« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: How bad was the TOS phaser rifle?  (Read 9329 times)

Offline lint

  • Posts: 599
  • Cookies: 211
Re: How bad was the TOS phaser rifle?
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2008, 04:57:18 AM »
looks like a toy
Logged

Offline blaXXer

  • Your Leader
  • Posts: 479
  • Cookies: 96
  • The proud result of slave labor
    • blaXXer.design
Re: How bad was the TOS phaser rifle?
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2008, 06:51:45 AM »
yeah, way too bulky  n all that.
Logged

YOU suck, get a life, moran.

COME TO MY PLACE clicketh me!

Weasel

  • Guest
Re: How bad was the TOS phaser rifle?
« Reply #22 on: July 06, 2008, 07:32:23 AM »
It's a support weapon, like a light machine gun. Notice the bipod?
Logged

Offline 1DeadlySAMURAI

  • Posts: 578
  • Cookies: 139
  • Do'h
Re: How bad was the TOS phaser rifle?
« Reply #23 on: July 06, 2008, 07:52:04 AM »
Yeah, I noticed the bipod, still a bulky toy.
Logged

Weasel

  • Guest
Re: How bad was the TOS phaser rifle?
« Reply #24 on: July 06, 2008, 07:56:49 AM »
Well, that prototype is now more than five years old, so who knows what it looks like now. The point is, it looks a lot better than the TOS weapon, above- despite the phaser being how many hundred years older?
Logged

Offline undedavenger

  • It's simple. I reek of awesomeness, and you don't.
  • Posts: 131
  • Cookies: 14
    • Official Star Trek Century Myspace!
Re: How bad was the TOS phaser rifle?
« Reply #25 on: July 24, 2008, 04:16:32 AM »
Quote from: Weasel on July 06, 2008, 04:52:21 AM
This is about where tech is now-ish:



It's unfortunate that we'll lose our sense of style in the next several hundred years- cuz this thing really looks fairly badass.  :arms:

Lol. Kirk should use the BFG from DOOM. I bet he could make it look more macho than the Rock did. Bwahahahaha!
Logged
"Books are not canon, only what you see on screen. Yes, even the horrible Voyager episode where they go past warp 10 and have crazy lizard babies."
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »