Author Topic: CE Nebula Class Packs..... Coming soon.  (Read 41226 times)

Offline FekLeyr Targ

  • DS9FX Team
  • Posts: 492
  • Cookies: 538
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #240 on: January 20, 2008, 11:48:14 AM »
most impressive Glenn

And who would disagree with you? Not me. :)
TaH pagh, Tah be.

Offline ACES_HIGH

  • BCC Roleplay Game Narrator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1678
  • Cookies: 54
  • while(!(succeed=try()));
    • BCC Roleplay Games
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #241 on: January 20, 2008, 02:54:08 PM »
which version of the Melbourne are you going to do?
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/proto-nebula.htm

Offline Glenn

  • Starfleet Command
  • Posts: 371
  • Cookies: 190
  • Captain - USS Explorer
    • Captain Elgy's Star Trek Files
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #242 on: January 20, 2008, 03:05:40 PM »
which version of the Melbourne are you going to do?

Either version 1 which I think was the Wolf 359 physical model or version 3 which was seen in Sisko's ready room.

But I'll let you guys have the final say on which one should be modded!!.

Offline Kirk

  • Posts: 1438
  • Cookies: 139
    • My Released Mods
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #243 on: January 20, 2008, 03:14:14 PM »
I say v1, because I always liked how the little nacelles stick up over the primary hull. Also, we already have enough pods.

Offline moed

  • Posts: 1472
  • Cookies: 57
  • Star Trekus Fanaticus
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #244 on: January 20, 2008, 11:24:53 PM »
I think v3 looks better but, v1 is more logical if the saucer separates and needs warp capability... so, v1 is my vote.

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5500
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #245 on: January 20, 2008, 11:31:10 PM »
hmm v1 with experimental saucer sep hmm interesting
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline Shadowknight1

  • Posts: 1684
  • Cookies: 71
  • Star Trek Into Darkness
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #246 on: January 21, 2008, 12:21:14 AM »
I'd go with v3 myself, I mean yeah, we have enough pods, but those small warp engines just look weird.

To Boldly Go...Again.

Offline Shion

  • Posts: 82
  • Cookies: 4
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #247 on: January 21, 2008, 04:36:54 AM »

Here are a few in-game screenies of the Phoenix for you people, now I'm starting work on the Melbourne.  8)

Yes, Awesome!  Version 1 with the Nacelles, thats the single thing that makes the Melbourne unique. 

 cookie for making the Melbourne, cause your that cool! 8)

Offline El

  • Master Hardpointer
  • Retired Administrator
  • Posts: 653
  • Cookies: 123
  • Former Vice Admin
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #248 on: January 21, 2008, 06:28:34 AM »
I'd go with v3 myself, I mean yeah, we have enough pods, but those small warp engines just look weird.

Got to agree there. I always thought the little nacelle's looked weird, sort of a scaling conflict with the bigger ones.


Yes, Awesome!  Version 1 with the Nacelles, thats the single thing that makes the Melbourne unique. 


I don't know that tapered aft section looks pretty unique to me.

Offline lint

  • Posts: 599
  • Cookies: 211
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #249 on: January 21, 2008, 06:29:56 AM »
just do them both, make everyone happy,  :lol:

Offline Glenn

  • Starfleet Command
  • Posts: 371
  • Cookies: 190
  • Captain - USS Explorer
    • Captain Elgy's Star Trek Files
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #250 on: January 21, 2008, 01:57:59 PM »
just do them both, make everyone happy,  :lol:

It's easier said than done, that would be two more models and additional textures to a large ship pack already. And the truth is I want to get these ship released so you can all play 'em!!  8)

Personally I didn't want to do any of them as all the melbourne variants are butt ugly.... plain and simple!!
  :D

Offline 086gf

  • Location: United Socialist States of America!
  • Posts: 1357
  • Cookies: 32
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #251 on: January 21, 2008, 02:09:32 PM »
I say release the regular Nebulas now and then do the 3 prototypes for a V2 pack. But thats just me though ofcourse.
All hail the messiah!

Offline Bigkap

  • Posts: 112
  • Cookies: 5
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #252 on: January 21, 2008, 06:45:33 PM »
Outstanding work on these Glenn. They look perfect.

Offline moed

  • Posts: 1472
  • Cookies: 57
  • Star Trekus Fanaticus
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #253 on: January 22, 2008, 02:42:52 AM »
just do them both, make everyone happy,  :lol:

It's easier said than done, that would be two more models and additional textures to a large ship pack already. And the truth is I want to get these ship released so you can all play 'em!!  8)

Personally I didn't want to do any of them as all the melbourne variants are butt ugly.... plain and simple!!
  :D

I completely agree! I've always thought the Melbourne variants were as you said "butt ugly".

Nearly as ugly as the Galaxy X  :lol: Which IMO takes the cake.


Offline Glenn

  • Starfleet Command
  • Posts: 371
  • Cookies: 190
  • Captain - USS Explorer
    • Captain Elgy's Star Trek Files
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #254 on: January 24, 2008, 11:02:16 AM »
Update time folks.  :)

I've completed my first pass at the Melbourne model, despite being a butt ugly ship I think it's looking ok. Several changes have been made compared to the Nebula, here is a list of the changes.

1) Stretched secondary hull by about 25%, and added a hull panel above shuttlebay 2 and an aft torpedo launcher added to the spine on the secondary hull.

2) Added scaled down Nacelles and pylons, scaling about 50% to original size.

3) Dorsal saucer retextured to add extra windows which are similar in placement to the Galaxy Class.

The role of the Melbourne is a Heavy Cruiser which has been enhanced specificly for missions of Diplomacy but also proves useful as a command ship.

The Melbourne has a higher top speed and is more maneuverable than the Nebula, but a reduced photon torpedo capability which is offset by stronger phaser arrays as the ship is powered by two warp cores. this ship also has a considerably shorter sensor range than the Nebula.

Sorry if this has been a little long winded...... enjoy the pics!!
:wink:

Offline Barihawk

  • Ninth Fleet STO Commanding Officer
  • Posts: 766
  • Cookies: 225
  • BC: The Aftermath Member
    • My Released Work
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #255 on: January 24, 2008, 11:06:55 AM »
It's an ugly ship, but you make it look good.

intrepid90

  • Guest
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #256 on: January 24, 2008, 11:16:20 AM »
hell man.
this looks cool (as well)^^
though ugly, she is unique :)

Offline Darkthunder

  • Vice Administrator
  • Posts: 2323
  • Cookies: 1527
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #257 on: January 24, 2008, 11:37:04 AM »
Personally, i'd rather see a brand new "pod variant" on top of the "pylon" holding the two nacelles in place on this Nebula variant, instead of the two nacelles. Those small nacelles on such a big ship looks really bad tbh :P

Not knocking your work, just the design itself ;)
Official BCC Discord ยท https://discord.gg/nJAx4HNQ2G
Ad Astra Per Aspera

Jay Crimson

  • Guest
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #258 on: January 24, 2008, 11:56:54 AM »
I agree that the nacelle variant is strange. Perhaps the ship was an experimental vessel for saucer seperation or a courrier of some kind?

Offline JimmyB76

  • Posts: 6423
  • Cookies: 421
Re: Nebula Class WiP
« Reply #259 on: January 24, 2008, 01:32:18 PM »
It's an ugly ship, but you make it look good.
no doubt!

im curious - will you still be doing a Bonchune?