« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Epsilon IX  (Read 6647 times)

Offline Lurok91

  • Posts: 1309
  • Cookies: 2062
  • SPMod Developer (Retired)
    • Lurok91 Mods
Re: Epsilon IX
« Reply #40 on: June 11, 2010, 09:31:06 PM »
Quote from: tiqhud on June 10, 2010, 03:00:16 PM
YEP, BC has a problem with small hulls , smaller than a standard type6 shuttle.

Only real problem encountered is the LOD issue , where hull 'disappears'  closer get to ship and in flybys.  Other than that, all the TMP ones I've rescaled much smaller than Type6 and to canon size all fly ok and can transport to.   I'm kind of surprised more modellers don't pay closer attention to scaling. 

Quote from: USS Prime on June 11, 2010, 12:05:19 PM
I remember that shuttle/warpsled project... I had it sitting around, and must've forgotten about it. I could always dust it off after I'm happy enough with the Danube additions. If they're wanted. Otherwise I can just throw them up to BCF as is.

Model looked good in pics you posted and as far as I know isn't on BCF.
Logged

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: Epsilon IX
« Reply #41 on: June 12, 2010, 02:58:28 PM »
Scaling does work, you just need to adjust the camera somehow... I think.

The CGI Voyager kit came with 'to scale' Type-6's and 9's.

Anyway, I'll pack up the shuttle when I get a chance, who should I pass it to?
Logged


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: Epsilon IX
« Reply #42 on: June 21, 2010, 04:20:44 PM »
I suppose this can go here. Rebuilt the entire thing to meet shuttle standards in terms of polys. 2k combined, model comes as the TAI sled, shuttle, and docked mode. Who should I pass it off to (If anyone?)
Logged


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline baz1701

  • Posts: 3392
  • Cookies: 1434
Re: Epsilon IX
« Reply #43 on: June 21, 2010, 04:46:47 PM »
LOL great minds think alike. I have just brused the old TMP connie off for some more work.
Logged
Whatever knocks us back, can only make us stronger.

Offline tiqhud

  • BCFiles File Poster
  • Posts: 1763
  • Cookies: 1067
  • San Francisco Shipyards (HPer) file manuiplater
Re: Epsilon IX
« Reply #44 on: June 21, 2010, 05:37:47 PM »
Quote from: USS Prime on June 21, 2010, 04:20:44 PM
I suppose this can go here. Rebuilt the entire thing to meet shuttle standards in terms of polys. 2k combined, model comes as the TAI sled, shuttle, and docked mode. Who should I pass it off to (If anyone?)
\Great, BC has needed one of these
Logged
TiqHud
you sir, are unable to strike, the port or starboard parts of hull , of a bovine storage facility.
Canon , what people argue exists, that doesn't really  exist.
It is all the little details, that cause headaches.
"Never judge wealth with Money"
'Intelligence has Nothing to do with Politics'
it is Late, Do you know where your Towel is?
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »