Author Topic: Star Wars VII The Force Awakens Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers  (Read 11215 times)

Offline FarShot

  • That guy with good ideas...
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2470
  • Cookies: 787
  • I'm actually making stuff! :D
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #80 on: January 15, 2013, 01:03:00 PM »
Yeah...  okay, time to do a bit of moderating...

1.  Wrong thread for this discussion.

2.  You're all about four years late.

3.  No matter what anyone says, the twelfth movie will come out and will make millions.  No point tearing you hair out over it.

Now, can we call it settled?  I understand everyone has their opinions, but I believe we've all heard this before, and when you get two opposite opinions butting heads, nothing happens.  Except for some hot air getting everyone steamed.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #81 on: January 15, 2013, 01:11:07 PM »
Aye aye :salute2:

On the subject of Star Wars, there was a rumor that Zack Snyder was going to be making a Star Wars side-story kind of in the vein of The Seven Samurai, but Snyder shot that down fast.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Killallewoks

  • RNR
  • Posts: 1179
  • Cookies: 175
  • Innuendo implier extordanaire.

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2321
  • Cookies: 1527
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #83 on: January 24, 2013, 06:33:33 PM »
First he said ABSOLUTELY NO!!!

Then he said YES!!!

Did someone offer him more money? While I don't mind the "JJ reboot" of Trek as much as most others, i'm not a fan of him rebooting Star Wars ALSO. And the potential for those god-forsaken lens flares everywhere...
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Offline CyAn1d3

  • MacDill Shipyards Design Team
  • Posts: 1656
  • Cookies: 420
  • RETIRED
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #84 on: January 24, 2013, 07:02:58 PM »
I came, i saw, i added a Sig.
Later gents, i have Youtube to take over.
Cy - 1-12-15

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #85 on: January 24, 2013, 07:05:05 PM »
It hasn't been confirmed by Abrams or by Disney.  I treat this as a rumor.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #86 on: January 25, 2013, 03:29:52 PM »
Yeah, this is fake he is still saying no.

EDIT: Also since Star Wars:Underworld and Level 1313 share the exact same specifics I guess its fair to say that that is what happened to it. Though the possibility seems to still be there for a live action series. It is Disney afterall.
All hail the messiah!

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #87 on: January 25, 2013, 04:30:04 PM »

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #88 on: January 25, 2013, 06:01:56 PM »
That's not a confirmation.  It's not a press release from Disney/Lucas OR from Abrams.  Until then, I'm still taking this with a grain of salt.

However, I will say this.  Abrams being in charge of both could be the best thing ever, especially given Abrams' penchant for "real, real, real" in his movies.  Might see fewer CGI aliens this time around.  Give the makeup department something to do.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Lionus

  • Posts: 1561
  • Cookies: 79
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire

StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot

"Beyond the rim of the star-light
My love
Is wand'ring in star-flight
I know
He'll find in star-clustered reaches
Love,
Strange love a star woman teaches.
I know
His journey ends never
His star trek
Will go on forever.
But tell him
While he wanders his starry sea
Remember, remember me."

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #90 on: January 26, 2013, 01:10:10 AM »
That's official enough for me.  Here's hoping that JJ will take some of the lessons learned from Trek into Wars.  Characters and story should matter more than special effects.  And at the very least, Paramount IS holding him to Trek XIII, at least as a producer.

I find it both exciting and frightening to think that one man could be responsible for reinvigorating two of the biggest science fiction franchises of all time.  I just hope JJ hasn't bitten off more than he can chew.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline ShaunKL

  • Posts: 177
  • Cookies: 3
  • Semper Exploro
    • My YouTube Channel
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #91 on: January 26, 2013, 01:24:21 AM »
I totally understand the dislike of the overuse of lens-flares in Star Trek, but some kind of big flare when a lightsaber activates seems cool in my imagination.
Thanks for letting me know the forum was back up, guys.  I thought everyone died.

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #92 on: January 26, 2013, 10:49:56 AM »
Well JJ is a self admitted SW fan, hes more a SW fan then a ST fan.

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #93 on: January 27, 2013, 10:38:35 PM »
Somebody said that they hoped JJ would leave Trek alone after "Into Darkness" and that somebody who actually loves Trek would helm any future movies. I told him, "the people who love Trek are the ones doing the fan films". Only trouble is, fan stuff can't be canon. More's the pity.
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #94 on: January 27, 2013, 11:08:15 PM »
Somebody said that they hoped JJ would leave Trek alone after "Into Darkness" and that somebody who actually loves Trek would helm any future movies. I told him, "the people who love Trek are the ones doing the fan films". Only trouble is, fan stuff can't be canon. More's the pity.

Um...that's the most retarded statement ever considering that both Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman are self affirmed Trekkies and they WRITE THE DAMN THINGS.  And if anything, doing the first movie has made JJ a Trek fan.  I can't say for the other guys in the "Supreme Court" but I think there's plenty of love for Trek in there.

And frankly, fan films aren't always that good.  And the ones that are, are few and far between.

And finally, I think this can only be a good thing.  Bring the franchises together, as it were.  More so than before, at any rate.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #95 on: February 15, 2013, 01:19:17 PM »
More big news!

Every important original trilogy character(minus R2, 3PO, Luke, Leia, Kenobi and Vadar for obvious reasons) just might be getting their own origins type movies. Yoda seems to be the first on the list with a Boba Fett movie all but certain aswell as ofcourse Han Solo. Those are the big three going around right now but again everyones on the table. Lucasfilm and Disney apparently want these standalone movies to be released in the same year as each of the sequal trilogy movies.
All hail the messiah!

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #96 on: February 15, 2013, 02:40:18 PM »
Uh....Vader is getting an origin movie? He already HAD an origin movie. Three, in fact.

...except they made Star Wars' ultimate badass originate from a whiny bitch, so maybe this is a retcon, God willing?
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline eclipse74569

  • Roger Smith of the U.S.S. Lollypop, a good ship
  • Webmaster
  • Posts: 2240
  • Cookies: 65535
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #97 on: February 16, 2013, 10:46:50 AM »
Uh....Vader is getting an origin movie? He already HAD an origin movie. Three, in fact.

...except they made Star Wars' ultimate badass originate from a whiny bitch, so maybe this is a retcon, God willing?

Re-read that......he said:

(minus R2, 3PO, Luke, Leia, Kenobi and Vadar for obvious reasons)
Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return, to obtain, something of equal value must be lost.  That is alchemy's first law of equivalent exchange.  In those days we really believed that to be the world's one and only truth~Alphonse Elric

Offline Joshmaul

  • Lunatic with a Starship
  • Posts: 727
  • Cookies: 8
  • A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk in Dark Places
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #98 on: February 16, 2013, 04:33:56 PM »
*squint* Hmm. Dunno how I missed that. Maybe I need to see an eye doc?

Anywho...I know the books and what not have given hints on origin stories, but I would definately like to see it played out. Yoda, Boba and Han are definately a good start - question is, will they be TV, straight-to-DVD/BlueRay/etc...? Or are they gonna do like the X-Men origin stories and make 'em theatrical releases, separate from the "main canon" but still part of the series?
"If one does as God does enough times, one will become as God is." - Dr. Hannibal Lecter

Offline Tuskin38

  • Posts: 2476
  • Cookies: 111
RE: Star Wars VII Topic Discussion - May Contain Spoilers
« Reply #99 on: February 16, 2013, 11:39:34 PM »
I think its very likely the movies will ignore parts if not all of the EU.