Author Topic: Star Trek Into Darkness - Images, Videos, Discussion, etc  (Read 101910 times)

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #420 on: April 17, 2013, 07:07:53 PM »
She may take a beating, the Enterprise nearly always does...but David trumps Goliath. :dontcare:

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline CyAn1d3

  • MacDill Shipyards Design Team
  • Posts: 1656
  • Cookies: 420
  • RETIRED
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #421 on: April 17, 2013, 08:29:45 PM »
theres a hollow in the saucer section?
strange...
I came, i saw, i added a Sig.
Later gents, i have Youtube to take over.
Cy - 1-12-15

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #422 on: April 17, 2013, 08:49:25 PM »
theres a hollow in the saucer section?
strange...

X3
Very Eaves like.

Also, with the clearer view of the ship crashing into the bay I think that may still be a third ship. Why? Soild saucer coupled with the size of that ship vs the Dreadnought and not to mention the hump at the back of the saucer thats missing from the Dread. Its all but a mile straight from the shore to Alcatraz as someone has said. The Dreadnought would fill most of that space in no time.
All hail the messiah!

Offline eclipse74569

  • Roger Smith of the U.S.S. Lollypop, a good ship
  • Webmaster
  • Posts: 2240
  • Cookies: 65535
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #423 on: April 17, 2013, 09:40:34 PM »
Another theory that I have, which may be wrong, is when the Ent is "falling" it might be that they're going to the Dry Dock on earth for repairs....anyone even think of that one?
Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return, to obtain, something of equal value must be lost.  That is alchemy's first law of equivalent exchange.  In those days we really believed that to be the world's one and only truth~Alphonse Elric

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #424 on: April 17, 2013, 11:20:50 PM »
I'm sure that if they can get the ship under water, its engines, thrusters, and inertial dampeners are strong enough to travel through an atmosphere without burning on entry.  No, pretty sure that's an uncontrolled descent.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #425 on: April 18, 2013, 01:22:12 AM »
I'm sure that if they can get the ship under water, its engines, thrusters, and inertial dampeners are strong enough to travel through an atmosphere without burning on entry.  No, pretty sure that's an uncontrolled descent.
Not to mention the lack of running lights.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Locke

  • Posts: 535
  • Cookies: 36
  • Cannot find REALITY.SYS - Universe Halted
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #426 on: April 18, 2013, 03:51:01 AM »
Okay, haven't paid much *any* attention to this thread recently, but I just caught this on a great website that "proves" the much-contended size of the JJprise.

http://mightymega.com/2013/04/17/star-trek-into-darkness-u-s-s-enterprise-model-kit/

Using high-tech maths and a little thing I call "the rule of thumb" (being the digit that punches numbers into the calculator), I come up with a figure of 964.5 feet for the JJprise.  According to Memory Beta that "proves" the much-contended size of the JJprise.

http://mightymega.com/2013/04/17/star-trek-into-darkness-u-s-s-enterprise-model-kit/

Using high-tech maths and a little thing I call "the rule of thumb" (being the digit that punches numbers into the calculator), I come up with a figure of 964.5 feet for the JJprise.  According to Memory Beta, the length of the original Enterprise (canon and before refit) is 946.8 feet.  So the difference is only . . . 17.7 feet.

Of course, if this has been covered already, I apologize for the distraction. :angel

EDIT: And for the insanity of the url tagging system.  I don't know WTF I did . . .

Fixed links -Nebula

you missed a closing [/url]

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #427 on: April 18, 2013, 12:10:46 PM »
I distrust a site that can't get the name of the movie that it's selling products for right. :p (They put a colon in.)

I don't mind it being a bigger ship than we're used to, given that in the real world we have naval vessels larger than the prime Connie. One of my favourite things in this is the window on the bridge. I always thought that the old ones were like that when I was a kid. I love how it can zoom right in/out of the bridge and across the ship. THAT gives a great sense of scale.

I'm on the side that there's three ships at play here. One of them must be Harrison's, but the ship with the wholes in the hull (If it is a ship) looks like it may be a separate one.

@Eclipse, if she were descending in control, surely the Enterprise would be travelling down vertically rather than nose first.


Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #428 on: April 18, 2013, 03:09:33 PM »
I distrust a site that can't get the name of the movie that it's selling products for right. :p (They put a colon in.)

I believe that could be a point of contention for the four TNG films (I count Generations in that number, despite Kirk, heh). The only one I've seen it definate is First Contact (with colon, heh) - Generations, Insurrection and Nemesis, I've seen it both with and without. Some peoples need to make up their minds, heh.
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #429 on: April 18, 2013, 07:43:47 PM »
Big series of films...and you guys are arguing over colons... :P
I miss :bigdance:

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #430 on: April 18, 2013, 08:01:56 PM »
...and I look over at the STO thread, and you're complaining about their adaption of the mantra, hypocrite. :P

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421

Offline mckinneyc

  • Screenshot Master
  • Posts: 1600
  • Cookies: 151
  • Screenshot Master
    • My DA page
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #432 on: April 19, 2013, 03:13:05 PM »
All the consoles feel like pinball machines  :funny

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #433 on: April 19, 2013, 06:44:54 PM »
...and I look over at the STO thread, and you're complaining about their adaption of the mantra, hypocrite. :P

Hey, at least it's a line of text that I detest and not just a single colon :D
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #434 on: April 19, 2013, 06:56:28 PM »
At least we aren't hating on a whole sentence. :p

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #435 on: April 19, 2013, 07:36:16 PM »
At least we aren't hating on a whole sentence. :p

At least I didn't feel the need to reverse an argument :P
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #436 on: April 20, 2013, 04:07:17 AM »
Have some videos

TV Spot:



Message from John Harrison



And two Acer sponsored videos.



Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #437 on: April 20, 2013, 01:42:29 PM »
Nice TV spot.  Showed the Enterprise blasting off from inside a planetary atmosphere.  I'm not sure if it's after the mission to Nibiru or what though.  And whoever did that spot timed Uhura's eye-roll perfectly.  "I have a reputation?"

And god DAMN Cumberbatch has an awesome voice.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Vortex

  • Modder in Learning
  • Posts: 1266
  • Cookies: 28
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #438 on: April 21, 2013, 02:28:48 PM »
At least I didn't feel the need to reverse an argument :P

When in doubt, always revert the argument of the neutron flow. :p

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
RE: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #439 on: April 21, 2013, 07:23:19 PM »
When in doubt, always revert the argument of the neutron flow. :p

If in doubt, call 'em out :P
I miss :bigdance: