Author Topic: Star Trek Online thread  (Read 409018 times)

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #480 on: July 26, 2009, 11:50:27 PM »
the scaling is wrong... check the windows...

this thing is supposed to carry a large wing of fighters/attack shuttles
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #481 on: July 27, 2009, 03:56:26 PM »
Whats with all of the 22nd century ships in a 25th century game? I just don't get it.
All hail the messiah!

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #482 on: July 27, 2009, 04:05:18 PM »
Since when can people not go retro? :P Just cos it looks ENT doesn't mean its as low powered. Also, its the only thing approaching a design "ethic" for the Klingons. Considering how different each Klingon TNG ship looks to each other...
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #483 on: July 30, 2009, 01:52:54 PM »
here is a load of new STO images....

Kling BOP:


Fed Excal:


Miranda:


Fed Unknown:


Fed ???:



Romulan Valdore:



Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #484 on: July 30, 2009, 01:55:18 PM »
I like that Fed Unkown ship. Don't like the Fed ??? ship though and not really changing my views
on the Excalibur/Connie thing.

The BoP, Miranda and Valdore look awesome though. :D
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline NeoSilverThorn

  • Explorer at heart
  • Posts: 53
  • Cookies: 1
    • NeoSilverThorn's DevArt gallery
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #485 on: July 30, 2009, 02:52:54 PM »
That second unknown looks an awful lot like a variant Sovereign that someone threw together with Starship Creator.
"You're diggin' my ride from outer space."

"Okay, okay, so I technically use an ether/anti-ether warp reactor.  Not that different from a matter/anti-matter reactor, is it?"

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #486 on: July 30, 2009, 02:58:14 PM »
The Excalibur looks cool from this angle.  The only funky thing is the neck IMO.  As for the ???, it's pretty cool, except for the aft of the secondary hull.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #487 on: July 30, 2009, 03:13:15 PM »
I REALLY hope they don't plan on having "engine exhausts" visible, like Nexus: The Jupiter Incident, or Eve Online. I know having it visible makes it easier to see which "direction" the ship is flying, but it would look really bad on Star Trek ships.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #488 on: July 30, 2009, 03:15:10 PM »
Thats what we've seen so far (unfortunately). Maybe there'll be an option to turn em off. Cos surely they'll be a gfx hog as well.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #489 on: July 30, 2009, 05:19:34 PM »
Is there any news on how much it is going to cost to play this game monthly on the main server?
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #490 on: July 30, 2009, 05:27:42 PM »
I haven't heard anything about that yet...
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #491 on: July 30, 2009, 05:32:35 PM »
I don't know if this has been posted already



I Like the Roll bar.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #492 on: July 30, 2009, 08:10:50 PM »
Is there any news on how much it going to cost to play this game monthly on the main server?

Most likely priced around the same as most other MMOs. 10-15 US dollars per month.
Official BCC Discord · https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline CyAn1d3

  • MacDill Shipyards Design Team
  • Posts: 1656
  • Cookies: 420
  • RETIRED
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #493 on: July 30, 2009, 09:53:49 PM »
the excal looks like a "modern" connie.... and i HATE IT... with a PASSION #loveFFX#
I came, i saw, i added a Sig.
Later gents, i have Youtube to take over.
Cy - 1-12-15

Offline Villain

  • Posts: 1480
  • Cookies: 71
  • The artist formerly known as Prime
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #494 on: July 31, 2009, 11:31:41 AM »
the excal looks like a "modern" connie.... and i HATE IT... with a PASSION #loveFFX#

That's kinda the point. Aside from the neck I love it, the Sov kitbash... Not so much. Too chunky.

MMO's are $15 a month, usually retail for $70-$90 on release. Prices don't change based on what server you are playing on, either, and I'm almost willing to bet everything I own that you won't get access to the SP mode if your account isn't active (As in, if you skip a payment, for that month/two months you won't be able to play at all).


"The design is clearly ancient... Launched hundreds of thousands of years ago."

Quote from: JimmyB76
der-ner-ner-ner-ner ..... der-ner-ner-ner-ner .....
---
Quote from: Rick Sternbach, on the topic of the Galor Class' length
...Probably not, but the number I get(379.6m) could be considered ?original intent,? a term that I think I will be using from now on, and ?canon? be damned.

Offline majormagna

  • English Idiot
  • Posts: 513
  • Cookies: 5
  • Bail Out!
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #495 on: July 31, 2009, 11:32:30 AM »
Hm, methinks I'l go Romulan or Cardassian... Purely to blast these... these abominations to ashes...

Although, some of them do look okay...
Did you know I'm on Twitter?

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #496 on: August 01, 2009, 07:31:34 AM »
Hm, methinks I'l go Romulan or Cardassian... Purely to blast these... these abominations to ashes...

Although, some of them do look okay...

Remember, the ships are customisable so its possible te Cryptic people have no Trek-ination whatsoever. If they did, the ships would look much better. :P
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #497 on: August 01, 2009, 09:58:58 AM »
Hm, methinks I'l go Romulan or Cardassian... Purely to blast these... these abominations to ashes...

Although, some of them do look okay...

Well, you'll have to wait for an Expansion or something, I believe on release the only Factions you can be in are Klingon and Federation.

Offline DJ Curtis

  • Ship Builder
  • Posts: 1967
  • Cookies: 1412
  • I make ships.
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #498 on: August 01, 2009, 12:50:59 PM »
I've gotta put my two cents in on this.  I think these ships look terrible.  The federation designs are not balanced or aesthetically pleasing, they look primitive and cartoonish.  The Klingon BOP is especially disappointing.  They have clearly not concerned themselves with making it look accurate.  They should see LC's work on ST:Excalibur.  The ship they've built simply doesn't compare.  And while we're talking about Excalibur, the STO version of the ship is just atrocious.  There is an obvious design lineage/pattern that all star trek ships follow, and they don't go for a "retro" look.  Starfleet is not about "retro".

When I look at these screenshots I am struck by a single thought.  These people are not Star Trek fans, and they don't understand it.

Offline Dalek

  • Posts: 1529
  • Cookies: 206
Re: Star Trek Online thread
« Reply #499 on: August 01, 2009, 01:05:39 PM »
I've gotta put my two cents in on this.  I think these ships look terrible.  The federation designs are not balanced or aesthetically pleasing, they look primitive and cartoonish.  The Klingon BOP is especially disappointing.  They have clearly not concerned themselves with making it look accurate.  They should see LC's work on ST:Excalibur.  The ship they've built simply doesn't compare.  And while we're talking about Excalibur, the STO version of the ship is just atrocious.  There is an obvious design lineage/pattern that all star trek ships follow, and they don't go for a "retro" look.  Starfleet is not about "retro".

The same could be said about JJ and STXI. Not meaning to start an argument or anything, but they are similar.

Thats why I hate that Excalibur/Connie thing. Sticking Nova nacelles and giving it a slanted brick for a neck does not work as a "refit", even if its a new class based on original guidelines. There have only been very few new class designs that I've seen that have not gone in my "eurgh" pile.

Images I've seen of the Cardie, Rommie and Klingon ships though don't look as cartooney as some of the Fed ship images. Perhaps they get there designs, but not the Federations.
"To live on as we have is to leave behind joy, and love, and companionship, because we know it to be transitory, of the moment. We know it will turn to ash. Only those whose lives are brief can imagine that love is eternal. You should embrace that remarkable illusion. It may be the greatest gift your race has ever received."

 - Lorien