BCC\BCMM Discord: https://discord.com/invite/AhN8a3KeP9
The model you are referring to comes from Starfleet Command. That fighter is the exact reason why I want new fighters, lol.I will give the scoop thing a try when I get the computer back up and running, but to be honest, I don't think it will work well. I'll post pics.Quote from: kruunch on February 13, 2009, 11:27:39 AMI'm ok with ventral or dorsal mount but I agree the nose would look better more like a 50s or 60s "scoop" intake fighter like an mig-15 through 19 or a Sabre jet with a deflector..kind of like..ah..I think theres one called a wasp or a hornet which is from some other game...if you get the TMP Ark Royal carrier it comes with the fighter I'm talking about...this one could have a smaller deflector Quote from: FarShot on February 12, 2009, 08:17:44 PMPersonally, I don't like ventral mounted nacelles in fighters. But that's just me.As for the nose, to make it more TMP, I'd make it look like the front of a MiG-17, and instead of an intake, have a mini deflector.
I'm ok with ventral or dorsal mount but I agree the nose would look better more like a 50s or 60s "scoop" intake fighter like an mig-15 through 19 or a Sabre jet with a deflector..kind of like..ah..I think theres one called a wasp or a hornet which is from some other game...if you get the TMP Ark Royal carrier it comes with the fighter I'm talking about...this one could have a smaller deflector Quote from: FarShot on February 12, 2009, 08:17:44 PMPersonally, I don't like ventral mounted nacelles in fighters. But that's just me.As for the nose, to make it more TMP, I'd make it look like the front of a MiG-17, and instead of an intake, have a mini deflector.
Personally, I don't like ventral mounted nacelles in fighters. But that's just me.As for the nose, to make it more TMP, I'd make it look like the front of a MiG-17, and instead of an intake, have a mini deflector.
A scoop at the front would be very Viper like (BSG).