Author Topic: Connie interpretation (Read 4499 times)

DJ Curtis · « **Reply #20 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:16:17 PM »

If Wiley wants a hand, I'd be honored.

086gf · « **Reply #21 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:17:49 PM »

Those can't be torp tubes on the nacells lol. Overall its pretty neat though.

DJ Curtis · « **Reply #22 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:19:38 PM »

they're nothing of consequence. I just like the way they look. er.. I mean.. they're inter-spacial subspace amplifiers. yeah... that's it.

Starforce2 · « **Reply #23 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:23:14 PM »

The deflector size is fine, it fits the new shape and style of the ship. I think it rocks.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #24 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:40:25 PM »

So, you mean to say that you whipped this up without really meaning to? Okay, DJ is officially the BCC "Scotty". That is just fantastic. I do agree with the majority about the deflector, but it still looks great.

Weasel · « **Reply #25 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:41:00 PM »

Quote from: DJ Curtis on May 15, 2008, 02:19:38 PM

they're nothing of consequence. I just like the way they look. er.. I mean.. they're inter-spacial subspace amplifiers. yeah... that's it.

And here I was thinking they were auxiliary bussard ram-scoops to provide supplemental matter injection to the trans-warp sequence initiators.

I guess I missed that lecture at Starfleet's Advanced Engineering Post-graduate Course. But you know how it is... I was getting my Weasel wet with a hot Vulcan cadet on Risa.

DJ Curtis · « **Reply #26 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:54:44 PM »

from this point on, they are Supplemental matter injectors for the trans-warp sequence initiators.

Weasel · « **Reply #27 on:** May 15, 2008, 02:57:47 PM »

So I was right? Damn, I'm good.

Mustang · « **Reply #28 on:** May 15, 2008, 03:38:57 PM »

That's a DAMN nice Connie. Personally, I like that deflector dish just the way it is. It could be a far-future Connie refit...

Oh hell, just smack me for even saying that.

moed · « **Reply #29 on:** May 15, 2008, 03:46:06 PM »

Yeah, this is well, ok I guess...... NOT

Very nice design!

I agree that the deflector needs to be increased in size... but just a bit, it looks pretty good right now but a little bigger will make it more balanced IMO

I actually think those thingys on top of the nacelles are supercharger ram scoops

Aeries · « **Reply #30 on:** May 15, 2008, 05:14:52 PM »

Wow, DJ, you really did the old girl justice, well done!

Your models, Wiley's textures... I think we have a Bridge Commander Revolution on the horizon! cookie for you, and your amazing modeling work. And, a cookie for Wiley, for taking on the challenge. Best wishes, both of you. And again, good work.

...those tubes aren't flux capacitors? Damn....

-Aeries.

Dawg81 · « **Reply #31 on:** May 15, 2008, 07:42:09 PM »

if this is going to be a future ships may want to think about redoing the phasers into something more futuristic like micro arrays on the saucer and standard arrays on the pylons and sec hull

DJ Curtis · « **Reply #32 on:** May 15, 2008, 08:22:11 PM »

it's not a future ship.

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #33 on:** May 15, 2008, 09:59:32 PM »

Quote from: DJ Curtis on May 15, 2008, 08:22:11 PM

it's not a future ship.

Hmmm, then perhaps what you think would be the refit version of Abram's 1701?

Weasel · « **Reply #34 on:** May 15, 2008, 10:44:01 PM »

TNG's -1701A?

Aeries · « **Reply #35 on:** May 15, 2008, 11:10:43 PM »

Or maybe it's just redesigned to look cool, or simply in a random impulse without any other real thought? :/ Anyone consider that?

DJ Curtis · « **Reply #36 on:** May 16, 2008, 12:37:59 AM »

heh, aeries is about right.

Aeries · « **Reply #37 on:** May 16, 2008, 12:00:20 PM »

I would like to see these one of these days, Mustang.

Mustang · « **Reply #38 on:** May 16, 2008, 05:37:12 PM »

Heh, too bad I deleted zem all.

Jay Crimson · « **Reply #39 on:** May 16, 2008, 07:25:57 PM »

My only frown goes to the deflector dish (or what's it called again). Making it larger adds some majestic flair to the ship. But woah, I love this vessel for real!

News:

Author Topic: Connie interpretation (Read 4499 times)

Weasel

Weasel

Weasel

Jay Crimson