Author Topic: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A  (Read 22170 times)

Offline Captain_D

  • Captain of the Seafood Universe
  • Posts: 403
  • Cookies: 5
Re: Cruiser
« Reply #200 on: November 30, 2011, 12:56:06 PM »
As they say at Micky D's,,"I'm Lovin' it.",, :yay:

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
Re: Cruiser
« Reply #201 on: November 30, 2011, 02:45:47 PM »
Beautiful ship DJ!
All hail the messiah!

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: Cruiser
« Reply #202 on: December 01, 2011, 02:12:52 AM »
I think I'm about done with the diffuse textures on the Excelsior now.  Here are a few renders with a modified lighting rig.

If you guys have any suggestions for the textures throw em at me.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #203 on: December 01, 2011, 02:31:42 AM »
She looks fantastic, I have no suggestions. :thumbsup:

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline flarespire

  • The one who breaks the cycle.
  • Posts: 1230
  • Cookies: 47
  • God Green God Dammit!
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #204 on: December 01, 2011, 02:37:32 AM »
looks good, and id suggest putting some dark hull areas on the ship like the sovereign class has, the ship seems a little bland withought em to me...

Offline Captain_D

  • Captain of the Seafood Universe
  • Posts: 403
  • Cookies: 5
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #205 on: December 01, 2011, 05:09:33 AM »
looks good, and id suggest putting some dark hull areas on the ship like the sovereign class has, the ship seems a little bland withought em to me...

As I wipe the drool off my face,,,, :drool:,,,,I can't see anything wanting at all.

If you feel the need to do so, I would go with a shade not much darker than the landing area of the shuttlebays. Anything darker and it would look like a checkerboard, My opinion anyway.

Stunning detail. :thumbsup:

Offline Phoenix Bondi

  • REMEMBER YOUR ORIGIN
  • Posts: 1294
  • Cookies: 575
  • Never Forget Your Origins
    • CHRIS JONES GAMING
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #206 on: December 01, 2011, 06:55:12 AM »
as per normal i really like it - it dont scream excelsior to me but damn its good! i dunno think its the lengh of the hull and nacelles for me but otherwise the MVAM part is SUPER SEXY!! good work as normal dj!

Offline 007bashir

  • Posts: 879
  • Cookies: 111
  • Android User/Screenshooter/Sci-Fi Rendering
    • http://007bashir.deviantart.com/
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #207 on: December 01, 2011, 08:01:45 AM »

If you feel the need to do so, I would go with a shade not much darker than the landing area of the shuttlebays. Anything darker and it would look like a checkerboard, My opinion anyway.

Yeah exactly that

Offline deadthunder2_0

  • Posts: 1181
  • Cookies: 39
  • Tech, Nonstop, General- Modders Of Steel
    • Modders of Steel Home page
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #208 on: December 01, 2011, 10:02:27 AM »
Depends, I would suggest the new glow system that Cord worked on a few months back for his Nova class.
Support the Post TNG Ship Pack

Tech, Nonstop, General- Modders Of Steel,
We are the Modders that take everything to the next level, We are the Modders of Steel

Offline starfox1701

  • Posts: 195
  • Cookies: 13
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #209 on: December 01, 2011, 10:10:02 AM »
I would make the Ventral Saucer registry bigger but thats just a personal preference. You might also think about tweeking the contrast of tha panaling so that it stands out a bit more but again these are just personal preferences. Sho look great! :yay:

Offline sovereign001

  • Posts: 639
  • Cookies: 77
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #210 on: December 01, 2011, 12:09:54 PM »
Looks like a model! (compliment!) Cookie!

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #211 on: December 01, 2011, 12:39:58 PM »
looks good, and id suggest putting some dark hull areas on the ship like the sovereign class has, the ship seems a little bland withought em to me...

I was thinking that too, but that second shot just looks so perfectly clean, I think the darker areas would kill the look. Maybe on the dorsal around the bridge and impulse area, it would work, but the venteral doesn't need it.

She's worthy of the Excelsior name, nicely done DJ.

Offline Locke

  • Posts: 535
  • Cookies: 36
  • Cannot find REALITY.SYS - Universe Halted
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #212 on: December 01, 2011, 12:42:58 PM »
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any impulse engines for the saucer section. :idk:

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #213 on: December 01, 2011, 01:15:30 PM »
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any impulse engines for the saucer section. :idk:

 :lostit: You're right. DJ Curtis' head implosion in 3, 2, 1..
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline Captain_D

  • Captain of the Seafood Universe
  • Posts: 403
  • Cookies: 5
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #214 on: December 01, 2011, 01:28:10 PM »
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any impulse engines for the saucer section. :idk:

As I recall, they are inside the connection area of the saucer.

Offline eclipse74569

  • Roger Smith of the U.S.S. Lollypop, a good ship
  • Webmaster
  • Posts: 2240
  • Cookies: 65535
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #215 on: December 01, 2011, 04:30:20 PM »
6 billion Silver dollars for Captain_D :P
Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return, to obtain, something of equal value must be lost.  That is alchemy's first law of equivalent exchange.  In those days we really believed that to be the world's one and only truth~Alphonse Elric

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #216 on: December 04, 2011, 05:10:38 PM »
Jingle bells, jingle bells...

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #217 on: December 04, 2011, 05:20:21 PM »
Do I really have to say that it looks fantastic in-game?  I think it already goes without saying, ya know. :thumbsup:

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Captain_D

  • Captain of the Seafood Universe
  • Posts: 403
  • Cookies: 5
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #218 on: December 04, 2011, 05:27:21 PM »
Jingle bells, jingle bells...

She's in game,,HOORAY!,,, :P :D


Do I really have to say that it looks fantastic in-game?  I think it already goes without saying, ya know. :thumbsup:

Agreed. And a jar of cookies from my silver dollar winnings.

Offline Commander_One

  • Chief of Operations, USS Bo Jangles
  • Posts: 111
  • Cookies: 8
  • Peace and Long Life...Live Long and Prosper
Re: U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000-A
« Reply #219 on: December 08, 2011, 02:39:46 AM »
Jingle bells, jingle bells...


Absolutely beautiful!  I am so glad you left it without all the darker paneling.  She's perfect with this color scheme!  Pristine white, similar to that of the Enterprise-A!!!   I look forward to using this ship as my 'sovereign' in the single player campaign!  As far as a name for the ship... why not use a ship class/name using one from the Royal Canadian Navy. (kinda like you did with the Edmonton, if I am correct) I looked up some names on Wikipedia showing a very large list of ship names and classes.  I think it would be great if you would consider this instead of using the Excelsior name.