Author Topic: BC Screenshot Thread (Read 488981 times)

Darkthunder · « **Reply #2620 on:** July 01, 2012, 08:20:54 PM »

Quote from: mckinneyc on July 01, 2012, 02:47:55 PM

More Enterprise loving

I think it's pretty much accepted within the modding community that the Century Class IS the Enterprise-F (no matter what Cryptic designed for STO), and the Eclipse Class is the Enterprise-G. Would love to see his take on the Enterprise-H and Enterprise-I (leading upto the Enterprise-J).

eclipse74569 · « **Reply #2621 on:** July 01, 2012, 08:52:52 PM »

Agreed DT! Hope someone does something soon!

FarShot · « **Reply #2622 on:** July 01, 2012, 09:19:49 PM »

I must be one of the few who thinks that better ships could have been designed for the F and G. Waiting for the "heresy!" exclamations.

Darkthunder · « **Reply #2623 on:** July 01, 2012, 09:33:20 PM »

Heretic! Booo!!! Hiss....!!!!

In fairness thou, with an opinion like that, care to back it up with a "better design" of your own?

FarShot · « **Reply #2624 on:** July 01, 2012, 09:48:03 PM »

Well, I'm not trying to be better than DJ. I'm simply saying I have problems with the Century and the Eclipse being the F and G, respectively. Each canon Enterprise has always had major differences from the previous one, with two exceptions, the A because it was the same class, and the C, which was intentionally designed as an in-between. The Century has nearly all the same proportions as the Sovereign, which bothers me because it doesn't feel all that original in comparison. As for the Eclipse, its hull detailing is less detailed than the F, when clearly the trend has been to increase complexity. Also, the Eclipse breaks the trend of having an elliptical or circular saucer, which has become a sort of trademark of Starfleet's main line of cruisers.

Centurus · « **Reply #2625 on:** July 01, 2012, 10:38:30 PM »

Quote from: Killallewoks on July 01, 2012, 11:47:49 AM

Fantastic stuff guys I won't be able to post for a whilst but have this too look at whilst im gone.

Intercept Course

DAMN!!!!!

mckinneyc · « **Reply #2626 on:** July 02, 2012, 05:55:58 AM »

Quote from: B5 on July 01, 2012, 07:42:27 PM

errmm, mckinney, you used the wrong Enterprise-C

I used my favourite Enterprise-C design and with the previous Enterprises being made my Wileycoyote it seemed fitting to use his ships in all but the F and G shots

B5 · « **Reply #2627 on:** July 02, 2012, 07:50:21 AM »

fair enough mckinney, fair enough.

mckinneyc · « **Reply #2628 on:** July 02, 2012, 07:52:30 AM »

There is method always to my madness

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #2629 on:** July 02, 2012, 11:39:43 AM »

Since mckinneyc forgot some... :angel

First the original Ent-C

The Kelvin-prise

The JJ-Prise

The Phase 2

And finally, the Koerner-prise

mckinneyc · « **Reply #2630 on:** July 02, 2012, 01:47:40 PM »

I forgot some did I?

Reason I didn't use the others as featured by Shadow is they aren't the nicest of Enterprises lol

Darkthunder · « **Reply #2631 on:** July 02, 2012, 01:50:18 PM »

Awesome. Would love to see an evolution from the original NX-01, all the way to the Enterprise-J, using the same angle, and preferably at a higher resolution

EDIT: On second thought, the only ship missing is the NX-01. Still would love to see them all at a higher res. 1024+ atleast.

mckinneyc · « **Reply #2632 on:** July 02, 2012, 03:24:34 PM »

I agree Dark. Few more from me today:

Patrol Blues

Let's Kill Neelix

Uneasy Escort

007bashir · « **Reply #2633 on:** July 02, 2012, 03:41:52 PM »

Cool pics guys, would love to see that evolution too.

Some TOS-Love (Think i never did one of those)

Research Station F-39

Shadowknight1 · « **Reply #2634 on:** July 02, 2012, 03:49:09 PM »

Quote from: mckinneyc on July 02, 2012, 01:47:40 PM

I forgot some did I?

Reason I didn't use the others as featured by Shadow is they aren't the nicest of Enterprises lol

Wow...way to make my computer look even more like crap.

And while I don't like the Kelvin-prise as much, I love the Koerner-prise almost as much as the original. It's a bit busy, but I still like it.

mckinneyc · « **Reply #2635 on:** July 02, 2012, 03:58:35 PM »

That is the reason I dislike the Koerner-prise, far too much going on

And amazingly awesome pics 007!

007bashir · « **Reply #2636 on:** July 02, 2012, 04:04:06 PM »

Thanks mc!

Need Help?

Is there a good vorcha? Or a good galor (Dont think there is...)

mckinneyc · « **Reply #2637 on:** July 02, 2012, 04:08:42 PM »

Like concept but I would have adjusted the lighting slightly, Klingon designs give some good shadow areas that contrast with the light. But loving it 007

007bashir · « **Reply #2638 on:** July 02, 2012, 04:10:52 PM »

Just saw i didn't hide the cursor. think will redo it later...

Edit: The last one for Today;

The Defector

mckinneyc · « **Reply #2639 on:** July 02, 2012, 05:31:32 PM »

I love it!

News:

Author Topic: BC Screenshot Thread (Read 488981 times)