thing has!
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4315 on: October 09, 2013, 10:05:04 AM »
Looks like a clunkier version of my Polaris.

See, Wiley, this is why Cryptic should hire people like you to design ships for them. Now I'm a fan of the Oddy, I'll admit, but most of Cryptic's 2409 designs...for lack of a better word, they suck.
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4316 on: October 09, 2013, 03:17:14 PM »
New dev blog regarding that cruiser we were discussing.

Too damn ugly for me.  Not getting it.
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4317 on: October 09, 2013, 03:56:31 PM »
I like the Development Patch, Thomas is great at makes those. There are high-res version of the ones hes done before here

http://sto.gamepedia.com/Utopia_Planitia_Shipyards#Starfleet_Department_Patches

Not all of them are there though, the Armitage one is on the page for the Player version of the ship.

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4318 on: October 09, 2013, 04:11:21 PM »
Love that Sovereign Development patch.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #4319 on: October 09, 2013, 04:18:57 PM »
So the fleet version of the Avenger has an alternate pylon configuration