« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class  (Read 7996 times)

Offline Hellsgate

  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
  • Posts: 195
  • Cookies: 2
  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
    • =^=Star Trek: New Worlds=^=
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #40 on: June 13, 2010, 02:08:26 AM »
Sweet. I like the Coto-Class, too.  :samtarget: Hmmm...needs Maru type underslung secondary hulls.  :dance
Logged
If At First You Don't Succeed, So Much For Skydiving.

Offline Captain_Licard

  • [RETIRED]
  • Posts: 323
  • Cookies: 12
  • Captain Tiberius Flynn
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #41 on: June 13, 2010, 09:15:51 PM »
Quote from: Hellsgate on June 13, 2010, 02:08:26 AM
Sweet. I like the Coto-Class, too.  :samtarget: Hmmm...needs Maru type underslung secondary hulls.  :dance

Ill work on a secondary hull. In the meantime, I adapted the weapons rollbar from the beta centauri
Logged
Star Trek Collision

Offline metalnick

  • Posts: 291
  • Cookies: 13
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #42 on: June 13, 2010, 10:37:50 PM »
cool stuff man.
Logged
Nothing Is True. Everything Is Permitted....

Offline Captain_D

  • Captain of the Seafood Universe
  • Posts: 403
  • Cookies: 5
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #43 on: June 15, 2010, 12:23:51 AM »
Yea, they look nice. Never was a big fan of Ol' NX either, but these look pretty cool.
Logged

Offline Captain_Licard

  • [RETIRED]
  • Posts: 323
  • Cookies: 12
  • Captain Tiberius Flynn
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #44 on: June 15, 2010, 08:15:28 PM »
I was thinking, I want this ship really to be a destroyer, so why not add in the pulse phasers along the lines of the ones on the galaxy dreadnaught(you know, the bug antena lookin things) and a third, underslung naccele. Thoughts?
Logged
Star Trek Collision

Offline Hellsgate

  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
  • Posts: 195
  • Cookies: 2
  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
    • =^=Star Trek: New Worlds=^=
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #45 on: June 17, 2010, 02:19:53 PM »
Please no third underslung nacelle. I can see docking units for underslung Oberth-Class type (tubular or rectangular) multi-mission pods but no third nacelle. I can see a stump instead of the rollbar for mounting Nebula-Class, Luna-Class, or Ronin-Class overhead scientific / tactical modules.
 

Logged
If At First You Don't Succeed, So Much For Skydiving.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #46 on: June 17, 2010, 04:51:56 PM »
I'm in complete agreement with Hellsgate. The NX-01 design has already been sufficiently screwed up. No need for a pointless 3rd or even 4th nacelle.
Logged
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Captain_Licard

  • [RETIRED]
  • Posts: 323
  • Cookies: 12
  • Captain Tiberius Flynn
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #47 on: June 17, 2010, 05:02:07 PM »
okay, so no third naccele, how about the pulse phasers? this is going to be a destroyer.
Logged
Star Trek Collision

Offline EDD_7

  • Posts: 124
  • Cookies: 24
  • Also Known As Mr_7 :P
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #48 on: June 17, 2010, 05:33:05 PM »
Quote from: Darkthunder on June 17, 2010, 04:51:56 PM
I'm in complete agreement with Hellsgate. The NX-01 design has already been sufficiently screwed up. No need for a pointless 3rd or even 4th nacelle.

I don't know, If the model is done well an NX with 4 nacelles would look good but only in the original era.
(see 1st attached image)
                                                                                                                                         
However 3 is a no. its strangely odd to see kitbashes of the NX. The roll bar seems abit out of place, I think its becaue it a  /^\  shape go for more of a Miranda shaped roll bar. ( 2nd attached image )
Logged

Offline Captain_Licard

  • [RETIRED]
  • Posts: 323
  • Cookies: 12
  • Captain Tiberius Flynn
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #49 on: June 17, 2010, 08:34:52 PM »
Alright, made the roll bar more miranda-ish, also widened the torp pod a little bit
Logged
Star Trek Collision

Offline Captain_Licard

  • [RETIRED]
  • Posts: 323
  • Cookies: 12
  • Captain Tiberius Flynn
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #50 on: June 17, 2010, 09:09:27 PM »
and for the heck of it made a variant
Logged
Star Trek Collision

Offline Hellsgate

  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
  • Posts: 195
  • Cookies: 2
  • Administrator, "Star Trek: New Worlds"
    • =^=Star Trek: New Worlds=^=
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #51 on: June 18, 2010, 12:15:40 AM »
Looks ok. But i'd stick with the original version with the nacelles in the 'up' dorsal position. I'd have pulse phaser ports in the front (in the rectangular section above the front lip of the saucer where the navigation deflector should be.) The variant with the nacelles in the down position should be a freighter or science vessel minus the rollbar but with a Nebula type overhead module on a thick vertical EPS/ODN trunk.



 
Logged
If At First You Don't Succeed, So Much For Skydiving.

Offline tiqhud

  • BCFiles File Poster
  • Posts: 1763
  • Cookies: 1067
  • San Francisco Shipyards (HPer) file manuiplater
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #52 on: June 24, 2010, 10:55:23 AM »
the Gabe-enterprise, just SCREEMS, make me a Terran Empire vessel
Logged
TiqHud
you sir, are unable to strike, the port or starboard parts of hull , of a bovine storage facility.
Canon , what people argue exists, that doesn't really  exist.
It is all the little details, that cause headaches.
"Never judge wealth with Money"
'Intelligence has Nothing to do with Politics'
it is Late, Do you know where your Towel is?

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #53 on: June 24, 2010, 01:42:49 PM »
I want that quad-nacelle NX-prise! :dance :yay:
Logged
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline Locke

  • Posts: 535
  • Cookies: 36
  • Cannot find REALITY.SYS - Universe Halted
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #54 on: June 24, 2010, 01:51:05 PM »
Quote
I'd have pulse phaser ports in the front . . .

The only issue with that is pulse phasers weren't standard weapons on Starfleet vessels until the DS9 era.  Even then, they were reserved for Defiant and her bretheren.  Look at the Enterprise E: a perfect platform for high-powered weapons (quantum torpedoes anyone?) yet the designers didn't feel it was necessary to include pulse phasers.

And if anyone brings up the Reliant, then so help me . . .  :evil:
Logged

Offline deadthunder2_0

  • Posts: 1181
  • Cookies: 39
  • Tech, Nonstop, General- Modders Of Steel
    • Modders of Steel Home page
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #55 on: June 26, 2010, 08:13:33 PM »
NX had plasma cannons
Logged
Support the Post TNG Ship Pack

Tech, Nonstop, General- Modders Of Steel,
We are the Modders that take everything to the next level, We are the Modders of Steel

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: CL Connie Variant, TMP NX-Class, and 25th Century Coto Class
« Reply #56 on: June 26, 2010, 09:20:36 PM »
Quote from: Locke on June 24, 2010, 01:51:05 PM
The only issue with that is pulse phasers weren't standard weapons on Starfleet vessels until the DS9 era.  Even then, they were reserved for Defiant and her bretheren.  Look at the Enterprise E: a perfect platform for high-powered weapons (quantum torpedoes anyone?) yet the designers didn't feel it was necessary to include pulse phasers.
perhaps a little something of "artistic license" could apply...  besides, this isnt something meant for anything onscreen so it little bit of bending-the-rules i think is ok lol :P  just like the Achilles Class, which has pulse phasers...

anywhoo - going back ontopic...
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »