Author Topic: Star Trek Into Darkness - Images, Videos, Discussion, etc  (Read 101919 times)

Offline Saquist

  • Posts: 414
  • Cookies: 24
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #660 on: May 19, 2013, 04:59:47 PM »
I agree with everything you said Farshot.  And my point Saquist is that expecting them to not play fast and loose with canon is dumb.  In fact, it's a miracle there's as many nods to canon as there are.  And I think you are missing Farshot's point, but oh well.

Then... it's just a coincidence that your view of canon ("on screen is absolute") isn't actually how the Franchise looks at it anymore?  You can't go around telling people what to believe when you don't know yourself.

Isn't this more about taking a personal stake in "canon"?
Believe what ever you want to.  Agree with who ever you want to it's all just as valid.

Quote
Kori Barnes:
Honestly, I think i like Into Darkness more then 09

It was a better movie.  Less plot holes...Less Contrivance...Less "hard" scientific errors.
I think 75% of the film was actually a creative take on Wrath of Khan but the last 25% was just EPIC amounts of Plagiarism and I think we all see that.  There is no need to have line after line of quotes from Star Trek II.  

For me...It's just okay.  Not particularly good and certainly not bad.
It wasn't Lord of the Rings, Matrix, Empire Strikes Back or Dark Knight.  
Rather it was more like Charlie's Angles, Wild Wild West, Men In Black, any James Bond Movie.

----
Did anyone ever question why in 1959 they apparently had the ability to bring people back to life and superior biological medicine than the 23rd century?

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #661 on: May 19, 2013, 06:27:58 PM »
Thought I'd throw this back in here.

Quote
btw the island measures 1,675 feet (511 m) by 590 feet (180 m) and is 135 feet (41 m) at highest point during mean tide

The Vengeance is supposed to be twice the size of the Ent and that is most likely volume. Though from all the shots she certainly looked a lot longer than the Ent.

Thing to consider about the Vengeance hitting Alcatraz... She hit the main building on the island not the the entire island. But we should still be able to get a good judge of size. xD
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #662 on: May 19, 2013, 08:02:15 PM »
Then... it's just a coincidence that your view of canon ("on screen is absolute") isn't actually how the Franchise looks at it anymore?  You can't go around telling people what to believe when you don't know yourself.

Isn't this more about taking a personal stake in "canon"?
Believe what ever you want to.  Agree with who ever you want to it's all just as valid.

You misunderstand.  I assume most everything seen in movies and TV are canon, regardless of whether it seems contradictory or not.  To put it mathematically, 99% of onscreen stuff is canon.  Then I make the assumption that an extra 50% on top of that not seen onscreen would explain any discrepancy.  Examples include novelizations that go into what happens behind the scenes, et cetera.

For me...It's just okay.  Not particularly good and certainly not bad.
It wasn't Lord of the Rings, Matrix, Empire Strikes Back or Dark Knight.  
Rather it was more like Charlie's Angles, Wild Wild West, Men In Black, any James Bond Movie.

You seem to be neglecting the fact that there are strong moral lessons and exploration of the human condition behind this movie.  Follow authority before following gut.  Don't demonize your enemy.  Due process should be afforded to everyone.  The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.  Kirk and Spock finally understand one another, deeply and personally.  Spock stikes a balance between human feeling and vulcan stoicism.  None of those four movies you mentioned have any of that.

Did anyone ever question why in 1959 they apparently had the ability to bring people back to life and superior biological medicine than the 23rd century?

You seem to be forgetting that superman genetic engineering wasn't impossible.  It was outlawed.  They could do cell altering super biological medicine if they wanted.  But they don't.

Thought I'd throw this back in here.

The Vengeance is supposed to be twice the size of the Ent and that is most likely volume. Though from all the shots she certainly looked a lot longer than the Ent.

Thing to consider about the Vengeance hitting Alcatraz... She hit the main building on the island not the the entire island. But we should still be able to get a good judge of size. xD

Alcatraz is roughly two kilometers offshore.  Vengeance was roughly half that distance long, hence no longer than about a kilometer.  Given shots of the Vengeance and Enterprise together, that again puts the Enterprise probably around 366 meters long.

Offline captain_obvious

  • The captain of obvious-ness
  • Posts: 1703
  • Cookies: 54
    • ARmy Rumour SErvice- British Army Unofficial community
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #663 on: May 19, 2013, 08:22:26 PM »
For me...It's just okay.  Not particularly good and certainly not bad.

It took you that long to reach that conclusion? :P
It's typical JJ fare, not great but not awful.  Perfectly decent, but hardly worth seeing again. 

I so want to see that jjprise taken out.  It's probably the only on screen ship that's ever repulsed me.  Heck, I didn't even hate the NX as much as this thing! 
Perhaps JJtrek3 will oblige? Perhaps it will feature a re-enactment of the Big E going out with a bang? Or perhaps Christopher Lloyd in Klingon make up again? :D
I miss :bigdance:

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #664 on: May 19, 2013, 08:32:43 PM »
Only ONE DAMN BIT was taken from Wrath of Khan, and that's the reactor bit.  Of that scene, there were only a few lines directly lifted from Wrath of Khan:

1. Scotty: "You'd better get down here.  Better hurry."  Originally a McCoy line.
2. Scotty: "You'll flood the whole compartment."  Delivered a lot less manically and more sadly.  Also originally a McCoy line.
3. Spock: "Out of danger."  Spoken by Spock in both instances.
4. Spock: "KHAAAAAAAAN!!!"  Originally spoken by Kirk in a completely unrelated scene.  To be honest, Spock's rage at Khan here feels a helluva lot more real than Kirk's in Wrath of Khan.  Why was Kirk so absolutely livid with Khan when he knew the Enterprise would be there in two hours?

Also, gotta say this.  I think if he hadn't been brought back so quick and hadn't had the line, "You were barely dead," I would think of Kirk's death scene as the best in the franchise.  And even with the revival(one must assume that he still had some brain activity or there would've been no need to cryo-freeze him), it was a much better death than the one they gave Kirk in Generations.  And speaking of, honestly I feel more and more that it wasn't so much bullshit.  Khan was genetically engineered.  If they had the capacity to make him stronger, faster, and smarter, why not give him some regenerative abilities as well?  A lot less bullshit than Spock's katra and his body being reborn on Genesis out of pure luck.

And one other thing?  Thank you JJ for NOT KILLING A VILLAIN!  That is my biggest gripe with movies in franchises these days, they kill off villains like crazy.  I think R'as al Ghul and Harvey Two-Face are good examples here.

I so want to see that jjprise taken out.  It's probably the only on screen ship that's ever repulsed me.  Heck, I didn't even hate the NX as much as this thing! 
For me, that would be the Enterprise-D.  I've slowly grown to appreciate her over the years, but she's still my least favorite Enterprise design.  The proportions just throw me off.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Saquist

  • Posts: 414
  • Cookies: 24
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #665 on: May 19, 2013, 08:40:09 PM »
You misunderstand.

Farshot, I just watched one member berate another member over the officialism of official officialism.  I assure you I understand your opinion/position on the matter.   There is nothing wrong with it either.

Quote
You seem to be neglecting the fact that there are strong moral lessons and exploration of the human condition behind this movie.  Follow authority before following gut.  Don't demonize your enemy.  Due process should be afforded to everyone.  The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.  Kirk and Spock finally understand one another, deeply and personally.  Spock stikes a balance between human feeling and vulcan stoicism.  None of those four movies you mentioned have any of that.

I assure you again...
I have not neglected that fact.  
Drawing similarities does not mean identical in every-way.

Quote
You seem to be forgetting that superman genetic engineering wasn't impossible.  It was outlawed.  They could do cell altering super biological medicine if they wanted.  But they don't.

That's not how I would phrase it.
I would say, "Saquist is assuming that such a technology to resurrect the dead isn't intrinsic to such law or ban." And Saquist would be right they are not mutually exclusive.


 Spock: "KHAAAAAAAAN!!!"  Originally spoken by Kirk in a completely unrelated scene.  To be honest, Spock's rage at Khan here feels a helluva lot more real than Kirk's in Wrath of Khan.  Why was Kirk so absolutely livid with Khan when he knew the Enterprise would be there in two hours?





It was to throw off Khan.
Don't you remember.  Kirk wasn't really pissed he had a plan the whole time.  Kirk had a plan.
You guys tell me "You seem to forget" a lot but you guys don't seem to understand that Nichols Meyers ran through his movie with a fine tooth comb.  Perhaps it was too subtle.  He still made... one mistake that I've counted by disabling the Enterprise months from Regula.  (which probably comes down to budget because there was no Warp effect for Reliant)

Meyers took the show's tech and crafted it into a strategy that made sense as though to mimic a real situation.  He set up the Enterprise to take a certain amount of damage, he planned out that damage to make sure that the Enterprise had no way to escape at warp and neither could Khan.  (LOOK at the locations on the Hull that took Damage...near the impulse engines, the spine of the ship, warp plasma conduits.  Even the approach of the Reliant was planned to the "T" as Reliant passes Enterprise and fires a torpedo from the rear that strikes said impulse components) Once the Enterprise gets it's ability to fight back it only has "partial main power" and a 1/2 impulse.  He put Kirk in a position to succeed against a superior enemy and during the end the MAINS are taken off line (in the script Kirk says (I guess we'll have to finish the job on auxiliary power.) Then the mains are brought fully on line because of Spock.

Kirks reminder of regulation occurs before the first battle and he QUICKLY LEARNS FROM THE MISTAKE.  But we aren't given any clue until he's beamed back to Enterprise.  Kirk and Spock are a Great Team at this point.  It was a strategy game to make Khan believe he had won ...and FRANKLY....This was one part where Shatner acted his pants off.  The scene of Kirk after the "Khan yell" shows very good direction because it's a big clue that he's playing Khan.  He's calm and even goes into  a (extremely over confident) description of the Kobyashi Maru.

"He just doesn't want me going in there"  
That was the cockiness that Abrams was trying to recreate.  By this point Kirk is executing a formulated attack strategy against an opponent that had zero Space War Combat Experience.  His first officer was with him the whole way.  After the first attack it was ALL Kirk.  That's a bit of the movie genius that Nicholas Meyer created in this mock SUBwarfare depiction of combat in space.

Most of this I didn't know... and I wasn't a fan of Wrath of Khan previously.  It seemed just a battle with no point...But the themes (that as a kid I wasn't aware of) helped to fill the substance part of the film...It was a drama not just a Space Battle.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #666 on: May 20, 2013, 12:22:52 AM »
Eh, Kirk's Khan yell is still slightly silly.  I will say this.  As much as I love the new Enterprise, especially in the last movie(point defense phasers FTW), she has yet to actually have a proper space battle against an evenly matched opponent.  As such...Star Trek 2 still has my favorite space battles.  Into Darkness's space battle is essentially the equivalent of Chang's Bird-of-Prey vs. the Enterprise-A, just that they could SEE the Vengeance.  I believe the phrase "curb stomp" adequately describes it.  I would love to see the new Enterprise have a good, solid match-up with the same frenetic energy that they seem to have in these movies.  Basically, have the Wrath of Khan battles with a bit more maneuverability out of these ships.

Also, I want to apologize if I've appeared belligerent towards you Saquist.  I just have a really hard time with some "Trekkies" these days that do tend to outright dismiss the new timeline just out of sheer spite.  Heck, a friend of mine's brother absolutely refused to even watch the 2009 film and even left the house when my friend put it on for the heck of it.  So you dismissing it from canon touched a nerve, and I do apologize if I was too harsh in my rebuttals and defense of the new timeline.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Saquist

  • Posts: 414
  • Cookies: 24
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #667 on: May 20, 2013, 09:44:56 AM »
Eh, Kirk's Khan yell is still slightly silly. 

I guess I can understand that.  I've gotten used to Shatner's odd style but to me this made more sense Yelling "Khan" to Khan than yelling Khan to no one. 

Quote
Also, I want to apologize...

Not at all, I like the fire.  Passion is a good thing.
-----------

To Captain Oblivious:

I don't really think that JJ Abrams is coming back to finish off the series.  I'm thinking though JJ might have done his job and given the Franchise a fresh start.  I think someone else will finish off the the 3rd film and then we'll have another try at a series.  Say...another five years?

Additional:
I think it was a mistake to put Star Trek After Ironman.  It took a 4 million dollar loss compared to the first movie and it doesn't make sense that Paramount expected 100 million dollar pay day on an Ironman month.  I think Paramount is drinking Goofy Juice. 

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #668 on: May 20, 2013, 07:14:00 PM »
Here are all the models seen on Marcus' desk

http://www.qmxonline.com/news/stid-history-of-starflight-models/

A bunch of props in Into Darkness were made my Quantum Machanix

http://www.qmxonline.com/news/qmx-offers-props-from-star-trek-into-darkness/

Offline Phaser

  • Star Trek Canon Authority
  • Posts: 387
  • Cookies: 231
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #669 on: May 20, 2013, 08:14:09 PM »
What, no Cheers-like "Phaser!" exclamation from everyone? :P

Oh well, I'll take what I can get.
1. Kirk stole the scroll to get the natives out of the temple that was right by the soon to erupt volcano, presumably just in case the pre-eruption totaled the temple.  Which it did.
Was this stated, or are you implying this from the scene?  Honestly, I didn't understand a good chunk of what Bones said during that scene, so I might have missed it.  If it was stated, thank you for the clarification.

As for the Enterprise being under water instead of in orbit, Chekov's line about the planet's magnetic field probably has a lot to do with it.  The magnetic field obviously interferes with transporter ability, and I think the general audience doesn't want to sit through five minutes of Trek-nobabble, even though we the fans would appreciate it.
Ah!  Okay, I'll buy that one.  Even if that wasn't the case, you gotta admit, seeing the E rise out of an ocean was BAD*SS. :D And seeing the natives worship it afterwards=LOL It's just like our own history!


2. I hate having to CONTINUE to defend this.  First off, CADET ISN'T A RANK.  Kirk was a Lieutenant when Pike field promoted him to first officer.  All "cadet" means is that the officer has yet to graduate Starfleet Academy.
Okay, so it's equivalent to a student at a naval academy suddenly being given command of an aircraft carrier.  Yea, that makes a lot more sense, now. -.-

Also, Kirk saved Earth and the Federation.  Good deeds get rewarded.
Now that's a much better argument!  Fair enough.

But this film was about Kirk having to come to grips with ALL the responsibilities of command.
Agreed.

3. Enterprise is canon.  Period.  Get over it.
NEVER!! :P (Seriously though, I think Saquist pretty well described the fluidity of the canon, and how it's subject to opinion.)

4. I think you're mistaking me for someone else.  MY nitpicks were about Scotty getting canned(and not drinking nearly enough scotch as a result), the Enterprise taking a pounding without giving one back, no explanations for Khan's "nationality" and very little explanation for the regenerative capacity of his blood, and the new impulse deck the Enterprise gets at the end.  I'm no diving expert, nor do I really care if that was accurate or not, and I felt that Spock saying that the gravity was going offline was explanation enough.
My apologies. I was thinking of Saquist.

That being said, I agree completely with your "Loved" list.
:D


Oh, and also: HI, NEBULA!! :D

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #670 on: May 20, 2013, 09:00:50 PM »
Hello........................................... P H A S E R. xD

Quote
Okay, so it's equivalent to a student at a naval academy suddenly being given command of an aircraft carrier.  Yea, that makes a lot more sense, now. -.-

Kirks rank in the 09 movie was Lieutenant.

Also I kick thee for thee has missed some of my posts. xD

I sooooooo wish I could post Steam chat history.... DarkThunder and I had a great convo about this film and the next movie plot.
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Saquist

  • Posts: 414
  • Cookies: 24
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #671 on: May 20, 2013, 10:08:53 PM »
Didn't know it had a hole.















Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #672 on: May 20, 2013, 10:25:50 PM »
Seriously you didn't? Okay. xD
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #673 on: May 20, 2013, 10:37:28 PM »
Memory Alpha is doing a very excellent job covering STID.  I was just reading the behind-the-scenes info on alternate reality Khan.  Very fascinating!

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #674 on: May 20, 2013, 10:41:14 PM »
Here are all the models seen on Marcus' desk

http://www.qmxonline.com/news/stid-history-of-starflight-models/

A bunch of props in Into Darkness were made my Quantum Machanix

http://www.qmxonline.com/news/qmx-offers-props-from-star-trek-into-darkness/

Also, they'll be including a phaser prop replica with a spring-powered nozzle.

EDIT: TrekMovie has a really good shot of the Enterprise from the end of the film, spoilers! http://scifanatic.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1701r.jpg

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #675 on: May 21, 2013, 06:09:08 AM »
really not seeing much different other then the impulse drive.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #676 on: May 21, 2013, 07:22:55 AM »
really not seeing much different other then the impulse drive.

The fins on the warp engines are different too, at least in how they open.  They used to split into 3 segments that were flush on the bottom, now they split into 4 segments that have a curving arc downwards from the fore-most split to the aft-most.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline 007bashir

  • Posts: 879
  • Cookies: 111
  • Android User/Screenshooter/Sci-Fi Rendering
    • http://007bashir.deviantart.com/
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #677 on: May 21, 2013, 07:24:49 AM »
Also think the spine behind the bridge to the impulse drive looks different too.

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #678 on: May 21, 2013, 09:35:52 AM »
here is another shot



also it would seem the whole nacelle actually got thinner.... oh and this looks less sharp.

Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline 007bashir

  • Posts: 879
  • Cookies: 111
  • Android User/Screenshooter/Sci-Fi Rendering
    • http://007bashir.deviantart.com/
Re: Trek XII - Images, Videos, Discussion, ect... (WARNING: SPOILERS)
« Reply #679 on: May 21, 2013, 09:46:14 AM »

also it would seem the whole nacelle actually got thinner.... oh and this looks less sharp.



Not easy to say, since that pic happen when she goes to warp