« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash  (Read 6929 times)

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #20 on: October 08, 2008, 10:14:26 AM »
Quote from: JimmyB76 on October 08, 2008, 10:11:08 AM
i never did like those nacelles in all honesty...  slap on some galaxy-type nacelles and id like the ship a whole lot more lol  ok it's completely uncanon, i know - i just think it would look nicer... :P (it would almost look like a sister ship to the New Orleans, id imagine...)

Quote from: Barihawk on October 08, 2008, 10:13:27 AM
Ambassador nacelles would look just a nice.
this is true also...

Quote from: Barihawk on October 08, 2008, 10:13:27 AM
But those resemble choco-pops.
lol ya
Logged

Offline Aeries

  • Posts: 1446
  • Cookies: 226
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #21 on: October 08, 2008, 10:27:12 AM »
We're COO-COO for COCOA POPS!  :shock:

I must agree, though. Slap on some Galaxy nacelles for the ole' girl and she's set. I don't imagine it'd be that hard... even for an amateur modeler, I think it'd be fairly easy when you know where the tools are and what some of them do.
Logged

intrepid90

  • Guest
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #22 on: October 08, 2008, 10:36:31 AM »
Quote from: JimmyB76 on October 08, 2008, 10:11:08 AM
i never did like those nacelles in all honesty...  slap on some galaxy-type nacelles and id like the ship a whole lot more lol  ok it's completely uncanon, i know - i just think it would look nicer... :P (it would almost look like a sister ship to the New Orleans, id imagine...)
lol, I agree on that 100%.
Logged

Offline Kirk

  • Posts: 1438
  • Cookies: 139
    • My Released Mods
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #23 on: October 08, 2008, 10:44:44 AM »
How about I do both? A canon and non-canon, but the canon will probably get done first.
Logged

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #24 on: October 08, 2008, 10:47:43 AM »
Canon should ALWAYS go first. ;) Great work so far, as usual. :S
Logged


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline Barihawk

  • Ninth Fleet STO Commanding Officer
  • Posts: 766
  • Cookies: 225
  • BC: The Aftermath Member
    • My Released Work
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #25 on: October 08, 2008, 10:49:18 AM »
I don't think we should throw the C word around here since it was never really seen on screen :P. Well, as a pile of debris but that doesn't really count!
Logged

Offline Kirk

  • Posts: 1438
  • Cookies: 139
    • My Released Mods
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #26 on: October 08, 2008, 10:54:02 AM »
Alright, here's my plan of attack:
  • Bash in the Korolev saucer and LC's Cheyenne nacelles for a podless version.
  • Bash in the SNS engineering hull for the pod.
  • Bash in new nacelles. (Poll will be up for nacelle type.)
  • Then, redo textures.
Logged

Offline NeoKaede

  • Posts: 201
  • Cookies: 4
  • We're watching you... scum.
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #27 on: October 08, 2008, 10:55:39 AM »
Quote from: JimmyB76 on October 08, 2008, 10:11:08 AM
i never did like those nacelles in all honesty...  slap on some galaxy-type nacelles and id like the ship a whole lot more lol  ok it's completely uncanon, i know - i just think it would look nicer... :P (it would almost look like a sister ship to the New Orleans, id imagine...)

I was bored:
Logged

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #28 on: October 08, 2008, 11:02:22 AM »
nice!!  see - thats what im talking about!
how does the deflector look on that ship?  honestly, the nacelles were the only reason ive never bothered to include it in any of my installs...  but if a version with nacelles like that were out there, then i definitely would include it in my ships list :)
Logged

Offline Kirk

  • Posts: 1438
  • Cookies: 139
    • My Released Mods
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #29 on: October 08, 2008, 11:04:18 AM »
There is no deflector on the ship without the pod, just a ton of mesh errors.
Logged

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #30 on: October 08, 2008, 11:06:42 AM »
no deflector?  hmm...  i guess i never really took notice to this ship before lol
Logged

Offline Barihawk

  • Ninth Fleet STO Commanding Officer
  • Posts: 766
  • Cookies: 225
  • BC: The Aftermath Member
    • My Released Work
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #31 on: October 08, 2008, 11:31:39 AM »
Use as much of the Korolev as you can if Glenn lets you. The Korolev is my absolute favorite ship! :D
Logged

Offline NeoKaede

  • Posts: 201
  • Cookies: 4
  • We're watching you... scum.
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #32 on: October 08, 2008, 11:40:50 AM »
Quote from: JimmyB76 on October 08, 2008, 11:06:42 AM
no deflector?  hmm...  i guess i never really took notice to this ship before lol

Yeah, no deflector. The secondary hull blends with the saucer. I wonder why LC never did a Springfield for his Wolf 359 pack.
Logged

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #33 on: October 08, 2008, 11:43:20 AM »
Quote from: NeoKaede on October 08, 2008, 11:40:50 AM
Quote from: JimmyB76 on October 08, 2008, 11:06:42 AM
no deflector?  hmm...  i guess i never really took notice to this ship before lol

Yeah, no deflector. The secondary hull blends with the saucer. I wonder why LC never did a Springfield for his Wolf 359 pack.

Maybe he forgot.
Logged
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #34 on: October 08, 2008, 12:12:02 PM »
honestly, i just never bothered to install it lol   the nacelles always kinda turned me off to the ship, so ive never really seen it ingame or anywhere before...
Logged

Offline moed

  • Posts: 1472
  • Cookies: 57
  • Star Trekus Fanaticus
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #35 on: October 08, 2008, 03:29:36 PM »
Quote from: kirk2164 on October 08, 2008, 10:44:44 AM
How about I do both? A canon and non-canon, but the canon will probably get done first.

Doing both sounds great.

IMO, canon (or what is considered "quasi-canon") first. As you already stated.

Non-canon (Galaxy nacelles) 2nd.
Logged

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #36 on: October 08, 2008, 05:17:13 PM »
I wouldn't mind seeing more ships (including this one) with Ambassador-style nacelles. The Springfield Class while it has some similarities with the Galaxy, Nebula and Freedom classes, I believe it was constructed pre-TNG and should logically have an older design. But that's just my opinion of course.
Logged
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #37 on: October 08, 2008, 06:04:06 PM »
Quote from: Maxloef on October 08, 2008, 03:34:48 AM
also remember to model in the pod at the bottom..wich is lacking on most models...check ex astris  Scientia

Its missing from most models cause a standard Springfield doesn't have any pods. ;)

Sometimes it carries a SWAC pod similar to the neb's and sometimes it carries an engineering hull pod.
Logged
All hail the messiah!

Offline Kirk

  • Posts: 1438
  • Cookies: 139
    • My Released Mods
Re: Springfield Class Retexture/Rebash
« Reply #38 on: October 08, 2008, 09:57:21 PM »
Some progress. There are some holes in the mesh, but I am trying to figure out how to fill them in.
Logged

Offline Shion

  • Posts: 82
  • Cookies: 4
Re: Springfield Class Retexture
« Reply #39 on: October 09, 2008, 01:16:52 AM »
Quote from: NeoKaede on October 08, 2008, 11:40:50 AM
Quote from: JimmyB76 on October 08, 2008, 11:06:42 AM
no deflector?  hmm...  i guess i never really took notice to this ship before lol

Yeah, no deflector. The secondary hull blends with the saucer. I wonder why LC never did a Springfield for his Wolf 359 pack.

He did.  He just never textured/released it.  There was a thread on BCU about it, but I see that those threads are most likely all gone now.

Good luck on the mesh though, A decent Springfield is long overdue.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »